BPM004422 Consensus Evaluation Report.pdf
PDF 238 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Master Agreement AZ|CTR061676
- Contract number
- CTR061676
- Issued by
- Arizona
About this file
This document is an Evaluation Report for Solicitation No. BPM004422 for Statewide Environmental Laboratory Services. The evaluation was conducted by an unnamed state procurement agency, with review completed by evaluators Mindi Cross and Mary Charlson on August 10, 2022. Four offerors were evaluated: Environmental Science Corp (dba Pace Analytical National), Eurofins Environment Testing Southwest LLC, Legend Technical Services of Arizona, Inc., and Turner Laboratories, Inc.
The solicitation was for environmental laboratory services, with proposals evaluated across three primary criteria: Offeror's Experience and Capacity (600 points), Offeror's Method of Approach (300 points), and Cost (100 points). Based on the evaluation, the procurement team recommended awarding contracts to three companies: Environmental Science Corp dba Pace Analytical National, Eurofins Environment Testing Southwest LLC, and Legend Technical Services of Arizona, Inc. Eurofins received the highest total score of 625 points, with notably strong ratings in the Method of Approach category. The scoring methodology used weighted point allocations and considered factors such as organizational profile, key personnel, sample handling processes, and quality assurance procedures.
View the file
Other files
Show all 32
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EVALUATION REPORT
Solicitation No. BPM004422, Description: Statewide Environmental Laboratory Services
Rating Definitions for Criteria 1 and 2 Exceeds Expectations = Proposal is very detailed, indicates a clear understanding of the RFP and provides innovative or exceptional responses.
Formula for Scoring Cost (Criteria 3)
Total Score
Weight 1 - Offeror's Experience and Capacity = 600 points
Organization Profile, Experience and Capacity Questionnaire, Key Personnel Subcontractors, References Meets Expectations 300 Meets Expectations 300 Meets Expectations 300 Below Expectation 150
Comments
Weight 2 - Offeror's Method of Approach = 300 points
300 Method of Approach Meets Expectations 150 Above Expectations 225 Meets Expectations 150 Below Expectation 75
Comments
Weight 3 - Cost = 100 points
100 23 100 47 67
Mindi Cross Date Mary Charlson Date
Evaluator Name
Date
Evaluator Name
Procurement Officer Name
The members of the evaluation committee have completed their review and reached consensus regarding the proposals received in response to Solicitation No. BPM004422 for Statewide Environmental Laboratory Services. This evaluation report accurately and completely reflects the opinion of the committee as a whole. Therefore, in accordance with Solicitation Instructions, 6.5 Evaluation Criteria, it is recommended that it would be in the best interest of the State to make an award to the following: Environmental Science Corp, dba Pace Analytical National, Eurofins Environment Testing Southwest LLC and Legend Technical Services of Arizona, Inc.
Environmental Science Corp, DBA Pace Analytical National
Attachment 11: Method of Approach, Question #1 lacks details on the review process for quality assurance.
Turner Laboratories, Inc.
Offeror did not provide a table that specifies the current status of any proficiency testing and the status of any corrective actions by method. Offeror did not provide organizational chart. DHS Audit identified 18 deficiencies with repeat issues. DHS identified that the laboratory failed to provide proficiency testing for several methods.
Offerors
Above Expectations = Proposal meets all requirement(s) outlined in the RFP but also provides a response that goes beyond what is required.
Legend Technical Services of Arizona, Inc.
Offeror meets solicitation requirements.
Offeror meets solicitation requirements.
Highly detailed overview of sample flow from receipt to report. Data review process and how the laboratory handles rush and short-hold TATs is explained. Different report & EDD formats are thoroughly explained. Detailed explanation as to what their online portal can do. DHS audit had no repeat issues, issues were minor.
Offeror meets solicitation requirements.
For each evaluation criteria that follows, a determination was made regarding how well the proposals satisfied the stated requirements. The rating definitions, found below, formed the basis for determining the scores assigned to each proposal. The comments fields were used to note strengths and weaknesses of the proposal.
Lowest Price / Offered Price X Maximum Points = Awarded Points
Eurofins Environment Testing Southwest LLC
Offeror meets solicitation requirements.
Offeror meets solicitation requirements.
Unacceptable = Elements of the proposal that are unacceptable to the State.
Meets Expectations = Proposal meets requirement(s) outlined in the RFP.
Below Expectation = Proposal doesn’t fully meet or doesn’t completely address requirement(s) of the RFP.
Aug 10, 2022 Aug 10, 2022
Aug 10, 2022 https://azdeqsign.na1.echosign.com/verifier?tx=CBJCHBCAABAAijc2TswWqxNqDFGJJ_QDesM8P6NxPz5K https://azdeqsign.na1.echosign.com/verifier?tx=CBJCHBCAABAAijc2TswWqxNqDFGJJ_QDesM8P6NxPz5K https://azdeqsign.na1.echosign.com/verifier?tx=CBJCHBCAABAAijc2TswWqxNqDFGJJ_QDesM8P6NxPz5K
Sheet1
| 2022-08-10T13:58:53-0700 | |
| Agreement certified by Adobe Acrobat Sign |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .