NoticetoOfferors-CCnotification18Aug05.doc

DOC document 100 KB Posted

Attached to
Sources Sought Synopsis #2/Pre-Solicitation Notice, Keesler PAB Cost Study
Solicitation number
F41689-02-R-0048
Issued by

About this file

Notice to Offerors - Tentative Cost Comparison

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
1_DocumentinMicrosoftInternetExplorer.doc DOC document
DocumentinMicrosoftInternetExplorer.doc DOC document
NoticetoOfferorsBigBOS-6APR07.doc DOC document
NoticetoOfferorsBigBOS-26FEB07.doc DOC document
NoticetoOfferors-30Jan07.doc DOC document
NoticetoOfferors-19Jan07.doc DOC document
NoticetoOfferors-19Oct06.doc DOC document
NoticetoOfferors-06Sep06.doc DOC document
NoticetoOfferors-05Jul06.doc DOC document
NoticetoOfferors-26Oct05.doc DOC document
NoticetoOfferors-08Sep05.doc DOC document
NoticetoOfferors-11Aug05.doc DOC document
FinalRFPF41689-02-R-0048Amendment0026.doc DOC document
94-2301(Rev27).doc DOC document
04-0401(Rev2)Elevators.doc DOC document
MS030056Building-8Apr05.doc DOC document
F41689-02-R-0048-0026SF30(AmendmentSummary).doc DOC document
NoticetoOfferors-17Jun05.doc DOC document
FinalRFPF41689-02-R-0048Amendment002526MAY05JT.doc DOC document
HealthBenefitsPlanCosts.doc DOC document
F41689-02-R-0048-0025SF30(AmendmentSummary).doc DOC document
NoticetoOfferors-23May05.doc DOC document
Attch12-KeeslerSubktrPlanWorksheet(Amend21).xls XLS spreadsheet
NoticetoOfferors-19Apr05.doc DOC document
F41689-02-R-0048-0024SF30(AmendmentSummary)18APR05JT.doc DOC document
FinalRFPF41689-02-R-0048Amendment002418APR05JT.doc DOC document
F41689-02-R-0048-0023SF30(AmendmentSummary)15APR05JT.doc DOC document
FinalRFPF41689-02-R-0048Amendment002315APR05JT.doc DOC document
NoticetoOfferors-14Apr05.doc DOC document
KeeslerPRDBigBOSAmendment19.zip ZIP file
FinalRFPF41689-02-R-0048Amendment0022.doc DOC document
F41689-02-R-0048-0022SF30(AmendmentSummary).doc DOC document
NOTICETOOFFERORS-CompetitiveRange14Mar05.doc DOC document
FinalRFPF41689-02-R-0048Amendment0021.doc DOC document
F41689-02-R-0048-0020SF30(AmendmentSummary).doc DOC document
Attch12-KeeslerSubktrPlanWorksheetRevised.xls XLS spreadsheet
F41689-02-R-0048-0020SF30(AmendmentSummary)Posted25FEB05JT.doc DOC document
FinalRFPF41689-02-R-0048Amendment0020Posted25FEB05JT.doc DOC document
94-2301Rev25-30Sep04.doc DOC document
NOTICETOOFFERORS-CompetitiveRange.doc DOC document
NOTICETOOFFERORS-POCUpdate.doc DOC document
RFIPosted-21Oct04.xls XLS spreadsheet
RFIPosted-13Oct04.xls XLS spreadsheet
FinalRFPF41689-02-R-0048Amendment001912OCT04JT.doc DOC document
K02_PRD_BB_GFPandServicesAmendment19.pdf PDF
F41689-02-R-0048-0019SF30(AmendmentSummary)12OCT04JT.doc DOC document
RFIPosted-7Oct04.xls XLS spreadsheet
Atch4 ManpowerMatrix-AMEND0018-BB7Oct04.xls XLS spreadsheet
FinalRFPF41689-02-R-0048Amendment00187OCT04JT.doc DOC document
ContentsofVolumeV.doc DOC document
Show 40 more

50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

AIR EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND

18 August 2005

SUBJECT: Notice and Results of the OMB A-76 Cost Comparison Study, RFP F41689-02-R-0048, Base Operating Support Services at Keesler AFB MS

1. Please be advised that the result of the subject cost comparison study favors contract performance. The completed cost comparison forms and detailed supporting data are available for review on the Keesler Technical library at http://www.keesler.af.mil/a76pubs/. The COMPARE2 Version 1.6 can be downloaded at http://www.comparea76.com/frames1.html. In accordance with Air Force Instruction 38.203, Para 17.2.4, the public review period extends for 30 calendar days, beginning with the date the completed COMPARE cost comparison form and supporting documentation are made available to the directly affected parties. For all purposes, the date of 18 Aug 05 will be the date the public review period begins. Upon completion of this review period, and resolution of any requests for review under Air Force administrative appeal procedures, either a contract will be awarded or this solicitation will be cancelled and base performance will commence by the Government, as appropriate.

2. In accordance with FAR 15.503(b), the following information is provided:

a. Sixteen companies were solicited.

b. Eight proposals were received.

c. The (selected offeror) for cost comparison was:

DynCorp (A CSC Company)

3430 Alemeda Street, Suite 124

Fort Worth TX 76126

d. The selected offeror’s total proposed price was $307,383,943 (inclusive of Government

NTE/Estimated CLINs totaling $41,602,134).

e. The MEO’s total in-house cost was $335,613,542 (exclusive of Government NTE/Estimated CLINs and other cost comparison adjustments IAW AFI 38-203).

RON A. MORTAG

Contracting Officer

PAGE

_1173520126

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .