Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-086P.pdf

PDF 3 MB Posted

Attached to
Great Smoky Mountains National Park Projects Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
DTFH71-17-B-00007
Issued by
Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration

About this file

Report_Bridge Inspection_5460-086P

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Great Smoky Mountains National Park Projects, newest first.
File Type Posted
Results_of_Bid_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf PDF
Amendment_0001_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf PDF
Report_Pavement_Newfound_Gap_Road.pdf PDF
ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc DOC document
Report_NEPA_GRSM_11(2)_CE.pdf PDF
Report_NEPA_GRSM_1A29_FONSI.pdf PDF
Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-084P.pdf PDF
Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-087P.pdf PDF
Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-044P.pdf PDF
Report_Uniguide_GRSM_1A29.pdf PDF
Plans_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf PDF
FP14_Eng.pdf PDF
Report_SWPPP_GRSM_1A29_(draft).pdf PDF
Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-089P.pdf PDF
Report_Uniguide_GRSM_11(2).pdf PDF
IFB_Solicitation_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf PDF
Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-040P.pdf PDF
VETS-4212_-_Form.pdf PDF
Synopsis_NP-GRSM_11(2)_and_NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf PDF
Show all 19

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

HUSKEY GROVE ROAD CROSSOVER BRIDGE

SPUR CROSSOVER ROAD OVER WEST PRONG LPR

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK

LW

STRUCTURE NO. 5460-086P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 6/27/12

Report prepared by: ND

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-086P

HUSKEY GROVE ROAD CROSSOVER BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/27/12

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... PRESTRESSED CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 5 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 188.6 FT (57.5 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 63.3 FT (19.3 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 33.3 FT (10.1 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 26.3 FT (8.0 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 15A6, 15A30 / 3004A SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1995-Beam #1 replaced, joint repair. 2008-bridge and approaches repaved, Beams #1, #3, & #5 repaired, west pier wall patched, joints sealed, underpass guardrail replaced

LOCATION

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 1.83 (KM PT 2.95)

STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 2.0 MILES NORTH FROM NPS ROUTE 12

(GATLINBURG BYPASS). FACILITY CARRIED: ............ SPUR CROSSOVER ROAD

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. WEST PRONG LPR

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This prestressed concrete multi-beam bridge is in fair condition overall. The main problem is the moderate diagonal and horizontal cracking on the north face of Beam #1 in the west span; The diagonal cracks extend across the bottom flange and full height of web to the top flange. These cracks appear to have occured during vehicular impact in the past and should continue to me monitored.

Other problems include deteriorated concrete with exposed rebar on the pier walls, exposed rebar on the underside of the beams and deck, rusted anchor bolts, nuts and washers at abutments, and a lack of object markers at the bridge corners and vertical clearance signs along the underpass roadway.

Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: C.C. THRIFT, L.M. MUELLER (CLARK NEXSEN)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

C. CHRISTOPHER THRIFT, NICET LEVEL IV, FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 10/30/12

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-086P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

C226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

60.13 REPAIR AREAS OF DETERIORATED CONCRETE AND CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED

REBAR WITH APPROVED PROTECTIVE SEALANT ON PIER WALLS.

24 SF

58.1, 59.2,6 CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR ON UNDERSIDE OF DECK AND BEAMS WITH

APPROVED PROTECTIVE SEALANT.

20 SF

59.1 CLEAN ANCHOR BOLTS AND REPLACE ANCHOR NUTS AND WASHERS AT

ABUTMENTS.

1 LS

222.7 INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT PARAPET ENDS. POST

CLEARANCE SIGNS ON UNDERPASS ROADWAY.

6 EA

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that the recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

Continue to monitor cracking of Beam #1 in West Span.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-086P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE

9 EXCELLENT CONDITION

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

58. DECK

1. DECK SLAB

2. EXPANSION JOINTS

3. WEARING SURFACE

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10. OTHER

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 5

1. BEARING DEVICES F

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS F

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S) N

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS N

5. TRUSSES N

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING G

7. PAINT N

8. FASCIA(E) N

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION G

10. ALIGNMENT G

11. OTHER N

60. SUBSTRUCTURE 6

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

2. PILE BENTS

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

5. FOUNDATIONS

6. WINGWALLS

7. WEEP HOLES

8. EXPANSION JOINTS

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

11. SLOPE PROTECTION

12. OTHER

PIER(S)

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

14. PILE BENTS

15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

16. FOUNDATIONS

17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19. OTHER

F G G G F G G N G N

F N G G G G G N G G N N

F N G G G G N

58.1

58.2,3

58.5

58.6

58.7, 59.2

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

MINOR CRACKING OF DECK UNDERSIDE WITH EFFLORESCENCE

THROUGHOUT. MINOR SPALLING OF DECK UNDERSIDE IN CENTER

SPAN, BAY #4. MINOR SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR OVER

PIERS IN BAY #4, ALL SPANS.

POLYMER-MODIFIED ASPHALT EXPANSION JOINT SYSTEM. NEW

ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE INSTALLED IN 2008. MODERATE TO

SEVERE DETERIORATION OF CURB AND SIDEWALK EXPANSION

JOINT FILLER MATERIAL.

MINOR TO MODERATE SCALING AND FLAKING OF FINISH COAT ON

CURBS AND SIDEWALKS.

MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON PARAPETS. MINOR

VEHICLE SCRAPES ON NORTH RAILING, EAST SPAN. NORTH

RAILING/PARAPET APPEARS TO HAVE SLIGHT SAGS; APPEARS TO

BE AS-BUILT. MODERATE DETERIORATION OF APPROACH

PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS.

SCUPPERS DRAIN PARTIALLY ONTO BEAMS, CAUSING STAINING

AND MINOR SCALING OF CONCRETE, PRIMARILY ON BOTTOM

FLANGES.

PREVIOUSLY NOTED MODERATE COLLISION DAMAGE TO BEAMS #1,

#3, AND #5 IN WEST SPAN HAS BEEN PATCHED IN THE PAST;

UNABLE TO VERIFY CONDITION OF FORMERLY EXPOSED AND

SEVERED PRESTRESSING STRANDS.

BEAM #1 OF EAST SPAN HAS TWO AREAS OF EXPOSED REBAR ON

BOTTOM FLANGE NEAR EAST ABUTMENT DUE TO INSUFFICIENT

COVER. BEAM #5 OF EAST SPAN HAS ONE AREA OF EXPOSED

REBAR IN BOTTOM FLANGE NEAR EAST ABUTMENT DUE TO

INSUFFICIENT COVER.

BEAM #1 OF WEST SPAN HAS SEVERAL MINOR TO MODERATE

DIAGONAL CRACKS ON NORTH FACE EXTENDING TO BOTTOM FACE

OF BOTTOM FLANGE; CRACKS END AT TOP FILLET AND RUN

LONGITUDINALLY. LONGITUDINAL CRACKS ALONG TOP FLANGE

FILLET FULL LENGTH BETWEEN INTERMEDIATE DIAPHRAGMS ON

BAY #1 AND EXTERIOR FACES. TWO EXPOSED REBARS ON

UNDERSIDE OF BEAM #5 IN WEST SPAN NEAR WEST PIER.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-086P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

ALIGNMENT1.

61. CHANNEL 7

G G G G N

MED

SUFF

15 FT.

STONES, SILT

222. APPROACHES 8

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

2. RELIEF JOINTS

APPROACH SLABS1. N

N N G G G N G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.

APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.

TRANSITIONSB.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

59.1 MODERATE TO SEVERE RUSTING OF ANCHOR BOLTS, WASHERS

AND NUTS AT ABUTMENTS. ALL ROCKERS EXCEPT EAST EXTERIOR

ARE FULLY CONTRACTED. ALL BEARINGS AT WEST ABUTMENT

ARE FULLY CONTRACTED EXCEPT FOR BEARING #1.

59.6 MINOR RANDOM CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

DIAPHRAGMS.

60.1 WATER STAINING AND MINOR SCALING OF ABUTMENT

BREASTWALLS BELOW WEEP HOLES. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING

OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS. MINOR DELAMINATION (10 SF) WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL, NORTH END.

MODERATE DELAMINATION AND SPALLING (8 SF X 1"D) WITH

EXPOSED REBAR ON EAST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL BELOW BAY

#1.

60.4 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF WEST ABUTMENT BACKWALL.

60.5,9 TOP 6" OF FOOTING EXPOSED FOR FULL LENGTH AT EAST

ABUTMENT.

60.6 MINOR TO MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH ON WINGWALLS.

60.13 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF PIER WALLS WITH

EFFLORESCENCE. SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON NORTHWEST

FACE OF WEST PIER.

MODERATE AREAS OF DELAMINATION AND SPALLING (24 SF TOTAL

X 1"D) WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON EAST PIER, EAST FACE. MINOR

TO MODERATE SCALING ON EAST PIER AT WATERLINE. MODERATE

VEGETATION GROWTH ON WEST PIER, EAST FACE.

60.15 MINOR CONCRETE DETERIORATION AND STAINING OF PIER CAPS

DUE TO LEAKAGE THROUGH JOINTS. MODERATE ACCUMULATION

OF DEBRIS ON WEST PIER BEARING SEAT.

222.4 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACK IN APPROACH PAVEMENT OVER FREE

ENDS OF APPROACH SLABS.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-086P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 20 18 27 24

HS 25 23 34 31

TYPE 3 22 20 30 27

TYPE 3S2 31 28 43 39

TYPE 3-3 38 34 52 47

DESIGN LOADING: H20 (M18)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-086P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... HUSKEY GROVE ROAD CROSSOVER BR

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-086P

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 11

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 086P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. S. DIST.

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 15A6, 15A30

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 3004A

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..

474 - TENNESSEE (TN)

155 - SEVIER

161000110

WEST PRONG LPR

SPUR CROSSOVER ROAD

5460086P0000000

2.0 MILES NORTH FROM NPS

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

1.83 (KM PT 2.95)

N/A

3 - FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER

63.3 FT (19.3 M)

188.6 FT (57.5 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 4 - H20 (M18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 25.0 TONS (23.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 4 - POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 34.0 TONS (31.0 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/12 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

o

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-086P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°44'59.50"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°31'19.80"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 5 MI (8 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 6 - HIGHWAY-WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 12.0 FT (3.7 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 26.3 FT (8.0 M)

(52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 33.3 FT (10.1 M)

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 36.0 FT (11.0 M)

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 26.0 FT (7.9 M)

LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 5.0 FT (1.5 M)

RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 5.0 FT (1.5 M)

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °

(35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 26.3 FT (8.0 M)

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT : ...................................... 2.5 FT (0.8 M)

RIGHT : ................................... 2.5 FT (0.8 M)

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET

MATERIAL: .............................. 6 - ALUMINUM

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 3.08 FT (0.94 M)

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 14.42 FT (4.40 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

8 - Stable; scour above top of fo

1 - MAINTENANCE

C - MODERATE

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1995-Beam #1 replaced, joint repair. 2008-bridge and approaches repaved, Beams #1, #3, & #5 repaired, west pier wall patched, joints sealed, underpass guardrail replaced

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

http:83�31'19.80 http:35�44'59.50

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-086P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-086P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING EAST TOWARD NORTHBOUND U.S. 441

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - SOUTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW

LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

CURB AND SIDEWALK EXPANSION JOINT

FILLER MATERIAL; SOUTH CURB AND

SIDEWALK OVER EAST ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL SCALING AND FLAKING OF FINISH COAT ON

CURBS AND SIDEWALKS; NORTH CURB IN WEST SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #6 - VEHICLE SCRAPES ON NORTH RAILING, EAST SPAN

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACK IN

APPROACH PAVEMENT OVER FREE ENDS OF

APPROACH SLABS; EAST APPROACH SHOWN

PHOTO #8 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW

LOOKING WEST, EAST SPAN

PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF DECK UNDERSIDE WITH

EFFLORESCENCE; BAYS #3 AND #4 IN CENTER SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL ROCKER BEARING FULLY CONTRACTED; BEAM

#5 BEARING AT WEST ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE TYPICAL RUSTING OF

ANCHOR BOLTS, WASHERS, AND NUTS AT ABUTMENTS

PHOTO #11 - GENERAL VIEW OF BEAM #1 IN WEST SPAN; DIAGONAL

CRACKS ON NORTH FACE EXTENDING TO BOTTOM FACE OF BOTTOM

FLANGE; ALSO NOTE LONGITUDINAL CRACKS ALONG TOP FLANGE

PHOTO #12 - DIAGONAL CRACK IN BOTTOM FLANGE OF BEAM #1,

WEST SPAN; CRACK EXTENDS DIAGONALLY UP WEB TO TOP FLANGE

FILLET

PHOTO #13 - DIAGONAL CRACKS ON NORTH FACE OF BEAM #1

EXTEND TO BOTTOM FACE OF BOTTOM FLANGE; CRACKS END AT TOP

FILLET AND RUN LONGITUDINAL ALONG THE TOP FLANGE COPE

PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL RANDOM CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

DIAPHRAGMS; BAY #4 END DIAPHRAGM IN EAST SPAN AT EAST

ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE CRACKING OF DECK UNDERSIDE

PHOTO #15 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #16 - DELAMINATION AND SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR

ON EAST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL BELOW BAY #1

PHOTO #17 - FOOTING EXPOSED AT EAST ABUTMENT; ALSO NOTE

TYPICAL WATER STAINING AND SCALING OF BREASTWALL BELOW

WEEP HOLES

PHOTO #18 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST PIER, EAST FACE

PHOTO #19 - TYPICAL DELAMINATION AND

SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON EAST

PIER, EAST FACE; SOUTH END SHOWN

PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL DELAMINATION OF

EAST PIER, EAST FACE; BELOW BEAMS #3

AND #4 AT TOP SHOWN

PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL SCALING OF EAST PIER AT WATERLINE; EAST

FACE OF SHOWN

PHOTO #22 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL

PHOTO #23 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .