Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-040P.pdf

PDF 3 MB Posted

Attached to
Great Smoky Mountains National Park Projects Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
DTFH71-17-B-00007
Issued by
Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration

About this file

Report_Bridge Inspection_5460-040P

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Great Smoky Mountains National Park Projects, newest first.
File Type Posted
Results_of_Bid_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf PDF
Amendment_0001_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf PDF
Report_Pavement_Newfound_Gap_Road.pdf PDF
ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc DOC document
Report_NEPA_GRSM_11(2)_CE.pdf PDF
Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-086P.pdf PDF
Plans_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf PDF
FP14_Eng.pdf PDF
Report_SWPPP_GRSM_1A29_(draft).pdf PDF
Report_NEPA_GRSM_1A29_FONSI.pdf PDF
Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-084P.pdf PDF
Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-087P.pdf PDF
Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-044P.pdf PDF
Report_Uniguide_GRSM_1A29.pdf PDF
Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-089P.pdf PDF
Report_Uniguide_GRSM_11(2).pdf PDF
IFB_Solicitation_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf PDF
VETS-4212_-_Form.pdf PDF
Synopsis_NP-GRSM_11(2)_and_NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf PDF
Show all 19

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

GATLINBURG BYPASS BRIDGE #1

GATLINBURG BYPASS OVER WEST PRONG LPR

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK

LN

STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 5/9/14

Report prepared by: WU

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P

GATLINBURG BYPASS BRIDGE #1 INSPECTION DATE: 5/9/14

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 230.0 FT (70.1 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 90.0 FT (27.4 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 36.0 FT (11.0 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 15A13, 15A28 / 4006 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 30 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1996-EXPANSION JOINTS RESEALED, POLYMER-MODIFIED ASPHALT EXPANSION JOINT

SYSTEM INSTALLED. 2012-NEW ASPHALT OVERLAY.

LOCATION

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 3.60 (KM PT 5.79)

STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 0.1 MILES NORTH FROM NPS ROUTE 10

(NEWFOUND GAP ROAD). FACILITY CARRIED: ............ GATLINBURG BYPASS

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. WEST PRONG LPR

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete box girder bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include deterioration of the approach parapet masonry mortar joints, a lack of object markers on the approach parapets and on structure at underpass roadway, and vehicle scrapes on the underside of the box girders. Other problems include vegetation growth on the wingwalls and debris accumulation in the deck drains.

The condition of the previously deteriorated expansion joints cannot be verified due to new asphalt overlay placed in 2012.

Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: J. REISINGER, B. HENRY (GANNETT FLEMING)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

JASON REISINGER, FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW :

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 9/30/14

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

222.7 INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT BRIDGE APPROACHES AS

NECESSARY. POST VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS AND INSTALL TYPE 3

REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT CORNERS OF STRUCTURE AT UNDERPASS

1 LS

58.2 REPLACE SIDEWALK EXPANSION JOINT SEALANT. 32 LF

60.6 REMOVE VEGETATION GROWTH FROM WINGWALLS. 1 LS

58.7 REMOVE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION FROM DRAINS. 1 LS

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE

9 EXCELLENT CONDITION

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

58. DECK 7

1. DECK SLAB G

2. EXPANSION JOINTS P

3. WEARING SURFACE G

4. RIDEABILITY G

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN G

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS G

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE F

8. UTILITIES N

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION G

10. OTHER N

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 6

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10. ALIGNMENT

11. OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

2. PILE BENTS

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

5. FOUNDATIONS

6. WINGWALLS

7. WEEP HOLES

8. EXPANSION JOINTS

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

11. SLOPE PROTECTION

12. OTHER (UTILITY CONDUIT)

PIER(S)

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

14. PILE BENTS

15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

16. FOUNDATIONS

17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19. OTHER (CORRUG. PIPE CULVERT)

N F N N N G N N G G N

G N G N N G F N G G G G

F N N N G G F

58.1,3

58.2

58.5

58.6

58.7

59.2

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE ADDED IN 1996; MINOR CRACKING OF

CONCRETE DECK WAS NOTED DURING PRIOR INSPECTION.

WEARING SURFACE HAS BEEN REPAVED WITH ASPHALT SINCE

LAST INSPECTION. MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF WEARING

SURFACE OVER NORTH ABUTMENT EXPANSION JOINT.

MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS AT PIERS.

EXPANSION JOINTS RESEALED AND POLYMER-MODIFIED ASPHALT

EXPANSION JOINT SYSTEM INSTALLED IN 1996; PAVED OVER WITH

ASPHALT SINCE LAST INSPECTION.

SEVERE DETERIORATION OF SIDEWALK EXPANSION JOINT

SEALANT AT BOTH ABUTMENTS WITH VEGETATION GROWING

THROUGH JOINTS.

MINOR SPALLING OF FINISH COAT ON SIDEWALKS. MINOR

CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SIDEWALKS AT

APPROACHES.

MINOR TO MODERATE MOSS GROWTH ON PARAPETS

THROUGHOUT. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF CONCRETE

PARAPETS WITH EFFLORESCENCE. CRACKED STONE IN WEST

PARAPET AT SOUTH DECK END. MASONRY PARAPETS AT BOTH

APPROACHES; MORTAR BETWEEN MASONRY STONES CRACKING

AND LOOSE.

MODERATE ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IN DECK DRAIN GRATING.

MINOR TO MODERATE TRANSVERSE CRACKING ON UNDERSIDE OF

BOX GIRDER THROUGHOUT; WATER LEAKAGE AND RUST STAINS

NEAR MIDDLE OF CENTER SPAN. SEVERAL AREAS OF MINOR

HONEYCOMBING ALSO PRESENT. VEHICLE SCRAPES ON

UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER, SOUTH SPAN.

MINOR ACCUMULATION OF SOIL ON FLOOR OF BOX GIRDER

INTERIOR. EXPOSED FORM TIES ON DECK UNDERSIDE ON BOX

GIRDER INTERIOR.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

ALIGNMENT1.

61. CHANNEL 7

G G G G N

MED

SUFF

28 FT.

ROCK, SAND, STONES

222. APPROACHES 8

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

2. RELIEF JOINTS

APPROACH SLABS1. N

N G G G G N G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.

APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.

TRANSITIONSB.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

59.6 MINOR TOP CORNER SPALL ON INTERIOR OF CELL #4 OF SOUTH

SPAN AT INTERSECTION OF DIAPHRAGM AND WEB HAUNCH.

60.1 MODERATE STAINING ON BREASTWALLS DUE TO LEAKAGE

THROUGH JOINTS AT BOTH ABUTMENTS. TWO MINOR VERTICAL

CRACKS (UP TO 1/16" W X FULL HEIGHT) ON SOUTH ABUTMENT

BREASTWALL, ONE WITH EFFLORESCENCE. MINOR VEGETATION

GROWTH ON NORTH ABUTMENT, EAST SIDE.

60.6 MINOR CRACKING ON WINGWALL MORTAR JOINTS WITH LIGHT

EFFLORESCENCE FROM CRACKS. MODERATE VEGETATION

GROWTH ON WINGWALLS.

60.7 MODERATE FILL LOSS FROM WEEP HOLES; SEVERAL WEEP HOLES

PARTIALLY CLOGGED.

60.11 GROUTED STONE SLOPE PAVING ON SOUTH FACE OF SOUTH PIER.

60.12 UTILITY CONDUIT IN GOOD CONDITION IN CELL #4 OF SOUTH SPAN.

60.13 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING AND STAINING ON PIERS. MODERATE

SCALING ON SOUTH FACE OF NORTH PIER.

60.19 MODERATE CRUSHING OF CORRUGATED PIPE CULVERTS NEAR

NORTH PIER.

61.2,3 GROUTED ROCK WALL ALONG NORTH CHANNEL BANK TO

SUPPORT GRAVEL ROAD; MINOR SCOUR ALONG BOTTOM OF WALL.

CLASS 3 RIPRAP IN PLACE ALONG CHANNEL FACE OF SOUTH PIER.

222.3 STEEL-BACKED TIMBER GUARDRAIL AT WEST SIDE OF NORTH

APPROACH.

222.4 REPAVED WITH ASPHALT IN 2012.

222.7 TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS MISSING AT BRIDGE

CORNERS ALONG UNDERPASS ROAD OR OVERPASS ROAD.

VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS MISSING ON UNDERPASS ROAD.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 25 23

HS 21 19 35 32

TYPE 3 20 18 34 31

TYPE 3S2 25 23 41 37

TYPE 3-3 28 25 46 42

DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 474 - TENNESSEE (TN)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... GATLINBURG BYPASS BRIDGE #1 (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 155 - SEVIER

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-040P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 12 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... WEST PRONG LPR

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 040P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. GATLINBURG BYPASS

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5460040P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 0.1 MILES NORTH FROM NPS

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. N. DIST. (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 15A13, 15A28 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 3.60 (KM PT 5.79)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 4006 (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

06 - BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD

90.0 FT (27.4 M)

230.0 FT (70.1 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 21.0 TONS (19.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 35.0 TONS (31.8 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 5/14 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°41'43.40"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°31'48.80"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 5 MI (8 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 4.0 FT (1.2 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

(52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 36.0 FT (11.0 M)

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 34.0 FT (10.4 M)

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 24.0 FT (7.3 M)

LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 5.0 FT (1.5 M)

RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 5.0 FT (1.5 M)

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 30 °

(35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT : ...................................... 2.8 FT (0.9 M)

RIGHT : ................................... 2.8 FT (0.9 M)

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET

MATERIAL: .............................. 6 - ALUMINUM

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 3.50 FT (1.07 M)

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 14.42 FT (4.40 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1111

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

8 - Stable; scour above top of fo

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1996-EXPANSION JOINTS RESEALED, POLYMER-MODIFIED ASPHALT EXPANSION JOINT SYSTEM INSTALLED. 2012-NEW ASPHALT

OVERLAY.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

CONFINED SPACE ENTRY PERMIT REQUIRED TO ENTER CONCRETE BOX. NORTH SPAN ACCESS HATCH ACCESSIBLE WITH 22' TELESCOPING MULTI-POSITION LADDER AND 9/16" SOCKET WRENCH. UBIV NEEDED FOR OTHER HATCHES.

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

http:83�31'48.80 http:35�41'43.40

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD GATLINBURG

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - EAST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW

LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #4 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF

WEARING SURFACE OVER NORTH ABUTMENT

EXPANSION JOINT

PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

SIDEWALK EXPANSION SEALANT, EAST

SIDEWALK OVER NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN;

NOTE TYPICAL VEGETATION GROWING

THROUGH JOINTS

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON SIDEWALKS AT

APPROACHES, DOWNSTREAM SIDEWALK AT

NORTH APPROACH SHOWN

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL MOSS GROWTH ON PARAPETS THROUGHOUT,

WEST PARAPET IN NORTH SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL MORTAR BETWEEN APPROACH PARAPET

MASONRY STONES CRACKING AND LOOSE, NORTHEAST CORNER

SHOWN

PHOTO #9 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH, CENTER

SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #10 - VEHICLE SCRAPES ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER,

SOUTH SPAN

PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING ON UNDERSIDE OF

BOX GIRDER, NORTH SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #12 - GENERAL VIEW OF BOX GIRDER INTERIOR LOOKING

NORTH, CELL #2 IN SOUTH SPAN

PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF SOIL ON FLOOR OF BOX

GIRDER INTERIOR, CELL #2 IN SOUTH SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #14 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE TYPICAL

VEGETATION GROWTH ON WINGWALLS

PHOTO #15 - VERTICAL CRACKS ON SOUTH

ABUTMENT BREASTWALL; ALSO NOTE

TYPICAL STAINING

PHOTO #16 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PIER,

SOUTH FACE

PHOTO #17 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL

PHOTO #18 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL

PHOTO #19 - GENERAL VIEW OF GROUTED ROCK WALL ALONG

NORTH CHANNEL BANK; NOTE SCOUR ALONG BOTTOM OF WALL

PHOTO #20 - CRUSHING OF CORRUGATED PIPE CULVERTS NEAR

NORTH PIER

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .