133208 - MassAbility_Pay_Scorecard_4-29-2026.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 50 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MassAbility Pay - MassAbility Pay 26-V01
- Solicitation number
- BD-27-1071-AO-02021-133208
- Issued by
- Massachusetts
About this file
This is a Pay Scorecard spreadsheet for MassAbility, a Massachusetts state agency seeking to implement a comprehensive financial transaction processing solution. The scorecard appears to serve as an evaluation tool for vendor proposals related to the MassAbility Pay 26-V01 contract opportunity, which requires a single selected vendor to develop and maintain a payment solution facilitating participant reimbursements and purchases tied to service plans. The document is dated April 29, 2026, and functions as a structured assessment mechanism for comparing vendor capabilities and qualifications against established organizational requirements and performance criteria.
The Pay Scorecard establishes a standardized framework for evaluating vendor proposals across multiple performance and capability dimensions. This evaluation tool reflects MassAbility's need to identify a vendor capable of managing complex financial transaction processing, including system development, maintenance, and ongoing support for participant-related financial activities. The scorecard structure suggests weighted criteria and scoring methodology to objectively assess competing bids and select the vendor best positioned to meet the organization's operational and technical requirements for implementing a sustainable payment processing platform.
View the file
Other files
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Instructions Minimum Qualifying Score Total Bidder Score
| 65 | Pts. | 45 | Pts. | ||
| B8 | |||||
| MassAbility RFR/RFQ Score Workbook |
| Bidder's Name | INSERT BIDDERS NAME HERE | |||
| COMMBUYS Bid Number | INSERT COMMBUYS BID # HERE | Supplier Diversity | ||
| RFR Name | MassAbility Pay | Bids with a value above $250,000 require bidders to provide a Supplier Diversity Plan. | ||
| Supplier Diversity Plans are scored on a separate scoring sheet, titled "SDP Scoring" by a member of OFA | ||||
| Bid Evaluation Start Date | INSERT EVAL START DATE HERE | Scores from the SDP Scoring sheet are not reflected on individual Scorecards, but instead pulled in on the "Score Tabulation" sheet for final scoring | ||
| Bid Evaluation End Date | INSERT EVAL END DATE HERE | Yes/ No | ||
| Is the value of this procurement greater than $250,000 and require an SDP plan? | Mass | Yes | ||
| PRT Members | INSERT PRT (OFA MEMBER) NAME HERE |
| Small Business Purchasing Program (SBPP) | ||
| Although the SBPP does not guarantee contract awards, Executive Departments are directed to give special consideration to SBPP participants when buying non-construction goods and services estimated to cost $250,000 or less per year. This applies to open-market public procurements as well as requests for quotes solicited from awarded vendors on existing departmental and statewide contracts | ||
| INSERT PRT MEMBER NAME HERE | ||
| INSERT PRT MEMBER NAME HERE | ||
| INSERT PRT MEMBER NAME HERE | Yes/ No | |
| INSERT PRT MEMBER NAME HERE | Is the value of this procurement less than $250,000 and require consideration of the SBPP? | No |
| INSERT PRT MEMBER NAME HERE |
| Workbook Instructions | Weight Multipliers |
| This workbook is usable for all types of procurements, including RFRs and RFQs. | The weight multiplier is used to indicate what percentage of the score is allocated to each criterion. These multipliers must equal 100%. When introducing scoring criteria, adjust other weights values down to ensure that this percentage does not exceed 100%. |
| This workbook uses formulas and coding to keep all pages consistent and to automatically calculate and tabulate scores |
| All Scores with an SDP Requirement add up to 100 Points | ||||||
| All Scores without an SDP Requirement add up to 75 points | Scoring Criteria | |||||
| When scoring responses, fill in only the cells with a Green header; all other cells will calculate based on the information in these cells. No partial or half points are permitted. | ||||||
| Point Value Breakdowns | Fixed Point Values | % Without SDP | % With SDP | |||
| SDP | 25 | 0% | 25% | All criteria are scored on a 5 Point Scale: | ||
| Program / Business Response | 75 | 100% | 75% | Unsatisfactory | 1 Point | Bidder fails to meet the defined criteria. |
| Below Average | 2 Points | Bidder is responsive, but response is lacking in clarity or inadequately addressed the defined criteria | ||||
| 100 | 100% | 100% | Average | 3 Points | Bidder is responsive and adequately addresses the requirements of the criteria |
tc={68D55950-034C-4A25-91B2-BCD842EA4C03}: [Threaded comment]
Your version of Excel allows you to read this threaded comment; however, any edits to it will get removed if the file is opened in a newer version of Excel. Learn more: https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=870924
Comment:
Average and above average should be consistent with what is stated in the RFR.
Reply:
Okay, it appears that the description just does not show. Can someone fix this to ensure that the FULL narrative is visible? May just need to fix the cells to ensure it is clearly seen.
| Above Average | 4 Points | Bidder is highly responsive, demonstrates an above average understanding of the topic and clearly demonstrates their ability to satisfy the requirement |
| Outstanding | 5 Points | Bidder’s response is outstanding in its clarity and their ability to deliver the desired requirement |
Average and above average should be consistent with what is stated in the RFR.
Okay, it appears that the description just does not show. Can someone fix this to ensure that the FULL narrative is visible? May just need to fix the cells to ensure it is clearly seen.
SDP Scoring
| SDP Required | ||
| https://www.diversitycertification.mass.gov/BusinessDirectory/BusinessDirectorySearch.aspx | ||
| Bidder 1 | Notes/ Certification Screen Shots: | |
| Bidder's Name | INSERT BIDDERS NAME HERE | |
| SDP Form Received |
| Estimated Contract Value | |
| Proposed Partner Spend | |
| Prior year Spend | |
| SDP $ | ERROR:#DIV/0! |
| Prime Contractor Certified Business? |
| Certification Body |
| SDO Client ID |
| Date Checked |
| Expiration Date |
| Total Score |
| Listed Partner Firms |
| Firm 1 |
| SDO Client ID |
| SDO Expiration |
| Firm 2 |
| SDO Client ID |
| SDO Expiration |
| Firm 3 |
| SDO Client ID |
| SDO Expiration |
| Firm 4 |
| SDO Client ID |
| SDO Expiration |
SBPP Not Considered
| Vendor 1 | Notes/ Certification Screenshots: | |
| INSERT BIDDERS NAME HERE | ||
| Small Business Registered? |
| SDO Client ID |
| Date Checked |
| Expiration Date |
https://www.diversitycertification.mass.gov/BusinessDirectory/BusinessDirectorySearch.aspx Bidder 1
| Bidder Name | INSERT BIDDERS NAME HERE | |||
| Date | ||||
| Mandatory Requirements to be considered for scoring (OFA) | YES/NO | Reviewed | ||
| 1 | Bidder provided filled in and signed required documents listed on the Bidder's Response Checklist | |||
| 2 | Bidder is not debarred or disqualified from doing business with the Commonwealth | |||
| 3 | SDP (Non-POS) Completion | |||
| Pass/ Fail | Pass | INSERT DATE HERE |
PRT Scoring
| Evaluation Criteria | Rating | Points | Weight Multiplier | Score | |||
| 1 | Organizational Experience and Capacity | Average | 3 | 40 | 120 | ||
| 2 | Pricing Structure | Average | 3 | 15 | 45 | ||
| 3 | Training Requirements & Plan | Average | 3 | 20 | 60 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Max | 375 | Subtotal | 225 | ||||
| Total (out of 75) | 45 | INSERT DATE HERE |
&"-,Bold"&16Procurement Scorecard image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .