Amendment_to_instructions_to_offerors_section.docx
DOCX document 12 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Replace Roofs at Buildings 36 & 2022
- Solicitation number
- W912JB-18-R-9004
About this file
The attached document describes changes made to the instructions to offerors.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W912JB-18-R-9004-0002.pdf | ||
| W912JB-18-R-9004-0004.pdf | ||
| Second_Site_Visit_Attendence_Sheet_Bldg_36_and_2022.docx | DOCX document | |
| 2nd_Site_Visit_minutes_Bldg_36_and_2022_roof.docx | DOCX document | |
| Revised_Evaluation_Factors-001.docx | DOCX document | |
| W912JB-18-R-9004-0003.pdf | ||
| Updated_Wage_Determination_(MI105).pdf | ||
| W912JB-18-R-9004-001.pdf | ||
| RFI-005.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFI-004.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFI-003.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFI-002.pdf | ||
| Bldg_36_and_2022_Drawings.pdf | ||
| RFI-001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Building_36_and_2022_Site_Visit_Minutes.pdf | ||
| 36_and_2022_site_visit_sign_in_sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| Building_36_Pics.pdf | ||
| Bldg._2022_Pics.pdf | ||
| W912JB-18-R-9004.pdf | ||
| 3._TDVG182579_Repair_Roofs_at_Bldgs._36_and_2022_100__Specs.pdf | ||
| 3._SOW_TDVG182579.doc | DOC document | |
| 2._TDVG182579_AF_Form_66_Schedule_of_Material_Submittals.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Alpena_Base_Access_requirements.pdf |
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
W912JB-18-R-9004-0001
Amendment to Instructions to offerors section
The following revision is being made to the instructions to offerors section:
5.3 Provide a construction schedule with a period of performance (POP) not to exceed 60 days after NTP, with all “Fast Tracking” areas clearly identified if proposed. The schedule shall be task oriented, capturing all Statement of Work (SOW) requirements and indicate dates by which milestones are to be achieved. The offeror shall use either the GANNT chart or an equivalent critical path scheduling approach and the schedules shall be graphically represented. The offeror shall also submit a brief written rationale (not to exceed 2 pages, typed with no smaller than 10pt font) explaining how the schedule will be achieved.
Evaluation Factors The Best Value offer will be determined on the basis of the lowest priced proposal meeting the acceptability standards for non-priced evaluation factors.
Non-Priced Evaluation Factors listed below were evaluated on an acceptable /unacceptable basis:
• Technical
• Past Performance
TECHNICAL
The Technical Evaluation consists of one factor: Construction Schedule.
Provide a construction schedule with a period of performance (POP) not to exceed 60 days after NTP, with all “Fast-Tracking” areas clearly identified if proposed. The schedule shall be task oriented, capturing all Statement of Work (SOW) requirements and indicate dates by which milestones are to be achieved. The offeror shall use a either the GANTT chart or an equivalent critical path scheduling approach and the schedules shall be graphically represented. The offeror shall also submit a brief written rationale (not to exceed 2 pages, typed with no smaller than 10pt font) explaining how the schedule will be achieved.
Acceptability will be based on the offeror’s demonstration of execution of the construction schedule Outlining completion within the desired POP. The schedule shall capture all SOW requirements, execution timelines, And critical path items. The written rationale shall describe coordination of work activities, phasing if applicable, And demonstrate an overview of how the project will be completed on time.
File details come from the government source that posted it.