W912PL19R0011_Amendment0001_Part1.pdf

PDF 4 MB Posted

Attached to
Integrated Fixed Tower, Ajo & Casa Grande, AZ
Solicitation number
W912PL19R0011
Issued by

About this file

Amendment 0001 - Part 1

View the file

Other files

Show all 21

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

(SEE ITEM 13)

1 713

W912PL19R0011

AMEND 0001

Remove and Replace SF1442 Remove and Replace Section 00 21 16 - Instructions to Proposers Remove and Replace Section 00 22 16 - Supplementary Instructions to Proposers Remove and Replace Section 00 22 00 - Supplementary Instructions Add Environmental Assessment - Geo Tech Report

IFT SITE PREP AJO & CASA GRANDE AOR W912PL19R0011

TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION, ARIZONA

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS

DIVISION 00 –

00 01 05 Certification Page 00 10 00 CLIN Schedule 00 21 16 Instructions to Proposers 00 22 00 Supplementary Instructions 00 22 16 Supplementary Instructions to Proposers

00 45 00 REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS

00 70 00 CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT

00 73 00 SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS

00 73 46 WAGE RATES

DIVISION 01 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

01 10 00 STATEMENT OF WORK

01 27 00 Measurement and Payment

01 32 01.00 10 PROJECT SCHEDULE

01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES

01 35 26 GOVERNMENTAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

01 37 00 SECURITY AND OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENT

01 42 00 SOURCES FOR REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS

01 45 00.00 10 QUALITY CONTROL

01 45 00.10 10 QUALITY CONTROL SYSTEM (QCS)

01 50 00 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES AND CONTROLS

01 57 20.00 10 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (PROVIDED IN NEXT SUBMITTAL)

01 57 23 TEMPORARY STORM WATER POLLUTION CONTROL

01 62 35 RECYCLED / RECOVERED MATERIALS

01 78 00 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS

DIVISION 03 – CONCRETE

03 11 13.00 10 STRUCTURAL CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE FORMING

03 15 00.00 10 CONCRETE ACCESSORIES

03 20 00.00 10 CONCRETE REINFORCING

03 30 00.00 10 CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE

03 39 00.00 10 CONCRETE CURING

03 40 00.00 10 PLANT-PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS

DIVISION 31 – EARTHWORK

31 00 00 EARTHWORK

31 05 19 GEOTEXTILE

31 11 00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING

31 32 11 SOIL SURFACE EROSION CONTROL

DIVISION 32 - EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS

32 11 23 GRADED-CRUSHED AGGREGATE BASE COURSE

32 11 34 PORTLAND CEMENT-STABILIZED SURFACE COURSE

32 15 00 AGGREGATE SURFACE COURSE

32 15 00.00 29 SURFACE BLADING

32 92 19 SEEDING

DIVISION 33 – UTILITIES

33 40 00 STORM DRAINAGE UTILITIES

Environmental Assessment Geo Tech Report

-- End of Project Table of Contents --

IFT SITE PREP AJO & CASA GRANDE AOR

TOHONO O’ODHAM NATION SECTION 00 21 165 W912PL19R0011

Amendment 0001

00 21 16 - 1

Section 00 21 16 - Instructions to Proposers

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2018 52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code

Reporting

JUL 2016

52.204-18 Commercial and Government Entity Code Maintenance

JUL 2016

52.204-22 Alternative Line Item Proposal JAN 2017 52.211-1 Availability of Specifications Listed in the GSA

Index of Federal Specifications, Standards and Commercial Item Descriptions, FPMR Part 101-29

AUG 1998

52.211-2 Availability of Specifications, Standards, and Data Item Descriptions Listed in the Acquisition Streamlining and Standardization Information System (ASSIST)

APR 2014

52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition JAN 2017 52.215-20 Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data or

Information Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data

OCT 2010

52.215-22 Limitations on Pass-Through Charges-- Identification of Subcontract Effort

OCT 2009

52.217-3 Evaluation Of Options APR 1984 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting. Jan 2017 52.222-5 Construction Wage Rate Requirements--Secondary

Site of the Work

MAY 2014

52.225-12 Notice of Buy American Requirement - Construction Materials Under Trade Agreements

MAY 2014

52.228-1 Bid Guarantee SEP 1996 52.228-2 Additional Bond Security OCT 1997 52.232-38 Submission of Electronic Funds Transfer

Information with Offer

JUL 2013

52.236-28 Preparation of Proposals--Construction OCT 1997 252.204-7008 Compliance With Safeguarding Covered Defense

Information Controls

OCT 2016

252.236-7008 Contract Prices-Bidding Schedules DEC 1991

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.0000-4010 INQUIRIES

00 21 16 - 2

52.211-3 AVAILABILITY OF SPECIFICATIONS NOT LISTED IN THE GSA INDEX OF FEDERAL

SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARDS AND COMMERCIAL ITEM DESCRIPTIONS (JUN 1988) Error! Bookmark not defined.

52.211-4 AVAILABILITY FOR EXAMINATION OF SPECIFICATIONS NOT LISTED IN THE GSA INDEX

OF FEDERAL SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARDS AND COMMERCIAL ITEM DESCRIPTIONS (JUN 1988)

..................................................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)

52.222-23 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TO ENSURE EQUAL

EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY FOR CONSTRUCTION (FEB 1999)

52.233-2 SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006)

52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995) – ALTERNATE I (FEB 1995)

52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)

52.252-3 ALTERATIONS IN SOLICITATION (APR 1984)

52.252-5 AUTHORIZED DEVIATIONS IN PROVISIONS (APR 1984)

52.0000-4010 INQUIRIES

1. Any prospective offeror desiring an explanation or interpretation of the solicitation, drawings, specifications, etc., must request it in writing soon enough to allow a reply to reach all prospective bidders/offerors before submission of their bids/offers. Oral explanations or instructions given before award of a contract are not binding. Any information given to a prospective offeror concerning a solicitation will be furnished promptly to all other prospective offerors as an amendment to the solicitation, if that information is necessary in submitting offers or if lack of it would be prejudicial to other prospective bidders/offerors.

2. All inquiries relating to this solicitation are to be submitted via Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at www.projnet.org/projnet.

A. To submit and review bid inquiry items, bidders will need to be a current registered user, or self register into the ProjNet system.

To access the Bid Inquiry system, go to the ProjNet web page and fill in:

- Managing Agency - USACE

- Email address

- Key Access (this is the Bidder Inquiry Key - see below for key)

- Click on “Sign In”

- You will be prompted for the answer to your secret question on the next screen

00 21 16 - 3

If this is your first time accessing ProjNet, you will be directed to a screen titled “User account not found. Please create one using the form below”. Fill in the requested information (name, company, city, phone #, etc)

B. From this page, you may view all bidder inquiries or add an inquiry. Please Note:

Offerors shall only submit one question per inquiry. All inquiries containing multiple questions may be rejected.

C. Offerors will receive an acknowledgement of their question via email, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed by the technical team.

D. The Solicitation Number is: W912PL19R0011.

The Bidder Inquiry Key is: RF3DWB-E89X7C

3. The Bidder Inquiry System will be unavailable for new inquiries 5 business days prior to bid/proposal submission in order to ensure adequate time allotted to form an appropriate response and amend the solicitation if necessary.

4. Offerors are requested to review the specifications in its entirety, review the Bidder Inquiry System for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry.

5. The ProjNet call center operates weekdays from 8AM to 5PM U.S. Central Time Zone (Chicago). The telephone number for the Call Center is 800-428-HELP.

6. Responses on the Bidder Inquiry System do not revise, change, amend or supersede the provisions of the solicitation. Changes to the solicitation must be by written amendment thereto. Any Bidder Inquiry System response that can be interpreted to be in conflict with the solicitation or amendment, shall be subordinate to the conflicting provision, term, and/or note, wherever it appears in the solicitation, until revised or altered by a written amendment to the solicitation.

Additionally, offerors may not anticipate a change to the solicitation until the change, revision, correction, or alteration of the solicitation is actually made, in writing and published as an amendment to the solicitation

00 21 16 - 4

(End of provision)

52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)

The Government contemplates award of a Firm Fixed Priced contract resulting from this solicitation.

(End of provision)

FAR 52.217-3 EVALUATION EXCLUSIVE OF OPTIONS (APR 1984) The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by including only the price for the basic requirement;

i.e.,options will not be included in the evaluation for award purposes.

52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting.

As prescribed in 19.508(e) or 19.811-3 (e), insert the following clause:

Limitations on Subcontracting (Jan 2017)

(a) This clause does not apply to the unrestricted portion of a partial set-aside.

(b) Applicability. This clause applies only to-

(1) Contracts that have been set aside or reserved for small business concerns or 8(a) participants;

(2) Part or parts of a multiple-award contract that have been set aside for small business concerns or 8(a) participants; and

(3) Orders set aside for small business or 8(a) participants under multiple-award contracts as described in 8.405-5 and 16.505(b)(2)(i)(F).

(c) By submission of an offer and execution of a contract, the Offeror/Contractor agrees that in performance of the contract in the case of a contract for-

(1) Services (except construction). At least 50 percent of the cost of contract performance incurred for personnel shall be expended for employees of the concern.

(2) Supplies (other than procurement from a nonmanufacturer of such supplies). The concern shall perform work for at least 50 percent of the cost of manufacturing the supplies, not including the cost of materials.

(3) General construction. The concern will perform at least 15 percent of the cost of the contract, not including the cost of materials, with its own employees.

00 21 16 - 5

(4) Construction by special trade contractors. The concern will perform at least 25 percent of the cost of the contract, not including the cost of materials, with its own employees.

(End of clause)

52.222-23 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TO ENSURE

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY FOR CONSTRUCTION (FEB 1999)

(a) The offeror's attention is called to the Equal Opportunity clause and the Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for Construction clause of this solicitation.

(b) The goals for minority and female participation, expressed in percentage terms for the Contractor's aggregate workforce in each trade on all construction work in the covered area, are as follows:

Goals for minority participation for each trade

Goals for female participation for each trade

25.0 – 30.0% 6.9%

These goals are applicable to all the Contractor's construction work performed in the covered area. If the Contractor performs construction work in a geographical area located outside of the covered area, the Contractor shall apply the goals established for the geographical area where the work is actually performed. Goals are published periodically in the Federal Register in notice form, and these notices may be obtained from any Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs office.

(c) The Contractor's compliance with Executive Order 11246, as amended, and the regulations in 41 CFR 60-4 shall be based on (1) its implementation of the Equal Opportunity clause, (2) specific affirmative action obligations required by the clause entitled "Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for Construction,'' and (3) its efforts to meet the goals. The hours of minority and female employment and training must be substantially uniform throughout the length of the contract, and in each trade. The Contractor shall make a good faith effort to employ minorities and women evenly on each of its projects. The transfer of minority or female employees or trainees from Contractor to Contractor, or from project to project, for the sole purpose of meeting the Contractor's goals shall be a violation of the contract, Executive Order 11246, as amended, and the regulations in 41 CFR 60-4. Compliance with the goals will be measured against the total work hours performed.

00 21 16 - 6

(d) The Contractor shall provide written notification to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Federal Contract Compliance, U.S. Department of Labor, within 10 working days following award of any construction subcontract in excess of $10,000 at any tier for construction work under the contract resulting from this solicitation. The notification shall list the --

(1) Name, address, and telephone number of the subcontractor;

(2) Employer's identification number of the subcontractor;

(3) Estimated dollar amount of the subcontract;

(4) Estimated starting and completion dates of the subcontract; and

(5) Geographical area in which the subcontract is to be performed.

(e) As used in this Notice, and in any contract resulting from this solicitation, the "covered area" is Tohono O'dham Nation, which is located southwest of Tucson, AZ, Pima County, AZ

52.228-1 Bid Guarantee. As prescribed in 28.101-2 , insert a provision or clause substantially as follows:

Bid Guarantee (Sept 1996)

(a) Failure to furnish a bid guarantee in the proper form and amount, by the time set for opening of bids, may be cause for rejection of the bid.

(b) The bidder shall furnish a bid guarantee in the form of a firm commitment, e.g.,bid bond supported by good and sufficient surety or sureties acceptable to the Government, postal money order, certified check, cashier’s check, irrevocable letter of credit, or, under Treasury Department regulations, certain bonds or notes of the United States. The Contracting Officer will return bid guarantees, other than bid bonds-

(1) To unsuccessful bidders as soon as practicable after the opening of bids; and

(2) To the successful bidder upon execution of contractual documents and bonds (including any necessary coinsurance or reinsurance agreements), as required by the bid as accepted.

00 21 16 - 7

(c) The amount of the bid guarantee shall be 20 percent of the bid price or $3,000,000, whichever is less.

(d) If the successful bidder, upon acceptance of its bid by the Government within the period specified for acceptance, fails to execute all contractual documents or furnish executed bond(s) within 10 days after receipt of the forms by the bidder, the Contracting Officer may terminate the contract for default.

(e) In the event the contract is terminated for default, the bidder is liable for any cost of acquiring the work that exceeds the amount of its bid, and the bid guarantee is available to offset the difference.

(End of Clause)

52.233-2 SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006)

(a) Protests, as defined in section 33.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, that are filed directly with an agency, and copies of any protests that are filed with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), shall be served on the Contracting Officer (addressed as follows) by obtaining written and dated acknowledgment of receipt from

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 915 Wilisre Bldg, Suie 930 Attn: CESPL-CTE Sandra Oquita Los Angeles, CA 90017

(b) The copy of any protest shall be received in the office designated above within one day of filing a protest with the GAO.

(End of provision)

52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995) – ALTERNATE I (FEB 1995)

(a) The clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigations and Conditions Affecting the Work, will be included in any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation. Accordingly, offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed.

(b) An organized site visit has been scheduled for--

May 29 and May 30. The start time will be at 8:00 am. The POC is Karl Ahlen and PH # is 213 280 8580

(c) Participants will meet at--

00 21 16 - 8

Everyone will meet at the San Miguel Gate which is at the end of IR 19. The directions are to drive to Seles AZ 86 go south on IR 19 until there is a 90 degree left turn. Go onto the gravel road and stop by the gate at the border. 31O33’18.39” N and 111o46”12.25”W

52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)

This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/

52.252-3 ALTERATIONS IN SOLICITATION (APR 1984)

Portions of this solicitation are altered as follows:

NA

52.252-5 AUTHORIZED DEVIATIONS IN PROVISIONS (APR 1984)

(a) The use in this solicitation of any Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR Chapter 1) provision with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of"(DEVIATION)" after the date of the provision.

(b) The use in this solicitation of any NA (48 CFR Chapter NA) provision with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of "(DEVIATION)" after the name of the regulation.

IFT SITE PREP AJO & CASA GRANDE AOR W912PL-19-R-0011

Amendment 0001

SECTION 00 22 00 - 1

SECTION 00 22 00 - SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

I. REQUIREMENT FOR SEPARATE PRICE AND TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

II. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

III. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL, VOLUME 1

IV. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL, VOLUME 2

V. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

VI. PROPOSAL EXPENSE AND PRE-AWARD COSTS

VII. ATTACHMENTS

Amendment 0001

SECTION 00 22 00 - 2

I. REQUIREMENT FOR SEPARATE PRICE AND TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

A. EACH OFFEROR MUST SUBMIT BOTH A PRICE PROPOSAL AND A

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL. THE PRICE PROPOSAL AND THE TECHNICAL

PROPOSAL MUST BE SUBMITTED AS SEPARATE (I.E., PHYSICALLY

DISTINCT) VOLUMES. BOTH THE PRICE PROPOSAL AND THE TECHNICAL

PROPOSAL MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE CLOSING DATE AND TIME SET FOR

RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS.

B. THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME 1) MUST INCLUDE THE SIGNED

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT SHEET(STANDARD FORM SF-1442, BLOCK #19),

INCLUDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ALL AMENDMENTS; THE

COMPLETED PRICING SCHEDULE; THE OFFEROR’S OFFICIAL ONLINE ORCA

REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS; BID BOND, AND ANY OTHER

REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPH 3 BELOW.

C. THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME 2) CONSISTS OF ALL INFORMATION

AND MATERIAL SUBMITTED OR PROVIDED FOR EVALUATION IN RESPONSE

TO THE TECHNICAL (NON-COST) EVALUATION FACTORS SPECIFIED IN

BOTH THIS SECTION AND SECTION 00 22 16: SUPPLEMENTARY

INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS. THE PURPOSE OF THE TECHNICAL

EVALUATION IS TO ASSESS THE QUALITY OF EACH OFFER (I.E., THE

QUALITY OF THE PROPOSED PRODUCT OR SERVICE), TO DETERMINE THE

CAPABILITY OF EACH OFFEROR, AND TO DETERMINE THE ABILITY OF

EACH OFFEROR TO PERFORM THE PERSPECTIVE CONTRACT

SUCCESSFULLY.

D. OFFERORS SUBMITTING PROPOSALS FOR THIS PROJECT SHOULD LIMIT

SUBMISSION TO DATA ESSENTIAL FOR EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS SO

THAT A MINIMUM OF TIME AND MONIES WILL HAVE BEEN EXPENDED IN

PREPARING THE INFORMATION REQUIRED HEREIN. HOWEVER, IN ORDER

TO BE EFFECTIVELY AND EQUITABLY EVALUATED, THE PROPOSALS MUST

INCLUDE INFORMATION SUFFICIENTLY DETAILED TO CLEARLY DESCRIBE

THE OFFEROR’S RESPONSES TO THE SOLICITATION FACTORS WHICH MAY

OR MAY NOT REQUIRE SUCH DETAILS ON EXPERIENCE, TECHNICAL

APPROACH AND MANAGEMENT CAPABILITIES TO SUCCESSFULLY

COMPLETE THE PROJECT. PROPOSALS SHOULD FOLLOW THE ORDER

SEQUENCE SET FORTH IN THE RFP. INFORMATION PROVIDED OUT OF

SEQUENCE WILL NOT BE EVALUATED AND MAY RESULT IN THE

OFFEROR’S DISQUALIFICATION FROM AWARD.

Amendment 0001

SECTION 00 22 00 - 3

II. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

A. WRITTEN PROPOSAL MATERIALS SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN STANDARD

THREE RING LOOSE-LEAF BINDERS AND ON A CD-ROM USING A

SEARCHABLE “.PDF” FORMAT. PROPOSALS SHALL BE TABBED AND

LABELED IN A MANNER TO AFFORD EASY IDENTIFICATION FROM A TABLE

OF CONTENTS. FONT SIZE SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 10 POINT. EACH

PAGE SHALL BE IDENTIFIED WITH THE APPROPRIATE PAGE NUMBER

CENTERED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE. SHEET SIZE OF THE PROPOSAL

CONTENTS SHALL BE 8-1/2 INCHES X 11 INCHES. THE PROPOSED

PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE SHEET SIZE MAY BE 11 INCHES

X 17 INCHES AND WILL COUNT AS ONE PAGE. OFFERORS THAT DO NOT

MEET THESE REQUIREMENTS MAY BE SUBJECT TO REJECTION.

B. PROPOSAL REVISIONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED AS PAGE REPLACEMENTS

WITH REVISED TEXT READILY IDENTIFIABLE, E.G., BOLD FACE PRINT OR

UNDERLINING. THE SOURCE OF THE REVISION, E.G., ERROR, OMISSION, OR

CLARIFICATION, OR AMENDMENT SHALL ALSO BE ANNOTATED FOR EACH

REVISION. PROPOSAL REPLACEMENT PAGES SHALL BE NUMBERED,

SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED “REVISED” SHALL SHOW THE DATE OF THE

REVISION, SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN APPROPRIATE NUMBER OF COPIES

E.G., IF TWO (2) COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL PAGE WERE REQUIRED, THEN

TWO (2) COPIES OF THE REVISED PAGE WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED, AND

SHALL BE A DIFFERENT COLOR THAN THE ORIGINAL PAGE THEY ARE TO

REPLACE.

C. PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE OUTSIDE OF EACH SEPARATE VOLUME IS

CLEARLY MARKED TO INDICATE ITS CONTENTS AND THE IDENTITY OF

THE OFFEROR. ADDITIONALLY, THE ORIGINAL COST/PRICE PROPOSAL

AND ORIGINAL TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SHOULD BE CLEARLY INDICATED

ON THE OUTSIDE COVER.

D. “CONFIDENTIAL” PROJECTS CANNOT BE SUBMITTED TO DEMONSTRATE

CAPABILITY UNLESS ALL OF THE INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR

EVALUATION PURPOSES AS SPECIFIED HEREIN CAN NONETHELESS BE

PROVIDED TO THE GOVERNMENT AS PART OF THE OFFEROR’S TECHNICAL

PROPOSAL. OFFERORS THAT INCLUDE IN THEIR PROPOSALS

INFORMATION THAT THEY DO NOT WANT TO DISCLOSE TO THE PUBLIC

FOR ANY PURPOSE, OR USED BY THE GOVERNMENT EXCEPT FOR

EVALUATION PURPOSES, MUST BE CLEARLY MARKED IN ACCORDANCE

WITH THE INSTRUCTIONS AT FAR 52.215-1, “INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFEROR-

COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION,” PARAGRAPH (3), “RESTRICTIONS ON

DISCLOSURE AND USE OF DATA.”

E. DRAWINGS, SKETCHES AND SCHEDULES SUBMITTED AS PART OF

Amendment 0001

SECTION 00 22 00 - 4

OFFEROR’S VOLUME 2, TECHNICAL PROPOSAL, SHALL ONLY BE USED FOR

THE PURPOSE OF EVALUATING THE PROPOSAL. SUCH DOCUMENTS SHALL

NOT BE THE BASIS FOR ALTERING THE REQUIREMENTS, TERMS AND

CONDITIONS OF THE SOLICITATION. THE PROJECT DURATION AS STATED

IN SECTION 00 73 00 SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS PARAGRAPH 52.211-10

“COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION AND COMPLETION OF WORK (APR 1984)

IS AS SET FORTH THEREIN.

III. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL, VOLUME 1

A. NUMBER OF SETS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

SUBMIT THE PRICE PROPOSAL AS FOLLOWS: ONE ORIGINAL

B. FORMAT AND CONTENTS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL/LIST OF TABS

THE ORIGINAL AND ALL COPIES OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL SHALL BE

APPROPRIATELY LABELED AS SUCH, SHALL BE ORGANIZED AS

INDICATED BELOW, AND SHALL BE COMPRISED OF THE FOLLOWING:

PROPOSAL COVER SHEET. THE PROPOSAL COVER SHEET IS REQUIRED

BY FAR 52.215-1(C) (2). THIS PROVISION, ENTITLED “INSTRUCTIONS TO

OFFERORS—COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION,” HAS BEEN INCLUDED IN FULL

TEXT IN SECTION 00 21 00 INSTRUCTIONS. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING

INFORMATION IN THE PROPOSAL COVER SHEET:

• SOLICITATION NUMBER.

• NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE AND FACSIMILE NUMBERS OF THE

OFFEROR (AND EMAIL ADDRESS IF AVAILABLE).

• DUNS, CAGE, AND TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS OF THE OFFEROR.

• STATEMENT SPECIFYING THE EXTENT OF AGREEMENT WITH ALL

TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND PROVISIONS INCLUDED IN THE

SOLICITATION AND THE OFFEROR’S AGREEMENT TO FURNISH ANY OR

ALL ITEMS UPON WHICH PRICES ARE OFFERED; AT THE PRICE SET

OPPOSITE EACH ITEM AS REFLECTED ON THE PROPOSAL SCHEDULE.

• NAMES, TITLES, TELEPHONE AND FACSIMILE NUMBERS (AND EMAIL

ADDRESSES IF AVAILABLE) OF PERSONS AUTHORIZED TO NEGOTIATE

ON THE OFFEROR’S BEHALF WITH THE GOVERNMENT IN CONNECTION

WITH THIS SOLICITATION.

• ACKNOWLEDGMENT THAT THE OFFEROR’S SYSTEM FOR AWARD

MANAGEMENT REGISTRATION IS CURRENT PER FAR CLAUSE 52.204-7,

SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT AND DFARS 252.204-7004,

ALTERNATE A, SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT.

Amendment 0001

SECTION 00 22 00 - 5

TAB CONTENTS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

#1 TAB 1 SHALL CONTAIN THE COMPLETED SF 1442, ENTITLED

“SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD” FRONT AND BACK; CERTIFICATE

OF CORPORATE PRINCIPAL, COMPLETED AS APPLICABLE, INCLUDING

CORPORATE SEAL, IF ANY.

#2 SECTION 00 10 00, CONTRACT LINE ITEM NUMBER SCHEDULE. THE

COMPLETED CONTRACT LINE ITEM NUMBER SCHEDULE WITH THE

OFFEROR’S PROPOSED CONTRACT LINE ITEM PRICES INSERTED IN THE

APPROPRIATE SPACES. PRICES MUST BE PROPOSED FOR ALL

CONTRACT LINE ITEMS AND PRICES SUB-LINE ITEMS. UNIT PRICES ARE

TO BE EXTENDED TO THE ACTUAL “DOLLAR AND CENTS” AMOUNTS

(I.E., TO TWO DECIMAL PLACES). DO NOT ROUND OFF TO THE NEAREST

DOLLAR. CHECK YOUR PRICING SUBMISSIONS VERY CAREFULLY FOR

MATHEMATICAL AND CLERICAL ERRORS PRIOR TO SUBMISSION.

#3 OFFICIAL ONLINE SAM (SYSTEM OF AWARD MANAGEMENT)

REPRESENTATIONS & CERTIFICATIONS

#4 A BID GUARANTEE, STANDARD FORM 24, “BID BOND.”

#5 TEAMING AGREEMENT OR IRREVOCABLE SUBCONTRACTOR OFFERS (IF

APPLICABLE)

IV. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL, VOLUME 2

A. THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SHALL NOT INCLUDE ANY COST

INFORMATION AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 35 PAGES.

VOLUME 2, TECHNICAL PROPOSAL, SHALL NOT EXCEED 35 PAGES,

EXCLUDING THE PROPOSAL COVER SHEET, TABLE OF CONTENTS, TAB

DIVIDERS. ALSO THE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRES (PPQ),

PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS FROM PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

RETRIEVAL SYSTEM (PPIRS), INCLUDING CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE

ASSESSMENT REPORTING SYSTEM (CPARS) WILL NOT COUNT AGAINST

THE PAGE LIMITATION. THE GOVERNMENT WILL NOT BE OBLIGATED TO

EVALUATE ANY INFORMATION BEYOND THE 35 PAGE LIMITATION NOTED

ABOVE. THE OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT VERBATIM SECTIONS OF THIS

SOLICITATION AS PART OF THEIR PROPOSAL. OFFERORS THAT DO NOT

MEET THESE REQUIREMENTS MAY BE SUBJECT TO REJECTION.

B. NUMBER OF SETS OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

SUBMIT THE ORIGINAL AND FOUR (4) ADDITIONAL SETS OF THE WRITTEN

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (I.E., THE ORIGINAL AND FOUR (4) THREE (3)) COPIES

Amendment 0001

SECTION 00 22 00 - 6

OF ALL OF THE INFORMATION REQUIRED BELOW, WITH EACH SET

SEPARATELY PACKAGED). AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF VOLUME 2 SHALL BE

SUBMITTED ON A CD-ROM USING A SEARCHABLE “.PDF” FORMAT.

C. FORMAT AND CONTENTS OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL/LIST OF TABS

THE ORIGINAL AND ALL COPIES OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SHALL

BE APPROPRIATELY LABELED AS SUCH, SHALL BE ORGANIZED AS

INDICATED BELOW, AND SHALL BE COMPRISED OF THE FOLLOWING:

THE PROPOSAL COVER SHEET AS REQUIRED BY FAR 52.215-1(C)(I)(V). THIS

PROVISION, TITLED “INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS-COMPETITIVE

ACQUISITION,” IS PROVIDED IN FULL TEXT IN SECTION 00 21 00

INSTRUCTIONS.

THE ORIGINAL AND ALL COPIES OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SHALL BE

APPROPRIATELY LABELED AS SUCH, SHALL BE ORGANIZED AS INDICATED

BELOW, AND SHALL BE COMPRISED OF THE FOLLOWING:

TAB CONTENTS OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

TAB #1 FACTOR 1: ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE

TAB #2 FACTOR 2: TECHNICAL APPROACH

TAB #3 FACTOR 3: PAST EXPERIENCE

TAB #4 FACTOR 4: KEY PERSONNEL

TAB #5 FACTOR 5: PAST PERFORMANCE

TAB #6 FACTOR 6: SCHEDULE

V. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

SEE ATTACHED FORMS AT THE END OF THIS SECTION AND SECTION 00 22 16

FOR PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, LIST OF EVALUATION FACTORS,

FOR MORE DETAILS.

Amendment 0001

SECTION 00 22 00 - 7

VI. PROPOSAL EXPENSE AND PRE-AWARD COSTS

THIS REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL DOES NOT COMMIT THE GOVERNMENT TO

PAY ANY COSTS INCURRED IN THE PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION OF

THE INITIAL AND ANY SUBSEQUENT PROPOSALS OR FOR ANY COSTS

INCURRED PRIOR TO EXECUTION OF A FORMAL CONTRACT.

VII. ATTACHMENTS

ATTACHMENT # 1: PROJECT EXPERIENCE FORM (TAB 3)

ATTACHMENT # 2: COVER LETTER AND PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

(PPQ) (TAB 5)

ATTACHMENT # 3: PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT (PAR) (TAB 5)

ATTACHMENT # 4: PERSONNEL RESUME FORM (TAB 4)

Amendment 0001

SECTION 00 22 00 - 8

ATTACHMENT # 1

PROJECT EXPERIENCE FORM

(TAB 3)

OFFEROR’S NAME:

PROVIDE A COMPLETED FORM FOR EACH PROJECT FOR

WHICH EXPERIENCE IS BEING CLAIMED. EXPERIENCE

PROVIDED FOR (CHECK MORE THAN ONE BOX IF

APPLICABLE):

[ ] OFFEROR:

[ ] KEY CONSTRUCTION SUBCONTRACTOR:

WAS PROJECT A FIRM-FIXED-PRICE CONTRACT (Y/N)?

IF NO, WHAT TYPE WAS IT?

PROJECT NAME:

PROJECT LOCATION:

OWNER/CLIENT:

FOR THIS PROJECT FOR WHICH EXPERIENCE IS BEING CLAIMED, FIRM(S)

WORKED AS THE [ ] PRIME CONTRACTOR; OR [ ] SUBCONTRACTOR. IF

EXPERIENCE IS PROVIDED FOR MORE THAN ONE FIRM, CHECK MORE THAN ONE

BOX AS APPROPRIATE FOR EACH FIRM LISTED.

Amendment 0001

SECTION 00 22 00 - 9

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT (INCLUDE, AS APPLICABLE, HOW PROJECT

IS SIMILAR IN SCOPE AND MAGNITUDE TO THE WORK REQUIRED IN THIS

RFP)

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AMOUNT OR DESIGN FEE (FOR DESIGNER):

ORIGINAL CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: ________________________

FINAL CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE: ________________________

ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE: ________________________

PERCENT OF COMPLETION (IF PROJECT IS CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION)

EXPLANATION OF ANY LATE FINISH:

WAS THE PROJECT TERMINATED EARLY OR WERE CURE/SHOW CAUSE LETTERS

RECEIVED? ___YES ___NO

EXPLAIN EARLY TERMINATION (DEFAULT/CONVENIENCE) OR CURE/SHOW

CAUSE LETTERS

SAFETY RECORD: ____INJURIES WITH LOST WORKDAYS*, ____INJURIES WITHOUT

LOST WORKDAYS*

(*USE THE NUMBER REPORTED ON OSHA FORM NO. 200 OR EQUIVALENT)

LIST AND EXPLAIN ANY CUSTOMER CONCERNS OR DISSATISFACTION. EXPLAIN

HOW YOU RESPONDED.

SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING (COMPLETE FOR OFFEROR (PRIME

CONTRACTOR) ONLY):

Amendment 0001

SECTION 00 22 00 - 10

LARGE BUSINESS OFFERORS ONLY: WHAT WERE T\HE VARIOUS SMALL

BUSINESS PERCENTAGE GOALS IN THE

ORIGINAL CONTRACT, IF APPLICABLE (SEE FAR 52.219-9)? SDB: _______ WOB:

SMALL BUSINESS: _______ VETERAN-OWNED: _______ HUBZONE: _______

WHAT WAS THE ACTUAL PERCENT ACHIEVED AT CONTRACT COMPLETION? SDB:

_______ WOB: _______

SMALL BUSINESS: _______ VETERAN-OWNED: _______ HUBZONE: _______

EXPLANATION—IF GOALS WERE NOT MET:

Amendment 0001

SECTION 00 22 00 - 11

ATTACHMENT #2

NAVFAC / USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

OWNER/CLIENT PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY

(TAB 5)

Amendment 0001

SECTION 00 22 00 - 12

SAMPLE COVER LETTER

DATE

SUBJECT: NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

NAME AND

ADDRESS OF

REFERENCE

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN:

THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, LOS ANGELES DISTRICT, IS

CONDUCTING A REVIEW OF OUR PAST PERFORMANCE HISTORY AS PART OF

AN UPCOMING SOURCE SELECTION ACQUISITION.

PLEASE COMPLETE THE ATTACHED NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE

QUESTIONNAIRE TO AID THE GOVERNMENT IN ITS EVALUATION OF OUR PAST

PERFORMANCE AND E-MAIL IT DIRECTLY TO THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF

ENGINEERS A THE BELOW E-MAIL ADDRESS

CHRISTINA.CHAVEZ@USACE.ARMY.MIL..

THE GOVERNMENT IS REQUESTING RECEIPT OF THIS INFORMATION BY 2:00

P.M. ON 27 JUNE 2019.

YOU ARE ADVISED THAT IT IS GOVERNMENT POLICY THAT THE IDENTITY OF

SOURCES PROVIDING PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION WILL NOT BE

RELEASED OUTSIDE THE GOVERNMENT.

WE APPRECIATE YOUR EFFORTS TO HELP THE GOVERNMENT FAIRLY

EVALUATE OUR RECORD OF PAST PERFORMANCE. SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY

QUESTIONS RELATED TO THIS MATTER, PLEASE CONTACT MS. CHAVEZ AT

TELEPHONE (213) 452-3246.

SINCERELY,

CONTRACTOR

ATTACHMENT

SECTION 00 22 00 - 13

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (FORM PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 1-4)

1. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION

FIRM NAME: CAGE CODE:

ADDRESS: DUNS NUMBER:

PHONE NUMBER:

EMAIL ADDRESS:

POINT OF CONTACT: CONTACT PHONE NUMBER:

2. WORK PERFORMED AS: PRIME CONTRACTOR SUB CONTRACTOR JOINT

VENTURE OTHER (EXPLAIN)

PERCENT OF PROJECT WORK PERFORMED:

IF SUBCONTRACTOR, WHO WAS THE PRIME (NAME/PHONE #):

3. CONTRACT INFORMATION

CONTRACT NUMBER:

DELIVERY/TASK ORDER NUMBER (IF APPLICABLE):

CONTRACT TYPE: FIRM FIXED PRICE COST REIMBURSEMENT OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY):

CONTRACT TITLE:

CONTRACT LOCATION:

AWARD DATE (MM/DD/YY):

CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE (MM/DD/YY):

ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE (MM/DD/YY):

EXPLAIN DIFFERENCES:

ORIGINAL CONTRACT PRICE (AWARD AMOUNT):

FINAL CONTRACT PRICE (TO INCLUDE ALL MODIFICATIONS, IF APPLICABLE):

EXPLAIN DIFFERENCES:

4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

COMPLEXITY OF WORK HIGH MED ROUTINE

HOW IS THIS PROJECT RELEVANT TO PROJECT OF SUBMISSION? (PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS SUCH AS

SIMILAR EQUIPMENT, REQUIREMENTS, CONDITIONS, ETC.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (CLIENT TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 5-8)

5. CLIENT INFORMATION

NAME:

TITLE:

PHONE NUMBER:

EMAIL ADDRESS:

6. DESCRIBE THE CLIENT’S ROLE IN THE PROJECT:

7. DATE QUESTIONNAIRE WAS COMPLETED (MM/DD/YY):

8. CLIENT’S SIGNATURE:

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT

RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

SECTION 00 22 00 - 14

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) EXCEPTIONAL PERFORMANCE MEETS CONTRACTUAL

REQUIREMENTS AND EXCEEDS MANY TO

THE GOVERNMENT/OWNER’S BENEFIT.

THE CONTRACTUAL PERFORMANCE OF

THE ELEMENT OR SUB-ELEMENT BEING

ASSESSED WAS ACCOMPLISHED WITH

FEW MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE

CONTRACTOR WAS HIGHLY EFFECTIVE.

AN EXCEPTIONAL RATING IS

APPROPRIATE WHEN THE

CONTRACTOR SUCCESSFULLY

PERFORMED MULTIPLE

SIGNIFICANT EVENTS THAT WERE

OF BENEFIT TO THE

GOVERNMENT/OWNER. A

SINGULAR BENEFIT, HOWEVER,

COULD BE OF SUCH MAGNITUDE

THAT IT ALONE CONSTITUTES AN

EXCEPTIONAL RATING. ALSO,

THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN NO

SIGNIFICANT WEAKNESSES

IDENTIFIED.

(VG) VERY GOOD PERFORMANCE MEETS CONTRACTUAL

REQUIREMENTS AND EXCEEDS SOME TO

THE GOVERNMENT’S/OWNER’S BENEFIT.

THE CONTRACTUAL PERFORMANCE OF

THE ELEMENT OR SUB-ELEMENT BEING

ASSESSED WAS ACCOMPLISHED WITH

SOME MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE

CONTRACTOR WERE EFFECTIVE.

A VERY GOOD RATING IS

APPROPRIATE WHEN THE

CONTRACTOR SUCCESSFULLY

PERFORMED A SIGNIFICANT EVENT

THAT WAS A BENEFIT TO THE

GOVERNMENT/OWNER. THERE

SHOULD HAVE BEEN NO

SIGNIFICANT WEAKNESSES

IDENTIFIED.

(S)

SATISFACTORY

PERFORMANCE MEETS MINIMUM

CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. THE

CONTRACTUAL PERFORMANCE OF THE

ELEMENT OR SUB-ELEMENT CONTAINS

SOME MINOR PROBLEMS FOR WHICH

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE

CONTRACTOR APPEAR OR WERE

SATISFACTORY.

A SATISFACTORY RATING IS

APPROPRIATE WHEN THERE WERE

ONLY MINOR PROBLEMS, OR

MAJOR PROBLEMS THAT THE

CONTRACTOR RECOVERED FROM

WITHOUT IMPACT TO THE

CONTRACT. THERE SHOULD HAVE

BEEN NO SIGNIFICANT

WEAKNESSES IDENTIFIED. PER DOD

POLICY, A FUNDAMENTAL

PRINCIPLE OF ASSIGNING RATINGS

IS THAT CONTRACTORS WILL NOT

BE ASSESSED A RATING LOWER

THAN SATISFACTORY SOLELY FOR

NOT PERFORMING BEYOND THE

REQUIREMENTS OF THE

CONTRACT.

(M) MARGINAL PERFORMANCE DOES NOT MEET SOME

CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS. THE

CONTRACTUAL PERFORMANCE OF THE

ELEMENT OR SUB-ELEMENT BEING

ASSESSED REFLECTS A SERIOUS

PROBLEM FOR WHICH THE CONTRACTOR

HAS NOT YET IDENTIFIED CORRECTIVE

ACTIONS. THE CONTRACTOR'S

PROPOSED ACTIONS APPEAR ONLY

MARGINALLY EFFECTIVE OR WERE NOT

FULLY IMPLEMENTED.

A MARGINAL IS APPROPRIATE

WHEN A SIGNIFICANT EVENT

OCCURRED THAT THE

CONTRACTOR HAD TROUBLE

OVERCOMING WHICH IMPACTED

THE GOVERNMENT/OWNER.

SECTION 00 22 00 - 15

(U)

UNSATISFACTORY

PERFORMANCE DOES NOT MEET MOST

CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS AND

RECOVERY IS NOT LIKELY IN A TIMELY

MANNER. THE CONTRACTUAL

PERFORMANCE OF THE ELEMENT OR

SUB-ELEMENT CONTAINS SERIOUS

PROBLEM(S) FOR WHICH THE

CONTRACTOR'S CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

APPEAR OR WERE INEFFECTIVE.

AN UNSATISFACTORY RATING IS

APPROPRIATE WHEN MULTIPLE

SIGNIFICANT EVENTS OCCURRED

THAT THE CONTRACTOR HAD

TROUBLE OVERCOMING AND

WHICH IMPACTED THE

GOVERNMENT/OWNER. A

SINGULAR PROBLEM, HOWEVER,

COULD BE OF SUCH SERIOUS

MAGNITUDE THAT IT ALONE

CONSTITUTES AN

UNSATISFACTORY RATING.

(N) NOT

APPLICABLE

NO INFORMATION OR DID NOT APPLY TO

YOUR CONTRACT

RATING WILL BE NEITHER

POSITIVE NOR NEGATIVE.

SECTION 00 22 00 - 16

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

A) QUALITY OF TECHNICAL DATA/REPORT PREPARATION

EFFORTS

E VG S M U N

B) ABILITY TO MEET QUALITY STANDARDS SPECIFIED FOR

TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE E VG S M U N

C) TIMELINESS/EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTRACT PROBLEM

RESOLUTION WITHOUT EXTENSIVE CUSTOMER GUIDANCE

E VG S M U N

D) ADEQUACY/EFFECTIVENESS OF QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM

AND ADHERENCE TO CONTRACT QUALITY ASSURANCE

REQUIREMENTS (WITHOUT ADVERSE EFFECT ON PERFORMANCE)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

A) COMPLIANCE WITH CONTRACT DELIVERY/COMPLETION

SCHEDULES INCLUDING ANY SIGNIFICANT INTERMEDIATE

MILESTONES. (IF LIQUIDATED DAMAGES WERE ASSESSED OR THE

SCHEDULE WAS NOT MET, PLEASE ADDRESS BELOW)

E VG S M U N

B) RATE THE CONTRACTOR’S USE OF AVAILABLE RESOURCES TO

ACCOMPLISH TASKS IDENTIFIED IN THE CONTRACT

E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

A) TO WHAT EXTENT WERE THE END USERS SATISFIED WITH THE

PROJECT?

E VG S M U N

B) CONTRACTOR WAS REASONABLE AND COOPERATIVE IN

DEALING WITH YOUR STAFF (INCLUDING THE ABILITY TO

SUCCESSFULLY RESOLVE DISAGREEMENTS/DISPUTES;

RESPONSIVENESS TO ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS, BUSINESSLIKE

AND COMMUNICATION)

E VG S M U N

C) TO WHAT EXTENT WAS THE CONTRACTOR COOPERATIVE,

BUSINESSLIKE, AND CONCERNED WITH THE INTERESTS OF THE

CUSTOMER?

E VG S M U N

D) OVERALL CUSTOMER SATISFACTION E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

A) EFFECTIVENESS OF ON-SITE MANAGEMENT, INCLUDING

MANAGEMENT OF SUBCONTRACTORS, SUPPLIERS, MATERIALS,

AND/OR LABOR FORCE?

E VG S M U N

B) ABILITY TO HIRE, APPLY, AND RETAIN A QUALIFIED

WORKFORCE TO THIS EFFORT

E VG S M U N

C) GOVERNMENT PROPERTY CONTROL E VG S M U N

D) KNOWLEDGE/EXPERTISE DEMONSTRATED BY CONTRACTOR

PERSONNEL

E VG S M U N

E) UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS E VG S M U N

F) ABILITY TO SIMULTANEOUSLY MANAGE MULTIPLE PROJECTS

WITH MULTIPLE DISCIPLINES

E VG S M U N

SECTION 00 22 00 - 17

G) ABILITY TO ASSIMILATE AND INCORPORATE CHANGES IN

REQUIREMENTS AND/OR PRIORITY, INCLUDING PLANNING,

EXECUTION AND RESPONSE TO GOVERNMENT CHANGES

E VG S M U N

H) EFFECTIVENESS OF OVERALL MANAGEMENT (INCLUDING

ABILITY TO EFFECTIVELY LEAD, MANAGE AND CONTROL THE

PROGRAM)

E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

A) ABILITY TO MEET THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS WITHIN THE

CONTRACTUALLY AGREED PRICE(S)?

E VG S M U N

B) CONTRACTOR PROPOSED INNOVATIVE ALTERNATIVE

METHODS/PROCESSES THAT REDUCED COST, IMPROVED

MAINTAINABILITY OR OTHER FACTORS THAT BENEFITED THE

CLIENT

E VG S M U N

C) IF THIS IS/WAS A GOVERNMENT COST TYPE CONTRACT,

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR’S TIMELINESS AND ACCURACY

IN SUBMITTING MONTHLY INVOICES WITH APPROPRIATE BACK-

UP DOCUMENTATION, MONTHLY STATUS REPORTS/BUDGET

VARIANCE REPORTS, COMPLIANCE WITH ESTABLISHED BUDGETS

AND AVOIDANCE OF SIGNIFICANT AND/OR UNEXPLAINED

VARIANCES (UNDER RUNS OR OVERRUNS)

E VG S M U N

D) IS THE CONTRACTOR’S ACCOUNTING SYSTEM ADEQUATE FOR

MANAGEMENT AND TRACKING OF COSTS? IF NO, PLEASE

EXPLAIN IN REMARKS SECTION.

YES NO

E) IF THIS IS/WAS A GOVERNMENT CONTRACT, HAS/WAS THIS

CONTRACT BEEN PARTIALLY OR COMPLETELY TERMINATED FOR

DEFAULT OR CONVENIENCE OR ARE THERE ANY PENDING

TERMINATIONS? INDICATE IF SHOW CAUSE OR CURE NOTICES

WERE ISSUED, OR ANY DEFAULT ACTION IN COMMENT SECTION

BELOW.

YES NO

F) HAVE THERE BEEN ANY INDICATIONS THAT THE CONTRACTOR

HAS HAD ANY FINANCIAL PROBLEMS? IF YES, PLEASE EXPLAIN

BELOW.

YES NO

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

A) TO WHAT EXTENT WAS THE CONTRACTOR ABLE TO MAINTAIN

AN ENVIRONMENT OF SAFETY, ADHERE TO ITS APPROVED

SAFETY PLAN, AND RESPOND TO SAFETY ISSUES? (INCLUDES:

FOLLOWING THE USERS RULES, REGULATIONS, AND

REQUIREMENTS REGARDING HOUSEKEEPING, SAFETY,

CORRECTION OF NOTED DEFICIENCIES, ETC.)

E VG S M U N

B) CONTRACTOR COMPLIED WITH ALL SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

FOR THE PROJECT AND PERSONNEL SECURITY REQUIREMENTS.

E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

A) ABILITY TO SUCCESSFULLY RESPOND TO EMERGENCY AND/OR

SURGE SITUATIONS (INCLUDING NOTIFYING COR, PM OR

CONTRACTING OFFICER IN A TIMELY MANNER REGARDING

URGENT CONTRACTUAL ISSUES).

E VG S M U N

B) COMPLIANCE WITH CONTRACTUAL TERMS/PROVISIONS

(EXPLAIN IF SPECIFIC ISSUES)

E VG S M U N

C) WOULD YOU HIRE OR WORK WITH THIS FIRM AGAIN? (IF NO,

PLEASE EXPLAIN BELOW)

YES NO

SECTION 00 22 00 - 18

D) IN SUMMARY, PROVIDE AN OVERALL RATING FOR THE WORK

PERFORMED BY THIS CONTRACTOR.

E VG S M U N

PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO THE QUESTIONS ABOVE (IF APPLICABLE) AND/OR

ADDITIONAL REMARKS. FURTHERMORE, PLEASE PROVIDE A BRIEF NARRATIVE

ADDRESSING SPECIFIC STRENGTHS, WEAKNESSES, DEFICIENCIES, OR OTHER

COMMENTS WHICH MAY ASSIST OUR OFFICE IN EVALUATING PERFORMANCE

RISK (PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES IF NECESSARY):

SECTION 00 22 00 - 19

ATTACHMENT # 3:

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT (PAR)

(TAB 5)

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

(TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR)

1. CONTRACTOR (FIRM BEING

EVALUATED): NAME: ADDRESS:

2. CONTRACT NUMBER: TASK ORDER (TO)

NUMBER IF APPLICABLE:

3. SOLICITATION TYPE: NEGOTIATED OR SEALED

BID

4. CONTRACT/TO TYPE: FIXED-

PRICE COST, REIMBURSEMENT,

HYBRID (EXPLAIN)

5. ROUTINE DIFFICULT (LOW TO HIGH)

COMPLEXITY OF WORK 1 2 3 4 5

6. CONTRACT/TO DOLLAR VALUE:

7. CONTRACT/TO STATUS: ACTIVE

COMPLETE COMPLETION DATE (W/

EXTENSIONS):

8. DESCRIPTION, LOCATION & RELEVANCY OF WORK:

9. PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED AND HOW RESOLVED:

10. NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL OF THE PROCURING

CONTRACTING OFFICER AND/OR THE CONTRACTING OFFICER’S REPRESENTATIVE (COR)

(AND OTHER REFERENCES, E.G., ADMINISTRATIVE CONTRACTING OFFICER, IF

APPLICABLE):

11. CHECK ONE OF THE FOLLOWING BLOCKS:

A WRITTEN PERFORMANCE EVALUATION WAS RECEIVED FOR THIS PROJECT AND IS

ATTACHED.

A WRITTEN PERFORMANCE EVALUATION WAS NOT RECEIVED FOR THIS PROJECT. A

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ) HAS BEEN SENT TO THE REFERENCE(S)

LISTED IN BLOCK 10, WITH A LETTER REQUESTING THAT THE COMPLETED

QUESTIONNAIRE BE RETURNED DIRECTLY TO THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BY

SECTION 00 22 00 - 20

SECTION 00 22 00 ATTACHMENT 4

PHASE 1 – VOLUME 1 - TAB 4

RESUME FORM

RESUME FORM - KEY PERSONNEL AND QUALIFICATIONS

(COMPLETE ONE FORM FOR EACH KEY PERSON)

1. NAME AND TITLE:

2. ROLE IN THIS

CONTRACT:

3. NAME OF FIRM WITH WHICH ASSOCIATED

(CITY AND STATE):

4. YEARS EXPERIENCE AS

ROLE IN BLOCK 2:

TOTAL:________________

WITH CURRENT

FIRM:_____________

5. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (STATE AND DISCIPLINE), IF

APPLICABLE:

6. EDUCATION (DEGREE AND SPECIALIZATION), IF APPLICABLE:

7. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (PUBLICATIONS,

ORGANIZATIONS, TRAINING, AWARDS, ETC.):

8. SUMMARY OF RELEVANT EXPERIENCE:

A.

(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (CITY

AND STATE):

(2) DATES

STARTED/COMPLETED:

(3) PROJECT DESCRIPTION (BRIEF SCOPE, SIZE, COST, ETC.) AND

SPECIFIC ROLE:

B.

SECTION 00 22 00 - 21

C.

D.

SECTION 00 22 16 - 1

SECTION 00 22 16 - SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

I. ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD

II. SOURCE SELECTION USING BEST VALUE TRADE OFF PROCESS

III. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL

IV. INITIAL EVALUATION OF TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME II)

V. EVALUATION OF PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME I)

VI. INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS

VII. DISCUSSION PROCESS

VIII. FINAL PROPOSAL REVISIONS

IX. DEBRIEFINGS

SECTION 00 22 16 - 2

I. ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD

IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FAR, NO CONTRACT SHALL BE ENTERED INTO

UNLESS THE CONTRACTING OFFICER ENSURES THAT ALL REQUIREMENTS OF

LAW, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, REGULATIONS, AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE

PROCEDURES, INCLUDING CLEARANCES AND APPROVALS, HAVE BEEN MET.

THIS INCLUDES THE FAR REQUIREMENT THAT NO AWARD SHALL BE MADE

UNLESS THE CONTRACTING OFFICER MAKES AN AFFIRMATIVE DETERMINATION

OF RESPONSIBILITY. TO BE DETERMINED RESPONSIBLE, A PROSPECTIVE

CONTRACTOR MUST MEET THE GENERAL STANDARDS IN PART FAR 9 AND ANY

SPECIAL STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE SOLICITATION.

II. SOURCE SELECTION USING BEST VALUE TRADE OFF PROCESS

THE GOVERNMENT WILL SELECT THE OFFER THAT REPRESENTS THE BEST

VALUE TO THE GOVERNMENT BY USING THE TRADE-OFF PROCESS DESCRIBED

IN FAR PART 15. THIS PROCESS PERMITS TRADE-OFFS BETWEEN PRICE AND

TECHNICAL FACTORS AND ALLOWS THE GOVERNMENT TO ACCEPT OTHER THAN

THE LOWEST PRICED OFFER.

THE AWARD DECISION WILL BE BASED ON A COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF

PROPOSALS AGAINST ALL SOURCE SELECTION CRITERIA IN THE SOLICITATION.

PROPOSALS SHALL NOT USE BROAD STATEMENTS SUCH AS: “OFFEROR

UNDERSTANDS”, OR “WILL COMPLY WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS”, OR

STATEMENTS PARAPHRASING THE SPECIFICATIONS, AND GENERAL OR OVERLY

BROAD STATEMENTS SUCH AS “STANDARD PROCEDURES WILL BE EMPLOYED”

OR “WELL KNOWN TECHNIQUES WILL BE USED”. PROPOSALS WITH THESE TYPES

OF STATEMENTS WILL BE RATED NON-ACCEPTABLE. LIST OF EVALUATION

FACTORS (VOLUME II) AND SPECIFIC TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA

ALL TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS, WHEN COMBINED, ARE SIGNIFICANTLY

MORE IMPORTANT THAN COST OR PRICE.

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE WILL BE THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTOR

FOLLOWED BY TECHNICAL APPROACH. THE FACTORS ARE LISTED IN ORDER OF

IMPORTANCE WITH FACTOR 1 BEING THE MOST IMPORTANT AND FACTOR 6

BEING THE LEAST IMPORTANT.

THE GOVERNMENT IS CONCERNED WITH OBTAINING THE MOST

ADVANTAGEOUS BALANCE BETWEEN TECHNICAL MERIT/QUALITY AND

COST/PRICE TO THE GOVERNMENT. THE DEGREE OF IMPORTANCE OF PRICE

SECTION 00 22 16 - 3

COULD BECOME GREATER DEPENDING UPON THE EQUALITY OF THE TECHNICAL

PROPOSALS. IF COMPETING TECHNICAL PROPOSALS ARE DETERMINED TO BE

ESSENTIALLY EQUAL, PRICE COULD BECOME THE CONTROLLING FACTOR. THE

GOVERNMENT MAY AWARD A CONTRACT ON THE BASIS OF INITIAL OFFERS

RECEIVED WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS; THEREFORE, THE OFFEROR’S PROPOSAL

SHOULD CONTAIN THE BEST TERMS FROM A TECHNICAL AND PRICE

STANDPOINT.

THE EVALUATION PROCESS ESSENTIALLY CONSISTS OF THREE PARTS:

PROPOSAL COMPLIANCE REVIEW AND RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION,

TECHNICAL/QUALITY EVALUATION, AND PRICE EVALUATION.

A. PROPOSAL COMPLIANCE REVIEW: THIS IS AN INITIAL REVIEW TO ENSURE

THAT ALL REQUIRED FORMS AND CERTIFICATIONS ARE COMPLETED AND THAT

BOTH A TECHNICAL AND PRICE PROPOSAL WERE RECEIVED.

B. TECHNICAL/QUALITY EVALUATION: THE SSEB WILL EVALUATE AND

RATE THOSE PROPOSALS PASSING THE FIRST REVIEW, ABOVE. PROPOSALS WILL

BE EVALUATED AGAINST THE RFP REQUIREMENTS. FACTORS WILL BE RATED

ON AN “UNACCEPTABLE, MARGINAL, ACCEPTABLE, GOOD AND OUTSTANDING

BASIS”.

C. PRICE EVALUATION: THE SSEB WILL EVALUATE PRICE PROPOSALS

INDEPENDENT OF THE TECHNICAL/QUALITY EVALUATION. THE SSEB WILL NOT

HAVE ACCESS TO PRICE INFORMATION UNTIL COMPLETION OF THE

TECHNICAL/QUALITY EVALUATION. THE PROPOSED PRICE WILL BE ANALYZED

FOR REASONABLENESS. IT MAY ALSO BE ANALYZED TO DETERMINE WHETHER

IT IS REALISTIC FOR THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED; REFLECTS A CLEAR

UNDERSTANDING OF THE REQUIREMENTS; AND IS CONSISTENT WITH THE

OFFEROR’S TECHNICAL PROPOSALS. ALL OFFERS WITH SEPARATELY PRICE LINE

ITEMS AND/OR SUB LINE ITEMS WILL BE ANALYZED FOR UNBALANCED PRICING.

FACTOR 1: ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE

THIS FACTOR WILL BE THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTOR. THIS PROJECT WILL BE

CONSTRUCTED ON THE TOHONO O’ODHAM NATION, REFERRED TO AS THE

NATION IN THE REST OF THIS SECTION, AND IN AREAS THAT HAVE CULTURALLY

AND ENVIRONMENTALLY IMPORTANT TO THE NATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL

COMPLIANCE PLAN WILL NEED TO COVER THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS;

(1) COMPLIANCE WITH THE BEST PRACTICES IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL

ASSESSMENT.

(2) TRAINING THE PERSONNEL TO WORK WITH THE MONITORS

SECTION 00 22 16 - 4

(3) ENFORCEMENT OF TRAINING RECEIVED (CONSEQUENCE OF NON-

COMPLIANCE)

(4) MANAGEMENT PROCESS TO SUPPORT EMPLOYEES IN COMPLYING

WITH THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS

(5) TAKING TRAINING WITH NATION, HOW TO ACCOMPLISH IT

(6) COMPILING WITH THE RESTORATION PLAN BEST PRACTICE’S

(7) AVOIDANCE OF IMPACTS

(8) HOW TO THE RELOCATION OF (3) SAGUARO

(9) RISK AVOIDANCE STRATEGY TO AVOID

SUPERIOR RATINGS WILL BE GIVEN TO OFFERORS THAT GIVE EXAMPLES OF

HOW THEY WOULD COMPLY WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS AND

HOW THEIR COMPLIANCE STRATEGY WILL REDUCE RISK TO THE CONTRACTOR

AND THE GOVERNMENT. SUPERIOR RATINGS WILL ALSO BE GIVEN TO OFFERORS

ON HOW COMPREHENSIVE AND DETAILED THEIR RESPONSE TO THE FACTOR IS,

WHILE STILL ADHERING TO THE PAGE LIMIT FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL.

FACTOR 2: TECHNICAL APPROACH

PROVIDE A CONCISE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE PROJECT THAT DESCRIBES

HOW YOUR LABOR, RESOURCES, SUBCONTRACTORS AND MATERIAL SUPPLIERS

WILL BE COORDINATED AND USED TO ENSURE SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF

THE PROJECT. PLEASE ENSURE THAT YOUR RESPONSE TO THIS FACTOR BY

ADDRESSES THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS;

(1) HOW WILL THE PROJECT BE STAFFED, PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW YOU WILL

BILLET THE CONSTRUCTION CREWS, AND TRANSPORT THEM TO THE

PROJECT AND BACK.

(2) WILL NEED TO EXPLAIN HOW THE PROJECT WILL BE IMPLEMENTED. THE

ELEMENTS THAT WOULD NEED TO BE COVERED WOULD BE PHASING

WITH THE AJO CAG 0434, 0436, 0438, 0440 AND 0442 SITES BEING STARTED

FIRST.

(3) HOW WILL OFFEROR COMPLY WITH THE STAGING REQUIREMENTS OF THE

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT THAT ONLY TWO STAGING AREAS ARE

IDENTIFIED

(4) HOW WILL THE LOGISTICS OF THE CONSTRUCTION BE HANDLED.

INCLUDED IN THIS RESPONSE WOULD BE A PLAN ON HOW THE

CONTRACTOR WILL INTEND TO STAY WITHIN THE AUTHORIZED RIGHT OF

WAYS.

(5) PROVIDE A DETAILED EXPLANATION ON HOW QUALITY CONTROL PLAN

WILL BE IMPLEMENTED.

(6) PROVIDE A DESCRIPTION OF HOW CONSTRUCTION CREWS, EQUIPMENT

WILL BE TRANSPORTED OUT TO THE SITE. THIS PLAN WILL ALSO HAVE TO

INCLUDE DESCRIPTION ON HOW THE HAUL ROUTES WILL NOT BE

SECTION 00 22 16 - 5

DAMAGED AND AREAS WITHIN BUILT UP AREAS WILL BE KEPT CLEAN.

(7) DESCRIBE HOW EACH CLIN WILL BE MANAGED IN THE BASE CONTRACT

SUPERIOR RATINGS WILL BE GIVEN TO OFFERORS THAT TIE THEIR

TECHNICAL APPROACH WITH HOW THEY COMPLY WITH ENVIRONMENTAL

REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT. SUPERIOR RATING WILL ALSO BE GIVEN

RESPONSES THAT INDICATE A METHOD TO REDUCE IMPACTS ON TRAFFIC

AND INHABITANT AREAS AND HOW THEY WILL RESPECT THE LOCAL

INHABITANTS CONCERNS ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENT AND CULTURE.

FACTOR 3 PAST EXPERIENCE

THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT 3 PROJECTS THAT WORTH AT LEAST $5 MILLION

DOLLARS. THE PROJECTS WILL HAVE TO BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN RURAL AREAS

WHERE THERE WAS SIGNIFICANT LOGISTICAL CHALLENGES. THE PROJECTS

WILL HAVE INVOLVED ROAD WORK AND SITE DEVELOPMENT IN RURAL AREAS.

THE CONTRACTS ALSO NEED TO SUBMIT ONE PROJECT WORTH AT LEAST $2

MILLION THAT WAS COMPLETED ON A NATIVE AMERICAN RESERVATION OR

NATIVE ALASKAN OR HAWAIIN VILLAGE

SUPERIOR RATINGS WILL BE GIVEN TO PROJECTS SUBMITTED THAT MORE

CLOSELY RESEMBLE THE SCOPE AND COST OF THE CURRENT SOLICITATION.

SUPERIOR RATINGS WILL ALSO BE GIVEN TO OFFERORS THAT HAVE MORE THAN

ONE PROJECT THAT HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED ON A NATIVE AMERICAN

RESERVATION OR NATIVE ALASKAN OR HAWAIIAN COMMUNITY.

FACTOR 4: KEY PERSONNEL RESUMES

KEY PERSONNEL: PROVIDE RESUMES FOR THE FOLLOWING:

KEY PERSONNEL: PROVIDE RESUMES FOR THE FOLLOWING:

(1) HEALTH LIFE SAFETY OFFICER

(2) QUALITY CONTROL MANAGER

(3) SUPERINTENDENT

SECTION 00 22 16 - 6

(4) PROJECT MANAGER

(5) ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE COORDINATOR

RESUMES SUBMITTED FOR THIS TECHNICAL PROPOSAL…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it.