Atch 5 FA3002-08-R-0012.doc

DOC document 119 KB Posted

Attached to
Taiwan Aircraft Maintenance Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA3002-08-R-0012
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Installation and Mission Support Center Installation Contracting Agency

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Taiwan Aircraft Maintenance, newest first.
File Type Posted
SF30_Amen 0009_08-R-0012.pdf PDF
Atch 4 - FA3002-08-R-0012 - 24 Mar 09.xls XLS spreadsheet
FA3002-08-R-0012-0009.zip ZIP file
Amend 0008 FA3002-08-R-0012.zip ZIP file
Taiwan RFP Amendment 0007.pdf PDF
Additional R0012_Q A Posting_12_30_2008.xls XLS spreadsheet
R0012_Q A Posting_12_30_2008.xls XLS spreadsheet
Preproposal_ Slides Taiwan 3 Nov 08.ppt PPT presentation
Q A Posting Update 06.xls XLS spreadsheet
Updated Amendment 0005.zip ZIP file
Correction Letter FBO.doc DOC document
Q A Posting Update 05.xls XLS spreadsheet
Amendment 0005.zip ZIP file
Amendment 0004.zip ZIP file
Q A Posting Update 04.xls XLS spreadsheet
Taiwan RFP Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
Taiwan Pre-Proposal Conf Attendees Slides.zip ZIP file
Q A Posting Update 03.doc DOC document
LukeSitevisitContractorList27Oct2008.doc DOC document
Taiwan RFP Amendment 0002.zip ZIP file
Q A Posting Update 02.xls XLS spreadsheet
Q A Posting Update 01.xls XLS spreadsheet
Pre-Proposal Conf Info Amend 001.doc DOC document
Q A Posting.xls XLS spreadsheet
Taiwan Site Visit Info.zip ZIP file
Taiwan Pre-Proposal Information.zip ZIP file
Amend 01 to FA3002-08-R-0012.pdf PDF
Atch 8 FA3002-08-R-0012.doc DOC document
Atch 3 FA302-08-R-0012.xls XLS spreadsheet
Atch 11 FA3002-08-R-0012.pdf PDF
Atch 12 - Schedule B Worksheet 11 Sep 08.xls XLS spreadsheet
Atch 9 FA3002-08-R-0012.doc DOC document
PWS.zip ZIP file
Atch 2 FA3002-08-R-0012.pdf PDF
Atch 6 FA3002-08-R-0012.doc DOC document
Atch 4 - FA3002-08-R-0012.xls XLS spreadsheet
08-R-0012.doc DOC document
Atch 7 FA3002-08-R-0012.doc DOC document
RFP release info.doc DOC document
Show all 39

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FA3002-08-R-0012

30 Jul 08

Attachment 5

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

The contractor listed below is being considered in a Source Selection by the Air Education and Training Command, Randolph AFB, TX. Any comments you could provide regarding the past performance of the contractor providing this form would be greatly appreciated. Your comments are considered Source Selection Sensitive; therefore, you are advised that the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR 15.609) prohibits the release of the names of individuals providing reference information about an offeror’s past performance. In order to maintain the integrity of the source selection process, please do not discuss your comments on this questionnaire with any other individuals.

The completed questionnaire should be e-mailed to germaine.miller@randolph.af.mil or myles.rellstab@randolph.af.mil . Email is preferred, but if you do not have access to email, you may fax your reply to the attention of Ms. Miller or Mr. Rellstab at 210-652-3445, or DSN 487-3445, or mail to:

Ms. Germaine Miller

OR

Mr. Myles Rellstab

AETC CONS/LGCI

(----------------------------- SAME ADDRESS

2021 First Street West

Randolph AFB, TX 78150-4302

Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection records. We appreciate your help. Your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of the source selection.

Project Information:

1. Contractor (Prime/Sub): ______________________________________________________

2. Project Title / Contract Number: _______________________________________________

3. Description of Functions Performed by this Firm: _________________________________

Evaluator:

(The following information will assist in the analysis of the data. Information will be kept confidential)

1. Name: _____________________________ Date: ____________________________

2. Phone Number: ______________________ Fax Number: ______________________

3. Address: ______________________________________________________________

4. Position held or function in relation to the project: _____________________________

CONFIDENCE RATINGS

Please answer the following questions about the contractor's previous or ongoing contracts. We will use the answers to assign a confidence assessment rating. To assist you, we are enclosing the past performance rating definitions. Please assign a performance rating of Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory or Not Applicable (no identifiable performance) for each question by circling the appropriate rating. We encourage you to provide a detailed narrative to support your ratings. We will keep the rater's name confidential.

Following are confidence ratings we would like you to assign to each question below:

PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENT DEFINITIONS

Rating
Definition

Substantial

Confidence Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory

Confidence Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
No Confidence
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
Unknown Confidence
No performance record is identifiable or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

1. QUALITY CONTROL

a.
Effectiveness of contractor’s program/contract manager
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
b.
Effectiveness of corporate management involvement
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
c.
Effectiveness of contractor’s quality control program
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
d.
Quality of contractor’s performance
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
e.
Subcontractor’s quality of work
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
f.
Knowledge of key personnel in relationship to contract requirements
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
g.
Preparation and accuracy of reports
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A

Comments:

2. ORGANIZATIONAL AND PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS

a.
Ability to hire/train qualified personnel
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
b.
Adequacy of skill mix of employees
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
c.
Retention of employees and key personnel
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
d.
Management relationship with union
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
e.
Ability to refill vacant positions
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
f.
Management of personnel training
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
g.
Manning to successfully meet PWS requirements
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A

3. MANAGEMENT

a.
Conformance to contract requirements
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
b.
Contractor’s timely completion of contractual requirements
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
c.
Contractor’s performance within costs established in the contract
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
d.
Contractor’s effectiveness in reducing costs
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
e.
Reasonableness of costs proposed for modifications
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
f.
Contractor’s invoices are current and accurate
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
g.
Tenacity and innovation in resolving problems
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
h.
Compliance with terms of its proposal
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
i.
Contractor’s financial stability during contract performance
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A

4. MAINTENANCE PRACTICES

a.
Customer satisfaction with services performed
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
b.
Contractor’s responsiveness in making adjustments to schedules or services to meet the needs of the government
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
c.
Contractor’s timely submission of reports
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
d.
Contractor’s response to modification requests
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
e.
Conformance to contract requirements (e.g. contract specific clauses and requirements)
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
f.
Compliance with Tech Orders, directives
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
g.
Effectiveness of planning and scheduling of maintenance requirements
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A

5. MOBILIZATION AND CHANGEOVER

a.

Success of mobilization/changeover
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
b.
Compliance with transition plan milestones
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
c.
Uninterrupted service to the government during mobilization/changeover
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
d.
Timely submission of required plans
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
e.
Timely completion of required inventories
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
f.
Success in hiring/training workforce
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A

6. BUSINESS RELATIONS/SUBCONTRACTING

a.

Cooperation with government in resolving problems
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
b.
Working relationship with technical personnel
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
c.
Relationship with contracting officer
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
d.
Relationship with subcontractors
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A
e.
Achievements of small business subcontracting goals
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A

7. GENERAL

a.

Was the contractor issued any cure notices?
YES
NO
If yes, what were the circumstances?
b.
Were any show cause notices issued?
YES
NO
If yes, how many? What were the circumstances?
c.
Would you award another contract to this contractor?
YES
NO
If no, please state reasons for not recommending this contractor additional work.
d.
Based on all of this information, how would you rate the contractor’s performance?
EXC
VG
SAT
MAR
UNSAT
N/A

7. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES

We are attaching a summary description of the Taiwan AFB aircraft maintenance functions that are provided in this solicitation. Please indicate the areas covered by your contract by marking them on the following page:

PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENT DEFINITIONS

Rating
Definition

Substantial

Confidence Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory

Confidence Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
No Confidence
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
Unknown Confidence
No performance record is identifiable or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF

TAIWAN AFB

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE FUNCTIONS

Brief Description of Effort as __Prime or __Subcontractor

(Please indicate and highlight portions considered most relevant to current acquisition)

Service Areas
(Note 1)
Magnitude and Complexity

(Note 2)

1.
On-equipment aircraft scheduled and unscheduled aircraft maintenance
2.
Flightline sortie generation (Launch, Recovery, Service, and Inspections)
3.
Backshop maintenance support (on & off-equipment aircraft and Component repairs)
3.a
Jet engine maintenance
3.b
Ejection seat maintenance
3.c
Hydraulics maintenance
3.d
Fabrication (Sheetmetal, Welding, and Machine)
3.e
Electric, Battery and Mechanical Accessories
3.f
Parachute Inspection and Repair
4.
Precision Measurement Equipment Laboratory (PMEL)
5.
Aircraft Plastic Media Blasting (PMB) and Painting
6.
Munitions storage
7.
Aerospace Ground Equipment (AGE) and equipment maintenance
8.
Transient Alert
9.
Disabled aircraft off-station recovery
10.
Environmental Management responsibilities

Chart does not show any order of relevance.

Note 1: Please indicate with an “X” in this column whether or not the items listed in Column 2 (Service Areas) were included in the contract that you are providing as a reference.

Note 2: Describe magnitude and complexity of service provided (e.g. number and type of aircraft or equipment maintained, type and level of maintenance (organizational, intermediate, or Depot) performed, number of sorties produced. Also include level of management (Operational planning, scheduling, controlling of resources and production) and quality for maintenance services.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .