9-AS27-12 Score Sheet - Informational Only.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 33 KB Posted

Attached to
AS27-12 Jordanelle State Park Concession Operations
Solicitation number
AS27-12
Issued by
Utah

About this file

This is a score sheet document prepared by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing and the Division of State Parks for the evaluation of proposals in response to RFP AS27-12 for Jordanelle State Park concession operations. The RFP seeks a responsive and responsible vendor to provide concessionaire services at Jordanelle State Park under a single contract award. The contract term is ten years with two optional ten-year renewal periods, for a potential total of thirty years of service. The procurement process is designed to award the contract to the vendor achieving the highest evaluation score as justified by Utah's procurement code.

The score sheet functions as an informational evaluation tool for assessing vendor proposals. Vendors must guarantee their proposed concession fee percentage for the entire contract term. Specific details regarding pricing terms, evaluation criteria weights, minimum qualifications, and scoring methodology would be contained within the referenced RFP documents and attachments, particularly Attachment C which contains additional information regarding the scope of concessionaire services required at the facility.

View the file

Other files

Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Score Sheet

Jordanelle State Park Concessions Operations
SOLICITATION # AS27-12
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Evaluator:Score will be assigned as follows:
0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information
Date:1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information
2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner
3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner
4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them
5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP
Vendor AVendor BVendor CVendor DVendor EVendor FVendor GVendor HVendor IVendor J
Minimum Mandatory RequirementsRFP SectionEvaluation (Pass/Fail)Evaluation (Pass/Fail)Evaluation (Pass/Fail)Evaluation (Pass/Fail)Evaluation (Pass/Fail)Evaluation (Pass/Fail)Evaluation (Pass/Fail)Evaluation (Pass/Fail)Evaluation (Pass/Fail)Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
1Site Visit VerificationAtt D
2Professional Experience BaselineAtt D
3Financial and Bonding ViabilityAtt D
4Insurance Indemnification CapacityAtt D
5Clean Operational HistoryAtt D
6Contractual and Statutory ComplianceAtt D
Vendor AVendor BVendor CVendor DVendor EVendor FVendor GVendor HVendor IVendor J
Scoreable Technical CriteriaRFP SectionCriteria Weight% of Tech CriteriaPoints PossibleEvaluator Score (0-5)Points
EarnedEvaluator Score (0-5)Points
EarnedEvaluator Score (0-5)Points
EarnedEvaluator Score (0-5)Points
EarnedEvaluator Score (0-5)Points
EarnedEvaluator Score (0-5)Points
EarnedEvaluator Score (0-5)Points
EarnedEvaluator Score (0-5)Points
EarnedEvaluator Score (0-5)Points
EarnedEvaluator Score (0-5)Points

Earned

1.1Rental Fleet & Safety PlanAtt D2011.8%100.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
1.2Storage & Field LogisticsAtt D169.4%80.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
1.3Staffing & Customer Service StandardsAtt D148.2%70.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
2.1Proposed Capital Improvements & Conceptual VisionAtt D2514.7%125.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
2.2Infrastructure & Permitting FeasibilityAtt D158.8%75.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
2.3Operational Continuity & Tenant ProtectionAtt D105.9%50.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
3.1Experience & Operational Track RecordAtt D2011.8%100.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
3.2Key Leadership & Site Management ResumesAtt D158.8%75.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
4.1Proof of Capital & Financial BackingAtt D169.4%80.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
4.230-year Financial ForecastAtt D127.1%60.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
4.3Financial History & Credity WorthinessAtt D74.1%35.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
850.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Required Technical Point ThresholdRFP SectionMin PercentMin Points Required
Att D70%595.0
* Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each Offeror’s fee proposal will be based on the highest percentage of gross receipts. The Offeror with the highest proposed percentage will receive 100% of the price points. All other Offerors will receive a portion of the total points based on what percentage lower their proposed percentage is than the highest proposed percentage. The formula to compute the points is: price points x (Offeror’s Proposed Percentage/Highest Proposed Percentage).
Total Evaluation PointsPoints Possible
Total Technical Evaluation Points850.0
Total Concession Fee Evaluation Points150.0
Total Evaluation Points1,000.0

Scoresheet Summary AS27-12 Jordanelle State Park Concession Operations

Signatures:Date:
Evaluator 1__________________
Evaluator 2__________________
Evaluator 3__________________
Evaluator 4__________________
Evaluator 5__________________
Minimum Mandatory RequirementsVendor AVendor BVendor CVendor DVendor EVendor FVendor GVendor HOfferor IOfferor JOfferor KOfferor LOfferor MOfferor NOfferor OOfferor POfferor QOfferor ROfferor SOfferor T
1Site Visit Verification
2Professional Experience Baseline
3Financial and Bonding Viability
4Insurance Indemnification Capacity
5Clean Operational History
6Contractual and Statutory Compliance
WeightTechnical ScoresVendor AVendor BVendor CVendor DVendor EVendor FVendor GVendor HOfferor IOfferor JOfferor KOfferor LOfferor MOfferor NOfferor OOfferor POfferor QOfferor ROfferor SOfferor T
Criteria #1.1 Rental Fleet & Safety Plan
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
20.0Criteria #1.1 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 100)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Criteria #1.2.Marina, Storage & Field Logistics
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
16.0Criteria #1.2 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 80)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Criteria #1.3.Staffing & Customer Service Standards
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
14.0Criteria #1.3 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 70)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Criteria #2.1.Proposed Capital Improvements & Conceptual Vision
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
25.0Criteria #2.1 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 125)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Criteria #2.2.Infrastructure & Permitting Feasibility
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
15.0Criteria #2.2 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 75)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Criteria #2.3.Operational Continuity & Tenant Protection
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
10.0Criteria #2.3 - Total Points (Total Possible 50)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Criteria #3.1.Experience & Operational Track Record
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
20.0Criteria #3.1 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 100)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Criteria #3.2.Key Leadership & Site Management Resumes
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
15.0Criteria #3.2 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 75)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Criteria #4.1.Proof of Capital & Financial Backing
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
16.0Criteria #4.1 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 80)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Criteria #4.2.30-Year Financial Forecast
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
12.0Criteria #4.2- Total Points (Total Possible Points = 60)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Criteria #4.3.Financial History & Creditworthiness
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
6.0Criteria #4.3 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 35)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Total Technical Points (Total Possible Points = 850) Minimum Threshold = 5950.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Total Fee PointsConcession Fee ScoresVendor AVendor BVendor CVendor DVendor EVendor FVendor GVendor HOfferor IOfferor JOfferor KOfferor LOfferor MOfferor NOfferor OOfferor POfferor QOfferor ROfferor SOfferor T
Concession Fee
150.0Concession Fee Points0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Score SummaryVendor AVendor BVendor CVendor DVendor EVendor FVendor GVendor HOfferor IOfferor JOfferor KOfferor LOfferor MOfferor NOfferor OOfferor POfferor QOfferor ROfferor SOfferor T
Total Technical Points (Total Possible = 850)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Total Cost Points (Total Possible = 150)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Grand Total Points (Total Possible = 1000)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .