Bridge Inspection Report 3300-037P.pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Attached to
- George Washington Memorial Parkway Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-20-B-000013
About this file
This document summarizes a federal solicitation for rehabilitation work on the George Washington Memorial Parkway. The National Park Service is seeking bids for the Clara Barton Parkway and George Washington Memorial Parkway Project in Maryland and Washington D.C. The work includes asphalt milling and overlay, concrete deck repair, culvert replacement, guardrail replacement, and other miscellaneous work. The project will be split into multiple schedules with a total expected cost over $10 million. Bids are due in April 2020. The solicitation is set aside for small business concerns only. Interested vendors must register on SAM.gov and complete annual representations and certifications online. Bid documents are available for download on SAM.gov and no hard copies will be mailed. Visitors to the bid opening must arrive one hour early and register with security.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Results of Bid Opening - NP-GWMP 6(1) 7(2).pdf | ||
| Amendment 0001 - NP-GWMP 6(1) 7(2).pdf | ||
| PEPCO Procedure for Working in Close Proximity to Underground Transmission Facilities.pdf | ||
| Bridge Inspection Report 3300-030P.pdf | ||
| VETS-4212 Form.pdf | ||
| Bridge Inspection Report 3300-031P.pdf | ||
| Pavement Report No. FY18-01_Addendum.pdf | ||
| IFB Solicitation - NP-GWMP 6(1) 7(2).pdf | ||
| Plans - NP-GWMP 6(1) 7(2).pdf | ||
| CE_GWMP 6(1) 7(2)_NPS.pdf | ||
| Bridge Inspection Report 3300-034P.pdf | ||
| Bridge Inspection Report 3300-032P.pdf | ||
| FP14_Eng.pdf | ||
| Pavement Report No. FY18-01_FINAL.pdf | ||
| ADV_Bidders Qualifications Form.doc | DOC document | |
| CE_GWMP 6(1) 7(2)_EFLHD.pdf | ||
| Bridge Inspection Report 3300-044P.pdf | ||
| Bridge Inspection Report 3300-033P.pdf |
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 3300-037P
LITTLE FALLS BRANCH BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 4/24/19
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... PRESTRESSED CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 6 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 59.3 FT (18.1 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 52.0 FT (15.8 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... NONE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 38.5 FT (11.7 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 35.0 FT (10.7 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. 1993
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 100A5,100A23 / 1415 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 50 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 7 - URBAN PARKWAY FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1993-DECK REPLACEMENT, BRIDGE RAILINGS PAINTED, ABUTMENTS AND WINGWALLS
REPAIRED. 2005-GABION CHANNEL PROTECTION ADDED.
LOCATION
GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 0.77 (KM PT 1.24)
STATE: ................................. MARYLAND LOCATION: 4.5 MILES SOUTH OF I-495.
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ CLARA BARTON PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. LITTLE FALLS BRANCH
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This prestressed concrete multi-girder bridge is in fair condition overall. The main problems are spalling of the north end of Girder #3 with exposed prestressing strands, moderate undermining of the concrete slope protection below the abutments, and erosion of the south upstream channel bank undermining the abutment footing for the pedestrian bridge. In addition, there is cracking of the deck underside with efflorescence which is indicative of water intrusion through the deck concrete.
Other problems include cracking, delamination, and spalling of the girder ends, curbs and abutment breastwalls;
vegetation growth from the wingwalls and vertical joints; cracking of the approaches; faded pavement markings;
differential settlement at the approaches; and failure of the paint system on the railings, with the bottom rail rusted through at one location.
Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: K.M. GREEN, M.D. SPEAS (CLARK NEXSEN)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
KATIE M. GREEN, PE, FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 8/30/19
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 3300-037P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
60.6,8 REMOVE VEGETATION GROWTH FROM WINGWALLS AND VERTICAL JOINTS. 1 LS
58.1 RESTRIPE PAVEMENT MARKINGS ON DECK SURFACE. 1 LS
59.2 REPAIR DELAMINATION AND SPALLING OF GIRDER #3 AT NORTH ABUTMENT. 1 EA
58.5, 60.1 REPAIR SPALLING OF EAST CURB AT BASE OF RAIL POST AT NORTH APPROACH.
CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR AT SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL WITH
APPROVED SEALANT.
3 SF
60.12 REPAIR GATE FOR STORM DRAINAGE PIPE AT SOUTH ABUTMENT. 1 LS
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST
ESTIMATES
REHAB. RECONSTR.
60.9,11, 61.2
GROUT AREAS OF UNDERMINED SLOPE PROTECTION AT BOTH
ABUTMENTS AND AT SOUTH FOOTING FOR UPSTREAM
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE; PLACE ADDITIONAL ENGINEERED RIPRAP.
1 LS
58.6 CLEAN AND PAINT RAILINGS. REPAIR BROKEN AND CORRODED
BOTTOM RAIL, EAST SIDE NEAR MIDSPAN.
1 LS
222.4,6 REPAVE APPROACHES. 1 LS
58.1 CLEAN AND SEAL DECK SURFACE. 1 LS
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL,
DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING
1 LS
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3300-037P
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
N
58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER
ALIGNMENT
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
FASCIA(E)
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
TRUSSES
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
GIRDERS OR BEAMS
BEARING DEVICES
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
OTHER
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
UTILITIES
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
RIDEABILITY
WEARING SURFACE
EXPANSION JOINTS
DECK SLAB
OTHER
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
FOUNDATIONS
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
PILE BENTS
WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
PIER(S)
OTHER
SLOPE PROTECTION
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
EXPANSION JOINTS
WEEP HOLES
WINGWALLS
FOUNDATIONS
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
PILE BENTS
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS
ABUTMENTS
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
10.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
PAINT
11.
G F N N N G N N G
N G
F N G G N G G G F G F
F(DRAINAGE PIPE)
N N N N N N N
11.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
58.1 MINOR ABRASION OF LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE DECK SURFACE
WITH EXPOSED AGGREGATE. MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF
DECK SURFACE; MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKS EXTENDING FROM
ENDS OF DECK. SAWCUT IN DECK SURFACE NEAR CENTERLINE OF
ROADWAY AT SOUTH END. PAVEMENT MARKINGS WORN AWAY
FROM DECK SURFACE.
MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK
UNDERSIDE , HEAVIEST IN BAYS #1 AND #2 AND UNDERSIDE OF
OVERHANGS.
58.5 MINOR CRACKING OF CURBS. MINOR DETERIORATION OF SEALANT
IN CURBS. MODERATE CRACKING, DELAMINATION, AND SPALLING
OF EAST CURB AT BASE OF RAIL POST, NORTH APPROACH NEAR
END OF DECK. MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG BOTH
CURBS.
58.6 MINOR VEHICLE SCRAPES, PEELING OF PAINT, AND RUSTING OF
RAILINGS, PRIMARILY TOP RAILS AT SPLICE JOINTS AND AT
APPROACHES. BOTTOM RAIL BROKEN AND CORRODED WITH A
MINOR HOLE RUSTED THROUGH AT WELDED SPLICE, EAST SIDE
NEAR MIDSPAN.
58.7 EVIDENCE OF WATER PONDING IN WEST SHOULDER OF BOTH
APPROACHES DUE TO DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND MINOR
SETTLEMENT/DEPRESSION IN ASPHALT PAVEMENT, NOT OBSERVED
DUE TO DRY CONDITIONS.
59.1 MINOR TO MODERATE RUSTING OF BEARING DEVICES.
59.2 MINOR CRACKING, DELAMINATION, AND SPALLING OF GIRDER ENDS
IN SOME LOCATIONS, PRIMARILY OVER BEARING INSERT PLATES.
MODERATE SPALL WITH EXPOSED PRESTRESSING STRANDS ON
GIRDER #3 AT NORTH ABUTMENT. MINOR COVER SPALLS IN WEB
ON GIRDER #5, WEST FACE NEAR MIDSPAN.
60 GRAFFITI ON LOWER PORTIONS OF SUBSTRUCTURE AND SLOPE
PROTECTION.
N G G F G N
N
N
G
G
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
61. CHANNEL 6
1. ALIGNMENT F
2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR F
3. CHANNEL PROTECTION F
4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS G
5. OTHER N
6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING SUFF
7. NORMAL VELOCITY MED
8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 22 FT.
9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :
ROCK, SAND
222. APPROACHES 6
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER
N N N F G F G G N
223. RETAINING WALL N
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS
B. TRANSITIONS
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS
N N N
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS WITH
EFFLORESCENCE AND RUST STAINING; MODERATE AT EAST AND
WEST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT WITH MINOR DELAMINATION.
MINOR SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR AT TOP OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
BREASTWALL, EAST END. MINOR DELAMINATION IN SOUTH
ABUTMENT BELOW BAY #2.
60.4 MINOR SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR IN SOUTH ABUTMENT
BACKWALL, EAST SIDE OF GIRDER #6.
60.6,8 MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH ON ALL WINGWALLS AND IN
VERTICAL JOINTS AT NORTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST WINGWALLS.
MINOR DETERIORATION OF VERTICAL JOINT FILLER THROUGHOUT.
60.7 MINOR CORROSION OF WEEP HOLE PIPES.
60.9,11 MINOR DETERIORATION AND CRACKING OF CONCRETE AND
GROUTED STONE SLOPE PROTECTION. SLOPE PROTECTION AT
SOUTH ABUTMENT UNDERMINED AT BASE, FULL LENGTH X UP TO
1-1/2'H X 1-1/2' UNDER. SLOPE PROTECTION AT NORTH ABUTMENT
UNDERMINED AT BASE, 3/4 OF ABUTMENT LENGTH X UP TO 1'H X
1'-6" UNDER. SEVERE DETERIORATION OF MORTAR JOINT AROUND
TWO STONES IN SOUTH SLOPE PROTECTION AT WEST END
RESULTING IN STONES SETTLING UP TO 8".
60.12 GATE FOR STORM DRAINAGE PIPE AT SOUTH ABUTMENT SLOPE
PROTECTION IS DAMAGED.
61.1 CHANNEL FLOWS PRIMARILY ALONG SOUTH ABUTMENT SLOPE
PROTECTION AND HAS SEVERELY UNDERMINED (UP TO 4') SOUTH
ABUTMENT FOOTING FOR PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE LOCATED
UPSTREAM.
61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.
61.2,3 MODERATE CHANNEL BANK EROSION HAS EXPOSED MANY TREE
ROOTS UPSTREAM OF STRUCTURE. DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL
BANKS PROTECTED WITH CONCRETE AND STONE GABIONS; STONE
MISSING FROM GABIONS AT SEVERAL LOCATIONS.
61.4 SEPARATE PEDESTRIAN STRUCTURE APPROXIMATELY 12'
UPSTREAM OF BRIDGE, WHICH ALSO CARRIES A SEWAGE LINE.
ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
222.4,6 MINOR TO MODERATE RANDOM CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT WITH SHORT COLD MIX PATCHES AT ENDS OF DECK AND AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS ELSEWHERE. DIFFERENTIAL SETTLEMENT (UP TO 1 1/2") OF APPROACH PAVEMENT AT NORTH APPROACH IN SOUTHBOUND LANE AND UP TO 1" AT SOUTH APPROACH IN BOTH LANES.
RUTTED ASPHALT PATCHES AT APPROACHES. MINOR POTHOLES IN NORTH APPROACH ASPHALT ADJACENT TO END OF DECK IN NORTHBOUND LANE. MINOR TO MODERATE POTHOLES IN BOTH LANES AT SOUTH APPROACH
ADJACENT TO DECK.
222.7 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS PRESENT AT ALL FOUR CORNERS. MINOR DAMAGE TO NORTHEAST OBJECT MARKER. SOUTHWEST OBJECT MARKER INSET TOO FAR AND LEANING AWAY FROM STRUCTURE. OBJECT
MARKER HEIGHTS VARY 2'-2" TO 2'-9" (MEASURED FROM GROUND TO BOTTOM OF MARKER).
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 3300-037P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 32 29 71 64
HS 41 37 90 82
TYPE 3 38 34 83 75
TYPE 3S2 58 53 118 107
TYPE 3-3 69 63 139 126
DESIGN LOADING: H20 (M18)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 5/15
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: INTERIOR GIRDER
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 3300-037P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL PARKWAY
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... LITTLE FALLS BRANCH BRIDGE
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 3300-037P
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 2 - NATIONAL CAPITAL
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 6
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........037P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 7 - URBAN PARKWAY
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................100A5,100A23
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..
243 - MARYLAND (MD)
031 - MONTGOMERY
161000060
LITTLE FALLS BRANCH
CLARA BARTON PARKWAY
3300037P0000000
4.5 MILES SOUTH OF I-495.
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
0.77 (KM PT 1.24)
3 - FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER
52.0 FT (15.8 M)
59.3 FT (18.1 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 0 - NONE
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 4 - H20 (M18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 41.0 TONS (37.2 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 90.0 TONS (81.6 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 4/19 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 3300-037P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 38°56'15.60"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 77°07'04.60"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 5 MI (8 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
(52) DECK WIDTH:
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:
LEFT SHOULDER:
RIGHT SHOULDER:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:
(34) SKEW ANGLE:
(35) DECK FLARE?:
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT :
RIGHT :
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION:
MATERIAL:
DESIGN TYPE:
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:
35.0 FT (10.7 M)
38.5 FT (11.7 M)
24.0 FT (7.3 M)
24.0 FT (7.3 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0 - NO MEDIAN
50 °
NO
35.0 FT (10.7 M)
0.7 FT (0.2 M)
0.7 FT (0.2 M)
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
4 - STEEL
1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
3.46 FT (1.05 M)
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT: ...........................N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
5 - Stable; scour within limits of
2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1993-DECK REPLACEMENT, BRIDGE RAILINGS PAINTED, ABUTMENTS AND WINGWALLS REPAIRED. 2005-GABION CHANNEL
PROTECTION ADDED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 3300-037P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 3300-037P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD GEORGETOWN
FLOW
PHOTO #2 - WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH; NOTE
PAVEMENT MARKINGS WORN AWAY
PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF JOINT SEALANT IN CURBS;
EAST CURB NEAR NORTH END OF DECK SHOWN
PHOTO #5 - DELAMINATION AND SPALLING OF
EAST CURB AT NORTH APPROACH NEAR
NORTH END OF DECK
PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION
ALONG CURBS; WEST CURB SHOWN
PHOTO #7 - HOLE RUSTED THROUGH BOTTOM RAIL ON EAST SIDE AT
MIDSPAN
PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL RANDOM CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT;
NORTH APPROACH IN NORTHBOUND LANES SHOWN; ALSO NOTE
POTHOLES AND ASPHALT PATCHES ADJACENT TO DECK
PHOTO #9 - ASPHALT PATCHING AND
POTHOLES IN NORTH APPROACH PAVEMENT
ALONG END OF DECK
PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL RANDOM CRACKING
AND DIFFERENTIAL SETTLEMENT OF ASPHALT
APPROACH PAVEMENT; SOUTH APPROACH
SHOWN; ALSO NOTE POTHOLES IN
NORTHBOUND LANE
PHOTO #11 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON
UNDERSIDE OF DECK; BAYS #1 AND #2 SHOWN
PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL SPALLING OF BEAMS OVER BEARING INSERT
PLATES; EAST SIDE OF GIRDER #6 AT SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #14 - SPALL WITH EXPOSED PRESTRESSING STRANDS ON
GIRDER #3 AT NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #15 - COVER SPALLS IN WEB OF GIRDER #5 ON WEST FACE
NEAR MIDSPAN
PHOTO #16 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #17 - CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE AND RUST STAINING AT
EAST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #18 - SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR AT
TOP OF EAST END OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
BELOW GIRDER #6
PHOTO #19 - AREA OF DELAMINATION AT TOP
OF SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL BELOW
BAY #2
PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL VEGETATION GROWTH
AT WINGWALLS AND VERTICAL JOINTS AT
NORTHEAST CORNER OF BRIDGE SHOWN;
ALSO NOTE DETERIORATION OF VERTICAL
JOINT FILLER
PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL VEGETATION GROWTH ON WINGWALLS;
SOUTHWEST WINGWALL SHOWN
PHOTO #22 - TYPICAL MORTAR JOINT DETERIORATION OF SOUTH
ABUTMENT SLOPE PROTECTION
PHOTO #23 - UNDERMINING AT WEST END OF SLOPE PROTECTION AT
SOUTH ABUTMENT; ALSO NOTE DISPLACED STONES IN SLOPE
PROTECTION
PHOTO #24 - UNDERMINING OF SLOPE PROTECTION AT NORTH
ABUTMENT BELOW GIRDER #2
PHOTO #25 - UNDERMINING OF SOUTH ABUTMENT FOOTING FOR
ADJACENT PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
PHOTO #26 - BROKEN GATE FOR STORM DRAINAGE PIPE AT EAST END
OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #27 - UPSTREAM CHANNEL
PHOTO #28 - DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .