Bridge Inspection Report 3300-034P.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- George Washington Memorial Parkway Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-20-B-000013
About this file
This solicitation is for the rehabilitation of the Clara Barton Parkway and associated facilities within the George Washington Memorial Parkway. Work includes asphalt pavement milling and overlay, full depth asphalt pavement patching, concrete deck repair, culvert replacement, riprap, underdrain, guardrail replacement, signing, pavement markings, and other miscellaneous work. The project will be split into multiple work schedules and is expected to cost over $10 million. Only certified Small Business Concerns may submit sealed bids by the due date specified in the solicitation. The Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration is the contracting agency.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Results of Bid Opening - NP-GWMP 6(1) 7(2).pdf | ||
| Amendment 0001 - NP-GWMP 6(1) 7(2).pdf | ||
| CE_GWMP 6(1) 7(2)_NPS.pdf | ||
| PEPCO Procedure for Working in Close Proximity to Underground Transmission Facilities.pdf | ||
| Bridge Inspection Report 3300-030P.pdf | ||
| VETS-4212 Form.pdf | ||
| Bridge Inspection Report 3300-031P.pdf | ||
| Pavement Report No. FY18-01_Addendum.pdf | ||
| IFB Solicitation - NP-GWMP 6(1) 7(2).pdf | ||
| Plans - NP-GWMP 6(1) 7(2).pdf | ||
| Bridge Inspection Report 3300-032P.pdf | ||
| FP14_Eng.pdf | ||
| Pavement Report No. FY18-01_FINAL.pdf | ||
| Bridge Inspection Report 3300-037P.pdf | ||
| ADV_Bidders Qualifications Form.doc | DOC document | |
| CE_GWMP 6(1) 7(2)_EFLHD.pdf | ||
| Bridge Inspection Report 3300-044P.pdf | ||
| Bridge Inspection Report 3300-033P.pdf |
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 3300-034P
FUTURE ALIGNMENT BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 4/24/19
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:
MAIN SPAN TYPE:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: ..
DECK TYPE:
WEARING SURFACE:
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:
PIER FOUNDATION(S):
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ...
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:
NPS ROAD CLASS:
STRUCTURE HISTORY:
CONCRETE
FRAME
CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
NONE
SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
CONCRETE
100A9 / 1415
7 - URBAN PARKWAY
NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..
MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
DECK WIDTH:
CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
YEAR BUILT:
YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..
SKEW ANGLE:
FRACTURE CRITICAL:
216.8 FT (66.1 M)
77.0 FT (23.5 M)
38.5 FT (11.7 M)
28.0 FT (8.5 M)
N/A
63 °
NO
LOCATION
GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 2.59 (KM PT 4.17)
STATE: ................................. MARYLAND LOCATION: 2.5 MILES SOUTH OF I-495.
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ FUTURE ALIGNMENT
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. CLARA BARTON PARKWAY (NB)
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This concrete frame bridge is not currently in use. The bridge is in good condition overall and has only minor problems at this time. Problems include corrosion of the railings throughout, heavy accumulation of debris on the deck surface preventing proper drainage, and tree growth on the approaches and beneath and adjacent to the structure.
Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: K.M. GREEN, M.D. SPEAS (CLARK NEXSEN)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
KATIE M. GREEN, PE, FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 8/30/19
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 3300-034P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
ROUTINE MAINTENANCE QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
58.10, 59.11, 60.12
REMOVE TREES FROM ENDS OF STRUCTURE AND ADJACENT TO BOTH SPANS. 1 LS
58.7 REMOVE DEBRIS FROM DECK SURFACE. 1 LS
60.9,17 REMOVE LOOSE ROCK NEAR WEST COLUMN OF NORTH PIER. 1 LS
60.13 CLEAN AND SEAL EXPOSED REBAR WITH A PROTECTIVE SEALANT. 1 LS
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST
ESTIMATES
REHAB. RECONSTR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Structure is closed to all traffic.
Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3300-034P
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or sec ion loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
N
58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER
ALIGNMENT
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
FASCIA(E)
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
TRUSSES
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
GIRDERS OR BEAMS
BEARING DEVICES
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
OTHER
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
UTILITIES
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
RIDEABILITY
WEARING SURFACE
EXPANSION JOINTS
DECK SLAB
OTHER
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
FOUNDATIONS
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
PILE BENTS
WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
PIER(S)
OTHER
SLOPE PROTECTION
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
EXPANSION JOINTS
WEEP HOLES
WINGWALLS
FOUNDATIONS
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
PILE BENTS
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS
ABUTMENTS
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
10.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
PAINT
11.
(TREE GROWTH)
F G N N N N N N G
P G
(TREE GROWTH)
G N G N N G N N F G N
F(TREE GROWTH)
G N N G F G N
11.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
(BURIED)
(THRUST BLOCKS)
58.1 DECK HAS BEEN CORED IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS. WEARING
SURFACE NEVER APPLIED TO DECK. MINOR GRAFFITI ON DECK
SURFACE.
MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK
UNDERSIDE AND UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS; MODERATE IN
NORTH AND SOUTH SPANS. MINOR SEASONAL VINE GROWTH ON
OVERHANGS AND ABUTMENTS IN FEW LOCATIONS.
58.5 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF SIDEWALKS. MINOR RUST
STAINING ON SIDEWALKS FROM RAILINGS. MINOR TRANSVERSE
CRACKING OF APPROACH SIDEWALK OVERHANGS WITH
EFFLORESCENCE. MINOR ADHESION FAILURE AND
DETERIORATION OF JOINT FILLER MATERIAL IN SIDEWALKS.
58.6 SEVERE DETERIORATION OF PAINT, MODERATE TO SEVERE
SURFACE RUSTING AND MINOR SECTION LOSS TO RAILINGS.
DAMAGED SEGMENTS OF WEST RAILING HAVE BEEN RETROFITTED
NEAR NORTH END IN PAST.
58.7,10 HEAVY ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS, GLASS, AND VEGETATION
GROWTH ON DECK SURFACE PREVENTING ADEQUATE DRAINAGE.
59, 60 WIDESPREAD GRAFFITI ON SUBSTRUCTURE AND
SUPERSTRUCTURE.
59.1 STRIP BEARING PADS AND JOINT FILLER MATERIAL MIGRATING OUT
IN SEVERAL AREAS AT BOTH ABUTMENTS.
59.11, 60.12, 222.9
HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH AT APPROACHES. TREES, UP TO 12"
DIAMETER, GROWING UP AGAINST STRUCTURE ALONG RAILINGS
AND IMMEDIATELY BEHIND END OF DECK IN BOTH SPANS.
60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS WITH
EFFLORESCENCE. WATER STAINING ON BOTH BREASTWALLS,
INDICATING LEAKAGE THROUGH BEARING AREA.
60.6 HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG ALL WINGWALLS.
N G G F P N
P
N
G
G
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3300-034P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.
ALIGNMENT 1.
61. CHANNEL N
222. APPROACHES 6
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER (TREE GROWTH)
N N N N F G G G P
223. RETAINING WALL N
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS
B. TRANSITIONS
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS
N N N
60.9 MINOR TO MODERATE EROSION IN FRONT OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
DUE TO RUNOFF AND NATURAL DRAINAGE; EROSION UNDERMINES
TREE ROOTS ON EAST SIDE OF STRUCTURE.
60.9,17 LOOSE ROCKS ON SLOPE NEAR WEST AND EAST COLUMNS OF
NORTH PIER.
60.13 MINOR SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON SOUTH FACE OF
NORTHWEST PIER COLUMN AT BOTTOM.
60.16,17 MODERATE EROSION AT SOUTH PIER COLUMNS; ALL PIER THRUST
BLOCKS EXPOSED. RUST STAINS ON NORTH FACE OF SOUTHWEST
PIER COLUMN THRUST BLOCK. SOUTHEAST PIER COLUMN THRUST
BLOCK REMAINS WET DUE TO DRAINAGE THROUGH EMBANKMENT.
222.5 MINOR EROSION AND UNDERMINING (UP TO 10"L X 4' UNDER) OF
SOUTH APPROACH SIDEWALKS DUE TO LACK OF AN APPROACH
ROADWAY.
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
N
Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
Meets currently acceptable standards.
Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 3300-034P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 18 16 30 27
HS 23 21 39 35
TYPE 3 21 19 36 33
TYPE 3S2 29 26 49 44
TYPE 3-3 36 33 60 54
DESIGN LOADING: H20 (M18)
CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
X CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 4/16
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: SPAN #2
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 3300-034P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 243 - MARYLAND (MD)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... FUTURE ALIGNMENT BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 031 - MONTGOMERY
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 3300-034P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 2 - NATIONAL CAPITAL (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 6 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... CLARA BARTON PARKWAY (N
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........034P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. FUTURE ALIGNMENT
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 7 - URBAN PARKWAY (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 3300034P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: .......YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 2.5 MILES SOUTH OF I-495.
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................100A9 (11) MILE POINT: .............................2.59 (KM PT 4.17)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 1415 (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
1 - CONCRETE
07 - FRAME
77.0 FT (23.5 M)
216.8 FT (66.1 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 0 - NONE
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 4 - H20 (M18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 23.0 TONS (20.9 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 39.0 TONS (35.4 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 4/19 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 3300-034P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 38°57'46.30"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 77°08'08.80"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 6 MI (10 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 0 - OTHER
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 10.5 FT (3.2 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 2.0 FT (0.6 M)
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
(52) DECK WIDTH:
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:
LEFT SHOULDER:
RIGHT SHOULDER:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:
(34) SKEW ANGLE:
(35) DECK FLARE?:
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT :
RIGHT :
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION:
MATERIAL:
DESIGN TYPE:
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:
28.0 FT (8.5 M)
38.5 FT (11.7 M)
40.0 FT (12.2 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0 - NO MEDIAN
63 °
YES
28.0 FT (8.5 M)
4.0 FT (1.2 M)
4.0 FT (1.2 M)
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
4 - STEEL
1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
3.42 FT (1.04 M)
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
15.92 FT (4.85 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N
(62) CULVERT: ...........................N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
N - Not over waterway.
1 - MAINTENANCE
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 3300-034P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 3300-034P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD GEORGETOWN
PHOTO #2 - EAST SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH; NOTE DEBRIS
AND VEGETATION GROWTH ON DECK
PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF SIDEWALKS; WEST
SIDEWALK SHOWN
PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL ADHESION FAILURE AND DETERIORATION OF
JOINT FILLER MATERIAL; WEST SIDEWALK AT SOUTH APPROACH
SHOWN
PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL RUSTING OF RAILINGS; EAST RAILING IN CENTER
SPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #7 - TREE GROWTH ENCROACHING ON WEST RAILING IN
NORTH SPAN
PHOTO #8 - TREES GROWING IMMEDIATELY BEHIND DECK AT NORTH
APPROACH
PHOTO #9 - UNDERMINING AT SOUTH END OF EAST SIDEWALK
PHOTO #10 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH, CENTER
SPAN
PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF DECK UNDERSIDE;
SOUTH SPAN NEAR SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #12 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #13 - BEARING STRIP MATERIAL MIGRATING OUT AT BEARING
AREA FOR EAST FRAME AT SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #14 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH PIER, NORTH SIDE
PHOTO #15 - SPALLING ON SOUTH FACE OF NORTHWEST COLUMN
PHOTO #16 - EROSION AROUND SOUTHEAST COLUMN WITH PIER
THRUST BLOCK EXPOSED; ALSO NOTE MOISTURE SEEPAGE
PHOTO #17 - LOOSE ROCKS ON SLOPE NEAR NORTHWEST COLUMN
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .