Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-086P.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Great Smoky Mountains National Park Projects Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- DTFH71-17-B-00007
About this file
Report_Bridge Inspection_5460-086P
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Results_of_Bid_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf | ||
| Amendment_0001_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf | ||
| Report_Pavement_Newfound_Gap_Road.pdf | ||
| ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc | DOC document | |
| Report_NEPA_GRSM_11(2)_CE.pdf | ||
| Report_NEPA_GRSM_1A29_FONSI.pdf | ||
| Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-084P.pdf | ||
| Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-087P.pdf | ||
| Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-044P.pdf | ||
| Report_Uniguide_GRSM_1A29.pdf | ||
| Plans_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf | ||
| FP14_Eng.pdf | ||
| Report_SWPPP_GRSM_1A29_(draft).pdf | ||
| Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-089P.pdf | ||
| Report_Uniguide_GRSM_11(2).pdf | ||
| IFB_Solicitation_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf | ||
| Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-040P.pdf | ||
| VETS-4212_-_Form.pdf | ||
| Synopsis_NP-GRSM_11(2)_and_NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf |
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
HUSKEY GROVE ROAD CROSSOVER BRIDGE
SPUR CROSSOVER ROAD OVER WEST PRONG LPR
GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK
LW
STRUCTURE NO. 5460-086P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 6/27/12
Report prepared by: ND
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-086P
HUSKEY GROVE ROAD CROSSOVER BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/27/12
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... PRESTRESSED CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 5 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 188.6 FT (57.5 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 63.3 FT (19.3 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 33.3 FT (10.1 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 26.3 FT (8.0 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 15A6, 15A30 / 3004A SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1995-Beam #1 replaced, joint repair. 2008-bridge and approaches repaved, Beams #1, #3, & #5 repaired, west pier wall patched, joints sealed, underpass guardrail replaced
LOCATION
GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 1.83 (KM PT 2.95)
STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 2.0 MILES NORTH FROM NPS ROUTE 12
(GATLINBURG BYPASS). FACILITY CARRIED: ............ SPUR CROSSOVER ROAD
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. WEST PRONG LPR
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This prestressed concrete multi-beam bridge is in fair condition overall. The main problem is the moderate diagonal and horizontal cracking on the north face of Beam #1 in the west span; The diagonal cracks extend across the bottom flange and full height of web to the top flange. These cracks appear to have occured during vehicular impact in the past and should continue to me monitored.
Other problems include deteriorated concrete with exposed rebar on the pier walls, exposed rebar on the underside of the beams and deck, rusted anchor bolts, nuts and washers at abutments, and a lack of object markers at the bridge corners and vertical clearance signs along the underpass roadway.
Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: C.C. THRIFT, L.M. MUELLER (CLARK NEXSEN)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
C. CHRISTOPHER THRIFT, NICET LEVEL IV, FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 10/30/12
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-086P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
C226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
60.13 REPAIR AREAS OF DETERIORATED CONCRETE AND CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED
REBAR WITH APPROVED PROTECTIVE SEALANT ON PIER WALLS.
24 SF
58.1, 59.2,6 CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR ON UNDERSIDE OF DECK AND BEAMS WITH
APPROVED PROTECTIVE SEALANT.
20 SF
59.1 CLEAN ANCHOR BOLTS AND REPLACE ANCHOR NUTS AND WASHERS AT
ABUTMENTS.
1 LS
222.7 INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT PARAPET ENDS. POST
CLEARANCE SIGNS ON UNDERPASS ROADWAY.
6 EA
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ..
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that the recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
Continue to monitor cracking of Beam #1 in West Span.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-086P
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
N NOT APPLICABLE
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
58. DECK
1. DECK SLAB
2. EXPANSION JOINTS
3. WEARING SURFACE
4. RIDEABILITY
5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
8. UTILITIES
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10. OTHER
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 5
1. BEARING DEVICES F
2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS F
3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S) N
4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS N
5. TRUSSES N
6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING G
7. PAINT N
8. FASCIA(E) N
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION G
10. ALIGNMENT G
11. OTHER N
60. SUBSTRUCTURE 6
ABUTMENTS
1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS
2. PILE BENTS
3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS
5. FOUNDATIONS
6. WINGWALLS
7. WEEP HOLES
8. EXPANSION JOINTS
9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
11. SLOPE PROTECTION
12. OTHER
PIER(S)
13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
14. PILE BENTS
15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
16. FOUNDATIONS
17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
19. OTHER
F G G G F G G N G N
F N G G G G G N G G N N
F N G G G G N
58.1
58.2,3
58.5
58.6
58.7, 59.2
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
MINOR CRACKING OF DECK UNDERSIDE WITH EFFLORESCENCE
THROUGHOUT. MINOR SPALLING OF DECK UNDERSIDE IN CENTER
SPAN, BAY #4. MINOR SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR OVER
PIERS IN BAY #4, ALL SPANS.
POLYMER-MODIFIED ASPHALT EXPANSION JOINT SYSTEM. NEW
ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE INSTALLED IN 2008. MODERATE TO
SEVERE DETERIORATION OF CURB AND SIDEWALK EXPANSION
JOINT FILLER MATERIAL.
MINOR TO MODERATE SCALING AND FLAKING OF FINISH COAT ON
CURBS AND SIDEWALKS.
MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON PARAPETS. MINOR
VEHICLE SCRAPES ON NORTH RAILING, EAST SPAN. NORTH
RAILING/PARAPET APPEARS TO HAVE SLIGHT SAGS; APPEARS TO
BE AS-BUILT. MODERATE DETERIORATION OF APPROACH
PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS.
SCUPPERS DRAIN PARTIALLY ONTO BEAMS, CAUSING STAINING
AND MINOR SCALING OF CONCRETE, PRIMARILY ON BOTTOM
FLANGES.
PREVIOUSLY NOTED MODERATE COLLISION DAMAGE TO BEAMS #1,
#3, AND #5 IN WEST SPAN HAS BEEN PATCHED IN THE PAST;
UNABLE TO VERIFY CONDITION OF FORMERLY EXPOSED AND
SEVERED PRESTRESSING STRANDS.
BEAM #1 OF EAST SPAN HAS TWO AREAS OF EXPOSED REBAR ON
BOTTOM FLANGE NEAR EAST ABUTMENT DUE TO INSUFFICIENT
COVER. BEAM #5 OF EAST SPAN HAS ONE AREA OF EXPOSED
REBAR IN BOTTOM FLANGE NEAR EAST ABUTMENT DUE TO
INSUFFICIENT COVER.
BEAM #1 OF WEST SPAN HAS SEVERAL MINOR TO MODERATE
DIAGONAL CRACKS ON NORTH FACE EXTENDING TO BOTTOM FACE
OF BOTTOM FLANGE; CRACKS END AT TOP FILLET AND RUN
LONGITUDINALLY. LONGITUDINAL CRACKS ALONG TOP FLANGE
FILLET FULL LENGTH BETWEEN INTERMEDIATE DIAPHRAGMS ON
BAY #1 AND EXTERIOR FACES. TWO EXPOSED REBARS ON
UNDERSIDE OF BEAM #5 IN WEST SPAN NEAR WEST PIER.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-086P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.
ALIGNMENT1.
61. CHANNEL 7
G G G G N
MED
SUFF
15 FT.
STONES, SILT
222. APPROACHES 8
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT 8.
SIGNS7.
SETTLEMENT 6.
EROSION5.
SURFACING4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
2. RELIEF JOINTS
APPROACH SLABS1. N
N N G G G N G N
223. RETAINING WALL N
OTHER 6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.
FOUNDATION3.
WEEP HOLES2.
1. WALL
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.
APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.
TRANSITIONSB.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1
N N N
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
59.1 MODERATE TO SEVERE RUSTING OF ANCHOR BOLTS, WASHERS
AND NUTS AT ABUTMENTS. ALL ROCKERS EXCEPT EAST EXTERIOR
ARE FULLY CONTRACTED. ALL BEARINGS AT WEST ABUTMENT
ARE FULLY CONTRACTED EXCEPT FOR BEARING #1.
59.6 MINOR RANDOM CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON
DIAPHRAGMS.
60.1 WATER STAINING AND MINOR SCALING OF ABUTMENT
BREASTWALLS BELOW WEEP HOLES. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING
OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS. MINOR DELAMINATION (10 SF) WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL, NORTH END.
MODERATE DELAMINATION AND SPALLING (8 SF X 1"D) WITH
EXPOSED REBAR ON EAST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL BELOW BAY
#1.
60.4 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF WEST ABUTMENT BACKWALL.
60.5,9 TOP 6" OF FOOTING EXPOSED FOR FULL LENGTH AT EAST
ABUTMENT.
60.6 MINOR TO MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH ON WINGWALLS.
60.13 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF PIER WALLS WITH
EFFLORESCENCE. SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON NORTHWEST
FACE OF WEST PIER.
MODERATE AREAS OF DELAMINATION AND SPALLING (24 SF TOTAL
X 1"D) WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON EAST PIER, EAST FACE. MINOR
TO MODERATE SCALING ON EAST PIER AT WATERLINE. MODERATE
VEGETATION GROWTH ON WEST PIER, EAST FACE.
60.15 MINOR CONCRETE DETERIORATION AND STAINING OF PIER CAPS
DUE TO LEAKAGE THROUGH JOINTS. MODERATE ACCUMULATION
OF DEBRIS ON WEST PIER BEARING SEAT.
222.4 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACK IN APPROACH PAVEMENT OVER FREE
ENDS OF APPROACH SLABS.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-086P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 20 18 27 24
HS 25 23 34 31
TYPE 3 22 20 30 27
TYPE 3S2 31 28 43 39
TYPE 3-3 38 34 52 47
DESIGN LOADING: H20 (M18)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-086P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... HUSKEY GROVE ROAD CROSSOVER BR
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-086P
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 11
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 086P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. S. DIST.
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 15A6, 15A30
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 3004A
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..
474 - TENNESSEE (TN)
155 - SEVIER
161000110
WEST PRONG LPR
SPUR CROSSOVER ROAD
5460086P0000000
2.0 MILES NORTH FROM NPS
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
1.83 (KM PT 2.95)
N/A
3 - FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER
63.3 FT (19.3 M)
188.6 FT (57.5 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 4 - H20 (M18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 25.0 TONS (23.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 4 - POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 34.0 TONS (31.0 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/12 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
o
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-086P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°44'59.50"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°31'19.80"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 5 MI (8 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 6 - HIGHWAY-WATERWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 12.0 FT (3.7 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 26.3 FT (8.0 M)
(52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 33.3 FT (10.1 M)
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 36.0 FT (11.0 M)
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 26.0 FT (7.9 M)
LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 5.0 FT (1.5 M)
RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 5.0 FT (1.5 M)
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °
(35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 26.3 FT (8.0 M)
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT : ...................................... 2.5 FT (0.8 M)
RIGHT : ................................... 2.5 FT (0.8 M)
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET
MATERIAL: .............................. 6 - ALUMINUM
DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 3.08 FT (0.94 M)
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 14.42 FT (4.40 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
8 - Stable; scour above top of fo
1 - MAINTENANCE
C - MODERATE
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1995-Beam #1 replaced, joint repair. 2008-bridge and approaches repaved, Beams #1, #3, & #5 repaired, west pier wall patched, joints sealed, underpass guardrail replaced
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
http:83�31'19.80 http:35�44'59.50
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-086P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-086P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING EAST TOWARD NORTHBOUND U.S. 441
FLOW
PHOTO #2 - SOUTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW
LOOKING WEST
PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF
CURB AND SIDEWALK EXPANSION JOINT
FILLER MATERIAL; SOUTH CURB AND
SIDEWALK OVER EAST ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL SCALING AND FLAKING OF FINISH COAT ON
CURBS AND SIDEWALKS; NORTH CURB IN WEST SPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #6 - VEHICLE SCRAPES ON NORTH RAILING, EAST SPAN
PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACK IN
APPROACH PAVEMENT OVER FREE ENDS OF
APPROACH SLABS; EAST APPROACH SHOWN
PHOTO #8 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW
LOOKING WEST, EAST SPAN
PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF DECK UNDERSIDE WITH
EFFLORESCENCE; BAYS #3 AND #4 IN CENTER SPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL ROCKER BEARING FULLY CONTRACTED; BEAM
#5 BEARING AT WEST ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE TYPICAL RUSTING OF
ANCHOR BOLTS, WASHERS, AND NUTS AT ABUTMENTS
PHOTO #11 - GENERAL VIEW OF BEAM #1 IN WEST SPAN; DIAGONAL
CRACKS ON NORTH FACE EXTENDING TO BOTTOM FACE OF BOTTOM
FLANGE; ALSO NOTE LONGITUDINAL CRACKS ALONG TOP FLANGE
PHOTO #12 - DIAGONAL CRACK IN BOTTOM FLANGE OF BEAM #1,
WEST SPAN; CRACK EXTENDS DIAGONALLY UP WEB TO TOP FLANGE
FILLET
PHOTO #13 - DIAGONAL CRACKS ON NORTH FACE OF BEAM #1
EXTEND TO BOTTOM FACE OF BOTTOM FLANGE; CRACKS END AT TOP
FILLET AND RUN LONGITUDINAL ALONG THE TOP FLANGE COPE
PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL RANDOM CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON
DIAPHRAGMS; BAY #4 END DIAPHRAGM IN EAST SPAN AT EAST
ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE CRACKING OF DECK UNDERSIDE
PHOTO #15 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST ABUTMENT
PHOTO #16 - DELAMINATION AND SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR
ON EAST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL BELOW BAY #1
PHOTO #17 - FOOTING EXPOSED AT EAST ABUTMENT; ALSO NOTE
TYPICAL WATER STAINING AND SCALING OF BREASTWALL BELOW
WEEP HOLES
PHOTO #18 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST PIER, EAST FACE
PHOTO #19 - TYPICAL DELAMINATION AND
SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON EAST
PIER, EAST FACE; SOUTH END SHOWN
PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL DELAMINATION OF
EAST PIER, EAST FACE; BELOW BEAMS #3
AND #4 AT TOP SHOWN
PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL SCALING OF EAST PIER AT WATERLINE; EAST
FACE OF SHOWN
PHOTO #22 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL
PHOTO #23 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .