36C24119R0104-0005026.pdf

Attachment 1: Inspection report Building 27

Apex Companies, LLC 58 H Connecticut Avenue South Windsor, CT 06074 T 860.282.1700 F 860.282.1800 apexcos.com

AAttttaacchhmmeenntt 11

Asbestos, Lead Paint, PCBs, and Soil Sampling

Inspection Report for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) of Central

Western Massachusetts Healthcare System

Building 27

421 North Main Street Leeds, MA 01053-9764

Apex Project No: ACELA-001

December 15, 2017

Prepared for:

Acela Engineering Co

Daniel Witczak, PE, PMP

1275 Glenlivet Drive, Suite 100

Allentown, PA 18106-3107

APEX COMPANIES, LLC

Prepared by:

Ethan T. Platt

Project Manager

Industrial Hygiene Services

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT AND BULK SAMPLING METHODOLOGY

3.0 INSPECTING FOR ACM

4.0 LABORATORY ANALYSES

5.0 ASBESTOS RESULTS

6.0 LEAD SURVEY (Historic, TCLP, Soil)

7.0 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) RESULTS

8.0 PCB sOIL RESULTS

9.0 INACCESSIBLE AND LIMITED ACCESS SPACES

10.0 FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS

10.0 DISCLAIMER

FIGURES

Figure 1 Site Location Diagrams – Bulk Sample Locations Figure 2 Combined with Historic Site Location Diagram (from Appendix D)

TABLES

Table 1 NESHAP Sampling Protocol Table 2 Asbestos Sample Analytical Results Table 3 Pb Soil Analytical Results Table 4 PCB Building Sample Analytical Results Table 5 PCB Soil Analytical Results Table 6 Building Composite Total Character Leachate Procedure Soil Analytical Results

APPENDICES

Appendix A Personnel and Laboratory Certifications Appendix B Laboratory Data Sheets and Chain-of Custodies Appendix C Photographs Appendix D Client Provided Historic Reports

VA of Western Massachusetts December 15, 2017

Asbestos, Lead, PCBs, and Soil Survey – Attachment: 1 (Building 27) Page 2

1.0 INTRODUCTION

At the request of Acela Engineering Co (Acela) on behalf of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) of

Central Western Massachusetts Healthcare System(VA), Apex Companies, LLC (Apex) has conducted an inspection of Building 27 on the VA Campus located at 421 North Main Street in Leeds, Massachusetts. The building was unoccupied at the time of the survey and was inspected for the presence of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs), lead based paint via Total Characteristic Leachate

Procedure (TCLP), Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and soil samples were collected and analyzed for the presence of lead (Pb) and PCBs along the building ‘drip line’ where possible. The survey services were conducted on November 6 through 10, 2017.

Mr. Ethan T. Platt (Apex) was the inspector performing the inspection activities at the project site. Mr.

Platt is a Massachusetts Department of Labor Standards (MADOLS)-licensed asbestos Consultant

Inspector (License No. AM000219). Copies of Mr. Platt’s certifications are provided in Appendix A.

Apex conducted a visual inspection of the interior and exterior areas of the building. During the visual inspection, Apex identified and collected nineteen (19) samples of suspect ACMs, eight (8) PCB bulk samples, one sample for TCLP lead, four (4) soil samples for lead, and four (4) samples for PCBs. While

Apex made every attempt to seek out and sample all suspect materials, due to limitations, there exists the possibility that unidentified materials may remain in the building. At the time of demolition, any materials not identified in this report that is uncovered should be considered to be an ACM unless testing proves otherwise.

In addition to Apex’s inspection the VA supplied a historic report produced by Mabbett & Associates, Inc.

Where feasible this historic report has been incorporated into this report.

The building’s interior and exterior were inspected for suspect materials. Of the samples collected, due to

“positive stop” instructions, a total of seventeen (17) were analyzed via polarized light microscopy (PLM) to determine the presence of asbestos.

2.0 ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT AND BULK SAMPLING METHODOLOGY

Survey and assessment protocols used were based on those adopted by the United States

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as detailed in the National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air

Pollutants (NESHAP) 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 61, Subpart M. Mr. Platt conducted the on-site inspection and assessments.

Asbestos bulk samples were collected and analyzed using the EPA’s NESHAP protocol as follows:

• Sampling locations were initially chosen in a randomly distributed;

• Suspended ceiling tiles were moved slowly in a horizontal position;

• The sample areas were wetted (not saturated) during sampling to minimize fiber release;

• The suspect ACM was sampled using a utility knife, wood chisels, coring tools, or forceps. The tool that minimized the disturbance to the sample material, was least likely to cause fiber release, and was most efficient for sampling the particular material was used;

• All layers of suspected ACMs were sampled, with sample integrity maintained;

• The bulk sample size was approximately two square centimeters (cm2) or smaller;

Asbestos, Lead, PCBs, and Soil Survey – Attachment: 1 (Building 27) Page 3

• Wherever possible, samples were collected from damaged areas to minimize fiber release;

• Each sample was placed in a clear plastic container and the outside wet-wiped, sealed, and labeled with a unique sample number. This number, along with other pertinent information, was recorded on the bulk sample chain of custody and field form;

• The sampling tool was cleaned with a damp disposable towel between sample collection.

The sampling protocol established by NESHAP was used to determine the required number of samples for this survey based on function (surfacing, thermal system insulation, or miscellaneous materials) and homogeneous building materials. A homogeneous area is defined as an area where a suspect material is uniform in texture, color, and appears to have been installed at the same time. Materials appearing to be identical but determined by the inspector to have been installed at different time periods were treated as different suspect materials.

The NESHAP protocol was used to determine functional areas, and subsequent, homogeneous areas of construction in the building.

Three forms of asbestos are typically found in buildings:

• sprayed- or troweled-on surfacing materials (spray-on fireproofing and plaster);

• thermal system insulation (insulation on pipes, boilers and other mechanical equipment); and

• miscellaneous materials such as floor tiles, ceiling tiles, roofing materials, drywall composition, window caulking / glazing, etc.

NESHAP recommends the collection of a minimum number of samples for each suspect ACM. Apex follows the NESHAP sampling protocol for each survey conducted. In addition, Apex generally collects a minimum of one to three samples per suspect homogeneous material. However, in cases where the material is hidden beneath layers the sample numbers are often reduced.

Identification of types of materials and the number of samples collected during the Apex survey, which is based on the NESHAP sampling protocol is identified in Table 1. The suspect and accessible materials that were observed in the facility were sampled per this protocol. Apex developed a sampling strategy following a walk-through visual inspection of the accessible areas of the building. This allowed the inspector to evaluate the construction of the building, as well as identify suspect homogeneous ACMs for sampling purposes.

Apex made every attempt to visually assess the entire structure included in this survey, as well as to collect samples of all suspect materials identified. However, some areas of the building were not inspected due to being inaccessible due to occupancy or without extensive demolition (such as wall interiors) and areas where safety would be compromised by entering (such as confined spaces or inside active machinery). Any new materials found in these areas during renovations or demolition is to be considered ACMs until sampling and testing confirms otherwise.

Once homogeneous suspect materials were identified, Apex began the collection of these materials for submission to the laboratory.

Asbestos, Lead, PCBs, and Soil Survey – Attachment: 1 (Building 27) Page 4

3.0 INSPECTING FOR ACM

This inspection and sampling was conducted on an area-by-area basis. Materials that were considered suspect were identified and the number of samples to be collected of these suspect materials was determined by the inspector using NESHAP protocols. As defined by NESHAP, suspect materials include the following building material types:

• surfacing materials - including plaster, spray-applied or troweled-on wall/ceiling coatings;

• thermal system insulation (TSI) - including pipe insulation, duct insulation, boiler lagging; and

• miscellaneous materials - including ceiling tile, floor tiles and mastics, gaskets (if accessible), fire doors, and wallboard/spackling compound.

Suspect materials that are homogeneous in nature (i.e., uniform in color and texture) were identified, touched to determine friability, and sampled by removing a small piece that was then placed in a labeled container. For a given homogeneous area, one or more samples were collected in a randomly distributed manner in accordance with NESHAP provisions (40 CFR 61). Unless specifically referenced, materials not considered by the NESHAP rules as suspect ACMs were not addressed by Apex during this survey.

Several suspect ACMs identified at the building warranted special scrutiny or otherwise required special consideration. These materials were:

• Joint Compound/Sheetrock: if sheetrock (wallboard and ceiling board) and its associated joint compound were considered suspect ACM and sampled separately in accordance with OSHA requirements. If either component was found to contain more than one percent asbestos, the entire wall system would be considered ACM; and

• Vinyl floor tiles and mastics: If floor tiles and underlying mastics were considered suspect ACM.

Each flooring material and its associated mastic were sampled separately. If either component was found to contain greater than one percent asbestos, then only that material was considered ACM.

However, if positive mastic adheres to floor tile, the floor tile must be considered contaminated.

Based on this observation, the characterization of the homogenous material underneath (i.e., tile or mastic), if any, was extrapolated to the entire floor surface of that area. The base flooring was examined to the subflooring.

4.0 LABORATORY ANALYSES

In order to determine whether the materials are asbestos containing (i.e., contain more than one percent asbestos as defined by the EPA, or containing ‘1% or more’ per MADEP 310 CMR 7.15) EMSL Analytical, Inc. in Cinnaminson, New Jersey analyzed samples for asbestos content. EMSL is a National Voluntary

Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) -accredited laboratory. Sample designations, gross descriptions, and analytical results are provided in Table 2. Laboratory analytical reports and field sampling logs are presented in Appendix B.

Asbestos fiber content is estimated by optically comparing the quantity of non-asbestos material to asbestos fibers utilizing polarized light microscopy/dispersion staining (PLM/DS). The lower limit of reliable detection using PLM is 1%. Samples that contain 1% or more asbestos are reported in percent

Asbestos, Lead, PCBs, and Soil Survey – Attachment: 1 (Building 27) Page 5 ranges. Samples that contain asbestos in a concentration lower than the limit of reliable detection (<1%) are reported as “<1%”. Samples in which no asbestos is observed are reported as “None Detected”.

EMSL analyzed seventeen (17) of the nineteen (19) collected bulk samples via PLM.

5.0 ASBESTOS RESULTS

Asbestos-containing building materials were detected in Building 27 of the VA campus site located at

421 North Main Street Leeds, Massachusetts. A material is considered by the EPA to be asbestos-containing if at least one sample collected from the homogeneous area shows asbestos present in an amount greater than one percent (>1%), and the Massachusetts DEP further defines the asbestos containing material as ‘1% or more’ per MADEP 310 CMR 7.15 . The full sample list is provided in Table

2. A copy of the laboratory ACM sample results is provided in Appendix B.

The following building materials contained ≥ 1 % asbestos:

Sample # 08A-C Roof Vent Flashing Tar – sealer on roof chimney vent

15% Chrysotile

~4 SF visible on the roof.

HISTORIC SAMPLE #03A-C Conduit Penetration Caulk (At back of greenhouse) 5% Chrysotile

~2 SF visible

Asbestos, Lead, PCBs, and Soil Survey – Attachment: 1 (Building 27) Page 6

6.0 LEAD SURVEY (Historic, TCLP, Soil)

Historic Report

In 2010 Mabbett & Associates conducted a full Lead Paint inspection via XRF. Lead was found to be present (see below table). This report is attached as Appendix D.

Reading

No.

Floor Location

Substrate and

Component Side Condition Color

Results

(mg/cm2)

2378 Groun d

Greenhous e

Wood Screen Door

East Intact Red 5.6

2379 Groun d

Greenhous e

Wood Screen

Door Casing East Intact Silver 20

2380 Ground Greenhous e

Metal Column West Intact Silver 0.5

2381 Groun d

Greenhous e

Metal Beam West Intact Silver 11.5

2382 Groun d

Greenhous e

Wood Trim West Intact Silver 15.3

2383 Groun d

Greenhous e

Wood Trim West Peeling Silver 18.5

2386 Groun d

Greenhous e

Wood Door Casing

Sout h

Intact White 24.4

2388 Groun d

Greenhous e

Wood Window

Casing North Intact White 15.3

2390 Groun d

Greenhous e

Drywall Pipe Sout h

Intact Green 12.5

2391 Ground Exterior Concrete Wall

(Exterior) South Intact White 0.25

2392 Groun d

Exterior Wood Sign Frame

Sout h

Intact Black 11.5

2393 Groun d

Exterior Wood Trim North Peeling White 38.4

2394 Ground Exterior Metal Handrail South Intact White 0.7

The HUD/EPA standard for lead-based paint of equal to or greater than 1.0 mg/cm2.

TCLP Lead Assessment

Apex collected building composite samples to represent the building’s construction and components. This composite sample was collected to determine whether components of either building which is slated for demolition have hazardous levels of lead-based paint. This TCLP analysis is conducted to determine whether debris generated from demolition needs to be disposed of as hazardous lead waste. The EPA has determined that if the result of the analysis is more than 5.0 milligram per liter (mg/L) then the waste needs to be disposed of as lead-contaminated waste.

Asbestos, Lead, PCBs, and Soil Survey – Attachment: 1 (Building 27) Page 7

The representative composite sample of building materials was collected, and submitted to the laboratory for analysis by EMSL. The results of all TCLP are summarized in Table 6:

The TCLP laboratory result for lead is reported at <0.40 mg/L for Building 27. The result does not exceed the regulatory threshold of 5.0 mg/L. The TCLP laboratory report is provided in Appendix B.

It is important to note that the OSHA 29 CFR 1926.62 (the Lead in Construction Standard) applies to demolition activity that disturbs any lead-containing paint. Therefore, paints that were not classified as lead-based paint but did have a lead detection are regulated under this standard in addition to paints classified as lead-based paint. Because several paints did contain low levels of lead, the OSHA Lead in

Construction Standard should be utilized during building demolition.

The Lead paint is present throughout the building.

Please refer to the report in Appendix D

Lead in Soil

Lead is naturally present in all soils. It occurs generally in the range of 15 to 40 parts lead per million parts of soil (ppm), or 15 to 40 milligrams lead per kilogram of soil (mg/kg). Pollution can increase soil lead levels to several thousand ppm; the major cause of soil lead contamination in populated areas is the weathering, chipping, scraping, sanding, and sand-blasting of structures bearing lead-based paint.

In the past, significant causes of soil contamination by lead included the use of tetraethyl lead as an anti-knock ingredient in gasoline and lead arsenate as an insecticide in fruit orchards. Automotive lead emissions have effectively ceased with the phasing out of leaded fuels, and with the development of more effective pesticides and Integrated Pest Management (IPM), lead arsenate is no longer in use.

Unfortunately, lead persists in soil for many hundreds of years and past use of these products continues to present problems in some areas.

Soil lead becomes a health risk when directly ingested or inhaled as dust. Garden produce, which has accumulated lead in its tissue or has soil particles adhering to it, can also be a hazard if eaten. Lead poisoning is a particular concern for young children (under 6) because their rapidly developing bodies are very sensitive to the effects of lead, and their play habits tend to increase exposure.

Under 40 CFR 261 the regulatory threshold is 5.0 mg/L. The four (4) drip line samples were found to be below the threshold and ranged from < 0.40 mg/l to 0.60 mg/l. The results are summarized in Table 3 below.

TABLE 3

TCLP Lead in Soil for Building 27

Sample Number Location Result (mg/l)

Pb-27-01 South side drip line 0.60

Pb-27-02 West side drip line < 0.40

Pb-27-03 North side drip line 0.41

Pb-27-04 East side drip line < 0.40

Asbestos, Lead, PCBs, and Soil Survey – Attachment: 1 (Building 27) Page 8

7.0 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS) RESULTS

Many building products produced from the 1950’s through the 1970’s were manufactured with PCBs as a key ingredient because of their non-flammability, chemical stability, high boiling point, and electrical and thermal insulating properties. PCBs were also added to many building products as a plasticizer, which increased their flexibility. Although the use of products with PCBs is unauthorized per Section 6(e)(2) of the Toxics Substances Control Act (TSCA) and in Chapter 40, Section 761.20 of the Code of Federal

Regulations (CFR), there is no regulatory requirement to test products in use to determine their PCB concentration.

If PCBs are detected in building materials at concentrations between 1 ppm and 50 ppm and the building materials meet the definition of a PCB Excluded Product as defined in 40 CFR 761.3, then the

Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) recommends that the building materials be removed.

Building materials containing PCBs at concentrations greater than or equal to 50 parts per million (ppm) are not authorized for use under Section 6(3)(2) of TSCA and must be removed and properly disposed of as PCB Bulk Product Waste in accordance with 40 CFR 761.62.

Apex collected samples from different materials in the building. These samples were also analyzed for

PCBs in accordance with EPA 40 CFR 761. Refer to Table 4 - PCB Bulk Sample Results. The results for

Table 4 are summarized below:

Sample Number Location / Material

Total result mg/Kg

(see Appendix B and Table 4)

ND = None Detected

PCB-B-27-01 Front Door Exterior caulk ND

PCB-B-27-02 Silicon Caulk under windows ND

PCB-B-27-03 Expansion Joint Caulk ND

PCB-B-27-04 Wall to greenhouse panel caulk ND

PCB-B-27-05 Exterior Paint ND

PCB-B-27-06 Interior Wall paint ND

PCB-B-27-07 Interior Floor Paint ND

PCB-B-27-08 Roof Penetration Flashing Tar ND

The bulk material samples were submitted to EMSL Analytical, Inc., a certified laboratory, for analysis.

The samples were prepared and analyzed in accordance with the EPA analytical method SW-846 3540C.

Refer to Appendix B for the laboratory analytical reports.

8.0 PCB SOIL RESULTS

Representative soil samples were collected from each of building ‘drip-lines’ where possible submitted for laboratory analysis. Collected soil samples were placed within laboratory provided pre-preserved glassware and submitted to EMSL for analysis for PCBs.

Laboratory samples were analyzed in accordance EPA SW-846 3550B/8082A/608 method.

Asbestos, Lead, PCBs, and Soil Survey – Attachment: 1 (Building 27) Page 9

The PCB regulations separate PCB waste into two categories, with different disposal requirements for each. When assessing your building, it is important to determine what types of PCB waste you will be disposing of.

A PCB-containing material is considered PCB bulk product waste if the concentration of PCBs in the material is greater than or equal to (≥) 50 ppm (see, 40 C.F.R. § 761.3). PCB bulk product waste includes waste derived from manufactured products containing PCBs in a non-liquid state where the concentration at the time of designation for disposal is ≥ 50 ppm PCBs (see, 40 C.F.R. §§ 761.3 & 761.62). Additionally, the definition of PCB bulk product waste includes building materials that have been coated or serviced with PCBs. That is, masonry, wood, metals, and other building materials that are purposely coated with a

PCB-containing material are regulated as PCB bulk product waste if the material coating the building materials contains PCBs at concentrations ≥ 50 ppm.

If PCBs have contaminated either the surrounding building materials or adjacent soil, these materials are considered PCB remediation waste. PCB remediation waste is subject to the cleanup and disposal requirements according to 761.61.

Although state, local, and federal regulations may allow for the disposal of materials containing PCBs at concentrations of <50 ppm, some disposal facilities will not accept waste with any concentration of PCBs.

When finding a disposal facility, you should ensure that the facility is able and willing to accept the waste.

Based on the soil analytical data, a reportable condition under the MCP and under 40CFR761 does not exist and the soils may be re-used. A summary of the soil sample results are provided in Table 5 (which is summarized below). A copy of the laboratory analytical report is provided in Appendix B.

TABLE 5 summery

PCB in Soil for Building 27

Sample Number Location Result (mg/l)

ND = None Detected

PCB -27-01 South side drip line ND

PCB -27-02 West side drip line ND

PCB -27-03 North side drip line ND

PCB -27-04 East side drip line ND

9.0 INACCESSIBLE AND LIMITED ACCESS SPACES

Every reasonable attempt was made to locate ACM in the areas surveyed. During the inspection of

Building 27, Apex did identify several inaccessible areas that were considered likely to contain suspect

ACMs. The inaccessible areas include behind fixed walls and pipe chases where full destructive sampling was not permitted.

Asbestos, Lead, PCBs, and Soil Survey – Attachment: 1 (Building 27) Page 10

10.0 FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS

Materials suspected of potentially containing asbestos were identified during the inspection and sampled for asbestos content. According to the laboratory analysis, there are several building materials were found to contain 1% or greater asbestos. Table 2, the Homogeneous Material List, provides a complete list of the identified suspect ACMs.

Since ACMs are present, actions should be taken to prevent fiber release and to minimize exposure to the customers, building owners, employees and demolition contractors to asbestos fibers. The following are Apex’s recommendations for management of these ACMs.

• The renovation/demolition contractor and other subcontractors working within the building should be made aware of the locations of the ACMs and the possibility of concealed suspect ACMs that could be found during renovation/demolition activities. They should be advised not to disturb the identified ACMs or suspect ACMs.

• OSHA requirements do apply when trace amounts of asbestos are found. OSHA requires that any detectable level of asbestos is hazardous, and workers must not exceed permissible exposure limits during removal. Apex recommends that any material with <1% asbestos be treated and handled as if it were an ACM up until the point of disposal. ACM with concentration

<1% do not require to be disposed of as asbestos, even under OSHA regulation.

• Any concealed building materials discovered during renovation/demolition activities, which are suspected to contain asbestos, should be sampled by a MA DLS-licensed asbestos inspector and analyzed by an NVLAP-accredited laboratory to confirm the absence or presence of asbestos prior to the disturbance of such materials. If the materials are found to contain asbestos, applicable local, state and federal regulations will apply.

• During planned future demolition activities that will impact the identified ACMs in the project site, they should be properly removed by a MA DLS-licensed asbestos abatement contractor prior to construction activities. Abatement activities must be performed in compliance with applicable local, state, and federal requirements.

• Any construction waste or debris leaving the site should be tested for waste characterization and disposal purposes.

10.0 DISCLAIMER

The results, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this report are based only on conditions that were noted during the November 6 through November 10, 2017, inspection of Building 27 of the VA of Western Massachusetts, located in Leeds Massachusetts. Apex’s selection of sample locations and frequency of sampling was based on Apex’s observations and the assumption that like materials in the same area are homogeneous in content, so far as access was granted.

Asbestos, Lead, PCBs, and Soil Survey – Attachment: 1 (Building 27) Page 11

This report is for the sole benefit of Acela Engineering and the VA of Western Massachusetts, and may not be relied upon by any other person or entity. The findings and conclusions for this work are limited in time and scope to the circumstances. Implementation or use of the recommendations, findings, or conclusions from this work in no way assures the elimination of present or future liability of fulfillment of the property owner’s obligation under any local, state, or federal laws.

The report is designed to aid the building owner, architect, construction manager, general contractors, and potential asbestos abatement contractors in locating ACM. Under no circumstances is the report to be utilized as a bidding document or as a project specification document since it does not have all the components required to serve as an Asbestos Project Design document or an Abatement

Work Plan. The quantities of ACMs identified in this report are only estimates and should not be used for bidding or developing specifications for abatement. It is the responsibility of the asbestos abatement contractor to calculate actual quantities and develop the abatement plan accordingly.

Our professional services have been performed, our findings obtained, and our conclusions and recommendations prepared in accordance with customary principles and practices in the fields of environmental science and engineering. This statement is in lieu of other statements either expressed or implied. This report does not warrant against future operations or conditions, nor does it warrant against operations or conditions present of a type or at a location not investigated.

Any conditions or materials that could not be visually identified on the surface were not inspected and may differ from those conditions or materials noted. It was not within the scope of the inspection to remove surface materials to investigate portions of the structure or materials that lay beneath the surface.

FIGURES

TABLES

TABLE 1

NESHAP SAMPLING PROTOCOL

Type of Material Estimated Quantity Required Samples

Sprayed or Troweled-on Surfacing Material

Greater than 5,000 ft2 7

Between 1,000 ft2 and 5,000 ft2 5

Less than 1,000 ft2 3

Thermal System Insulation All Quantities 3

Miscellaneous Materials All Quantities

Per NESHAP, these materials must be sampled "in a manner sufficient to determine whether or not they contain asbestos." Apex will generally collect 1 to 3 samples of such material based upon the inspector's judgment.

NOTE: These sampling protocol quantities are per functional area and/or homogeneous area.

TABLE 2

Building 27

ASBESTOS SAMPLE RESULTS

MATERIAL TYPE LOCATION

SAMPLE

IDs

ASBESTOS

CONTENT

Floor paint with residual mastic Entrance 01a None Detected

Front door interior window glazing Entrance 02a-c None Detected

Confirmatory sample - Exterior door frame caulk

Exterior 03a None Detected

Confirmatory sample – old window caulk Exterior 04a None Detected

Confirmatory sample – new window caulk Exterior 05a None Detected

Expansion Joint Caulk Exterior 06a-c None Detected

Brick wall to greenhouse panel caulk Exterior 07a-c None Detected

Roof Vent flashing tar Roof 08a-c 15% Chrysotile

Tar paper below slate roof tiles Roof 09a-c None Detected

ACM Table from 2010 Report (reformatted)

Door and Greenhouse caulking Exterior 01a-c None Detected

Old Window Caulking Exterior 02a-c None Detected

Penetration Caulking Exterior at conduit penetration 03a-c 15% Chrysotile

Drywall Entrance Foyer 04a-c None Detected

Joint Compound Entrance Foyer 05a-c None Detected

TABLE 3

TCLP Lead in Soil for Building 27

Sample Number Location Result (mg/l)

Pb-27-01 South side drip line 0.60

Pb-27-02 West side drip line < 0.40

Pb-27-03 North side drip line 0.41

Pb-27-04 East side drip line < 0.40

Table 4

PCB Bulk Sample Results

Sample #

Description

PCB-B-27-01

Building 27 – Front Door Exterior Caulk

PCB Parameter Sample Results Detection Limit Units Method

Aroclor-1016 ND 0.98 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1221 ND 0.98 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1232 ND 0.98 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1242 ND 0.98 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1248 ND 0.98 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1254 ND 0.98 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1260 ND 0.98 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1262 ND 0.98 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1268 ND 0.98 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Sample # -

Description

PCB-B-27-02

Building 27 – Silicon Window Exterior Caulk

PCB Parameter Sample Results Detection Limit Units Method

Aroclor-1016 ND 0.97 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1221 ND 0.97 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1232 ND 0.97 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1242 ND 0.97 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1248 ND 0.97 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1254 ND 0.97 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1260 ND 0.97 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1262 ND 0.97 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1268 ND 0.97 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Table 4 (continued)

Sample # -

Description

PCB-B-27-03

Building 27 – Expansion Joint Caulk

PCB Parameter Sample Results Detection Limit Units Method

Aroclor-1016 ND 0.95 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1221 ND 0.95 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1232 ND 0.95 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1242 ND 0.95 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1248 ND 0.95 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1254 ND 0.95 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1260 ND 0.95 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1262 ND 0.95 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1268 ND 0.95 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Sample # -

Description

PCB-B-27-04

Building 27 – Brick Wall to Greenhouse Panel Exterior Caulk

PCB Parameter Sample Results Detection Limit Units Method

Aroclor-1016 ND 0.98 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1221 ND 0.98 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1232 ND 0.98 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1242 ND 0.98 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1248 ND 0.98 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1254 ND 0.98 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1260 ND 0.98 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1262 ND 0.98 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1268 ND 0.98 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Sample # -

Description

PCB-B-27-05

Building 27 – Exterior Paint

PCB Parameter Sample Results Detection Limit Units Method

Aroclor-1016 ND 0.97 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1221 ND 0.97 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1232 ND 0.97 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1242 ND 0.97 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1248 ND 0.97 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1254 ND 0.97 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1260 ND 0.97 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1262 ND 0.97 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1268 ND 0.97 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Table 4 (continued)

Sample # -

Description

PCB-B-27-06

Building 27 – Interior Wall Paint

PCB Parameter Sample Results Detection Limit Units Method

Aroclor-1016 ND 0.96 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1221 ND 0.96 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1232 ND 0.96 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1242 ND 0.96 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1248 ND 0.96 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1254 ND 0.96 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1260 ND 0.96 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1262 ND 0.96 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1268 ND 0.96 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Sample # -

Description

PCB-B-27-07

Building 27 – Interior Floor Paint

PCB Parameter Sample Results Detection Limit Units Method

Aroclor-1016 ND 0.98 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1221 ND 0.98 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1232 ND 0.98 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1242 ND 0.98 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1248 ND 0.98 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1254 ND 0.98 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1260 ND 0.98 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1262 ND 0.98 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1268 ND 0.98 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Sample # -

Description

PCB-B-27-08

Building 27 – Roof Penetration Flashing Tar

PCB Parameter Sample Results Detection Limit Units Method

Aroclor-1016 ND 0.95 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1221 ND 0.95 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1232 ND 0.95 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1242 ND 0.95 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1248 ND 0.95 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1254 ND 0.95 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1260 ND 0.95 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1262 ND 0.95 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1268 ND 0.95 mg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

1 μg /kg = 0.001 mg/kg : 1mg/kg = 1,000 μg/kg

Table 5

PCB Soil Sample Results

Sample # Description

PCB-27-01

Building 27 – South side drip line soil

PCB Parameter Sample Results Detection Limit Units Method

Aroclor-1016 ND 20 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1221 ND 20 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1232 ND 20 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1242 ND 20 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1248 ND 20 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1254 ND 20 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1260 ND 20 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1262 ND 20 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1268 ND 20 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Sample # -

Description

PCB-27-02

Building 27 – West side drip line soil

PCB Parameter Sample Results Detection Limit Units Method

Aroclor-1016 ND 23 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1221 ND 23 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1232 ND 23 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1242 ND 23 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1248 ND 23 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1254 ND 23 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1260 ND 23 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1262 ND 23 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1268 ND 23 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Sample # -

Description

PCB-27-03

Building 27 – North side drip line soil

PCB Parameter Sample Results Detection Limit Units Method

Aroclor-1016 ND 24 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1221 ND 24 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1232 ND 24 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1242 ND 24 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1248 ND 24 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1254 ND 24 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1260 ND 24 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1262 ND 24 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1268 ND 24 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Table 5 (continued)

PCB Soil Sample Results

Sample # -

Description

PCB-27-04

Building 27 – East side drip line soil

PCB Parameter Sample Results Detection Limit Units Method

Aroclor-1016 ND 21 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1221 ND 21 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1232 ND 21 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1242 ND 21 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1248 ND 21 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1254 ND 21 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1260 ND 21 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1262 ND 21 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

Aroclor-1268 ND 21 μg/kg dry SW-846 3540C

1 μg /kg = 0.001 mg/kg : 1mg/kg = 1,000 μg/kg

TABLE 6

TCLP LEAD SAMPLING RESULTS

Sample Number Location of Material TCLP Lead Concentration

TCLP-27 Building 27: Building Composite sample <0.40 mg/L

The TCLP laboratory result for lead is reported at <0.40 mg/L for the building. The result does not exceed the regulatory threshold of 5.0 mg/L. The TCLP laboratory report is provided in Appendix B.

APPENDIX A

Certifications

A

IH

A

Laboratory A ccreditation Program s, LLC acknow ledges that

E M

SL

A nalytical, Inc.

200 R oute 130 N orth, C innam inson, N

J 08077 Laboratory ID

: 100194 along w ith all prem ises from w hich key activities are perform ed, as listed above, has fulfilled the requirem ents of the A

IH

A

Laboratory A ccreditation

Program s (A

IH

A

-LA

P), LLC

accreditation to the ISO

/IEC

17025:2005 international standard, G eneral Requirem ents for the C om petence of Testing and C alibration Laboratories in the follow ing:

L

B

O R

A T

O R

Y A

C C

R E

D

IT

A T

IO

N

PR

O

G R

A M

S

IN

D

U

ST

R

IA

L H

Y G

IE

N ccreditation Expires: Septem ber 01, 2018

V

IR

O N

M E

N T

A L

L E

V

IR

O N

M E

N T

A L

M

IC

R O

B

IO

L O

G Y

FO

O ccreditation Expires:

U

IQ

U

E

SC

O

PE

S A ccreditation Expires:

Specific Field(s) of Testing (FoT)/M ethod(s) w ithin each A ccreditation Program for w hich the above nam ed laboratory m aintains accreditation is outlined on the attached Scope of A ccreditation. C ontinued accreditation is contingent upon successful on-going com pliance w ith ISO

/IEC

17025:2005 and A

A

-LA

P, LLC

requirem ents. This certificate is not valid w ithout the attached Scope of A ccreditation. Please review the A

IH

A

LA

P, LLC

w ebsite (w w w .aihaaccreditedlabs.org ) for the m ost current Scope.

W illiam

W alsh, C

C hairperson, Analytical Accreditation Board

C heryl O

. M orton

M anaging D irector, AIH A Laboratory Accreditation Program s, LLC

R evision 15: 03/30/2016 ate Issued: 08/31/2016 http://www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org/

Effective: 04/10/2015 100194_Scope_IHLAP (Method Addition)_2017_04_12

AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION

EMSL Analytical, Inc. Laboratory ID: 100194 200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Issue Date: 04/13/2017

The laboratory is approved for those specific field(s) of testing/methods listed in the table below. Clients are urged to verify the laboratory’s current accreditation status for the particular field(s) of testing/Methods, since these can change due to proficiency status, suspension and/or withdrawal of accreditation.

Industrial Hygiene Laboratory Accreditation Program (IHLAP)

Initial Accreditation Date: 02/01/1989

IHLAP Scope Category

Field of Testing (FoT) (FoTs cover all relevant

IH matrices)

Technology sub-type/ Detector

Published Reference Method/Title of In-house Method

Method Description or Analyte

(for internal methods only)

Chromatography Core

Gas Chromatography

GC/FID

NIOSH 1003 Modified

NIOSH 1005

NIOSH 1400 Modified NIOSH 1500 Modified NIOSH 1501 Modified NIOSH 1550 Modified NIOSH 1603 Modified NIOSH 2000 Modified

GC/ECD

NIOSH 5502 Modified NIOSH 5503 Modified NIOSH 5510 Modified OSHA 1010 Modified

GC/MS GC/MS EPA TO-15

Gas Chromatography (Diffusive Samplers) NIOSH 1501 Modified

Ion Chromatography (IC)

NIOSH 6004 Modified

NIOSH 6011

NIOSH 7903

OSHA ID-165SG

OSHA ID-214

OSHA ID-215 Modified

Liquid Chromatography HPLC/FL NIOSH 2016 Modified HPLC/UV NIOSH 5506 Modified HPLC/MS NIOSH 9111 Modified

Spectrometry Core Atomic Absorption CVAA NIOSH 6009 Modified

Effective: 04/10/2015 100194_Scope_IHLAP (Method Addition)_2017_04_12

IHLAP Scope Category

Field of Testing (FoT) (FoTs cover all relevant

IH matrices)

Technology sub-type/ Detector

Published Reference Method/Title of In-house Method

Method Description or Analyte

(for internal methods only)

Spectrometry Core

Atomic Absorption

CVAA

OSHA ID-140 Modified

OSHA ID-145

FAA NIOSH 7082

GFAA NIOSH 7105

Inductively-Coupled Plasma

ICP/MS NIOSH 7300 Modified ICP/AES NIOSH 7300 Modified

X-ray Diffraction (XRD) NIOSH 7500 Modified OSHA ID-142 Modified

UV/VIS (Colorimetric) NIOSH 6010 Modified

Asbestos/Fiber Microscopy Core

Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) EPA 600/R-93/116

Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) NIOSH 7400

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

EPA AHERA - 40 CFR

Part 763

EPA AHERA Method (40 CFR 763, Subpart E, Appendix A, Mandatory Method

NIOSH 7402

Miscellaneous Core Gravimetric

NIOSH 0500

NIOSH 0600

NIOSH 5524

Thermo-optical Analysis

(TOA) NIOSH 5040

Beryllium Testing Inductively-Coupled Plasma ICP/MS NIOSH 7300

NIOSH 7303

A complete listing of currently accredited Industrial Hygiene laboratories is available on the AIHA-LAP, LLC website at:

http://www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org http://www.aihaaccreditedlabs.org/

APPENDIX B

Laboratory Data Sheets and Chain-of-Custodies

Laboratory Data Sheets and Chain-of Custodies

Asbestos

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077

Tel/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnasblab@EMSL.com

041732776EMSL Order:

Customer ID: APEX30

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Attention: Phone:Ethan Platt (860) 282-1700

Fax:Apex Companies, LLC (860) 282-1800

Received Date:58H Connecticut Ave. 11/13/2017 9:00 AM

Analysis Date:South Windsor, CT 06074 11/16/2017

Collected Date:

Project: VA Central Westren Massachusetts / Building 27 / VAMC Northampton Campus, MS 138 / 421 North Main

Street, Leeds MA 01053

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

01A

041732776-0001

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray/Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Building 27 - Entrance

- Floor Paint w/Residual Black

Mastic

02A

041732776-0002

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Building 27 - Entrance

- Front Door Window

Glaze

02B

041732776-0003

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Building 27 - Entrance

- Front Door Window

Glaze

02C

041732776-0004

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Building 27 - Entrance

- Front Door Window

Glaze

03A

041732776-0005

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Exterior - Building 27 -

Ext Door Frame Caulk

04A

041732776-0006

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Exterior - Building 27 -

Old Window Caulk

05A

041732776-0007

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Clear

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Exterior - Building 27 -

New Window Caulk

06A

041732776-0008

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Clear

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Exterior - Building 27 -

Expansion Joint Caulk

06B

041732776-0009

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Clear

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Exterior - Building 27 -

Expansion Joint Caulk

06C

041732776-0010

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Clear

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Exterior - Building 27 -

Expansion Joint Caulk

07A

041732776-0011

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Exterior - Building 27 -

Wall to Green House

Panel Caulk

07B

041732776-0012

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Exterior - Building 27 -

Wall to Green House

Panel Caulk

07C

041732776-0013

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Exterior - Building 27 -

Wall to Green House

Panel Caulk

08A

041732776-0014

15% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)85%Gray/Black

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Exterior - Building 27 -

Roof Vent FlashingTar

08B

041732776-0015

Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)Exterior - Building 27 -

Roof Vent FlashingTar

Initial report from: 11/16/2017 17:15:18

Page 1 of 2ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 11/17/2017 3:26 PM

200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077

Tel/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnasblab@EMSL.com

041732776EMSL Order:

Customer ID: APEX30

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

08C

041732776-0016

Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)Exterior - Building 27 -

Roof Vent FlashingTar

09A

041732776-0017

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)5%Cellulose95%Black

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Exterior - Building 27 -

Tar Paper below Slate

09B

041732776-0018

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)5%Cellulose95%Black

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Exterior - Building 27 -

Tar Paper below Slate

09C

041732776-0019

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)5%Cellulose95%Black

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Exterior - Building 27 -

Tar Paper below Slate

Analyst(s)

Michelle Skillman (17) Benjamin Ellis, Laboratory Manager or Other Approved Signatory

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis . This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government . Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Reporting limit is 1%

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Depew, NY

Initial report from: 11/16/2017 17:15:18

Page 2 of 2ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 11/17/2017 3:26 PM

OrderID: 041732776

OrderID: 041732776

Building Composite TCLP (Lead)

Client Sample Description ConcentrationLab ID Analyzed Lead

Collected

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com cinnaminsonleadlab@emsl.com

Attn: Ethan Platt Apex Companies, LLC 58H Connecticut Ave.

South Windsor, CT 06074

Received: 11/13/17 10:30 AM

ACELA-001

Fax: (860) 282-1800 Phone: (860) 282-1700

Project:

Collected:

Test Report: Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (SW846, 1311/7420)

201711719 CustomerID: APEX30 CustomerPO:

ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

Site: Bldg T7 201711719-0001T7 94 mg/L11/14/2017

Site: Bldg T8 201711719-0002T8 50 mg/L11/14/2017

Site: Bldg T12 201711719-0003T12 27 mg/L11/14/2017

Site: Bldg T13 201711719-0004T13 48 mg/L11/14/2017

Site: Bldg T15 201711719-0005T15 0.72 mg/L11/14/2017

Site: Bldg 27 201711719-000627 <0.40 mg/L11/15/2017

Site: Bldg 34 201711719-000734 78 mg/L11/15/2017

Site: Bldg 35 201711719-000835 <0.40 mg/L11/15/2017

Site: Bldg 40 201711719-000940 <0.40 mg/L11/15/2017

Site: Bldg 41 201711719-001041 53 mg/L11/15/2017

Site: Bldg 42 201711719-001142 <0.40 mg/L11/16/2017

Site: Bldg 52 201711719-001252 <0.40 mg/L11/16/2017

Site: Bldg 63 201711719-001363 <0.40 mg/L11/16/2017

Phillip Worby, Lead Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

Test Report ChmSnglePrm/nQC-7.32.3 Printed: 11/20/2017 9:29:41 AM

The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. This report relates only to those items tested. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Quality Control Data associated with this sample set is within acceptable limits, unless otherwise noted. "<" (less than) result signifies that the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NELAP Certifications: NJ 03036, NY 10872, PA 68-00367

Initial report from 11/20/2017 09:29:41 http://www.EMSL.com mailto:cinnaminsonleadlab@emsl.com

OrderID: 201711719

OrderID: 201711719

TCLP Lead in Soil

Client Sample Description ConcentrationLab ID Analyzed Lead

Collected

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com cinnaminsonleadlab@emsl.com

Attn: Ethan Platt Apex Companies, LLC 58H Connecticut Ave.

South Windsor, CT 06074

Received: 11/15/17 10:30 AM

ACELA-001 / Bldg. 27

Fax: (860) 282-1800 Phone: (860) 282-1700

Project:

11/14/2017Collected:

Test Report: Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (SW846, 1311/7420)

201711833 CustomerID: APEX30 CustomerPO:

ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

Site: South Side 201711833-0001Pb-27-01 0.60 mg/L11/17/201711/14/2017

Site: West Side 201711833-0002Pb-27-02 <0.40 mg/L11/17/201711/14/2017

Site: North Side 201711833-0003Pb-27-03 0.41 mg/L11/17/201711/14/2017

Site: East Side 201711833-0004Pb-27-04 <0.40 mg/L11/17/201711/14/2017

Phillip Worby, Lead Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

Test Report ChmSnglePrm/nQC-7.32.3 Printed: 11/22/2017 9:57:43 AM

The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. This report relates only to those items tested. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Quality Control Data associated with this sample set is within acceptable limits, unless otherwise noted. "<" (less than) result signifies that the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NELAP Certifications: NJ 03036, NY 10872, PA 68-00367

Initial report from 11/22/2017 09:57:43 mailto:cinnaminsonleadlab@emsl.com

OrderID: 201711833

OrderID: 201711833

PCBs in Building Materials

Phillip Worby, Environmental Chemistry Laboratory Director

Approved By:

Fax: (860) 282-1800 Phone: (860) 282-1700

The following analytical report covers the analysis performed on samples submitted to EMSL Analytical, Inc. on 11/13/2017. The results are tabulated on the attached data pages for the following client designated project:

ACELA-001 / Bldg 27

The reference number for these samples is EMSL Order #011709086. Please use this reference when calling about these samples. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (856) 303-2500.

11/30/2017Attn: Ethan Platt Apex Companies, LLC 58H Connecticut Ave.

South Windsor, CT 06074

The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAP and/or the specific certification program that is applicable, unless otherwise noted.

NELAP Certifications: NJ 03036, NY 10872, PA 68-00367, CA ELAP 1877

The samples associated with this report were received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report relates only to those items tested as received by the laboratory. The QC data associated with the sample results meet the recovery and precision requirements established by the NELAP, unless specifically indicated. All results for soil samples are reported on a dry weight basis, unless otherwise noted. This report may not be reproduced except in full and without written approval by EMSL Analytical, Inc.

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Phone: (856) 303-2500 Fax: (856) 858-4571 Email: EnvChemistry2@emsl.com mailto:EnvChemistry2@emsl.com

200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com EnvChemistry2@emsl.com

011709086 CustomerID: APEX30 CustomerPO:

ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

Analytical Results

Attn: Ethan Platt Apex Companies, LLC 58H Connecticut Ave.

South Windsor, CT…