Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-084P.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Great Smoky Mountains National Park Projects Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- DTFH71-17-B-00007
About this file
Report_Bridge Inspection_5460-084P
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Results_of_Bid_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf | ||
| Amendment_0001_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf | ||
| Report_Pavement_Newfound_Gap_Road.pdf | ||
| ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc | DOC document | |
| Report_NEPA_GRSM_11(2)_CE.pdf | ||
| Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-089P.pdf | ||
| Report_Uniguide_GRSM_11(2).pdf | ||
| IFB_Solicitation_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf | ||
| Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-040P.pdf | ||
| VETS-4212_-_Form.pdf | ||
| Report_NEPA_GRSM_1A29_FONSI.pdf | ||
| Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-087P.pdf | ||
| Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-044P.pdf | ||
| Report_Uniguide_GRSM_1A29.pdf | ||
| Report_Bridge_Inspection_5460-086P.pdf | ||
| Plans_-_NP-GRSM_11(2) _NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf | ||
| FP14_Eng.pdf | ||
| Report_SWPPP_GRSM_1A29_(draft).pdf | ||
| Synopsis_NP-GRSM_11(2)_and_NP-GRSM_1A29.pdf |
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
GUM STAND ROAD CROSSOVER BRIDGE
SPUR CROSSOVER ROAD OVER WEST PRONG LPR
GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK
LE
STRUCTURE NO. 5460-084P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 6/27/12
Report prepared by: ND
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-084P
GUM STAND ROAD CROSSOVER BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/27/12
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... PRESTRESSED CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 5 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 187.6 FT (57.2 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 63.1 FT (19.2 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 33.0 FT (10.1 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 26.0 FT (7.9 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 15A6 / 3003A SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2008-WEARING SURFACE INSTALLED. APPROACHES REPAVED. 2012-EXPANSION JOINTS
OVER PIERS RESEALED.
LOCATION
GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 1.21 (KM PT 1.95)
STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 3.3 MILES NORTH FROM NPS ROUTE 12
(GATLINBURG BYPASS). FACILITY CARRIED: ............ SPUR CROSSOVER ROAD
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. WEST PRONG LPR
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This prestressed concrete multi-beam bridge is in fair to good condition overall. The main problem is scour occuring at the west pier with portions of exposed footing. Other problems include exposed rebar on the abutment breastwalls and pier walls, drift accumulation in the downstream channel, exposed rebar on the underside of Beam #5 in the west span, and soil and debris accumulation on the caps.
Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: C.C. THRIFT, L.M. MUELLER (CLARK NEXSEN)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
C. CHRISTOPHER THRIFT, NICET LEVEL IV, FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 10/30/12
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-084P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
60.1,13,15 CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR ON ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS, EAST FACE
OF EAST PIER WALL, AND TWO AREAS ON EAST PIER CAP WITH APPROVED
PROTECTIVE COATING.
70 SF
60.17 PLACE ENGINEERED RIPRAP ALONG EXPOSED AREAS OF WEST PIER FOOTING. 10 CY
61.4 REMOVE DRIFT ACCUMULATION IN DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL. 1 LS
59.2, 60.1 CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR ON UNDERSIDE OF BEAM #5, WEST SPAN. 1 LS
60.15 PERIODICALLY REMOVE SOIL AND DEBRIS FROM CAPS. 1 LS
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ..
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-084P
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
N
58. DECK
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER
ALIGNMENT
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
FASCIA(E)
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
TRUSSES
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
GIRDERS OR BEAMS
BEARING DEVICES
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
OTHER
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
UTILITIES
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
RIDEABILITY
WEARING SURFACE
EXPANSION JOINTS
DECK SLAB
OTHER
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
FOUNDATIONS
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
PILE BENTS
WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
PIER(S)
OTHER
SLOPE PROTECTION
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
EXPANSION JOINTS
WEEP HOLES
WINGWALLS
FOUNDATIONS
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
PILE BENTS
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS
ABUTMENTS
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
10.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
PAINT
11.
F G N N N G N N G
N G
F N G G N G G N G G N N
G N F G F G N
11.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
58.1 MINOR CRACKING OF DECK UNDERSIDE IN BAYS #1 AND #4 AT
PIERS.
58.2 DECK EXPANSION JOINTS RESEALED AND POLYMER-MODIFIED
ASPHALT EXPANSION JOINT SYSTEM OVER PIERS. MINOR FULL
WIDTH TRANSVERSE CRACK IN WEARING SURFACE OVER EAST
ABUTMENT; FULL WIDTH OF WESTBOUND LANE OVER WEST
ABUTMENT.
MINOR DETERIORATION OF SIDEWALK AND PARAPET EXPANSION
JOINT FILLER.
58.3 MINOR POTHOLE DEVELOPMENT IN EASTBOUND LANE OVER WEST
PIER.
58.5,6 MINOR CRACKING AND SPALLING OF CURBS, PARAPETS, AND
SIDEWALKS WITH EFFLORESCENCE. WIDESPREAD MINOR
CRACKING OF APPROACH SIDEWALKS. MINOR DETERIORATION OF
SOME PARAPET MORTAR JOINTS AT APPROACHES. MODERATE
SCALING OF NORTH SIDEWALK, CENTER SPAN OVER EAST PIER.
MINOR COLLISION DAMAGE TO RAILINGS. NORTH RAIL DEFLECTED
SLIGHTLY TOWARD ROADWAY IN WEST SPAN. SEVERAL ANCHOR
BOLTS AND NUTS FOR RAILING SYSTEM UNDERSIZED AND NOT
GALVANIZED.
58.7 MINOR PONDING AT CURBLINES (UNABLE TO VERIFY DURING THIS
INSPECTION).
59.1 MODERATE RUSTING AND RUST SCALE ON ANCHOR BOLTS AND
NUTS. MODERATE RUSTING OF NORTH BEARINGS, BOTH PIERS; UP
TO 1/16" SECTION LOSS TO BEARINGS AT WEST PIER, CENTER
SPAN. BEARINGS AT PIERS CONTRACTED 3/4" AT TIME OF
INSPECTION.
59.2 MINOR STAINING OF GIRDERS UNDER DECK DRAINS DUE TO
INSUFFICIENT LENGTH OF SCUPPERS. APPROXIMATELY 3" LENGTH
OF EXPOSED REBAR ON BEAM #5, WEST SPAN.
G G G G G N
N
G
G
G
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-084P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.
ALIGNMENT1.
61. CHANNEL 6
G F G F N
MED
SUFF
15 FT.
ROCK
222. APPROACHES 8
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT 8.
SIGNS7.
SETTLEMENT 6.
EROSION5.
SURFACING4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
2. RELIEF JOINTS
APPROACH SLABS1. N
N N G G G N G N
223. RETAINING WALL N
OTHER 6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.
FOUNDATION3.
WEEP HOLES2.
1. WALL
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.
APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.
TRANSITIONSB.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1
N N N
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
59.6 MINOR CRACKING OF DIAPHRAGMS WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT
ISOLATED LOCATIONS.
60.1 MINOR WIDESPREAD DELAMINATION AND SHALLOW SPALLING OF
ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS, SOUTH SIDE, WITH EXPOSED REBAR
DUE TO INADEQUATE CONCRETE COVER. MINOR DELAMINATION
OF EAST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL IN OTHER LOCATIONS.
FORMWORK TIES EXPOSED AT BOTH ABUTMENTS. MINOR
VERTICAL CRACKING OF EAST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL. HEAVY
VEGETATION GROWTH ON EAST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL AND
BELOW EAST SPAN.
60.6 MINOR EFFLORESCENCE ON WINGWALLS; MINOR TO MODERATE
DETERIORATION OF MORTAR JOINTS. HEAVY VEGETATION
GROWTH ON EAST ABUTMENT WINGWALLS; VEGETATION EXTENDS
ONTO APPROACH PARAPETS.
60.9 CONCRETE FOOTING EXPOSED AT END OF NORTHEAST
WINGWALL.
60.13 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING AND MODERATE SCALING OF PIER
WALLS. MINOR SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON EAST SIDE OF
EAST PIER WALL. MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG WEST
FACE OF EAST PIER.
60.15 TWO MINOR SPALLS WITH EXPOSED REBAR DUE TO INSUFFICIENT
COVER ON EAST PIER CAP, WEST FACE. MODERATE
ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS ON CAPS.
60.16,17 PREVIOUSLY REPORTED EXPOSED FOOTING OF EAST PIER ON
NORTH SIDE HAS BEEN FILLED IN.
EXPOSED FOOTING ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF WEST PIER FOOTING
UP TO 1.7' DEEP. EAST FACE OF WEST PIER FOOTING EXPOSED UP
TO 1.7' DEEP FOR 12' STARTING FROM UPSTREAM SIDE. 17'L X 2.1'D
EXPOSED FOOTING ALONG WEST FACE STARTING FROM
DOWNSTREAM SIDE (UNABLE TO VERIFY DURING THIS INSPECTION
DUE TO WATER DEPTH). CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS INDICATE
FOOTINGS ARE FOUNDED ON BEDROCK.
61.2 LARGE SCOUR HOLE ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF WEST PIER (UNABLE
TO VERIFY DURING THIS INSPECTION). MINOR TO MODERATE
SLOUGHING OF CHANNEL BANKS. MINOR SCOUR ON NORTH SIDE
OF EAST PIER.
61.4 MINOR TO MODERATE DRIFT IN DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-084P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 20 18 33 30
HS 25 23 42 38
TYPE 3 24 22 40 36
TYPE 3S2 32 29 54 49
TYPE 3-3 39 35 65 59
DESIGN LOADING: H20 (M18)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-084P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... GUM STAND ROAD CROSSOVER BRIDG
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-084P
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 11
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 084P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. S. DIST.
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 15A6
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 3003A
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..
474 - TENNESSEE (TN)
155 - SEVIER
161000110
WEST PRONG LPR
SPUR CROSSOVER ROAD
5460084P0000000
3.3 MILES NORTH FROM NPS
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
1.21 (KM PT 1.95)
N/A
3 - FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER
63.1 FT (19.2 M)
187.6 FT (57.2 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 4 - H20 (M18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 25.0 TONS (23.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 42.0 TONS (38.1 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/12 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
o
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-084P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°45'44.80"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°31'24.40"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 10 MI (16 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 26.0 FT (7.9 M)
(52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 33.0 FT (10.1 M)
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 36.0 FT (11.0 M)
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 26.0 FT (7.9 M)
LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 5.0 FT (1.5 M)
RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 5.0 FT (1.5 M)
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °
(35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 26.0 FT (7.9 M)
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT : ...................................... 2.5 FT (0.8 M)
RIGHT : ................................... 2.5 FT (0.8 M)
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET
MATERIAL: .............................. 6 - ALUMINUM
DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 3.00 FT (0.91 M)
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
8 - Stable; scour above top of fo
1 - MAINTENANCE
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2008-WEARING SURFACE INSTALLED. APPROACHES REPAVED. 2012-EXPANSION JOINTS OVER PIERS RESEALED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
http:83�31'24.40 http:35�45'44.80
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-084P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-084P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST TOWARD SOUTHBOUND U.S. ROUTE 441
FLOW
PHOTO #2 - SOUTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW
LOOKING EAST
PHOTO #4 - POTHOLE DEVELOPMENT IN
WEARING SURFACE, EASTBOUND LANE OVER
WEST PIER
PHOTO #5 - TRANSVERSE CRACK IN WEARING
SURFACE OVER EAST ABUTMENT
PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF
PARAPET AND SIDEWALK EXPANSION JOINT
FILLER MATERIAL; SOUTH PARAPET AND
SIDEWALK OVER WEST PIER SHOWN
PHOTO #7 - SCALING OF NORTH SIDEWALK,
CENTER SPAN OVER EAST PIER
PHOTO #8 - NORTH RAIL DEFLECTED
SLIGHTLY TOWARD ROADWAY IN WEST SPAN
PHOTO #9 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST, WEST SPAN
PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF DECK UNDERSIDE IN BAYS #1
AND #4 AT PIERS; BAY #4 IN WEST SPAN AT WEST PIER SHOWN
PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL CONTRACTION OF BEARINGS AT PIERS; BEAM
#1 BEARING IN EAST SPAN AT EAST PIER SHOWN; ALSO NOT
ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS ON CAP
PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL RUSTING AND RUST SCALE ON ANCHOR BOLTS
AND NUTS; BEAM #1 BEARING AT WEST ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #13 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST
ABUTMENT
PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL DELAMINATION AND
SHALLOW SPALLING OF ABUTMENT
BREASTWALLS, SOUTH SIDE; WEST
ABUTMENT BREASTWALL SHOWN
PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL DELAMINATION AND
SHALLOW SPALLING OF ABUTMENT
BREASTWALLS, SOUTH SIDE; EAST
ABUTMENT BREASTWALL SHOWN
PHOTO #16 - VEGETATION GROWTH ON
NORTHEAST WINGWALL; VEGETATION
EXTENDS ONTO APPROACH PARAPETS.
PHOTO #17 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST PIER, WEST FACE; NOTE
VEGETATION GROWTH ON PIER WALL
PHOTO #18 - SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON EAST SIDE OF EAST
PIER WALL
PHOTO #19 - TYPICAL SCALING OF PIER WALLS; EAST SIDE OF WEST
PIER AT NORTH END SHOWN
PHOTO #20 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL
PHOTO #21 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL; NOTE DRIFT
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .