Attachment IS - 1 PACE V Innovation Scenario 1.pdf

PDF 68 KB Posted

Attached to
Professional, Administrative, Computational, and Engineering Services contract (PACE V) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
80GRC020R0010
Issued by
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Glenn Research Center

About this file

This document describes two scenarios for the Professional, Administrative, Computational, and Engineering Services contract (PACE V) with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Glenn Research Center. The first scenario involves supporting the agency's current portfolio of 20 WordPress sites, 44 ColdFusion applications, 15 PHP applications and 40 HTML websites. This includes maintaining code repositories, optimizing costs and processes, improving user satisfaction, security and performance. The second scenario requires designing, developing, testing and deploying an improved version of the Speakers Bureau digital service to better meet user needs, mitigate project risks, enable adaptive architecture and efficiently spend taxpayer funds. Successful proposals would list all relevant labor categories.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Professional, Administrative, Computational, and Engineering Services contract (PACE V), newest first.
File Type Posted
80GRC020R0010 Amendment 04.pdf PDF
Additional Questions and Answers for 80GRC020R0010 Amendment 04.pdf PDF
Additional Questions and Answers for PACE V RFP 80GRC020R0010.pdf PDF
80GRC020R0010 Amendment 03.pdf PDF
Attachment C - Historical WYE and ODC by Work Area updated.pdf PDF
Attachment B - Pricing Spreadsheet MS Excel Workbook Template updated.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment M - Historical Other Direct Costs updated.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
80GRC020R0010 Amendment 02.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers for 80GRC020R0010.pdf PDF
Attachment K - Historical Labor Category Descriptions Updated.pdf PDF
80GRC020R0010 Amendment 01.pdf PDF
Attachment E - E(b) GRC 533 Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment M - Historical Other Direct Costs.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment L - Cognizant Audit Office Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment J - Sample Work Orders.pdf PDF
Attachment P - Government Furnished Property.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment D - IT Master Plan 2020.pdf PDF
Attachment E - E(e) GRC Headcount Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment TS - 2 PACE V Technical Scenario 2.pdf PDF
80GRC020R0010 Rquest for Proposals (RFP).pdf PDF
Attachment K - Historical Labor Category Descriptions.pdf PDF
Attachment I - Past Performance Questionnaire.doc DOC document
Attachment IS - 2 PACE V Innovation Scenario 2.pdf PDF
Attachment E - E(d) GRC Baseline Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment A - Statement of Work.pdf PDF
Attachment TS - 1 PACE V Technical Scenario 1.pdf PDF
Attachment H - Client Authorization Letter (CAL).doc DOC document
Attachment E - E(c) GRC Accounting Calendar Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment B - Pricing Spreadsheet MS Excel Workbook Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment N - Data Center Information.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment Q - Large File Transfer User Guide.pdf PDF
Attachment C - Historical WYE and ODC by Work Area.pdf PDF
Attachment E - E(a) GRC 533 Supplemental Cost Report Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment O - ITS-HBK_2810_ 06_2B.pdf PDF
Show all 34

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

80GRC020R0010 - PACE V Innovation Scenario 1

Application Development Modernization

Part 1. Current Portfolio Management and Optimization

Our current applications portfolio includes:

20 WordPress sites, some with custom themes and plugins that we maintain 44 ColdFusion applications with Oracle database storage 15 PHP applications 40 HTML websites GitLab CE and Serena PVCS code repositories

Some of our web sites/apps are available to the public, others are internal to NASA, while others have portions of both. Each site and application is unique in size, scope, and age. Some are large, some small. Some are used by thousands every day, others are used by a handful once or twice a year. Some were written a month ago, some a decade or two ago. Application code is maintained in either Gitlab CE or Serena PVCS.

Based on this brief description, how would you go about supporting this portfolio and the users that use them? Describe all aspects (technical, business, processes, metrics) involved in achieving outcomes such as cost efficiency, high user satisfaction, high availability, and high security.

The web landscape is continually changing as new development stacks bring innovations and off-the-shelf, SaaS, and low-code/no-code solutions offer alternatives to custom-developed applications. Describe the steps you would take to make improvements to the portfolio to achieve results such as cost efficiency, improved user satisfaction, improved security, or improved performance. Include the criteria you would evaluate to make improvement recommendations to the government.

Please be sure to include a listing of all the labor categories your company would use in this effort.

Part 2. Application Modernization

To ascertain your agile delivery capabilities, NASA is requesting that you describe how you would approach creating a new and improved version of an existing government digital service called Speakers Bureau.

Speakers Bureau, which you can view at https://www.nasa.gov/centers/glenn/events/speakers.html, allows the public to request a NASA engagement. NASA employees offer their time and talent to share the NASA vision and mission with the public. Each year, Glenn's Speakers Bureau provides over 200 presentations to more than 60,000 people. Our audiences include pre-school to college classes, libraries and museums, scouts, and professional, technical, civic and social organizations. Members also participate in conferences, workshops, lectures and local community events.

80GRC020R0010 - PACE V Innovation Scenario 1

Based on this brief description of Speakers Bureau, how would you go about designing, developing, testing, deploying and/or operating a new and improved system that produces such outcomes as user needs being met, risk of overall project failure (in terms of cost, schedule, quality) being mitigated, the architecture being adaptive to change, and taxpayer dollars being spent efficiently and effectively?

Please be sure to include a listing of all the labor categories your company would use in this effort.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .