Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-087P.pdf

PDF 3 MB Posted

Attached to
Great Smoky Mountains National Park Projects Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
DTFH71-17-B-00007
Issued by
Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration

About this file

Report_Bridge Inspection_5460-087P

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Great Smoky Mountains National Park Projects, newest first.
File Type Posted
Results_of_Bid_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf PDF
Amendment_0001_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf PDF
Report_Pavement_Newfound_Gap_Road.pdf PDF
ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc DOC document
Report_NEPA_GRSM_11(2)_CE.pdf PDF
Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-086P.pdf PDF
Plans_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf PDF
FP14_Eng.pdf PDF
Report_SWPPP_GRSM_1A29_(draft).pdf PDF
Report_NEPA_GRSM_1A29_FONSI.pdf PDF
Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-084P.pdf PDF
Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-044P.pdf PDF
Report_Uniguide_GRSM_1A29.pdf PDF
Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-089P.pdf PDF
Report_Uniguide_GRSM_11(2).pdf PDF
IFB_Solicitation_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf PDF
Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-040P.pdf PDF
VETS-4212_-_Form.pdf PDF
Synopsis_NP-GRSM_11(2)_and_NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf PDF
Show all 19

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

WILEY OAK DRIVE CROSSOVER BRIDGE

SPUR CROSSOVER ROAD OVER WEST PRONG LPR

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK

LE

STRUCTURE NO. 5460-087P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 6/27/12

Report prepared by: SU

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-087P

WILEY OAK DRIVE CROSSOVER BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/27/12

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... PRESTRESSED CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 5 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 146.7 FT (44.7 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 49.2 FT (15.0 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 33.0 FT (10.1 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 26.2 FT (8.0 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. 1980

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 15A9 / 02881 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1995-EXPANSION JOINTS REPLACED. 2008-WEARING SURFACE AND APPROACHES

REPAVED.

LOCATION

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 3.70 (KM PT 5.95)

STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 1.1 MILES NORTH FROM NPS ROUTE 12

(GATLINBURG BYPASS). FACILITY CARRIED: ............ SPUR CROSSOVER ROAD

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. WEST PRONG LPR

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This prestressed concrete multi-beam bridge is in fair condition overall. The main problem is the moderate to severe rusting of the bearing assemblies. These should be cleaned and painted before further deterioration takes place.

Other problems include spalls with exposed rebar on the deck underside, vegetation growth along the southeast wingwall, and scupper drainage on the utility line in all spans of Bay #1.

Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: C.C. THRIFT, L.M. MUELLER (CLARK NEXSEN)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

C. CHRISTOPHER THRIFT, NICET LEVEL IV, FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 10/30/12

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-087P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

59.1 CLEAN AND PAINT BEARINGS. 30 EA

58.3 SEAL TRANSVERSE CRACKS IN WEARING SURFACE OVER ABUTMENT

BACKWALLS.

52 LF

58.1 CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED ON UNDERSIDE OF CENTER SPAN IN BAY #4 WITH

APPROVED PROTECTIVE COATING.

5 SF

60.6 REMOVE VEGETATION ALONG SOUTHEAST WINGWALL. 1 LS

58.8 REPAIR UTILITY LINE IN BAY #1 AS NEEDED. 1 LS

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-087P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

(SEWER LINE)

F F N N N F N N G

N N

G G F G G G

N

F

G

F

58.1 MINOR TO MODERATE TRANSVERSE AND RANDOM CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE. TWO MINOR SPALLS WITH

EXPOSED REBAR NEAR EAST PIER, BAY #4 OF CENTER SPAN.

EXTENSIVE PATCHING ON BAYS #3 AND #4, CENTER SPAN. MINOR

HONEYCOMBING IN EAST SPAN, BAY #4.

58.2 POLYMER-MODIFIED ASPHALT EXPANSION JOINT SYSTEM AT

PIERS. MODERATE RUTTING OF ASPHALTIC JOINT MATERIAL IN

WHEELPATHS OVER EAST PIER, EASTBOUND LANE. MINOR

DETERIORATION OF JOINT MATERIAL AT CURBS AND SIDEWALKS.

58.3 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACK IN WEARING SURFACE OVER

ABUTMENT BACKWALLS.

58.5 MODERATE CRACKING AND SCALING ON NORTH SIDEWALK, EAST

SPAN.

58.6 MODERATE SCALING ALONG TOP OF NORTH PARAPET, WEST

SPAN. MINOR COLLISION DAMAGE TO NORTH RAILING IN WEST

SPAN OVER WEST PIER AND TO SOUTH RAILING IN WEST SPAN

OVER WEST PIER. MODERATE DETERIORATION OF APPROACH

PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS.

58.7 PONDING IN EAST SPAN NOTED IN PAST (UNABLE TO VERIFY

DURING THIS INSPECTION). SCUPPERS DRAIN PARTIALLY ONTO

BEAMS AND ONTO UTILITY PIPE IN BAY #1. MODERATE RUSTING OF

SCUPPERS.

58.8 MINOR RUSTING OF UTILITY SUPPORT HANGERS. DETERIORATION

OF COATING ON UTILITY PIPE IN BAY #1, ALL SPANS, FROM

SCUPPERS DRAINING DIRECTLY ONTO IT; COATING MISSING FOR 4

LF IN EAST SPAN AT SCUPPER.

59.1 MODERATE TO SEVERE RUSTING OF BEARING ASSEMBLIES

THROUGHOUT; SECTION LOSS (1/16") ON EXTERIOR BEARING

ASSEMBLIES.

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS1. G

PILE BENTS2. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS3. G

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS4. G

FOUNDATIONS5. N

WINGWALLS6. G

WEEP HOLES7. F

EXPANSION JOINTS8. N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR9. G

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION10. G

SLOPE PROTECTION11. N

OTHER 12. N

PIER(S)

F13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

N14. PILE BENTS

G15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

N16. FOUNDATIONS

G17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

G18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

N19. OTHER

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-087P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

ALIGNMENT1.

61. CHANNEL 7

G G G G N

MED

SUFF

19 FT.

ROCK

222. APPROACHES 7

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

2. RELIEF JOINTS

APPROACH SLABS1. N

N N G G G N G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.

APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.

TRANSITIONSB.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

59.2,6 MINOR STAINING AND SCALING OF BEAMS AND DIAPHRAGMS DUE

TO DRAINAGE FROM SCUPPERS. MINOR CRACKING ON BOTTOM

FLANGES OF BEAMS OVER PIERS. MINOR CRACKING OF SEVERAL

DIAPHRAGMS WITH EFFLORESCENCE.

MODERATE DELAMINATION AND SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR

ON BAY #4 END DIAPHRAGMS AT EAST PIER AND WEST ABUTMENT.

60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS WITH

EFFLORESCENCE.

60.3 SOME FORMWORK REMAINS ON WEST ABUTMENT BEARING SEAT.

MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS AND BIRDS NESTS ON SEATS.

60.4 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BACKWALLS WITH

EFFLORESCENCE.

60.6 MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH ON SOUTHWEST WINGWALL. MINOR

EFFLORESCENCE THROUGHOUT WINGWALLS.

60.7 SEVERAL WEEP HOLES BURIED BY SILT. LARGE ROOT GROWS

FROM WEST WEEP HOLE AT NORTH ABUTMENT.

60.13 MINOR RUST STAINING ALONG ENDS OF PIERS FROM UTILITY

SUPPORT HANGERS. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF PIER WALLS.

MINOR EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST PIER, WEST SIDE. MODERATE

SCALING ALONG BOTTOM OF PIERS DUE TO WATER FLOW. MINOR

VEGETATION GROWTH ON WEST FACE OF WEST PIER. MINOR

SPALL ON WEST SIDE OF WEST PIER, SOUTH END. MINOR

DELAMINATION AND SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON WEST

FACE OF WEST PIER, NORTH END.

60.15 MINOR SCALING OF CONCRETE PIER CAPS DUE TO LEAKING

JOINTS. MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS ON PIER BEARING

SEATS.

60.17 MINOR SCOUR AT EAST PIER; FOOTING NOT EXPOSED. MINOR

EROSION ALONG SOUTH END OF WEST PIER.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-087P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 20 18 33 30

HS 26 24 43 39

TYPE 3 24 22 39 35

TYPE 3S2 36 33 61 55

TYPE 3-3 45 41 75 68

DESIGN LOADING: UNKNOWN (H20 ASSUMED - SEE REMARKS)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: DESIGN LOADING IS UNKNOWN; ASSUMPTION IS BASED ON STRUCTURE TYPE, LOCATION, AGE, AND

CONDITION.

E

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-087P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... WILEY OAK DRIVE CROSSOVER BRIDG

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-087P

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 11

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 087P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. S. DIST.

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 15A9

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..

474 - TENNESSEE (TN)

155 - SEVIER

161000110

WEST PRONG LPR

SPUR CROSSOVER ROAD

5460087P0000000

1.1 MILES NORTH FROM NPS

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

3.70 (KM PT 5.95)

3 - FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER

49.2 FT (15.0 M)

146.7 FT (44.7 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 26.0 TONS (23.6 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 43.0 TONS (39.0 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/12 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

o

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-087P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°44'01.90"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°31'12.20"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 5 MI (8 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 26.2 FT (8.0 M)

(52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 33.0 FT (10.1 M)

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 47.0 FT (14.3 M)

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 26.0 FT (7.9 M)

LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 16.0 FT (4.9 M)

RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °

(35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 26.2 FT (8.0 M)

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT : ...................................... 2.4 FT (0.7 M)

RIGHT : ................................... 2.4 FT (0.7 M)

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET

MATERIAL: .............................. 6 - ALUMINUM

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 3.08 FT (0.94 M)

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

8 - Stable; scour above top of fo

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1995-EXPANSION JOINTS REPLACED. 2008-WEARING SURFACE AND APPROACHES REPAVED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

http:83�31'12.20 http:35�44'01.90

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-087P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-087P

FLOW

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST TOWARD GATLINBURG WELCOME

CENTER

PHOTO #2 - NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW

LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACK IN

WEARING SURFACE OVER ABUTMENT

BACKWALLS; WEARING SURFACE OVER WEST

ABUTMENT BACKWALL SHOWN

PHOTO #5 - RUTTING OF POLYNER-MODIFIED

ASPHALT EXPANSION JOINT IN WHEEL PATHS

OVER EAST PIER, EASTBOUND LANE

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

CURB AND SIDEWALK JOINT FILLER

MATERIAL; NORTH SIDE OVER EAST PIER

SHOWN

PHOTO #7 - SCALING ON NORTH SIDEWALK,

EAST SPAN

PHOTO #8 - SCALING ALONG TOP OF NORTH

PARAPET, WEST SPAN

PHOTO #9 - COLLISION DAMAGE TO NORTH

RAILING IN WEST SPAN OVER WEST PIER

PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

APPROACH PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR

JOINTS; SOUTH PARAPET AT EAST APPROACH

PHOTO #11 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW

LOOKING EAST, WEST SPAN

PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE AND

RANDOM CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE

ON DECK UNDERSIDE; BAY #2 OF WEST SPAN

PHOTO #13 - SPALLS WITH EXPOSED REBAR NEAR EAST PIER, BAY #4

OF CENTER SPAN

PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF COATING ON UTILITY PIPE

IN BAY #1; WEST SPAN SHOWN; NOTE TYPICAL RUSTING OF UTILITY

SUPPORT HANGERS

PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL RUSTING OF INTERIOR BEARING ASSEMBLIES;

BEAM #4 BEARING AT WEST ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL RUSTING WITH SECTION LOSS ON EXTERIOR

BEARING ASSEMBLIES; BEAM #5 BEARING AT WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #17 - TYPICAL RUSTING WITH SECTION LOSS ON EXTERIOR

BEARING ASSEMBLIES; BEAM #1 BEARING AT WEST PIER SHOWN

PHOTO #18 - TYPICAL CRACKING ON BOTTOM FLANGES OF BEAMS

OVER PIERS; BEAM #5 OVER EAST PIER SHOWN

PHOTO #19 - DELAMINATION AND SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR

ON BAY #4 END DIAPHRAGM AT WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #20 - DELAMINATION AND SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR

ON BAY #4 END DIAPHRAGMS AT EAST PIER

PHOTO #21 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #22 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST PIER, WEST FACE; NOTE

VEGETATION GROWTH

PHOTO #23 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS ON PIER BEARING

SEATS; BAY #3 AT WEST PIER SHOWN

PHOTO #24 - SPALL ON WEST SIDE OF WEST PIER, SOUTH END

PHOTO #25 - TYPICAL SCALING ALONG BOTTOM OF PIERS DUE TO

WATER FLOW; SOUTH END OF WEST PIER SHOWN

PHOTO #26 - DELAMINATION AND SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR

ON WEST FACE OF WEST PIER, NORTH END

PHOTO #27 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL

PHOTO #28 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .