Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-040P.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Great Smoky Mountains National Park Projects Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- DTFH71-17-B-00007
About this file
Report_Bridge Inspection_5460-040P
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Results_of_Bid_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf | ||
| Amendment_0001_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf | ||
| Report_Pavement_Newfound_Gap_Road.pdf | ||
| ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc | DOC document | |
| Report_NEPA_GRSM_11(2)_CE.pdf | ||
| Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-086P.pdf | ||
| Plans_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf | ||
| FP14_Eng.pdf | ||
| Report_SWPPP_GRSM_1A29_(draft).pdf | ||
| Report_NEPA_GRSM_1A29_FONSI.pdf | ||
| Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-084P.pdf | ||
| Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-087P.pdf | ||
| Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-044P.pdf | ||
| Report_Uniguide_GRSM_1A29.pdf | ||
| Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-089P.pdf | ||
| Report_Uniguide_GRSM_11(2).pdf | ||
| IFB_Solicitation_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf | ||
| VETS-4212_-_Form.pdf | ||
| Synopsis_NP-GRSM_11(2)_and_NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf |
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
GATLINBURG BYPASS BRIDGE #1
GATLINBURG BYPASS OVER WEST PRONG LPR
GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK
LN
STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 5/9/14
Report prepared by: WU
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P
GATLINBURG BYPASS BRIDGE #1 INSPECTION DATE: 5/9/14
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 230.0 FT (70.1 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 90.0 FT (27.4 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 36.0 FT (11.0 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 15A13, 15A28 / 4006 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 30 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1996-EXPANSION JOINTS RESEALED, POLYMER-MODIFIED ASPHALT EXPANSION JOINT
SYSTEM INSTALLED. 2012-NEW ASPHALT OVERLAY.
LOCATION
GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 3.60 (KM PT 5.79)
STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 0.1 MILES NORTH FROM NPS ROUTE 10
(NEWFOUND GAP ROAD). FACILITY CARRIED: ............ GATLINBURG BYPASS
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. WEST PRONG LPR
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This concrete box girder bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include deterioration of the approach parapet masonry mortar joints, a lack of object markers on the approach parapets and on structure at underpass roadway, and vehicle scrapes on the underside of the box girders. Other problems include vegetation growth on the wingwalls and debris accumulation in the deck drains.
The condition of the previously deteriorated expansion joints cannot be verified due to new asphalt overlay placed in 2012.
Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: J. REISINGER, B. HENRY (GANNETT FLEMING)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
JASON REISINGER, FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW :
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 9/30/14
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
222.7 INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT BRIDGE APPROACHES AS
NECESSARY. POST VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS AND INSTALL TYPE 3
REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT CORNERS OF STRUCTURE AT UNDERPASS
1 LS
58.2 REPLACE SIDEWALK EXPANSION JOINT SEALANT. 32 LF
60.6 REMOVE VEGETATION GROWTH FROM WINGWALLS. 1 LS
58.7 REMOVE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION FROM DRAINS. 1 LS
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ..
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
N NOT APPLICABLE
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
58. DECK 7
1. DECK SLAB G
2. EXPANSION JOINTS P
3. WEARING SURFACE G
4. RIDEABILITY G
5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN G
6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS G
7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE F
8. UTILITIES N
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION G
10. OTHER N
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 6
1. BEARING DEVICES
2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS
3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
5. TRUSSES
6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
7. PAINT
8. FASCIA(E)
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10. ALIGNMENT
11. OTHER
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
ABUTMENTS
1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS
2. PILE BENTS
3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS
5. FOUNDATIONS
6. WINGWALLS
7. WEEP HOLES
8. EXPANSION JOINTS
9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
11. SLOPE PROTECTION
12. OTHER (UTILITY CONDUIT)
PIER(S)
13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
14. PILE BENTS
15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
16. FOUNDATIONS
17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
19. OTHER (CORRUG. PIPE CULVERT)
N F N N N G N N G G N
G N G N N G F N G G G G
F N N N G G F
58.1,3
58.2
58.5
58.6
58.7
59.2
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE ADDED IN 1996; MINOR CRACKING OF
CONCRETE DECK WAS NOTED DURING PRIOR INSPECTION.
WEARING SURFACE HAS BEEN REPAVED WITH ASPHALT SINCE
LAST INSPECTION. MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF WEARING
SURFACE OVER NORTH ABUTMENT EXPANSION JOINT.
MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON
UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS AT PIERS.
EXPANSION JOINTS RESEALED AND POLYMER-MODIFIED ASPHALT
EXPANSION JOINT SYSTEM INSTALLED IN 1996; PAVED OVER WITH
ASPHALT SINCE LAST INSPECTION.
SEVERE DETERIORATION OF SIDEWALK EXPANSION JOINT
SEALANT AT BOTH ABUTMENTS WITH VEGETATION GROWING
THROUGH JOINTS.
MINOR SPALLING OF FINISH COAT ON SIDEWALKS. MINOR
CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SIDEWALKS AT
APPROACHES.
MINOR TO MODERATE MOSS GROWTH ON PARAPETS
THROUGHOUT. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF CONCRETE
PARAPETS WITH EFFLORESCENCE. CRACKED STONE IN WEST
PARAPET AT SOUTH DECK END. MASONRY PARAPETS AT BOTH
APPROACHES; MORTAR BETWEEN MASONRY STONES CRACKING
AND LOOSE.
MODERATE ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS IN DECK DRAIN GRATING.
MINOR TO MODERATE TRANSVERSE CRACKING ON UNDERSIDE OF
BOX GIRDER THROUGHOUT; WATER LEAKAGE AND RUST STAINS
NEAR MIDDLE OF CENTER SPAN. SEVERAL AREAS OF MINOR
HONEYCOMBING ALSO PRESENT. VEHICLE SCRAPES ON
UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER, SOUTH SPAN.
MINOR ACCUMULATION OF SOIL ON FLOOR OF BOX GIRDER
INTERIOR. EXPOSED FORM TIES ON DECK UNDERSIDE ON BOX
GIRDER INTERIOR.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.
ALIGNMENT1.
61. CHANNEL 7
G G G G N
MED
SUFF
28 FT.
ROCK, SAND, STONES
222. APPROACHES 8
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT 8.
SIGNS7.
SETTLEMENT 6.
EROSION5.
SURFACING4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
2. RELIEF JOINTS
APPROACH SLABS1. N
N G G G G N G N
223. RETAINING WALL N
OTHER 6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.
FOUNDATION3.
WEEP HOLES2.
1. WALL
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.
APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.
TRANSITIONSB.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
59.6 MINOR TOP CORNER SPALL ON INTERIOR OF CELL #4 OF SOUTH
SPAN AT INTERSECTION OF DIAPHRAGM AND WEB HAUNCH.
60.1 MODERATE STAINING ON BREASTWALLS DUE TO LEAKAGE
THROUGH JOINTS AT BOTH ABUTMENTS. TWO MINOR VERTICAL
CRACKS (UP TO 1/16" W X FULL HEIGHT) ON SOUTH ABUTMENT
BREASTWALL, ONE WITH EFFLORESCENCE. MINOR VEGETATION
GROWTH ON NORTH ABUTMENT, EAST SIDE.
60.6 MINOR CRACKING ON WINGWALL MORTAR JOINTS WITH LIGHT
EFFLORESCENCE FROM CRACKS. MODERATE VEGETATION
GROWTH ON WINGWALLS.
60.7 MODERATE FILL LOSS FROM WEEP HOLES; SEVERAL WEEP HOLES
PARTIALLY CLOGGED.
60.11 GROUTED STONE SLOPE PAVING ON SOUTH FACE OF SOUTH PIER.
60.12 UTILITY CONDUIT IN GOOD CONDITION IN CELL #4 OF SOUTH SPAN.
60.13 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING AND STAINING ON PIERS. MODERATE
SCALING ON SOUTH FACE OF NORTH PIER.
60.19 MODERATE CRUSHING OF CORRUGATED PIPE CULVERTS NEAR
NORTH PIER.
61.2,3 GROUTED ROCK WALL ALONG NORTH CHANNEL BANK TO
SUPPORT GRAVEL ROAD; MINOR SCOUR ALONG BOTTOM OF WALL.
CLASS 3 RIPRAP IN PLACE ALONG CHANNEL FACE OF SOUTH PIER.
222.3 STEEL-BACKED TIMBER GUARDRAIL AT WEST SIDE OF NORTH
APPROACH.
222.4 REPAVED WITH ASPHALT IN 2012.
222.7 TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS MISSING AT BRIDGE
CORNERS ALONG UNDERPASS ROAD OR OVERPASS ROAD.
VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS MISSING ON UNDERPASS ROAD.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 15 14 25 23
HS 21 19 35 32
TYPE 3 20 18 34 31
TYPE 3S2 25 23 41 37
TYPE 3-3 28 25 46 42
DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 474 - TENNESSEE (TN)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... GATLINBURG BYPASS BRIDGE #1 (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 155 - SEVIER
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-040P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 12 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... WEST PRONG LPR
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 040P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. GATLINBURG BYPASS
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5460040P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 0.1 MILES NORTH FROM NPS
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. N. DIST. (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 15A13, 15A28 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 3.60 (KM PT 5.79)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 4006 (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS
06 - BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD
90.0 FT (27.4 M)
230.0 FT (70.1 M)
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 21.0 TONS (19.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 35.0 TONS (31.8 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 5/14 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°41'43.40"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°31'48.80"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 5 MI (8 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 4.0 FT (1.2 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)
(52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 36.0 FT (11.0 M)
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 34.0 FT (10.4 M)
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 24.0 FT (7.3 M)
LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 5.0 FT (1.5 M)
RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 5.0 FT (1.5 M)
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 30 °
(35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 28.0 FT (8.5 M)
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT : ...................................... 2.8 FT (0.9 M)
RIGHT : ................................... 2.8 FT (0.9 M)
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET
MATERIAL: .............................. 6 - ALUMINUM
DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 3.50 FT (1.07 M)
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 14.42 FT (4.40 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1111
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
8 - Stable; scour above top of fo
1 - MAINTENANCE
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1996-EXPANSION JOINTS RESEALED, POLYMER-MODIFIED ASPHALT EXPANSION JOINT SYSTEM INSTALLED. 2012-NEW ASPHALT
OVERLAY.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
CONFINED SPACE ENTRY PERMIT REQUIRED TO ENTER CONCRETE BOX. NORTH SPAN ACCESS HATCH ACCESSIBLE WITH 22' TELESCOPING MULTI-POSITION LADDER AND 9/16" SOCKET WRENCH. UBIV NEEDED FOR OTHER HATCHES.
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
http:83�31'48.80 http:35�41'43.40
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-040P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD GATLINBURG
FLOW
PHOTO #2 - EAST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW
LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #4 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF
WEARING SURFACE OVER NORTH ABUTMENT
EXPANSION JOINT
PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF
SIDEWALK EXPANSION SEALANT, EAST
SIDEWALK OVER NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN;
NOTE TYPICAL VEGETATION GROWING
THROUGH JOINTS
PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON SIDEWALKS AT
APPROACHES, DOWNSTREAM SIDEWALK AT
NORTH APPROACH SHOWN
PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL MOSS GROWTH ON PARAPETS THROUGHOUT,
WEST PARAPET IN NORTH SPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL MORTAR BETWEEN APPROACH PARAPET
MASONRY STONES CRACKING AND LOOSE, NORTHEAST CORNER
SHOWN
PHOTO #9 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH, CENTER
SPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #10 - VEHICLE SCRAPES ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER,
SOUTH SPAN
PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING ON UNDERSIDE OF
BOX GIRDER, NORTH SPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #12 - GENERAL VIEW OF BOX GIRDER INTERIOR LOOKING
NORTH, CELL #2 IN SOUTH SPAN
PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF SOIL ON FLOOR OF BOX
GIRDER INTERIOR, CELL #2 IN SOUTH SPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #14 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE TYPICAL
VEGETATION GROWTH ON WINGWALLS
PHOTO #15 - VERTICAL CRACKS ON SOUTH
ABUTMENT BREASTWALL; ALSO NOTE
TYPICAL STAINING
PHOTO #16 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PIER,
SOUTH FACE
PHOTO #17 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL
PHOTO #18 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL
PHOTO #19 - GENERAL VIEW OF GROUTED ROCK WALL ALONG
NORTH CHANNEL BANK; NOTE SCOUR ALONG BOTTOM OF WALL
PHOTO #20 - CRUSHING OF CORRUGATED PIPE CULVERTS NEAR
NORTH PIER
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .