7-Attachment E- Score Sheet.xls
XLS spreadsheet 44 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RM27-1 Vehicles
- Solicitation number
- RM27-1
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an RFP evaluation score sheet for Solicitation RM27-1, issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing, for the procurement of vehicles including cars, trucks, and vans. The contract is expected to result in multiple awards based on vendors' ability to pass both technical score thresholds and overall evaluation thresholds. The contract term is five years, with vendors required to guarantee pricing for 12 months and maintain percentage discounts for the life of the contract.
The evaluation utilizes a structured scoring methodology across four technical criteria categories: Discounts (375 points, 37.5% weight), Customer Service (250 points, 25% weight), Warranty (250 points, 25% weight), and Delivery Process (125 points, 12.5% weight), for a total of 1,000 technical points. Vendors must achieve a minimum score of 600 points (60% threshold) in the technical evaluation to advance to the cost phase. Cost evaluation is based on established terms and rates submitted via Attachment C, with the evaluation committee determining whether submitted pricing is reasonable for contract award eligibility. An administrative fee of 0.50% (one-half of one percent) applies to all transactions. No additional administrative or state fees may be charged to eligible users as separate line items. Vendors must submit fully completed technical responses in Attachment D and price information in Attachment C to meet mandatory prerequisites for evaluation.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Attachment B- Scope of Work.docx | DOCX document | |
| 4-Attachment D- Technical Criteria.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf | ||
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - Statewide RFP.pdf | ||
| 6-Attachment A- Terms and Conditions.docx | DOCX document | |
| 3-Attachment C Vehicle Pricing Info.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| Attachment E Score Sheet | |||||||||||
| Vehicles (All Types) Cars, Trucks, & Vans | |||||||||||
| SOLICITATION # RM27-1 | |||||||||||
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET | |||||||||||
| Score will be assigned as follows: | |||||||||||
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information | |||||||||||
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information | ||||||||||
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | |||||||||||
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner | ||||||||||
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | |||||||||||
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP | ||||||||||
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | |||||||||
| 1 | Vendor has uploaded fully completed technical responses (Attachment D) | Prerequisites | |||||||||
| 2 | Vendor has uploaded Price Information as stated within Attachment C | Prerequisites | |||||||||
| 0 | |||||||||||
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | RFP Section | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | |||||
| Earned | Minimum Required | ||||||||||
| 1 | Discounts | Attachment D Section 1 | 75 | 37.5% | 375.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| 2 | Customer Service | Attachment D Section 2 | 50 | 25.0% | 250.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| 3 | Warranty | Attachment D Section 3 | 50 | 25.0% | 250.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| 4 | Delivery Process | Attachment D Section 4 | 25 | 12.5% | 125.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| 100.0% | 1000.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||||||||
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation | |||||
| 60% | 600.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | |||||||
| Cost for this solicitation we be based upon Established Terms/Rates as described in 63G-6a-113: A procurement unit acquiring a procurement item may establish the price of the procurement item based on: (1) A price list, rate schedule, or price catalog: (a) submitted by a vendor and accepted by the procurement unit. All dealerships will be required to submit their pricing per Attachment C Vehicle Price Information and upload a document which contains the requested pricing. The Evaluation Committee will review the costs of all dealerships that proceed to the cost stage. If the Evaluation Committee determines the submitted price is reasonable, they will accept the established price and the dealership will be eligible for a contract award. | |||||||||||
| Cost | RFP Section | Cost Accepted | Points Possible | Points Earned | |||||||
| YES/NO | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | ||||||||
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 60% | 1,000.0 | 0.0 | ||||||||
| Cost Reasonable and Accepted by the Procurement Unit | NA | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | 60% | 1,000.0 | 0.0 |
Sheet1
No admin fees or state fees may be charged to eligible users as a separate line item.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .