Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-089P.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Great Smoky Mountains National Park Projects Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- DTFH71-17-B-00007
About this file
Report_Bridge Inspection_5460-089P
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Results_of_Bid_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf | ||
| Amendment_0001_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf | ||
| Report_Uniguide_GRSM_11(2).pdf | ||
| IFB_Solicitation_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf | ||
| Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-040P.pdf | ||
| VETS-4212_-_Form.pdf | ||
| Report_Pavement_Newfound_Gap_Road.pdf | ||
| ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc | DOC document | |
| Report_NEPA_GRSM_11(2)_CE.pdf | ||
| Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-086P.pdf | ||
| Plans_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf | ||
| FP14_Eng.pdf | ||
| Report_SWPPP_GRSM_1A29_(draft).pdf | ||
| Report_NEPA_GRSM_1A29_FONSI.pdf | ||
| Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-084P.pdf | ||
| Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-087P.pdf | ||
| Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-044P.pdf | ||
| Report_Uniguide_GRSM_1A29.pdf | ||
| Synopsis_NP-GRSM_11(2)_and_NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf |
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
SB SPUR BRIDGE OVER WEST PRONG LPR
SB GATLINBURG SPUR OVER WEST PRONG LPR
GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK
LS
STRUCTURE NO. 5460-089P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 6/27/12
Report prepared by: ED
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-089P
SB SPUR BRIDGE OVER WEST PRONG LPR INSPECTION DATE: 6/27/12
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... STEEL NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 5 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 200.6 FT (61.1 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 72.2 FT (22.0 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 33.5 FT (10.2 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 15A5, 15A28 / 1478 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 50 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1996-structural steel painted, expansion joints resealed, polymer-matrix joint system installed, bridge railing replaced. 2008-wearing surface repaved and striping replaced.
LOCATION
GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 0.18 (KM PT 0.29)
STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 0.5 MILES NORTH FROM NPS ROUTE 12 (GATLINBURG BYPASS). IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF FACILITY CARRIED: ............ SB GATLINBURG SPUR
STRUCTURE NO. 5460-044P.
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. WEST PRONG LPR
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This painted steel multi-beam bridge is in fair condition overall. Problems include deterioration of the mortar joints and vertical joints in the abutments, spalling with exposed rebar throughout the bridge, deterioration of the joint material in the curbs and sidewalks, and a lack of reflective object markers at the north approach. Also, several capstones in the southeast approach parapet have been displaced up to 1-1/4". Another problem which may need attention in the future, is the moderate paint failure with rusting of the structural steel and the bearings.
Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: C.C. THRIFT, L.M. MUELLER (CLARK NEXSEN)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
C. CHRISTOPHER THRIFT, NICET LEVEL IV, FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 10/30/12
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-089P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
60.1,3 REPOINT ABUTMENT MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS AS NEEDED; CLEAN AND SEAL
CRACK AT SOUTHWEST ABUTMENT/WINGWALL JUNCTION.
50 LF
222.3 RESET CAPSTONES AND REPOINT MORTAR JOINTS IN SOUTHEAST APPROACH
PARAPET.
32 LF
58.1,5,6, 60.13
CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR WITH APPROVED PROTECTIVE COATING. 30 SF
58.3, 222.4 SEAL CRACKING AND RAVELING OF PAVEMENT OVER NORTH ABUTMENT JOINT. 28 LF
58.2 CLEAN AND RESEAL CURB AND SIDEWALK JOINTS. 20 LF
222.7 INSTALL OBJECT MARKERS AT NORTH BRIDGE CORNERS. 2 EA
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
59.1,2,6,7 CLEAN AND SPOT PAINT STRUCTURAL STEEL AND BEARINGS AS
NEEDED.
20 EA
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ..
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-089P
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
N NOT APPLICABLE
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
58. DECK 6
1. DECK SLAB F
2. EXPANSION JOINTS G
3. WEARING SURFACE G
4. RIDEABILITY G
5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN F
6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS G
7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE G
8. UTILITIES N
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION G
10. OTHER N
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 6
1. BEARING DEVICES
2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS
3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
5. TRUSSES
6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
7. PAINT
8. FASCIA(E)
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10. ALIGNMENT
11. OTHER
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
ABUTMENTS
1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS
2. PILE BENTS
3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS
5. FOUNDATIONS
6. WINGWALLS
7. WEEP HOLES
8. EXPANSION JOINTS
9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
11. SLOPE PROTECTION
12. OTHER
PIER(S)
13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
14. PILE BENTS
15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
16. FOUNDATIONS
17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
19. OTHER
G F N N N G F N G G N
G N G N G F G F G G N N
F N F G F G N
58.1
58.2
58.3, 222.4
58.5
58.6
59.1,7
59.2,6,7
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
MINOR HONEYCOMBING AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE AND UNDERSIDE OF
OVERHANGS. SEVERAL PATCHES ON DECK UNDERSIDE, SOUTH
SPAN; WIDESPREAD HONEYCOMBING AND EXPOSED REBAR IN
PATCH IN BAY #4, SOUTH SPAN. ONE PATCH ON DECK UNDERSIDE,
NORTH SPAN. MODERATE SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON
EAST DECK OVERHANG AT SOUTH ABUTMENT.
POLYMER-MODIFIED ASPHALT EXPANSION JOINT SYSTEM IN GOOD
CONDITION. MODERATE DETERIORATION OF JOINT MATERIAL IN
CURBS AND SIDEWALKS.
MODERATE TRANSVERSE CRACKING AND RAVELING OF PAVEMENT
OVER NORTH ABUTMENT JOINT.
MODERATE SPALLING OF CURB AT WEST SIDE OF NORTH
APPROACH. SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON EAST CURB OVER
SOUTH PIER HAS BEEN PATCHED IN THE PAST; MODERATE
DELAMINATION AND SPALLING OF PATCH. MINOR SPALLING OF
EAST CURB AT JOINT OVER NORTH PIER. MODERATE SCALING OF
EAST CURB AND SIDEWALK, CENTER SPAN.
MINOR WIDESPREAD CRACKING AND SPALLING OF CONCRETE
PARAPETS, EXPOSED REBAR IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS DUE TO
INADEQUATE CONCRETE COVER. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING
WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON EXTERIOR OF PARAPETS. MODERATE
SCALING ALONG TOP OF WEST PARAPET, SOUTH SPAN.
MINOR DETERIORATION OF APPROACH PARAPET MASONRY
MORTAR JOINTS.
MINOR TO MODERATE PAINT FAILURE AND RUSTING OF BEARINGS.
MINOR RUSTING OF STRUCTURAL STEEL AT SOME LOCATIONS,
PRIMARILY ALONG EDGES OF FLANGES. MINOR PITTING (1/16"D)
PREDATING PAINT ON BEAM BOTTOM FLANGES AND BOTTOM 8" OF
WEBS IN END 5 LF AT PIERS AND ABUTMENTS. MODERATE AREAS
OF PEELING PAINT AT BEAM #3, NORTH ABUTMENT, AND IN CENTER
SPAN AT SOUTH PIER.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-089P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.
ALIGNMENT1.
61. CHANNEL 7
G G N G N
MED
SUFF
17 FT.
ROCK, GRAVEL, BOULDERS
222. APPROACHES 6
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT 8.
SIGNS7.
SETTLEMENT 6.
EROSION5.
SURFACING4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
2. RELIEF JOINTS
APPROACH SLABS1. N
N F G G G N G N
223. RETAINING WALL N
OTHER 6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.
FOUNDATION3.
WEEP HOLES2.
1. WALL
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.
APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.
TRANSITIONSB.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
60.1,3,6 MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE AND STAINING ON ABUTMENT
BREASTWALLS. MINOR CRACKING OF MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS;
MODERATE ALONG BEARING AREAS. TWO LOOSE STONES AT
NORTHEAST BEARING AREA DUE TO TREE ROOT. MINOR TO
MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH ON EAST SIDE OF NORTH
ABUTMENT BREASTWALL.
MODERATE CRACK AT SOUTHWEST WINGWALL/BREASTWALL
JUNCTION WITH VINE GROWTH IN CRACK. MINOR TO MODERATE
DETERIORATION OF WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS AND
STONES; MINOR EFFLORESCENCE.
MINOR SOIL AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON ABUTMENT BEARING
SEATS.
60.8 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINTS AT
WINGWALLS. VEGETATION GROWTH IN SOME JOINTS.
60.9 MINOR EROSION ALONG SOUTHWEST AND EAST WINGWALLS.
60.13 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF PIER WALLS. NUMEROUS MINOR
SPALLS WITH EXPOSED REBAR AND REBAR TIES DUE TO
INADEQUATE CONCRETE COVER, ESPECIALLY ON NORTH PIER.
SEVERE SCALING OF NORTH FACE, SOUTH PIER IN NORMAL
WATER ZONE; MINOR ELSEWHERE.
60.15 MINOR DELAMINATION AND CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON
EAST AND WEST SIDES OF NORTH PIER CAP.
60.17 MINOR SCOUR AT NORTH FACE OF NORTH PIER WITH TOP OF
FOOTING EXPOSED 6' LONG AT UPSTREAM END.
61.4 MINOR DRIFT AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT UPSTREAM SIDES OF
PIERS.
222.3 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS ALONG TOP OF EAST SIDEWALK
AND WEST CURBLINE. CAPSTONES IN SOUTHEAST APPROACH
PARAPET DISPLACED UP TO 1-1/4" APPROXIMATELY 75' FROM
STRUCTURE.
36.B RAILING TRANSITIONS DO NOT MEET CURRENT AASHTO
SPECIFICATIONS.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-089P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 20 18 33 30
HS 26 24 44 40
TYPE 3 25 23 42 38
TYPE 3S2 32 29 53 48
TYPE 3-3 38 34 63 57
DESIGN LOADING: H20 (M18)
CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
X CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.
L
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-089P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... SB SPUR BRIDGE OVER WEST PRONG
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-089P
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 11
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 089P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. S. DIST.
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 15A5, 15A28
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..
474 - TENNESSEE (TN)
155 - SEVIER
161000110
WEST PRONG LPR
SB GATLINBURG SPUR
5460089P0000000
0.5 MILES NORTH FROM NPS
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
0.18 (KM PT 0.29)
N/A
3 - FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
3 - STEEL
02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER
72.2 FT (22.0 M)
200.6 FT (61.1 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 4 - H20 (M18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 26.0 TONS (23.6 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 44.0 TONS (39.9 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/12 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
o
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-089P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°43'35.30"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°31'01.60"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 5 MI (8 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)
(52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 33.5 FT (10.2 M)
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 28.0 FT (8.5 M)
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 24.0 FT (7.3 M)
LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 2.0 FT (0.6 M)
RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 2.0 FT (0.6 M)
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 50 °
(35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT : ...................................... 0.5 FT (0.2 M)
RIGHT : ................................... 3.0 FT (0.9 M)
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET
MATERIAL: .............................. 6 - ALUMINUM
DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.92 FT (0.89 M)
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1011
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
8 - Stable; scour above top of fo
2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1996-structural steel painted, expansion joints resealed, polymer-matrix joint system installed, bridge railing replaced. 2008-wearing surface repaved and striping replaced.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
http:83�31'01.60 http:35�43'35.30
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-089P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-089P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING NORTH TOWARD PIGEON FORGE
FLOW
PHOTO #2 - WEST (UPSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW
LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #4 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING AND
RAVELING OF PAVEMENT OVER NORTH
ABUTMENT JOINT
PHOTO #5 - SPALLING OF CURB AT WEST
SIDE OF NORTH APPROACH
PHOTO #6 - DELAMINATION AND SPALLING OF
PATCH IN EAST CURB OVER SOUTH PIER
PHOTO #7 - SCALING OF EAST CURB AND
SIDWALK, CENTER SPAN
PHOTO #8 - SCALING ALONG TOP OF WEST
PARAPET, SOUTH SPAN
PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF
APPROACH PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR
JOINTS; WEST PARAPET AT NORTH
APPROACH SHOWN
PHOTO #10 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW
LOOKING NORTH, SOUTH SPAN
PHOTO #11 - WIDESPREAD HONEYCOMBING
AND EXPOSED REBAR IN DECK UNDERSIDE
PATCH, BAY #4 OF SOUTH SPAN, NOTE
TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF DECK
UNDERSIDE
PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL PAINT FAILURE AND
RUSTING OF BEARINGS; BEAM #5 BEARING AT
SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL RUSTING OF STRUCTURAL STEEL, PRIMARILY
ALONG EDGES OF FLANGES; BEAM #4 AT SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL RUSTING OF STRUCTURAL STEEL, PRIMARILY
ALONG EDGES OF FLANGES; BEAM #1 IN SOUTH SPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL PITTING PREDATING PAINT ON BEAM BOTTOM
FLANGES AND BOTTOM OF WEBS; BEAM #4 IN CENTER SPAN AT
SOUTH PIER SHOWN
PHOTO #16 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #17 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALL
MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS ALONG BEARING AREAS; EAST
BREASTWALL SHOWN
PHOTO #18 - VEGETATION GROWTH ON EAST SIDE OF NORTH
ABUTMENT BREASTWALL
PHOTO #19 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PIER, SOUTH FACE
PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL SPALLS WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON PIER WALLS;
NORTH FACE OF NORTH PIER SHOWN
PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL SCALING OF NORTH FACE, SOUTH PIER IN
NORMAL WATER ZONE, EAST END SHOWN
PHOTO #22 - DRIFT AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT UPSTREAM SIDE
OF NORTH PIER
PHOTO #23 - LOOKING UPSTREAM THROUGH CENTER SPAN
PHOTO #24 - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM THROUGH CENTER SPAN
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .