J.5__Past_Performance_Questionnaire_Rev.1.pdf

PDF 72 KB Posted

Attached to
NOAA Ship RONALD H. BROWN DOCKSIDE REPAIRS Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
EA-133M-17-RP-0081
Issued by
Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

About this file

J.5 Past Performance Questionnaire Rev.1

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to NOAA Ship RONALD H. BROWN DOCKSIDE REPAIRS, newest first.
File Type Posted
RFP_EA-133M-17-RP-0081,_REV-2.pdf PDF
J.1_SPECIFICATION_NOAA_SHIP_RONALD_H._BROWN_REV_2.pdf PDF
Pricing_Sheet__MSWord_RFP_EA-133M-17-RP-0081.R1.docx DOCX document
WI_16240__Doors_Rev._2.pdf PDF
665-6932883.pdf PDF
WI_25140__AC_PLant_Renewals_Rev._2.pdf PDF
WI_13200__Switchboard_Cleaning_Rev._2.pdf PDF
WI_12330_Engine_Overhaul_Rev._2.pdf PDF
RB-085-001_Booklet_of_General_Plans.pdf PDF
RFP_EA-133M-17-RP-0081,_REV-1.pdf PDF
RB-085-001.pdf PDF
439-001.pdf PDF
J.1_SPECIFICATION_NOAA_SHIP_RONALD_BROWN_REV_1.pdf PDF
Switchboard_Breakers_Info.pdf PDF
US_Standard_Bus_Connection_Bolt_Torque_Values.pdf PDF
WI_22520_Woodward_Controls_Upgrade_spec.pdf PDF
Motor_Inventory_Information.pdf PDF
RHB_Firehose_Inventory.pdf PDF
Tech_Manaul_167-00_Part_1.pdf PDF
Tech_Manaul_167-00_Part_2.pdf PDF
551-04.pdf PDF
RB_555-02_REV_C.pdf PDF
514_6932961.pdf PDF
14_in._exhaust_silencer.pdf PDF
Tech_Man_RB-437-00r.pdf PDF
J.3__Subcontracting_Plan.pdf PDF
201-6932912.pdf PDF
J.5__Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf PDF
RB-085-001.pdf PDF
514-6932961.pdf PDF
RB_555-02_REV_C_Model.pdf PDF
528-6932928.pdf PDF
512-6932959.pdf PDF
300-1_Overhaul_of_Electrical_Rotating_Machinery.pdf PDF
514-6932921.pdf PDF
623-6932856.pdf PDF
514-6932962,_Diagram.pdf PDF
512-6932955_HVAC_Mn_Dk_r.pdf PDF
171-6932832.pdf PDF
259-6932917.pdf PDF
573-2_Overhaul_Repair_of_Hydraulic_Cylinders.pdf PDF
J.2__USDL_Poster.pdf PDF
512-6932954_HVAC_02_Lvl_and_up.pdf PDF
J.4_Past_Performance_Information_Form.pdf PDF
J.1__SPECIFICATION_NOAA_SHIP_RONALD_BROWN_DOCKSIDE_REPAIR.pdf PDF
512-6932958_HVAC_ER.pdf PDF
634-1B_DECK_COVERINGS.pdf PDF
506-6932919_REV_C.pdf PDF
Brown_Life_Raft_Certificates_2016.pdf PDF
NOAA_CAT_3500__Standard_Spec.pdf PDF
Show all 50

NOAA Ship RONALD H. BROWN DOCKSIDE REPAIRS has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Solicitation #: EA-133M-17-RP-0081 Attachment: J.5

Source Selection Information

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

REFERENCE CONTRACT #: _______________________

Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Sarah Rall no later than July 21, 2017, 1:00 pm EST:

Sarah.rall@noaa.gov

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING ADJECTIVAL

RATING

DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Comments:

Rev. 1

Source Selection Information

2. SCHEDULE

Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING ADJECTIVAL

RATING

DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

3. COST CONTROL

Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost.

to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being

4. MANAGEMENT

Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.

to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:

Rater’s Name: ___________________________

Rater’s Signature: ________________________

Date: ____________________________________

Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Sarah Rall no later than July 21, 2017, 1:00 pm EST:

Sarah.rall@noaa.gov

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .