Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-087P.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Great Smoky Mountains National Park Projects Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- DTFH71-17-B-00007
About this file
Report_Bridge Inspection_5460-087P
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Results_of_Bid_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf | ||
| Amendment_0001_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf | ||
| Report_Pavement_Newfound_Gap_Road.pdf | ||
| ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc | DOC document | |
| Report_NEPA_GRSM_11(2)_CE.pdf | ||
| Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-086P.pdf | ||
| Plans_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf | ||
| FP14_Eng.pdf | ||
| Report_SWPPP_GRSM_1A29_(draft).pdf | ||
| Report_NEPA_GRSM_1A29_FONSI.pdf | ||
| Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-084P.pdf | ||
| Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-044P.pdf | ||
| Report_Uniguide_GRSM_1A29.pdf | ||
| Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-089P.pdf | ||
| Report_Uniguide_GRSM_11(2).pdf | ||
| IFB_Solicitation_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf | ||
| Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-040P.pdf | ||
| VETS-4212_-_Form.pdf | ||
| Synopsis_NP-GRSM_11(2)_and_NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf |
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
WILEY OAK DRIVE CROSSOVER BRIDGE
SPUR CROSSOVER ROAD OVER WEST PRONG LPR
GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK
LE
STRUCTURE NO. 5460-087P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 6/27/12
Report prepared by: SU
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-087P
WILEY OAK DRIVE CROSSOVER BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/27/12
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... PRESTRESSED CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 5 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 146.7 FT (44.7 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 49.2 FT (15.0 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 33.0 FT (10.1 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 26.2 FT (8.0 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. 1980
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 15A9 / 02881 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1995-EXPANSION JOINTS REPLACED. 2008-WEARING SURFACE AND APPROACHES
REPAVED.
LOCATION
GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 3.70 (KM PT 5.95)
STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 1.1 MILES NORTH FROM NPS ROUTE 12
(GATLINBURG BYPASS). FACILITY CARRIED: ............ SPUR CROSSOVER ROAD
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. WEST PRONG LPR
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This prestressed concrete multi-beam bridge is in fair condition overall. The main problem is the moderate to severe rusting of the bearing assemblies. These should be cleaned and painted before further deterioration takes place.
Other problems include spalls with exposed rebar on the deck underside, vegetation growth along the southeast wingwall, and scupper drainage on the utility line in all spans of Bay #1.
Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: C.C. THRIFT, L.M. MUELLER (CLARK NEXSEN)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
C. CHRISTOPHER THRIFT, NICET LEVEL IV, FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 10/30/12
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-087P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
59.1 CLEAN AND PAINT BEARINGS. 30 EA
58.3 SEAL TRANSVERSE CRACKS IN WEARING SURFACE OVER ABUTMENT
BACKWALLS.
52 LF
58.1 CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED ON UNDERSIDE OF CENTER SPAN IN BAY #4 WITH
APPROVED PROTECTIVE COATING.
5 SF
60.6 REMOVE VEGETATION ALONG SOUTHEAST WINGWALL. 1 LS
58.8 REPAIR UTILITY LINE IN BAY #1 AS NEEDED. 1 LS
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ..
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-087P
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
N
58. DECK
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER
ALIGNMENT
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
FASCIA(E)
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
TRUSSES
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
GIRDERS OR BEAMS
BEARING DEVICES
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
OTHER
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
UTILITIES
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
RIDEABILITY
WEARING SURFACE
EXPANSION JOINTS
DECK SLAB
ABUTMENTS
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
10.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
PAINT
11.
(SEWER LINE)
F F N N N F N N G
N N
G G F G G G
N
F
G
F
58.1 MINOR TO MODERATE TRANSVERSE AND RANDOM CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE. TWO MINOR SPALLS WITH
EXPOSED REBAR NEAR EAST PIER, BAY #4 OF CENTER SPAN.
EXTENSIVE PATCHING ON BAYS #3 AND #4, CENTER SPAN. MINOR
HONEYCOMBING IN EAST SPAN, BAY #4.
58.2 POLYMER-MODIFIED ASPHALT EXPANSION JOINT SYSTEM AT
PIERS. MODERATE RUTTING OF ASPHALTIC JOINT MATERIAL IN
WHEELPATHS OVER EAST PIER, EASTBOUND LANE. MINOR
DETERIORATION OF JOINT MATERIAL AT CURBS AND SIDEWALKS.
58.3 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACK IN WEARING SURFACE OVER
ABUTMENT BACKWALLS.
58.5 MODERATE CRACKING AND SCALING ON NORTH SIDEWALK, EAST
SPAN.
58.6 MODERATE SCALING ALONG TOP OF NORTH PARAPET, WEST
SPAN. MINOR COLLISION DAMAGE TO NORTH RAILING IN WEST
SPAN OVER WEST PIER AND TO SOUTH RAILING IN WEST SPAN
OVER WEST PIER. MODERATE DETERIORATION OF APPROACH
PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS.
58.7 PONDING IN EAST SPAN NOTED IN PAST (UNABLE TO VERIFY
DURING THIS INSPECTION). SCUPPERS DRAIN PARTIALLY ONTO
BEAMS AND ONTO UTILITY PIPE IN BAY #1. MODERATE RUSTING OF
SCUPPERS.
58.8 MINOR RUSTING OF UTILITY SUPPORT HANGERS. DETERIORATION
OF COATING ON UTILITY PIPE IN BAY #1, ALL SPANS, FROM
SCUPPERS DRAINING DIRECTLY ONTO IT; COATING MISSING FOR 4
LF IN EAST SPAN AT SCUPPER.
59.1 MODERATE TO SEVERE RUSTING OF BEARING ASSEMBLIES
THROUGHOUT; SECTION LOSS (1/16") ON EXTERIOR BEARING
ASSEMBLIES.
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS1. G
PILE BENTS2. N
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS3. G
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS4. G
FOUNDATIONS5. N
WINGWALLS6. G
WEEP HOLES7. F
EXPANSION JOINTS8. N
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR9. G
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION10. G
SLOPE PROTECTION11. N
OTHER 12. N
PIER(S)
F13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
N14. PILE BENTS
G15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
N16. FOUNDATIONS
G17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
G18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
N19. OTHER
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-087P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.
ALIGNMENT1.
61. CHANNEL 7
G G G G N
MED
SUFF
19 FT.
ROCK
222. APPROACHES 7
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT 8.
SIGNS7.
SETTLEMENT 6.
EROSION5.
SURFACING4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
2. RELIEF JOINTS
APPROACH SLABS1. N
N N G G G N G N
223. RETAINING WALL N
OTHER 6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.
FOUNDATION3.
WEEP HOLES2.
1. WALL
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.
APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.
TRANSITIONSB.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1
N N N
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
59.2,6 MINOR STAINING AND SCALING OF BEAMS AND DIAPHRAGMS DUE
TO DRAINAGE FROM SCUPPERS. MINOR CRACKING ON BOTTOM
FLANGES OF BEAMS OVER PIERS. MINOR CRACKING OF SEVERAL
DIAPHRAGMS WITH EFFLORESCENCE.
MODERATE DELAMINATION AND SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR
ON BAY #4 END DIAPHRAGMS AT EAST PIER AND WEST ABUTMENT.
60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS WITH
EFFLORESCENCE.
60.3 SOME FORMWORK REMAINS ON WEST ABUTMENT BEARING SEAT.
MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS AND BIRDS NESTS ON SEATS.
60.4 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BACKWALLS WITH
EFFLORESCENCE.
60.6 MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH ON SOUTHWEST WINGWALL. MINOR
EFFLORESCENCE THROUGHOUT WINGWALLS.
60.7 SEVERAL WEEP HOLES BURIED BY SILT. LARGE ROOT GROWS
FROM WEST WEEP HOLE AT NORTH ABUTMENT.
60.13 MINOR RUST STAINING ALONG ENDS OF PIERS FROM UTILITY
SUPPORT HANGERS. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF PIER WALLS.
MINOR EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST PIER, WEST SIDE. MODERATE
SCALING ALONG BOTTOM OF PIERS DUE TO WATER FLOW. MINOR
VEGETATION GROWTH ON WEST FACE OF WEST PIER. MINOR
SPALL ON WEST SIDE OF WEST PIER, SOUTH END. MINOR
DELAMINATION AND SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON WEST
FACE OF WEST PIER, NORTH END.
60.15 MINOR SCALING OF CONCRETE PIER CAPS DUE TO LEAKING
JOINTS. MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS ON PIER BEARING
SEATS.
60.17 MINOR SCOUR AT EAST PIER; FOOTING NOT EXPOSED. MINOR
EROSION ALONG SOUTH END OF WEST PIER.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-087P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 20 18 33 30
HS 26 24 43 39
TYPE 3 24 22 39 35
TYPE 3S2 36 33 61 55
TYPE 3-3 45 41 75 68
DESIGN LOADING: UNKNOWN (H20 ASSUMED - SEE REMARKS)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: DESIGN LOADING IS UNKNOWN; ASSUMPTION IS BASED ON STRUCTURE TYPE, LOCATION, AGE, AND
CONDITION.
E
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-087P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... WILEY OAK DRIVE CROSSOVER BRIDG
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-087P
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 11
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 087P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. S. DIST.
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 15A9
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..
474 - TENNESSEE (TN)
155 - SEVIER
161000110
WEST PRONG LPR
SPUR CROSSOVER ROAD
5460087P0000000
1.1 MILES NORTH FROM NPS
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
3.70 (KM PT 5.95)
3 - FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER
49.2 FT (15.0 M)
146.7 FT (44.7 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 26.0 TONS (23.6 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 43.0 TONS (39.0 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/12 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
o
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-087P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°44'01.90"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°31'12.20"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 5 MI (8 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 26.2 FT (8.0 M)
(52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 33.0 FT (10.1 M)
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 47.0 FT (14.3 M)
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 26.0 FT (7.9 M)
LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 16.0 FT (4.9 M)
RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °
(35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 26.2 FT (8.0 M)
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT : ...................................... 2.4 FT (0.7 M)
RIGHT : ................................... 2.4 FT (0.7 M)
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET
MATERIAL: .............................. 6 - ALUMINUM
DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 3.08 FT (0.94 M)
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
8 - Stable; scour above top of fo
1 - MAINTENANCE
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1995-EXPANSION JOINTS REPLACED. 2008-WEARING SURFACE AND APPROACHES REPAVED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
http:83�31'12.20 http:35�44'01.90
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-087P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-087P
FLOW
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST TOWARD GATLINBURG WELCOME
CENTER
PHOTO #2 - NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW
LOOKING WEST
PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACK IN
WEARING SURFACE OVER ABUTMENT
BACKWALLS; WEARING SURFACE OVER WEST
ABUTMENT BACKWALL SHOWN
PHOTO #5 - RUTTING OF POLYNER-MODIFIED
ASPHALT EXPANSION JOINT IN WHEEL PATHS
OVER EAST PIER, EASTBOUND LANE
PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF
CURB AND SIDEWALK JOINT FILLER
MATERIAL; NORTH SIDE OVER EAST PIER
SHOWN
PHOTO #7 - SCALING ON NORTH SIDEWALK,
EAST SPAN
PHOTO #8 - SCALING ALONG TOP OF NORTH
PARAPET, WEST SPAN
PHOTO #9 - COLLISION DAMAGE TO NORTH
RAILING IN WEST SPAN OVER WEST PIER
PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF
APPROACH PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR
JOINTS; SOUTH PARAPET AT EAST APPROACH
PHOTO #11 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW
LOOKING EAST, WEST SPAN
PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE AND
RANDOM CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE
ON DECK UNDERSIDE; BAY #2 OF WEST SPAN
PHOTO #13 - SPALLS WITH EXPOSED REBAR NEAR EAST PIER, BAY #4
OF CENTER SPAN
PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF COATING ON UTILITY PIPE
IN BAY #1; WEST SPAN SHOWN; NOTE TYPICAL RUSTING OF UTILITY
SUPPORT HANGERS
PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL RUSTING OF INTERIOR BEARING ASSEMBLIES;
BEAM #4 BEARING AT WEST ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL RUSTING WITH SECTION LOSS ON EXTERIOR
BEARING ASSEMBLIES; BEAM #5 BEARING AT WEST ABUTMENT
PHOTO #17 - TYPICAL RUSTING WITH SECTION LOSS ON EXTERIOR
BEARING ASSEMBLIES; BEAM #1 BEARING AT WEST PIER SHOWN
PHOTO #18 - TYPICAL CRACKING ON BOTTOM FLANGES OF BEAMS
OVER PIERS; BEAM #5 OVER EAST PIER SHOWN
PHOTO #19 - DELAMINATION AND SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR
ON BAY #4 END DIAPHRAGM AT WEST ABUTMENT
PHOTO #20 - DELAMINATION AND SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR
ON BAY #4 END DIAPHRAGMS AT EAST PIER
PHOTO #21 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST ABUTMENT
PHOTO #22 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST PIER, WEST FACE; NOTE
VEGETATION GROWTH
PHOTO #23 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS ON PIER BEARING
SEATS; BAY #3 AT WEST PIER SHOWN
PHOTO #24 - SPALL ON WEST SIDE OF WEST PIER, SOUTH END
PHOTO #25 - TYPICAL SCALING ALONG BOTTOM OF PIERS DUE TO
WATER FLOW; SOUTH END OF WEST PIER SHOWN
PHOTO #26 - DELAMINATION AND SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR
ON WEST FACE OF WEST PIER, NORTH END
PHOTO #27 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL
PHOTO #28 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .