2-BPM003500 Consensus Evaluation Report - signed (1).pdf
PDF 322 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Master Agreement AZ|CTR056543
- Contract number
- CTR056543
- Issued by
- Arizona
About this file
This document is an Evaluation Report for Solicitation No. BPM003500 for Water Quality Sampling and Monitoring. The evaluation was conducted by a committee that included Daniel Reeder, Gwen Minnier, and Jason Jones, with Patricia Lorenzen as the Procurement Officer. The evaluation involved four offerors: Harris Environmental Group, Blaine, Tetra Tech, and Great Lakes Environmental Center (GLEC). Based on the committee's review, three contractors were recommended for award: Harris Environmental Group, Tetra Tech, and Great Lakes Environmental Center.
The solicitation focused on water quality sampling and monitoring services across multiple environmental areas, including stream, lake, biological, SDAM, groundwater, and fish tissue sampling. The evaluation criteria included Experience and Capacity (500 points), Proposed Approach (400 points), and Cost Proposal (100 points). Scoring was based on meeting expectations, with variations from "Below Expectation" to "Exceeds Expectations". The total scores for the offerors ranged from 450 to 643 points, with Tetra Tech receiving the highest score of 643, followed by Harris Environmental Group at 527, and GLEC at 541. The cost proposal was scored using a formula of Lowest Price / Offered Price × Maximum Points, with points awarded accordingly.
View the file
Other files
Show all 38
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EVALUATION REPORT
Solicitation No. BPM003500
Total Score
Weight
1 - Experience and Capacity =
500 points 500 1.1 Experience and Capacity Meets Expectations 250 Meets Expectations 250 Above Expectations 375 Meets Expectations 250
Weight
2 - Proposed Approach =
400 points 400 2.1 Proposed Approach Meets Expectations 200 Below Expectation 100 Meets Expectations 200 Meets Expectations 200
100 3 - Cost Proposal = 100 points 77 100 68 91
Comments
Daniel reeder
Procurement Officer Name: Evaluator Name:
Signature Date Signature Date
Gwen Minnier
Evaluator Name: Evaluator Name:
Signature Date Signature Date
Jason Jones
The members of the evaluation committee have completed their review and reached consensus regarding the proposals received in response to
Solicitation No. BPM003500 for " Water Quality Sampling and Monitoring". This evaluation report accurately and completely reflects the opinion of the committee as a whole. Therefore, in accordance with Section 3-A, 6.0 Evaluation of Offers, it is recommended that it would be in the best interest of the State to make an award to the following Contractors:Harris Environmental Group, Tetra Tech and Great Lakes Environmental
Center.
Patricia Lorenzen
Tetra Tech
GLEC
250375
Capacity with number of experienced staff.
Skilled staff with relevant experience for
Scope.
Questions were not answered completely or with detail.
Offerors Blaine
Harris
Below Expectation = Proposal doesn’t fully meet or doesn’t completely address requirement(s) of the RFP
Unacceptable = Elements of the proposal that are unacceptable to the State.
Formula for Scoring Overall Price (Criteria 3)
Lowest Price / Offered Price X Maximum Points = Awarded Points
Areas Proposed
Description: Water Quality Sampling and Monitoring
For each evaluation criteria that follows, a determination was made regarding how well the proposals satisfied the stated requirements. The rating definitions, Rating Definitions for Criteria 1 and 2
Exceeds Expectations = Proposal is very detailed, indicates a clear understanding of the RFP and provides innovative or exceptional responses.
Above Expectations = Proposal meets all requirement(s) outlined in the RFP but also provides a response that goes beyond what is required.
Meets Expectations = Proposal meets requirement(s) outlined in the RFP.
Rating Definitions for Criteria 4
Complies with no exceptions
Complies with minimal exceptions
Does not comply - Several Exceptions
Stream, Biological, SDAM Groundwater Stream, Lake, Biological, SDAM, Groundwater & Fish Tissue
Stream, Lake, Biological, SDAM, Groundwater & Fish Tissue
Gwen Minnier (Aug 2, 2021 15:10 PDT) Gwen Minnier Aug 2, 2021Jason Jones (Aug 2, 2021 15:32 PDT)
Jason Jones Aug 2, 2021
Aug 2, 2021Aug 3, 2021 https://secure.na1.adobesign.com/verifier?tx=CBJCHBCAABAA3ksVuu9ai7pVMe6xHwKU9-9UOyjfdWGM https://azadoagov.na1.echosign.com/verifier?tx=CBJCHBCAABAA3ksVuu9ai7pVMe6xHwKU9-9UOyjfdWGM https://azadoagov.na1.echosign.com/verifier?tx=CBJCHBCAABAA3ksVuu9ai7pVMe6xHwKU9-9UOyjfdWGM https://azadoagov.na1.echosign.com/verifier?tx=CBJCHBCAABAA3ksVuu9ai7pVMe6xHwKU9-9UOyjfdWGM
| 2021-08-03T06:47:43-0700 | |
| Agreement certified by Adobe Sign |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .