2-BPM003500 Consensus Evaluation Report - signed (1).pdf

PDF 322 KB Posted

Attached to
Master Agreement AZ|CTR056545
Contract number
CTR056545
Issued by
Arizona

About this file

This document is an Evaluation Report for Solicitation No. BPM003500 for Water Quality Sampling and Monitoring, involving an evaluation committee that reviewed proposals from multiple contractors. The evaluation involved Harris Environmental Group, Blaine, Tetra Tech, and Great Lakes Environmental Center (GLEC) as offerors. The document reflects a consensus recommendation to award contracts to Harris Environmental Group, Tetra Tech, and Great Lakes Environmental Center.

The solicitation covers water quality sampling and monitoring services across multiple environmental areas including stream, lake, biological, SDAM (Sediment/Aquatic Monitoring), groundwater, and fish tissue sampling. The evaluation assessed proposals across three primary criteria: Experience and Capacity (500 points), Proposed Approach (400 points), and Cost Proposal (100 points). Total scores ranged from 450 to 643, with contractors evaluated on their staff experience, capacity, technical approach, and pricing. The scoring methodology used a detailed rating system with definitions ranging from "Exceeds Expectations" to "Unacceptable", and the cost proposal was scored using a formula comparing the lowest price to the offered price.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
2024-10-01_Tetra_Tech_CTR056545_GAUWP.pdf PDF
3.1-OIG Search Results_Blaine.pdf PDF
4.3-Harris Clarification for BPM003500 Submittal Water Quality Sampling and Monitoring.pdf PDF
5.1-Harris Environmental Group Revised Pricing BPM003500.pdf PDF
5.6-Tetra Tech Revised Pricing BPM003500.pdf PDF
BPM003500_Solicitation Requirements.pdf PDF
CTR056545_Tetra_Tech_Amendment__3_Extension_to_8.3.2025.pdf PDF
Tetra Tech Pricing BPM003500.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
2023-10-01_Tetra_Tech_CTR056545_GAWP.pdf PDF
3.0-Responsibility Responsiveness and Susceptibility Form.pdf PDF
3.2-OIG Search Results_GLEC.pdf PDF
3.4-OIG Search Results_Tetra Tech.pdf PDF
4.2-GLEC_USVI BAWQMP 2021 1st Quarter Monitoring Data.pdf PDF
5.5-Tetra Tech Price Reduction Request BPM003500.pdf PDF
CTR056545_Tetra_Tech_Amendment_2_Extension_to_8.3.2024.pdf PDF
Tetra Tech BPM003500_Method_of_Approach_Attachment_3_A.pdf PDF
Tetra Tech BPM003500_Offer_and_Acceptance_signed.pdf PDF
Tetra Tech CTR056545_Revised_Offer_and_Acceptance - signed.pdf PDF
2021-10-01_Tetra_Tech_CTR056545_GAUWP.pdf PDF
2022-10-01_Tetra_Tech_CTR056545_GAWP.pdf PDF
3.3-OIG Search Results_Harris.pdf PDF
4.1-GLEC_USVI BAWQMP 2021 1st Quarter Monitoring Data.pdf PDF
4.4-Tetra Tech Clarification Request - BPM003500_080221.pdf PDF
5.3-GLEC Pricing BPM003500_revised_8.02.21.pdf PDF
CTR056545_Pricing.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Tetra Tech BPM003500_Experience_and_Capacity_Questionnaire_2A_3B_3C.pdf PDF
Tetra Tech BPM003500_Required_Offer_Forms.pdf PDF
1-Executive Summary_Determination of Award RFP BPM003500 - signed.pdf PDF
5.2-Harris Environmental Price Reduction Request BPM003500.pdf PDF
5.4-GLEC Price Reduction Request BPM003500.pdf PDF
CTR056545_Amendment__4_Extension_to_8.3.2026.pdf PDF
CTR056545_Amendment___1_-_Personnel.pdf PDF
CTR056545_COI_GL_AL_WC_PEL.pdf PDF
Tetra Tech BPM003500_Pricing_Sheet_Attachment_1.pdf PDF
Tetra Tech Price Reduction Request BPM003500.docx DOCX document
Tetra Tech Price Reduction Request BPM003500.pdf PDF
Tetra Tech Revised Pricing BPM003500.pdf PDF
Show all 37

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

EVALUATION REPORT

Solicitation No. BPM003500

Total Score

Weight

1 - Experience and Capacity =

500 points 500 1.1 Experience and Capacity Meets Expectations 250 Meets Expectations 250 Above Expectations 375 Meets Expectations 250

Weight

2 - Proposed Approach =

400 points 400 2.1 Proposed Approach Meets Expectations 200 Below Expectation 100 Meets Expectations 200 Meets Expectations 200

100 3 - Cost Proposal = 100 points 77 100 68 91

Comments

Daniel reeder

Procurement Officer Name: Evaluator Name:

Signature Date Signature Date

Gwen Minnier

Evaluator Name: Evaluator Name:

Signature Date Signature Date

Jason Jones

The members of the evaluation committee have completed their review and reached consensus regarding the proposals received in response to

Solicitation No. BPM003500 for " Water Quality Sampling and Monitoring". This evaluation report accurately and completely reflects the opinion of the committee as a whole. Therefore, in accordance with Section 3-A, 6.0 Evaluation of Offers, it is recommended that it would be in the best interest of the State to make an award to the following Contractors:Harris Environmental Group, Tetra Tech and Great Lakes Environmental

Center.

Patricia Lorenzen

Tetra Tech

GLEC

250375

Capacity with number of experienced staff.

Skilled staff with relevant experience for

Scope.

Questions were not answered completely or with detail.

Offerors Blaine

Harris

Below Expectation = Proposal doesn’t fully meet or doesn’t completely address requirement(s) of the RFP

Unacceptable = Elements of the proposal that are unacceptable to the State.

Formula for Scoring Overall Price (Criteria 3)

Lowest Price / Offered Price X Maximum Points = Awarded Points

Areas Proposed

Description: Water Quality Sampling and Monitoring

For each evaluation criteria that follows, a determination was made regarding how well the proposals satisfied the stated requirements. The rating definitions, Rating Definitions for Criteria 1 and 2

Exceeds Expectations = Proposal is very detailed, indicates a clear understanding of the RFP and provides innovative or exceptional responses.

Above Expectations = Proposal meets all requirement(s) outlined in the RFP but also provides a response that goes beyond what is required.

Meets Expectations = Proposal meets requirement(s) outlined in the RFP.

Rating Definitions for Criteria 4

Complies with no exceptions

Complies with minimal exceptions

Does not comply - Several Exceptions

Stream, Biological, SDAM Groundwater Stream, Lake, Biological, SDAM, Groundwater & Fish Tissue

Stream, Lake, Biological, SDAM, Groundwater & Fish Tissue

Gwen Minnier (Aug 2, 2021 15:10 PDT) Gwen Minnier Aug 2, 2021Jason Jones (Aug 2, 2021 15:32 PDT)

Jason Jones Aug 2, 2021

Aug 2, 2021Aug 3, 2021 https://secure.na1.adobesign.com/verifier?tx=CBJCHBCAABAA3ksVuu9ai7pVMe6xHwKU9-9UOyjfdWGM https://azadoagov.na1.echosign.com/verifier?tx=CBJCHBCAABAA3ksVuu9ai7pVMe6xHwKU9-9UOyjfdWGM https://azadoagov.na1.echosign.com/verifier?tx=CBJCHBCAABAA3ksVuu9ai7pVMe6xHwKU9-9UOyjfdWGM https://azadoagov.na1.echosign.com/verifier?tx=CBJCHBCAABAA3ksVuu9ai7pVMe6xHwKU9-9UOyjfdWGM

2021-08-03T06:47:43-0700
Agreement certified by Adobe Sign

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .