Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-089P.pdf

PDF 3 MB Posted

Attached to
Great Smoky Mountains National Park Projects Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
DTFH71-17-B-00007
Issued by
Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration

About this file

Report_Bridge Inspection_5460-089P

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Great Smoky Mountains National Park Projects, newest first.
File Type Posted
Results_of_Bid_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf PDF
Amendment_0001_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf PDF
Report_Uniguide_GRSM_11(2).pdf PDF
IFB_Solicitation_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf PDF
Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-040P.pdf PDF
VETS-4212_-_Form.pdf PDF
Report_Pavement_Newfound_Gap_Road.pdf PDF
ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc DOC document
Report_NEPA_GRSM_11(2)_CE.pdf PDF
Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-086P.pdf PDF
Plans_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf PDF
FP14_Eng.pdf PDF
Report_SWPPP_GRSM_1A29_(draft).pdf PDF
Report_NEPA_GRSM_1A29_FONSI.pdf PDF
Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-084P.pdf PDF
Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-087P.pdf PDF
Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-044P.pdf PDF
Report_Uniguide_GRSM_1A29.pdf PDF
Synopsis_NP-GRSM_11(2)_and_NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf PDF
Show all 19

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

SB SPUR BRIDGE OVER WEST PRONG LPR

SB GATLINBURG SPUR OVER WEST PRONG LPR

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK

LS

STRUCTURE NO. 5460-089P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 6/27/12

Report prepared by: ED

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-089P

SB SPUR BRIDGE OVER WEST PRONG LPR INSPECTION DATE: 6/27/12

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... STEEL NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 5 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 200.6 FT (61.1 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 72.2 FT (22.0 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 33.5 FT (10.2 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 15A5, 15A28 / 1478 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 50 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1996-structural steel painted, expansion joints resealed, polymer-matrix joint system installed, bridge railing replaced. 2008-wearing surface repaved and striping replaced.

LOCATION

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 0.18 (KM PT 0.29)

STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 0.5 MILES NORTH FROM NPS ROUTE 12 (GATLINBURG BYPASS). IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF FACILITY CARRIED: ............ SB GATLINBURG SPUR

STRUCTURE NO. 5460-044P.

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. WEST PRONG LPR

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This painted steel multi-beam bridge is in fair condition overall. Problems include deterioration of the mortar joints and vertical joints in the abutments, spalling with exposed rebar throughout the bridge, deterioration of the joint material in the curbs and sidewalks, and a lack of reflective object markers at the north approach. Also, several capstones in the southeast approach parapet have been displaced up to 1-1/4". Another problem which may need attention in the future, is the moderate paint failure with rusting of the structural steel and the bearings.

Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: C.C. THRIFT, L.M. MUELLER (CLARK NEXSEN)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

C. CHRISTOPHER THRIFT, NICET LEVEL IV, FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 10/30/12

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-089P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

60.1,3 REPOINT ABUTMENT MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS AS NEEDED; CLEAN AND SEAL

CRACK AT SOUTHWEST ABUTMENT/WINGWALL JUNCTION.

50 LF

222.3 RESET CAPSTONES AND REPOINT MORTAR JOINTS IN SOUTHEAST APPROACH

PARAPET.

32 LF

58.1,5,6, 60.13

CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR WITH APPROVED PROTECTIVE COATING. 30 SF

58.3, 222.4 SEAL CRACKING AND RAVELING OF PAVEMENT OVER NORTH ABUTMENT JOINT. 28 LF

58.2 CLEAN AND RESEAL CURB AND SIDEWALK JOINTS. 20 LF

222.7 INSTALL OBJECT MARKERS AT NORTH BRIDGE CORNERS. 2 EA

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

59.1,2,6,7 CLEAN AND SPOT PAINT STRUCTURAL STEEL AND BEARINGS AS

NEEDED.

20 EA

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-089P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE

9 EXCELLENT CONDITION

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

58. DECK 6

1. DECK SLAB F

2. EXPANSION JOINTS G

3. WEARING SURFACE G

4. RIDEABILITY G

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN F

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS G

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE G

8. UTILITIES N

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION G

10. OTHER N

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 6

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10. ALIGNMENT

11. OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

2. PILE BENTS

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

5. FOUNDATIONS

6. WINGWALLS

7. WEEP HOLES

8. EXPANSION JOINTS

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

11. SLOPE PROTECTION

12. OTHER

PIER(S)

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

14. PILE BENTS

15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

16. FOUNDATIONS

17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19. OTHER

G F N N N G F N G G N

G N G N G F G F G G N N

F N F G F G N

58.1

58.2

58.3, 222.4

58.5

58.6

59.1,7

59.2,6,7

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

MINOR HONEYCOMBING AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE AND UNDERSIDE OF

OVERHANGS. SEVERAL PATCHES ON DECK UNDERSIDE, SOUTH

SPAN; WIDESPREAD HONEYCOMBING AND EXPOSED REBAR IN

PATCH IN BAY #4, SOUTH SPAN. ONE PATCH ON DECK UNDERSIDE,

NORTH SPAN. MODERATE SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON

EAST DECK OVERHANG AT SOUTH ABUTMENT.

POLYMER-MODIFIED ASPHALT EXPANSION JOINT SYSTEM IN GOOD

CONDITION. MODERATE DETERIORATION OF JOINT MATERIAL IN

CURBS AND SIDEWALKS.

MODERATE TRANSVERSE CRACKING AND RAVELING OF PAVEMENT

OVER NORTH ABUTMENT JOINT.

MODERATE SPALLING OF CURB AT WEST SIDE OF NORTH

APPROACH. SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON EAST CURB OVER

SOUTH PIER HAS BEEN PATCHED IN THE PAST; MODERATE

DELAMINATION AND SPALLING OF PATCH. MINOR SPALLING OF

EAST CURB AT JOINT OVER NORTH PIER. MODERATE SCALING OF

EAST CURB AND SIDEWALK, CENTER SPAN.

MINOR WIDESPREAD CRACKING AND SPALLING OF CONCRETE

PARAPETS, EXPOSED REBAR IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS DUE TO

INADEQUATE CONCRETE COVER. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING

WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON EXTERIOR OF PARAPETS. MODERATE

SCALING ALONG TOP OF WEST PARAPET, SOUTH SPAN.

MINOR DETERIORATION OF APPROACH PARAPET MASONRY

MORTAR JOINTS.

MINOR TO MODERATE PAINT FAILURE AND RUSTING OF BEARINGS.

MINOR RUSTING OF STRUCTURAL STEEL AT SOME LOCATIONS,

PRIMARILY ALONG EDGES OF FLANGES. MINOR PITTING (1/16"D)

PREDATING PAINT ON BEAM BOTTOM FLANGES AND BOTTOM 8" OF

WEBS IN END 5 LF AT PIERS AND ABUTMENTS. MODERATE AREAS

OF PEELING PAINT AT BEAM #3, NORTH ABUTMENT, AND IN CENTER

SPAN AT SOUTH PIER.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-089P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

ALIGNMENT1.

61. CHANNEL 7

G G N G N

MED

SUFF

17 FT.

ROCK, GRAVEL, BOULDERS

222. APPROACHES 6

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

2. RELIEF JOINTS

APPROACH SLABS1. N

N F G G G N G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.

APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.

TRANSITIONSB.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

60.1,3,6 MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE AND STAINING ON ABUTMENT

BREASTWALLS. MINOR CRACKING OF MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS;

MODERATE ALONG BEARING AREAS. TWO LOOSE STONES AT

NORTHEAST BEARING AREA DUE TO TREE ROOT. MINOR TO

MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH ON EAST SIDE OF NORTH

ABUTMENT BREASTWALL.

MODERATE CRACK AT SOUTHWEST WINGWALL/BREASTWALL

JUNCTION WITH VINE GROWTH IN CRACK. MINOR TO MODERATE

DETERIORATION OF WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS AND

STONES; MINOR EFFLORESCENCE.

MINOR SOIL AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON ABUTMENT BEARING

SEATS.

60.8 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINTS AT

WINGWALLS. VEGETATION GROWTH IN SOME JOINTS.

60.9 MINOR EROSION ALONG SOUTHWEST AND EAST WINGWALLS.

60.13 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF PIER WALLS. NUMEROUS MINOR

SPALLS WITH EXPOSED REBAR AND REBAR TIES DUE TO

INADEQUATE CONCRETE COVER, ESPECIALLY ON NORTH PIER.

SEVERE SCALING OF NORTH FACE, SOUTH PIER IN NORMAL

WATER ZONE; MINOR ELSEWHERE.

60.15 MINOR DELAMINATION AND CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

EAST AND WEST SIDES OF NORTH PIER CAP.

60.17 MINOR SCOUR AT NORTH FACE OF NORTH PIER WITH TOP OF

FOOTING EXPOSED 6' LONG AT UPSTREAM END.

61.4 MINOR DRIFT AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT UPSTREAM SIDES OF

PIERS.

222.3 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS ALONG TOP OF EAST SIDEWALK

AND WEST CURBLINE. CAPSTONES IN SOUTHEAST APPROACH

PARAPET DISPLACED UP TO 1-1/4" APPROXIMATELY 75' FROM

STRUCTURE.

36.B RAILING TRANSITIONS DO NOT MEET CURRENT AASHTO

SPECIFICATIONS.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-089P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 20 18 33 30

HS 26 24 44 40

TYPE 3 25 23 42 38

TYPE 3S2 32 29 53 48

TYPE 3-3 38 34 63 57

DESIGN LOADING: H20 (M18)

CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

X CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

L

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-089P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... SB SPUR BRIDGE OVER WEST PRONG

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-089P

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 11

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 089P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. S. DIST.

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 15A5, 15A28

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..

474 - TENNESSEE (TN)

155 - SEVIER

161000110

WEST PRONG LPR

SB GATLINBURG SPUR

5460089P0000000

0.5 MILES NORTH FROM NPS

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

0.18 (KM PT 0.29)

N/A

3 - FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

3 - STEEL

02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER

72.2 FT (22.0 M)

200.6 FT (61.1 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 4 - H20 (M18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 26.0 TONS (23.6 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 44.0 TONS (39.9 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/12 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

o

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-089P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°43'35.30"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°31'01.60"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 5 MI (8 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

(52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 33.5 FT (10.2 M)

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 24.0 FT (7.3 M)

LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 2.0 FT (0.6 M)

RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 2.0 FT (0.6 M)

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 50 °

(35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT : ...................................... 0.5 FT (0.2 M)

RIGHT : ................................... 3.0 FT (0.9 M)

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET

MATERIAL: .............................. 6 - ALUMINUM

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.92 FT (0.89 M)

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1011

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

8 - Stable; scour above top of fo

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1996-structural steel painted, expansion joints resealed, polymer-matrix joint system installed, bridge railing replaced. 2008-wearing surface repaved and striping replaced.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

http:83�31'01.60 http:35�43'35.30

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-089P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-089P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING NORTH TOWARD PIGEON FORGE

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - WEST (UPSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW

LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #4 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING AND

RAVELING OF PAVEMENT OVER NORTH

ABUTMENT JOINT

PHOTO #5 - SPALLING OF CURB AT WEST

SIDE OF NORTH APPROACH

PHOTO #6 - DELAMINATION AND SPALLING OF

PATCH IN EAST CURB OVER SOUTH PIER

PHOTO #7 - SCALING OF EAST CURB AND

SIDWALK, CENTER SPAN

PHOTO #8 - SCALING ALONG TOP OF WEST

PARAPET, SOUTH SPAN

PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

APPROACH PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR

JOINTS; WEST PARAPET AT NORTH

APPROACH SHOWN

PHOTO #10 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW

LOOKING NORTH, SOUTH SPAN

PHOTO #11 - WIDESPREAD HONEYCOMBING

AND EXPOSED REBAR IN DECK UNDERSIDE

PATCH, BAY #4 OF SOUTH SPAN, NOTE

TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF DECK

UNDERSIDE

PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL PAINT FAILURE AND

RUSTING OF BEARINGS; BEAM #5 BEARING AT

SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL RUSTING OF STRUCTURAL STEEL, PRIMARILY

ALONG EDGES OF FLANGES; BEAM #4 AT SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL RUSTING OF STRUCTURAL STEEL, PRIMARILY

ALONG EDGES OF FLANGES; BEAM #1 IN SOUTH SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL PITTING PREDATING PAINT ON BEAM BOTTOM

FLANGES AND BOTTOM OF WEBS; BEAM #4 IN CENTER SPAN AT

SOUTH PIER SHOWN

PHOTO #16 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #17 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALL

MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS ALONG BEARING AREAS; EAST

BREASTWALL SHOWN

PHOTO #18 - VEGETATION GROWTH ON EAST SIDE OF NORTH

ABUTMENT BREASTWALL

PHOTO #19 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PIER, SOUTH FACE

PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL SPALLS WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON PIER WALLS;

NORTH FACE OF NORTH PIER SHOWN

PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL SCALING OF NORTH FACE, SOUTH PIER IN

NORMAL WATER ZONE, EAST END SHOWN

PHOTO #22 - DRIFT AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT UPSTREAM SIDE

OF NORTH PIER

PHOTO #23 - LOOKING UPSTREAM THROUGH CENTER SPAN

PHOTO #24 - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM THROUGH CENTER SPAN

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .