Attachment 0012 Past_Performance_Questionnaire 31 March 2020.pdf

PDF 166 KB Posted

Attached to
Light Tactical Trailer Heavy Chassis (LTT HC) Program
Solicitation number
W56HZV-20-R-0089
Issued by

About this file

This document includes a past performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity for light tactical trailer heavy chassis. The Army Contracting Command - Detroit Arsenal is soliciting proposals from small businesses to supply light tactical trailer heavy chassis under solicitation number W56HZV-20-R-0089. The trailers will be acquired through a single firm-fixed-price indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract set aside for small businesses. A minimum of two trailers will be ordered initially, with a maximum quantity of 2,905 over the life of the contract. Fiscal year 2021 other procurement funds will be used for the first year. Proposals will be evaluated using a tradeoff process to select the best value to the government based on price and non-price factors including quality, delivery schedule, management, and regulatory compliance.

View the file

Other files

Show all 21

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

CCTA-HTA-A Date issued with RFP PCO Letter: XXXXX

Subject: Solicitation W56HZV-20-R-0089, Light Tactical Trailer Heavy Chassis (LTT HC), .5 ton Single Axle Chassis Trailer, Past Performance Questionnaire

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

LIGHT ENGINEER UTILITY TRAILER SOLICITATION

1. Product Director Light Tactical Vehicles (PD LTV) and the United States Army Contracting Command-Detroit Arsenal (ACC-DTA) has a need to procure LTT HC Trailers that fully comply with the requirements of the existing Government-owned Technical Data Package (TDP). These trailers are used by different customers as a component to multiple generator systems. The trailer mounted generator systems provide power throughout all levels of the US Army. ACC- DTA is conducting a past performance assessment in anticipation of possible contract award.

2. Offerors interested in proposing on this work have been requested to send the attached Past Performance Questionnaire to points of contact on recent and relevant contracts as defined in Section L of the solicitation. In this regard, we are requesting your assistance in completing this questionnaire so that we may evaluate the offeror in the area of past performance. The attached questionnaire has been developed for ease of electronic completion. Please provide your comments regarding the overall assessment of the contractor’s performance in each of the areas of consideration in the gray boxes for the identified contract. Any additional information, which your organization deems relevant or important, will be welcome by our evaluation team.

If a question on the questionnaire is not applicable, please so indicate. It is important that your information be as factual, accurate, and complete as possible to preclude that the need for follow-up by the evaluators.

3. Upon completion of this questionnaire, please forward by electronic mail to the LTV Trailers mailbox: usarmy.detroit.acc.mbx.ltv-trailers@mail.mil. Please confirm receipt of the submitted questionnaire via email response from the aforementioned email address. Please submit questions or comments regarding this letter to Helene Bell by e-mail at helene.m.bell.civ@mail.mil or the undersigned by e-mail at reymundo.moncayo.civ@mail.mil. `

4. Please complete and submit your questionnaire within 24 hours of the closing date of this solicitation. Thank you in advance for your assistance.

Sincerely, Reymundo Moncayo.

Contracting Officer

[Encl(s)] (1) Past Performance Questionnaire

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

UNITED STATES ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND

TACOM CONTRACTING CENTER

6501 EAST 11 MILE ROAD

WARREN, MICHIGAN 48397-5000

REPLY TO

ATTENTION OF: CCTA-HTA-A

Once Filled In, this document is considered Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104

Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire Please provide your candid response to the following questions. If you do not have the appropriate knowledge with the company in question, please forward this questionnaire to the person who does. Upon completion of this questionnaire, please forward by electronic email to the LTV Trailers mailbox at usarmy.detroit.acc.mbx.ltv-trailers@mail.mil within 24 hours of the closing date of this solicitation. Thank you for your assistance.

PART I - IDENTIFICATION (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. RELEVANT CONTRACT

Prime Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract/Task Order Number:

Contract Award Date:

Contract Period of Performance End Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion:

B. OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

E-mail Address:

PART II - EVALUATION

(To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

RATING SCALE & DEFINITIONS

Table 1 identifies the rating scale and descriptions. Please apply the rating that most closely matches your assessment for each area of consideration listed below. Please include a written narrative for each rating applied, utilizing the adjectival rating definition in Table 1.

Table 1

1. Quality:

a. Trailer Chassis. Assess the quality and workmanship of the contractor’s deliverable product(s) in accordance with the contract terms and conditions. (i.e. testing deficiencies, effective and timely corrective action plans, etc.)

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Too soon to tell Not Applicable

Comments:

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.

b. Assess the contractor’s ability to apply a coating system and manage a corrosion prevention system.

To what extent did the contractor satisfy the above stated past performance requirement, on an overall basis? Please check one answer and provide an explanation for your rating.

Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.

2. Delivery Schedule:

a. Assess the contractor compliance to the contractual delivery schedule.

Please include the contractor’s efforts that contributed, negatively or positively, to the delivery schedule and provide comments if any Delivery extensions were granted, and why the extensions were needed (i.e. the extent of the fault of the contractor).

Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

3. Management / Business Relations:

a. Assess the contractor’s management and business relations efforts during the contract period. (i.e. timely and effective communication, effective management of staff levels, etc.)

Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.

b. Quality Management Systems (QMS). Assess the contractor’s ability to establish, integrate into production, and regularly use a QMS such as ISO 9001. In the comment section provide information on any issues or root causes.

Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.

c. Effectiveness of Program Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

To what extent did the contractor satisfy the above stated past performance requirement, on an overall basis? Please check one answer and provide an explanation for your rating.

Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.

d. To what extent was the contractor effective in managing significant risks (cost, schedule, and performance) in the performance of this contract?

To what extent did the contractor satisfy the above stated past performance requirement, on an overall basis? Please check one answer and provide an explanation for your rating.

Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

4. Regulatory Compliance. Assess the contractor’s compliance with all terms and conditions in the contract relating to applicable regulations and codes, considering aspects of performance such as compliance with financial, environmental, safety, and labor regulations as well as any other reporting requirements in the contract terms and conditions

Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault and/or if other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor played a predominant role.

5. General Comments.

Any additional information, which your organization deems relevant or important, will be welcome by our evaluation team. Please provide any other relevant or important performance information.

PART III - RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION

Please provide a point of contact who compiled or completed this questionnaire and who, if needed, may be contacted by our evaluation team regarding the information provided in this questionnaire.

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

E-mail Address:

Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire
B. OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .