ATTACHMENT_D_PAST_PERFORMANCE_ASSESSMENT_FORM.pdf
PDF 41 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 80AFRC18R0007
About this file
This notice provides details for a Multiple Award Construction Contract opportunity with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Up to fourteen indefinite delivery indefinite quantity contracts with a total value of $300 million over five years will be awarded for general construction services including maintenance, repair, alteration, architectural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing and other services. Twelve of the contracts will be set aside for small businesses in various socioeconomic categories and up to two will be unrestricted. Seed projects described for Armstrong Flight Research Center and Ames Research Center range in value from $1 million to $10 million, with performance periods of 424 days and to be determined respectively. The solicitation is expected to be released on or about March 1st 2018 with bids due on or about April 3rd 2018. Organized site visits for the seed project locations are scheduled for March 13th and 15th 2018.
Attachment D
View the file
Other files
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT D – Past Performance Assessment Form
(FOR INFORMATION ONLY - DO NOT COMPLETE)
NAME OF
CONTRACTOR:
Project Title:
EVALUATOR:
Please assess the Contractor in the following areas.
NO. PERFORMANCE CRITERIA Assessment: NOTES:
MANAGEMENT
1 Contractor's management abilities
2 Professionalism of Contractor
3 Small Business Utilization / Subcontract management
4 Contractor's flexibility in handling unforeseen events
5 Ability to communicate effectively
6 Ability to manage/coordinate the effort of its subcontractors
7 Ability to adjust to schedule changes and outages
8 Ability to produce required permits/documentation
9 Response time to routine changes
10 Overall construction knowledge
11 Overall performance of Contractor
12 Your overall customer satisfaction
TECHNICAL
13 Quality of Submittals (design/drawings)
14 Ability to seek Value-Engineering activities
15 Ability to follow facility rules
16 Ability to minimize change orders/claims
17 Ability to minimize lost production time
18 Ability to minimize construction defects
19 Ability to complete punch list items timely
20 Contractor's housekeeping practices
QUALITY CONTROL
21 Contractor’s knowledge of codes and regulations
22 Compliance with Owner's safety programs
23 Overall Construction quality and workmanship
24 EPA/DOL knowledge & compliance. Any known violations?
(Circle One) Y / N
SAFETY PROGRAM
25 OSHA Violations past three years (Circle One) Y / N
26 Mitigation of OSHA violations
27 Evaluation of EMR rates
28 Evaluation of TRIR rates
29 Evaluation of DART rates
30 Overall evaluation of safety program/ safety plan
31 Any known lost time caused by onsite accidents (Circle One, explain if Y) Y / N
32 Work place violence incidents (Circle One) Y / N
OTHER
33 Responsiveness to emergencies and changes
34 Responsiveness to warranty work requests
35 Job completed on time (Circle One, explain if No) Y / N
36 Job completed ahead of schedule (Circle One) Y / N
37 Would you select this contractor again? Y / N
Project require Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Certification? (Circle One)
Y / N
39 Project require Building Information Modelling (BIM)?
(Circle One) Y / N
40 Project require Design-Build? (Circle One) Y / N
Assessment (as defined in CPARS): Exceptional (E) Very Good (V) Satisfactory (S) Marginal (M) Unsatisfactory (U) Not Applicable (N)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .