47PB0018R0019_Tab_2_Asbestos_Survey_Report.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Coburn Gore, ME LPOE Residence Improvements
- Solicitation number
- 47PB0018R0019
About this file
Asbestos Survey Report
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
General Services Administration
USBS Coburn Gore
Asbestos Survey Report
March 26, 2012
USBS Coburn Gore State Route 27
Coburn Gore, ME 04936
Prepared By
Federal Occupational Health JFK Building Room E‐110 Government Center Boston, MA 02203 i
GSA 2012 Draft Asbestos Survey Report – USBS Coburn Gore
ASBESTOS SURVEY REPORT
USBS Coburn Gore
Coburn Gore, ME 04936
For
New England Region
10 Causeway Street
Boston, MA 02222‐1077
March 26, 2012
Jacob Borchin ____________________________ Asbestos Inspector Signature
Michael J. Reeder ____________________________ Asbestos Inspector Signature
Dennis L. Hunter ____________________________ Senior Project Manager Signature
Earl C. McIntosh _____________________________ Senior Program Manager Signature
Prepared by:
Federal Occupational Health JFK Building Room E‐110 Government Center Boston, MA 02203
Table of Contents
I. List of Abbreviations
II. Executive Summary
Table 1 ‐ SUMMARY OF ACM IDENTIFIED AT THE SITE
III. Introduction and Background
IV. Project Tasks
V. Sample Locations & Sample Analysis
Table 2 ‐ SUMMARY OF PLM ANALYTICAL DATA
VI. ACM Condition Assessment
Table 3 – SUMMARY OF ACM PHYSICAL CONDITION
Table 4 – POTENTIAL FOR DISTURBANCE OF SUSPECT MATERIAL
VII. Sampling Protocol
Asbestos Sample Collection
VIII. Analytical Methods
Asbestos Samples
IX. Waste Management
X. Record Keeping
XI. Summary and Recommendations
XII. References
Attachments:
Appendix – A: Asbestos Containing Materials – Certified Laboratory Analytical Results Appendix – B: Photographs of ACM Building Materials Sampled Appendix – C: Asbestos Sampling Locations – Floor Plans and Drawings Appendix – D: Inspector Licenses and Company Certifications
I. List of Abbreviations
ACM Asbestos‐Containing Material
AHERA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act
DS Dispersion Staining
EA Each
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
Flame AAS Flame Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy
FOH Federal Occupational Health
GSA Government Services Administration HA Homogeneous Area LF Linear Feet NESHAP National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration O&M Operation & Maintenance PLM Polarized Light Microscopy PPE Personal Protective Equipment SF Square Feet SOW Scope of Work TEM Transmission Electron Microscopy US United States USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency MDEP Maine Department of Environmental Protection
II. Executive Summary
On March 2, 2012, Mr. Jacob Borchin and Mr. Michael J. Reeder, who are representatives of the Federal Occupational Health (FOH) on behalf of the General Services Administration (GSA), conducted an asbestos survey of the USBS Coburn Gore located at State Route 27 in Coburn Gore, Maine (Site).
The purpose of this assessment was to determine if asbestos containing material (ACM) is present at the Site by collecting non‐destructive samples of accessible suspect ACM throughout the interior of the Site.
The exterior of the Site was not evaluated as part of this survey. Additionally, historic asbestos inspection report(s) or drawings and specifications for original construction and renovation regarding the installation of suspect ACM were not provided or available when the inspectors were conducting the asbestos survey at the Site.
During the collection of suspect ACM samples, the FOH representatives implemented controls, techniques, and protocols to minimize occupational exposure to asbestos, which are in accordance with the New Hampshire Department of Health and other applicable laws and regulations. All sampling and analysis of the suspect ACMs were performed in accordance with applicable requirements by qualified FOH inspectors and by laboratories accredited by the EPA.
During the course of the asbestos survey, FOH asbestos inspector(s) were accompanied by:
Mr. Lyndon Millet, GSA Building Manager and/or designated representative.
The FOH asbestos inspectors collected a total of sixty (60) individual suspected ACM samples throughout accessible areas of the Site. According to analytical results (Appendix B), asbestos was identified in twenty‐seven (27) of the sixty samples collected. The ACMs and associated quantities identified at the Site are summarized in the following Table 1:
Table 1 ‐ SUMMARY OF ACM IDENTIFIED AT THE SITE
SAMPLE
NUMBER
162288‐
MATERIAL
TYPE
MATERIAL
LOCATION
ASBESTOS
CONTENT
QUANTITY
(SF/LF/EA)
1B
1D
2B
3B
3D
Sheetrock & Joint
Compound/Paint
Unit 3 Bedroom 3
Unit 3 Bedroom 2
Unit 3 Living Room
1‐2% Chrysotile
1‐3% Chrysotile
1‐3% Chrysotile
3,600 SF
Gray Insulation on Tank
Unit 3 Basement
25‐30% Chrysotile
50 SF
13A
13B
14A
14B
15A
15B
9” X 9” Tan Floor Tile
W/ Black Mastic
Unit 3 Basement Stair
Landing
3‐5% Chrysotile
8‐10% Chrysotile
3‐5% Chrysotile
8‐10% Chrysotile
3‐5% Chrysotile
25 SF
19B
20B
20D
21B
Sheetrock &
Joint Compound/Paint
Unit 4 Bedroom 3 Closet
Unit 4 Living Room Closet
Unit 4 Master Bedroom
22A
22B
23A
23B
24A
24B
Unit 4 Kitchen
3‐5% Chrysotile
8‐10% Chrysotile
3‐5% Chrysotile
400 SF
NUMBER
162288‐
MATERIAL
TYPE
MATERIAL
LOCATION
ASBESTOS
CONTENT
QUANTITY
(SF/LF/EA)
Gray Sink Coating
Unit 2 Kitchen
Unit 1 Kitchen
10‐15% Chrysotile 2 EA
2‐3% Chrysotile
37B
37D
38B
38D
39B
39D
Unit 2 Bedroom 1
Unit 2 Living Room
Unit 2 Bedroom 2
1‐2% Chrysotile
1‐2% Chrysotile
TSI Pipe Insulation
Unit 1 Basement
15‐20% Chrysotile
10‐15% Amosite
150 LF
Assumed 400 SF
Unit 1
Assumed 3,600 SF
Note: All Quantities are estimates. SF=Square Feet, LF=Linear Feet, and EA = Each
* Considered Homogenous to Previous Identified ACM in units 2, 3 and 4.
III. Introduction and Background
According to supplied information, the Site includes an approximate 122,807‐square foot; five‐story building with a penthouse and basement.
IV. Project Tasks
Project tasks included:
Reviewing existing drawings and specifications provided by the GSA for original construction and renovation information (as available) regarding the installation of suspect ACM.
Reviewing historic asbestos inspection reports (as available) to determine the existence of previously identified homogeneous areas (HAs) at each functional space.
Verify if previously conducted asbestos inspection was performed in accordance with the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) regulations. If not, the number of additional bulk samples necessary for compliance with the AHERA regulations will be calculated.
Developing sampling protocols in accordance to AHERA regulations.
Sampling and analyzing various interior building materials to determine if ACMs are present.
Developing maps for each floor showing areas where suspect ACM samples were collected and ACM was identified.
Note all areas identified as inaccessible (e.g., pipe chases, wall voids, elevator shafts, locked doors, etc.) during the sampling event.
Asbestos bulk samples of various building materials and surfaces were collected at the Site and submitted to the FOH Denver Asbestos Laboratory to undergo Polarized Light Microscopy with Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS) analysis in accordance with the “Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials” (US EPA Method 600/R‐93/116, July 1993).
V. Sample Locations & Sample Analysis
FOH’s accredited asbestos inspectors conducted the survey and collected samples of suspected ACM in general accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) interpretations and guidelines of AHERA. The inspectors surveyed the Site and collected samples of all suspected ACM. The PLM analytical data of asbestos samples collected at the Site is summarized in Table 2.
Table 2 ‐ SUMMARY OF PLM ANALYTICAL DATA
NUMBER
162288‐
MATERIAL
TYPE
MATERIAL
LOCATION
ASBESTOS
CONTENT
QUANTITY
(SF/LF/EA)
01A
01B
01C
01D
02A
02B
03A
03B
03C
03D
Sheetrock & Joint
Compound
Paper
Compound/Paint
Sheetrock & Joint
Compound
Sheetrock & Joint
Compound
Paper
Unit 3 Bedroom 3
Unit 3 Bedroom 2
Unit 3 Living Room
ND
ND
1‐2% Chrysotile
ND
1‐3% Chrysotile
ND
1‐3% Chrysotile
Insulation
Unit 3 Attic
ND NA
Tan Sheet flooring
Unit 3 Kitchen
Unit 3 Basement
25‐30% Chrysotile 50 SF
14A
14B
Unit 3 Basement Stair Landing
3‐5% Chrysotile
8‐10% Chrysotile
3‐5% Chrysotile
25 SF
162288‐
MATERIAL
TYPE
MATERIAL
LOCATION
ASBESTOS
CONTENT
White Sheet Flooring
Unit 4 Bathroom
19A
19B
20A
20B
20C
20D
21A
21B
Sheetrock & Joint
Compound
Sheetrock & Joint
Compound
Paper
Compound/Paint
Unit 4 Bedroom 3
Unit 4 Living Room
Unit 4 Master Bedroom
ND
1‐2% Chrysotile
ND
1‐2% Chrysotile
23A
23B
Unit 4 Kitchen
3‐5% Chrysotile
8‐10% Chrysotile
3‐5% Chrysotile
Insulation
Unit 4 Attic
White Sheet Flooring
10‐15% Chrysotile
2 EA
162288‐
MATERIAL
TYPE
MATERIAL
LOCATION
ASBESTOS
CONTENT
34A
34B
35A
35B
36A
36B
37A
37C
37D
38A
38B
38C
38D
39A
39B
39C
Compound
Paper
Compound/Paint
Sheetrock & Joint
Compound
Paper
Compound/Paint
Sheetrock & Joint
Compound
Paper
Unit 2 Bedroom 1
Unit 2 Living Room
Unit 2 Bedroom 2
ND
1‐2% Chrysotile
ND
1‐2% Chrysotile
ND
1‐2% Chrysotile
ND
1‐2% Chrysotile
ND
White Pipe Wrap
15‐20% Chrysotile
10‐15% Amosite
150 LF
162288‐
MATERIAL
TYPE
MATERIAL
LOCATION
ASBESTOS
CONTENT
QUANTITY
(SF/LF/EA)
12”’ X 12” Tan Floor Tile
1st Floor Main Office
1st Floor Office 2
1st Floor Main Office
49A
49B
50A
50B
51A
51B
Joint Compound
1st Floor Stair Case
2nd Floor Stair Case
1st Floor Restroom
2’ X 2’ White Ceiling Tile
2nd Floor Main Room
2nd Floor Main Room
2nd Floor Bedroom 2
ND NA
Gray Duct Mastic
Basement
2’ X 4’ White Ceiling Tile
Note: All Quantities are estimates. SF=Square Feet, LF=Linear Feet, EA = Each, ND=Non‐Detected
VI. ACM Condition Assessment
The FOH asbestos inspector(s) categorized the various suspect ACMs (Surfacing Material, Miscellaneous
Material, and Thermal System Insulation) collected at the Site by visual inspection and classified these materials by referencing the following definitions:
Surfacing and Miscellaneous Material
Good Condition (GC) – Material with no visible damage or deterioration, or showing only very limited damage or deterioration.
Damaged (D) – The surface is crumbling, blistered, water‐stained, gouged, marred or otherwise abraded over less than one‐tenth (1/10) of the surface if the damage is evenly distributed (one‐quarter if the damage is localized).
Significantly Damaged (SG) – The surface is crumbling or blistered over at least 1/10 of the surface if the damaged is evenly distributed (one‐quarter if the damage is localized); 1/10
(one‐quarter, if localized) of material hanging from surface, deteriorated, or showing adhesive failure; and/or water stains, gouges, or mars over at least 1/10 of the surface if the damage is evenly distributed (one‐quarter if the damage is localized).
AHERA Definition of Damaged Friable Surfacing Miscellaneous ACM:
“Friable surfacing miscellaneous ACM, which has deteriorated or sustained physical injury such that the internal structure (cohesion) of the material is inadequate or, if applicable, which has delaminated such that the bond to the substrate (adhesion) is adequate or which for any other reason lacks fiber cohesion or adhesion qualities. Such damage or deterioration may be illustrated by the separation of ACM into layers; separation of ACM from the substrate; flaking, blistering, or crumbling of ACM surface; water damage; significant or repeated water stains, scrapes, gouges, mars or other signs of physical injury on the ACM. Asbestos debris originating from the ACBM in question may also indicate damage.”
Thermal System Insulation
Good Condition (GC) – Material with no visible damage or deterioration, or showing only very limited damage or deterioration.
Damaged (D) – A few water stains or less than 1/10 of insulation with missing jackets and/or crushed insulation or water stains, gouges, punctures, or mars on up to 1/10 of the insulation if the damage is evenly distributed (or up to one‐quarter if the damaged is localized).
Significantly Damaged (SG) – Missing jackets on at least 1/10 of the piping or equipment and/or crushed or heavily gouged or punctured insulation on at least 1/10 of pipe runs/risers, boiler, tank, duct, etc., if the damage is evenly distributed (or up to one‐quarter if the damaged is localized).
Note: Accumulation of powder, dust, or debris similar in appearance to the suspect material on surfaces beneath the pipe/boiler/tank/duct, etc. can be used as confirmatory evidence.
AHERA Definition of Damaged or Significantly Damaged Thermal System Insulation:
“Thermal system insulation ACM on pipes, boilers, tanks, ducts, and other thermal system insulation equipment which has lost its structural integrity, or its covering, in whole or in part, is crushed, water‐ stained, gouged, punctured, missing, or not intact such that is not able to contain fibers. Damage may be further illustrated by occasional punctures, gouges, or other signs of physical injury to ACM;
occasional water damage on the protective coverings/jackets; or exposed ACM ends or joints. Asbestos debris, originating from the ACBM in question may also indicate damage.”
Table 3 – SUMMARY OF ACM PHYSICAL CONDITION
SAMPLE
NUMBER
162288‐
MATERIAL
TYPE
Surfacing Material Thermal System Insulation Miscellaneous Material
Friable Non‐
Friable
Condt. Friable Non‐
Friable
Condt. Friable Non‐
Friable
Condt.
1B
1D
2B
3B
3D
√ GC
Gray Insulation on
Tank
14A
14B
162288‐
MATERIAL
TYPE
Surfacing Material Thermal System Insulation Miscellaneous Material
Friable Non‐
Friable
Condt. Friable Non‐
Friable
Condt. Friable Non‐
23A
23B
38B
38D
162288‐
MATERIAL
TYPE
Surfacing Material Thermal System Insulation Miscellaneous Material
Friable Non‐
Friable
Condt. Friable Non‐
Friable
Condt. Friable Non‐
Note: GC = Good Condition, D = Damaged, and SD = Significantly Damaged
* Considered Homogenous to Previous Identified ACM.
The FOH asbestos inspector(s) also determined the ACMs potential for contact, the influence of vibration, and the potential for air erosion by referencing the following definitions:
Potential for Contact with the Material
High: Service workers work in the vicinity of the material more than once per week, or
The material is in a public area (e.g., hallway, corridor, auditorium) and accessible to building occupants.
Moderate: Service workers work in the vicinity of the material once per month to once per week, or
The material is in a room or office and accessible to the occupants.
Low: Service workers work in the vicinity of the material less than once per month, or
The material is visible but not within reach of building occupants.
Influence of Vibration
High: Loud motors or engines present (e.g., some fan rooms), or
Intrusive noises or easily sensed vibrations (e.g., major airports, a major highway).
Moderate: Motors or engines present but not obtrusive (e.g., ducts vibrating but no fan in the area), or
Occasional loud sounds (e.g., a music room)
Low/None: None of the above.
Potential for Air Erosion
High: High velocity air (e.g., elevator shaft, fan room).
Moderate: Noticeable movement of air (e.g., air shaft, ventilator air stream).
Low/None: None of the above.
Table 4 – POTENTIAL FOR DISTURBANCE OF SUSPECT MATERIAL
NUMBER
162288‐
MATERIAL
TYPE
Potential for Contact Influence of Vibration Potential for Air Erosion
High Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low
1B
1D
2B
3B
3D
Gray Insulation on
Tank
14A
14B
9” X 9” Tan Floor
Tile
23A
23B
162288‐
MATERIAL
TYPE
Potential for Contact Influence of Vibration Potential for Air Erosion
High Moderate Low High Moderate Low High Moderate Low
38B
38D
* Considered Homogenous to Previous Identified ACM in units 2, 3 and 4.
VII. Sampling Protocol
Asbestos Sample Collection
Representative bulk samples of suspect asbestos containing building materials (ACMBs) were collected at the Site building. The building was divided into separate and distinct project areas. For the purpose of this survey, each area was inspected and sampled as a separate functional space having separate and distinct homogenous materials. Homogenous material determination was based on the following criteria:
Similar physical characteristics (same color and texture, etc.)
Application (sprayed‐on, troweled‐on, assembly into a system etc.)
Material function (thermal insulation, floor tile, wallboard system etc.)
Samples of suspected ACM were collected and placed into sealed plastic bags and shipped via overnight delivery to the FOH Denver Asbestos Laboratory to undergo PLM/DS analysis in accordance with the
“Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials” (US EPA Method 600/R‐93/116, July 1993).
VIII. Analytical Methods
Asbestos Samples
Polarized Light Microscopy Analysis Methodology
The FOH Denver Asbestos Laboratory, which is a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program certified laboratory, provided the asbestos analytical services. The laboratory analyzed the suspected
ACM by PLM utilizing the EPAs Test Methods: Methods for the determination of Asbestos in Bulk
Building Materials (EPA 600/R‐93/116, July 1993) and the McCrone Research Institute’s The Asbestos
Particle Atlas as method references. Additional treatment and tests may be required to accurately define the sample composition (i.e. ashing, extraction, acetone treatment, and transmission electron microscopy).
The sample analysis was performed by using the bulk sample for visual observation and slide preparation(s) for microscopic examination and identification. The lab analyzed the samples for asbestos (chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, anthophyllite, and actinolite/tremolite), fibrous non‐asbestos constituents (mineral wool, cellulose, etc.) and non‐fibrous constituents. Using a stereoscope, the microscopist visually estimated relative amounts of each constituent by determining the volume of each constituent in proportion to the total volume of the sample.
IX. Waste Management
FOH representatives did not generate any waste material while conducting the asbestos survey at the
Site. The small amount of material collected while conducting these surveys was submitted to the laboratories for analysis, and there was no excess amount of material left that required disposal.
X. Record Keeping
In order to document the progress of this project, the FOH inspector maintained field notes, developed site sketches, and made notations on site diagrams and floor plans as the fieldwork progressed. Copies of the certified laboratory asbestos analytical reports and chain–of‐custodies are included in Appendix
A. Photos of the suspected ACM are included in Appendix B. Copies of asbestos sample locations are included in Appendix C and company certifications and inspector licenses are included in Appendix D.
XI. Summary and Recommendations
On March 2, 2012 FOH inspectors collected a total of sixty (60) individual suspected ACM samples at the
Site. Analytical results of the asbestos samples collected indicated that twenty‐seven (27) of the sixty suspected ACM samples contained at least one percent or more of asbestos. ACM identified at the Site include the following materials, which are defined and quantified in Table 1 and Table 2 of this report:
Sheetrock & Joint Compound/Paint
TSI Pipe Insulation
9” X 9” Tan Floor Tile W/ Black Mastic
Since asbestos was identified in concentrations greater than one percent, any construction or renovation activities performed in the future are subject to applicable rules and regulation concerning the disturbance or removal of the ACM. The Maine Depart of Environmental Protection rules apply to all buildings which are subject to public occupancy, or to which the general public has access. Any person disturbing, removing, or encapsulating asbestos in any public building including, renovation, dismantling, or demolition, shall notify the Maine Depart of Environmental Protection in writing ten (10) working days prior to the start date of the abatement project. It is the responsibility of the building
Owner or it’s Representative to ensure that only current Maine State license asbestos abatement companies and workers engage in asbestos related activities.
The U.S. EPA regulations do not require removal of asbestos‐containing materials that are in good condition. However, personnel who may be involved with building renovations will need to be advised of the presence of asbestos, and appropriate measures may be warranted in order to assure the identified ACM in the building are not disturbed during renovation activities. If the ACM left in place is disturbed during renovation activities, the materials must be handled and disposed of in accordance with the applicable State and Federal regulations.
References
EPA, Guidance on Systematic Planning Using the Data Quality Objective Process, EPA, QA/G-4, February 2006.
EPA, Guidance for Quality Assurance Project Plans, EPA QA/G-5, December 2002.
EPA, Framework for Investigating Asbestos-Contaminated Superfund Sites, OSWER Directive #9200.0-
68, September 2008.
EPA, Guidance on Choosing a Sampling Design for Environmental Data Collection, EPA QA/G-5S, December 2002.
Appendix – A
| Asbestos | Containing | Materials | |
| Certified | Laboratory | Analytical | Results |
Appendix – B
Photographs of ACM Building Materials Sampled
GSA 2011 Asbestos Survey Report – USBS Coburn Gore Photographs of ACM Building Materials Sampled
1. Sample Number 162288-01, 02 & 03, which includes Sheetrock & Joint Compound/Paint
2. Sample Number 162288-10, which includes Gray Tank Insulation.
3 Sample Number 162288-11, which includes Gray Tank
4. Sample Number 162288-12, which includes Gray Tank
5. Sample Number 162288-13, 14 & 15, which includes 9” X 9” Tan Floor Tile W/ Black Mastic.
6. Sample Number 162288-19, which includes Sheetrock & Joint Compound/Paint.
7. Sample Number 162288-20 which includes Sheetrock & Joint Compound/Paint.
8. Sample Number 162288-22, 23 &24, which includes 9” X 9” Tan Floor Tile W/ Black Mastic.
9. Sample Number 162288-31 which includes Gray Sink Coating.
10. Sample Number 162288-32, which includes Gray Sink Coating.
11. Sample Number 162288-33, which includes Gray Sink Coating.
12. Sample Number 162288-37, which includes Sheetrock & Joint Compound/Paint.
13. Sample Number 162288-38, which includes Sheetrock & Joint Compound/Paint.
14. Sample Number 162288-43 which includes TSI Pipe Insulation.
15. Sample Number 16288-44, which includes TSI Pipe Insulation.
16. Sample Number 162288-45, which includes TSI Pipe
Appendix – C
Asbestos Sampling Locations – Floor Plans and Drawings
Asbestos Survey
USBS Coburn Gore
Coburn Gore, ME
Sample Locations
ACM Locations
Non ACM Locations
Stairs
Down
Generator/
Outside Air
Fire Sprinkler
Storage Tanks
Water
Heater
Boiler
USBS Coburn Gore st Floor
Men’s
Women’s
Entry
Hall
Garage
#2
Garage
#1
Main
Office
Office
#1
Stairs
Up
Stairs
Down
Restroom
#2
Restroom
#1
Office 2
US Border Station nd
Floor
Up
Bed
#1
Bed
#2
Bed
#3 Bed
#4
Closet
#1
Closet
#2
StorageBathroom
USBS Coburn Cove
Unit #1
Down
44 45
TSI Pipe Insulation
ACM 9" X 9" Tan Floor Tile W/ Black
Mastic on Stair Case Landing
USBS Coburn Gore
Unit #1
First Floor
Entry
Kitchen Dinning
Living Room
RR
Bedroom 1
Bedroom 2
9" X 9" Tan Floor Tile
W/ Black Mastic
ACM Sheetrock &
Joint Compound Throughout
Gray Sink Coating
USBS Coburn Gore
Unit #2
Down
ACM 9" X 9" Tan Floor Tile W/ Black
Mastic on Stair Case Landing
USBS Coburn Gore
Unit #2
31,32,33 34,35,36
Bathroom
Bedroom
#1 Bedroom
#2
Kitchen Flooring
Living
Room
9" X 9" Tan Floor Tile
W/ Black Mastic
Gray Sink Coating
ACM Sheetrock &
Joint Compound Throughout
USBS Coburn Gore
Unit #3
Down
Water
Heater
Heater
13,14, 9" X 9" Tan Floor Tile
Gray Tank Insulation
USBS Coburn Gore
Down
Kitchen
Dining Room
Living Room
Master
Bedroom
Bedroom
#2
Bedroom
#3
Bathroom
USBS Coburn Gore
Attic
Ladder to attic
Plywood
USBS Coburn Gore
Unit #4
Down
Water
Heater Heater
9" X 9" Tan Floor Tile
USBS Coburn Gore
Down
Kitchen
Dining
Room
Living
Room
Master
Bedroom Bedroom
#2
Bedroom
#3
Bathroom
17 18
9" X 9" Tan Floor Tile
W/ Black Mastic
USBS Coburn Gore
Ladder
To Attic
Appendix – D
Inspector Licenses and Company Certifications
File details come from the government source that posted it.