RFP Replacement Pages - A1 127EAW23R0004.pdf

Replacement Page Amendment 1

RFP no. 127EAW23R0004 FY23 Middle Fork Parker Creek

Bridge Replacement, Modoc National Forest

SECTION J – LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

NUMBER TITLE PAGES

1 Forest Service Supplemental Specifications (FSSS) 28

2 Map - Middle Fork Parker Creek Bridge 1

3 Final Signed Plans 10

4 DOL Construction Wage Decision Number

CA20220007. 01/13/2023. Modoc County

5 NEW - Middle Parker Boring Logs * 7

6 NEW - Potential Seed Mix List - Modoc National Forest * 1 Sheet

7 NEW - Middle Fork Parker Ck bridge drawings * 2

(END OF SECTION)

*Attachments 5, 6 & 7 are added via Amendment 1 - 2/27/2023

RFP no. 127EAW23R0004 FY23 Middle Fork Parker Creek

Bridge Replacement, Modoc National Forest

L.3 TECHNICAL PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS

General. The technical proposal will evaluated to determine whether proposal meets the requirements of the Government. Therefore, the technical proposal must present sufficient information to reflect a thorough understanding of the requirements and a detailed description of the techniques, procedures, subcontractors, and program for achieving the objectives of the specifications/statement of work. Proposals which merely paraphrase the requirements of the Government's specifications/statement of work or use such phrases as "will comply" or "standard techniques will be employed" will be considered unacceptable and will not be considered further.

Offerors are strictly advised to comply with all instructions within this solicitation to ensure submission of a complete Prime Contractor Offer. Failure to furnish a complete offer per the instructions in this solicitation, at the required time and on the required date, may result in the Offeror’s proposal being determined ineligible.The proposal shall address the offeror’s capability and proposed approach to fully perform the requirements of the solicitation. The proposal should be prepared simply and economically, providing straightforward, concise delineation of capabilities to perform the contract. Offerors are cautioned that sufficient and detailed information must be presented in their proposals to enable the Government to evaluate their proposals fully in accordance with the evaluation and award criteria contained herein.

The Government is not obligated to request additional information, and in the absence of appropriate information, the proposal may be rated deficient. Offerors are discouraged from providing information not required by the RFP.

The Government will evaluate proposals in accordance with the evaluation criteria as set forth herein.

SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS

The technical proposal must provide and/or address the following:

A. Relevant Prior Experience and Past Performance

Submit detailed information for no more than three (3) prior projects/contracts completed within the prior five

(5) years. seven (7) years. Contracts may be those with federal, state, and local governments as well as commercial customers.

The contracts/subcontracts shall be similar in nature and complexity as that of this RFP and associated project.

For each contract or subcontract submitted,include the following information:

a. Name of customer or contracting activity

b. Contract number

c. Project name/description

d. Contract type

e. Total contract value

f. Completion date, or anticipated completion date if in progress

g. Scope, magnitude, complexity of the work

h. Contracting Officer (or Customer Representative if commercial)

i. Contracting Officer's Representative [COR] or Project Manager

j. List of major subcontractors *if performed 25% or more of the work

NOTE: Provide name, address, telephone, and email address for items h. and i.

Relevant Prior Experience.The Government review will be based on submitted contracts/projects (and all required information as listed above) for this factor.

RFP no. 127EAW23R0004 FY23 Middle Fork Parker Creek

Bridge Replacement, Modoc National Forest

SECTION M – EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND CRITERIA

M.1 EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS

The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible and responsvie offeror whose offer/proposal conforming to the solicitation is determined to the Lowest-Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) offer. The contract shall be evaluated on the LPTA source selection method conducted IAW, FAR Part 15 Contracting by Negotiation, 15.101-2.

The Government shall evaluate the submitted technical and price proposals in accordance with the following Evaluation Factors:

1. Relevant Prior Experience and Performance

2. Technical Approach

3. Price

TECHNICAL EVALUATION

1. Relevant Prior Experience and Performance

Criteria Offeror’s will be evaluated on Relevant Prior Experience to determine the extent to which the Offeror has performed same or similar work as the project described in this solicitation. “Relevant” and “Same or similar” is defined as experience on projects that are the same or similar in size, scope, complexity and dollar magnitude as the project described in this solicitation. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s submitted examples of prior project/contract experience to determine the degree of similarity to project solicited and to the extent the experience demonstrates the ability to successfully perform the requirements of this contract.

The Government shall also evaluate the offeror’s past performance information. Past performance is a measure of the degree to which an offeror satisfied its customers on prior contracts/projects and complied with Federal, State and Local laws and regulations on prior contracts/projects. Past performance of submitted prior projects/contracts and others known or researched will be evaluated primarily on the following categories:

a) Technical/Quality of Services

b) Schedule/Timeliness

c) Cost Control

The Government will evaluate the offeror’s performance for each of the projects/contracts submitted under this factor – maximum of three (3) contracts completed within the prior five (5) seven (7) years only. In additon, an offeror’s general past performance shall be considered as described below.