ATTACHMENT_1_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_(PPQ).docx

ATTACHMENT 1 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION W91QVN-19-R-0090

ATTACHMENT# 5

Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

411th CONTRACTING SUPPORT BRIGADE, KOREA

UNIT 15289

APO AP 96251-5289

REPLY TO

ATTENTION OF:

CCEC-KOY-SA 31 July 19

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) Number W91QVN-19-R-0199, Communications Infrastructure Installation and Engineering (C4I). Gwangju Co-located Air Base.

Dear Sir/Ma’am;

The 411th Contracting Support Brigade, Korea is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate Offerors for the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the Offerors provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state or local government or commercial contracts as compared to North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 238210. You have been identified as the point of contact cited for past performance on same or similar contracts.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosure and return directly to the POC below no later than 28 Oct 2019, 1300 hours (Korean Standard Date and Time). Your questionnaire shall be submitted electronically to the following:

411th CSB, Korea Services Division, Team Bear Pat Beckman: lorna.p.beckman.civ@mail.mil Percy Jones: percy.d.jones2.civ@mail.mil

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the Contract Specialist (L. Pat Beckman) and Contracting Officer (Percy Jones).

Sincerely, ***Signed***

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM

Contractor:____________________ Contract Number:____________________________ Subcontract Number (if applicable):_________________________________ Name:________________________ Position Title:________________________ (Agency, Telephone No., E-mail Address & Fax Number)

The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past seven (7) years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following ratings shall be used in your response.

Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.

NOTE: COMMENTS are MANDATORY for ratings other than “Acceptable”

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

A Description of work completed:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Length of Contract/ Project (Year/Month/Date):

Value of Contract/Project:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

· Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Good

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

D. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

E. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

F. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

G. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contract Specialist and Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

Typed or Printed Name image1.wmf