WellingtonInspection.pdf

Structure Name: Lightning Creek Route & MP: 489-0.2

USDA, FOREST SERVICE

ROUTINE ROAD BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

IDENTIFICATION and LOCATION:

Route: 489 Milepost: 0.2 Forest: Idaho Panhandle NF District: Sandpoint Feature Crossed: Lightning Creek

BRIDGE RATING SUMMARY:

Date: 9-4-14 Time Started: 730 am Time Completed: 800 am Inspection Team: Michael Brennan and Andy Cullison Weather: Sunny

Rerating required based on current inspection? Organization: Morrison - Maierle Inc.

YES NO (Circle One) Insp Team

Leader:

Signature

RECOMMENDED WORK

Reason*

/Priority** Reference

Code Description Check if Needed

Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost

09001002 Routine Bridge Inspection Yes 1 LS $700 $700 07001001 Brush Approaches Yes 1 LS $417.20 $417.20 03007005 Repair Approach Rail Yes 10 LF $141.10 $1411.00 05002007 Add Riprap Yes 20 CY $79.67 $1593.40 07003002 Repair Approach Fill Yes 1 LS $1644.60 $1644.60 08003001 Replace Object Markers Yes 1 EA $140.73 $140.73

*H = Health & Safety R = Resource Protection M = Mission **E = Emergency C = Critical N = Non critical

NO

Page __1_ of _9__

CONDITION CODES AND REMARKS

CONDITION RATING REMARKS

WEARING SURFACE G

58. DECK: 8

*1. DECK SLAB/PANELS/JOISTS G

C1. DECK JOINTS NA

C2. CURBS G

C3. SIDEWALKS NA

C4. BRIDGE RAILINGS G

C5. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE G

C6. RIDEABILITY G

C7. CLEANLINESS G

C8. UTILITIES NA

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE: 8

*1. GIRDERS 5 EA. G

A. DIAPHRAGMS G

B. BRACING G

*2. FLOOR BEAMS NA

*3. STRINGERS NA

*4. TRUSSES NA

A. CHORDS NA

B. PORTALS NA

C. VERTICALS/DIAGONAL NA

D. BRACING NA

C1. BEARING DEVICES F

C2. PAINT NA

C3. DEFLECTION UNDER LOAD NOB

C4. VIBRATION UNDERLOAD NOB

60. SUBSTRUCTURE: 6

A *1. ALIGNMENT (TIPPING, TILTING,...) F TIPPING UP TO 5%

B *2. EROSION OR SCOUR P FLOW AGAINST RIGHT ABUTMENT, RECOMMEND RIPRAP

U *3. SETTLEMENT G

T TIMBER ABUTMENTS (INCL. WW)

M *4. CAPS G

E *5. POSTS/PILES F

N *6. BACKING PLANKS G

T *7. SILLS/FOOTINGS NOB

S *8. CRIB WALLS NA

OTHER ABUTMENTS

*9. CAPS NA

*10. FOOTINGS NA

*11. WALLS NA

*12. PILES NA

*13. WINGWALLS F

P *14. ALIGNMENT (TIPING, TILTING,…) NA

I *15. EROSION OR SCOUR NA

E *16. SETTLEMENT NA

R *17. CAPS NA

S *18. COLUMNS OR WALLS NA

*19. FOOTINGS NA

*20. PILES NA

*21. BRACING NA

* Only these items are used in the determination of the overall condition rating for that category ie. Deck, superstructure, substructure.

Other items should be rated and remarked on but NOT included in determining the overall category rating. Items enumerated using a C (ex C1) should be commented on but not rated. See the FHWA Coding Guide for further information as to what is included in condition rating.

Page __2_ of _9__

CONDITION CODES AND REMARKS (Continued)

CONDITION RATING REMARKS

61. CHANNEL AND CHANNEL PROTECTION 6

*1. CHANNEL SCOUR/EROSION P BANK EROSION

*2. CHANNEL PROTECTION F

*3. VEGETATION G

*4. WATERWAY OBSTR./DRAFT G

*5. ADEQUACY OF OPENINGS G

C1. CLEAR HEIGHT 3-‘0”

APPROACH CONDITION: F

*1. SURFACING NA

*2. SHOULDER EMBANKMENT F

*3. ROADWAY EMBANKMENT F EROSION PREVALENT

*4. APPROACH SETTLEMENT F POTHOLES

APPRAISAL CODES and REMARKS

36. TRAFFIC SAFETY FEATURES: 1

*A. BRIDGE RAILING 1

*B. RAIL TRANSITIONS 1

*C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS 1

*D. APPROACH RAIL ENDS 1

1. SIGNING NA

2. OBJECT MARKERS F

72. APPROACH ROADWAY ALIGNMENT: 8

1. HORIZONTAL G

2. VERTICAL G

Bridge Appraisal Rating items may change as a result of this inspection. Use FHWA Coding Guide and Regional Office direction for appraisal rating code determination.

67. STRUCTURAL EVALUATION: 6 68. DECK GEOMETRY: 6

71. WATERWAY ADEQUACY: 9 113. SCOUR CRITICAL BRIDGES: 4

STRUCTURE LIFE REMAINING - SCOUR VULNERABILITY: MOD

CONDITION RATING OF EACH MEMBER OR ELEMENT

NA -NOT APPLICABLE

NOB -APPLICABLE, BUT NO OBSERVED. (Give reason unless obvious)

G = GOOD -ELEMENT IN NEW OR GOOD CONDITION WITH NO REPAIRS NECESSARY.

F = FAIR -ELEMENT IS STILL PERFORMING THE FUNCTION FOR WHICH IT WAS

INTENDED BUT MAY NEED MAINTENANCE.

P = POOR -ELEMENT STILL PERFORMING THE FUNCTION FOR WHICH IT WAS INTENDED

BUT IS IN NEED OF REPAIRS.

C = CRITICAL -ELEMENT IS NOT PERFORMING THE FUNCTION FOR WHICH IT WAS INTENDED

Page __3_ of _9__

ITEM

REFERENCE ADDITIONAL REMARKS

***Load Rating Sheet on File Verified***

Page __4_ of _9__

ROAD BRIDGE CORING SUMMARY

No. Location Depth, Results

Page __5_ of _9__

U/S Elevation

10’-2”

16’-10”

10’-0”

Page __6_ of _9__

Vertical Wall Abutments Not on Piles or Bedrock

Scour Scenarios Is Footing Exposed?

Is Channel Constriction greater than

10%?

Is Stream Laterally or

Vertically Unstable?

Is Flow Attacking?

Bank Erosion Other factors

Scour Vulnerability

Scour Critical Code

Ideal field conditions. No active scour or stream stability issues no no no no none none Low 5 Footing Exposed Only yes no no no none none Moderate 4 Footing Undermined (evaluate severity, substrate) yes (undermined) no no no none Fill in Moderate or High 4 or 2

Footing Exposed Plus Constriction, Unstable or Attacking (evaluate severity, substrate) yes Moderate or High 4 or 2 Bridge Constricts Channel > 10% no yes no no none none Moderate 4 Bridge Constricts Channel > 10% plus Unstable or Attacking (evaluate severity, substrate) no yes Moderate or High 4 or 2 Bridge on Unstable Channel with riprap in good condition, size and quantity. no no yes no no none Moderate/Low 5 Bridge on Unstable Channel with bank erosion and/or damaged riprap protection no no yes no yes Fill in Moderate or High 4 or 2 Designed countermeasures installed, stable and performing well. no no Fill in Low or Moderate 7

Severe scour, abutment failing yes

(undermined) High 1 or 0

None of the above, Needs further review Not Determined 6

Codings

Scour Critical Coding, Item 113 Field Evaluation Guide

Fill In

Fill in

Fill In

Parameters

Fill in

Fill in

Page __7_ of _9__

Page __8_ of _9__

Page __9_ of _9__