Attachment_A_-_Bldg_1928_HAZMAT_Survey.pdf

Attachment A Hazardous Material Reports

Appendix F.1 Building 1928 Lead Based Paint

Bureau Ver i tas Nor th Amer ica , Inc .

Health, Safety, and Environmental Services

109 North Center Drive

North Brunswick, NJ 08902

Main: (732) 225-6040

Fax: (732) 225-4577 www.us.bureauveritas.com

October 30, 2018

Joint Base McGuire/Dix/Lakehurst

3021 McGuire Boulevard

McGuire AFB, NJ 08641-0000

BVNA Project No. 12018-000163.00

Joint Base McGuire, Dix, Lakehurst

McGuire AFB, New Jersey

Subject: Sampling and Analysis of Paint on Structural Surfaces at the McGuire AFB, at the Joint Base McGuire, Dix, Lakehurst, New Jersey.

Dear Sir or Madam:

We are pleased to enclose Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.’s draft report of the assessment of paint for total lead content from Building 1928 at McGuire Air Force Base (AFB), located at the Joint Base

McGuire, Dix, Lakehurst (JB MDL), New Jersey.

As always, it is a pleasure to provide our services to you. If you have any questions, please call me at

732.225.6040.

Sincerely, J-B Chadwick

Senior Project Manager

Enclosures

Report for the Assessment of Lead-Based Paints

Joint Base McGuire, Dix, Lakehurst 3021 McGuire Boulevard

McGuire AFB, New Jersey

CH2M Project No. 695847

October 30, 2018

BVNA Project No. 12018-000163.00

USACE Contract No. W912ER-14-D-003

Task Order No. W912DS18F0012

Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.

109 North Center Drive

North Brunswick, New Jersey 08902

732.225.6040 www.us.bureauveritas.com

Joint Base McGuire/Dix/Lakehurst BVNA Project No. 12018-000163.00 Building 1928 Paint Assessment October 30, 2018 ii

CONTENTS

Section Page

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT

3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.0 STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES

4.1 LEAD STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES

4.1.1 USEPA Regulations

4.1.2 OSHA Regulations

4.1.3 New Jersey Regulations

5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

APPENDIX A - ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF PAINT SAMPLES

APPENDIX B - LABORATORY DOCUMENTATION

APPENDIX C - SAMPLE LOCATION DRAWING

APPENDIX D - POSITIVE SAMPLE PHOTOGRAPH

1.0 INTRODUCTION

On September 28, 2018, Mr. Luke Schroeder, a State of New Jersey licensed Lead Inspector and Risk

Assessor (Inspector/Risk Assessor No. 001615) of Lead Consulting and Inspection, Inc. (LCII) of Short

Hills, New Jersey, collected samples of paint for analysis. Lead Consulting and Inspection, Inc. is licensed by the State of New Jersey for lead hazard assessment in residential and commercial/steel structure buildings. Mr. J-B Chadwick of BVNA was present during the sampling and provided assistance.

Mr. Schroeder collected multiple chip samples of paint from various structures on the interior and exterior of Building 1928 located at the McGuire AFB, at the JB MDL, New Jersey.

Samples were submitted to EMSL Analytical, Inc. (EMSL) in Cinnaminson, New Jersey for analysis of total lead by United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) SW 846 3050B/7000B.

EMSL is accredited by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) Environmental Lead

Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELLAP). The results of the sampling appear in Appendix A.

Appendix B presents the laboratory documentation. Appendix C presents the positive paint sample location diagram. Appendix D presents the building sample location drawings.

2.0 DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT

On July 17, 2018 BVNA inspected Building 1928. This walkthrough assessment provided a visual inspection of the readily accessible portions of the building and allowed BVNA to determine where sampling of paint chips should be performed. The assessment was performed based on the following documents:

BVNA’s Proposal Number 1209.18.274, dated May 2, 2018, modified May 9, 10, 21, 23, and 24, 2018.

BVNA’s Sampling Plan dated July 24, 2018, which Unites States Army Corps of Engineers

(USACE) approved on August 8, 2018. BVNA developed the sampling plan based on a site walkthrough conducted on July 17, 2018.

On September 28, 2018, LCII collected multiple chip samples of paint from the interior and exterior structures of the Building 1928. On day of the assessment, LCII collected paint chip samples from materials that would be impacted by the planned renovations. LCII collected a total of sixty (60) paint chip samples. The samples collected were in line with the Scope of Work provided to BVNA by CH2MHill and the sampling plan that was approved by JB MDL.

The samples for laboratory analysis collected during this assessment for lead were analyzed by EMSL

Analytical, Inc. in Cinnaminson, New Jersey. BVNA had the sixty (60) paint chip samples analyzed for lead content using flame atomic absorption spectroscopy following United States Environmental

Protection Agency (USEPA) Method Solid Waste (SW) 846 3050B/7000B. EMSL is accredited by the

AIHA Environmental Lead Laboratory Approval Program (ELLAP) Laboratory # 100194.

3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Analytical results of samples collected from both buildings are summarized in the following table. It must be noted that EMSL analyzed the samples using EPA method 3050B/6010C, with the results reported in percent by weight. The complete results are presented in Table 1 of this report.

LCII collected a total of sixty (60) paint chip samples from paint on Building 1928. Analytical results indicate that Building 1928 has paint which contains detectable amounts of lead. Thirty-three (33) of the paint chip samples resulted in no lead detected, twenty-four (24) paint chip samples resulted in percentages below the 0.5% threshold, and another three (3) of the paint chip samples contained lead at a concentration greater than 0.5% (white-yellow wall paint in the utility closet and white wall paint in the gym). These three (3) samples are considered to be lead-based paint (LBP) in accordance with the guidelines established by United States Housing and Urban Development (USHUD). HUD defines a lead-based paint as having equal to or greater than (≥) than 0.5 percent lead by dry weight. Although

Building 1928 is not a residential property, the HUD threshold is mentioned in this report as a benchmark.

OSHA does not publish a threshold for lead in paint and is concerned with paint that contains any amount of lead including concentrations below 0.5%. If any of the paints that contain lead are disturbed OSHA requirements will apply. Table 1 indicates the paints sampled and the analytical results of those samples.

Bold indicates those samples that contain some quantity of lead. See Appendix A for tables of paint descriptions and results. See Appendix D for a photograph of the positive lead paint sample locations.

The lead paint in the utility closet appears to be the only identified lead paint at the HUD guideline in the proposed work area in accordance with the construction plans provided to BVNA.

Table 1

Analytical Results of Paint Chip Sampling for Lead

McGuire, Dix, Lakehurst Joint Base

BVNA Project No. 12018-000163.00

September 28, 2018

Building 1928

Paint Description

(Sample Numbers) Location

Range of Lead

(% calculated)

Light Gray Wall Paint

(L1-1 to L1-3) Men’s Room Walls <*0.0080% - <0.0094%

Yellow-Blue Wall Paint

(L2-1 to L2-3) Utility Closet Walls <0.0080% – 1.6%

Light Gray Wall Paint

(L3-1 to L3-3) Ladies’ Room Walls <0.0080%

Light Gray Wall Paint

(L4-1 to L4-3) Walls in Room 6 <0.0080%

White Wall Paint

(L5-1 to L5-3) Main Hallway Walls <0.0080%

White Door Frame Paint

(L6-1 to L6-3) Room 11, Utility Closet, Room 6 Door Frames 0.12% - 0.25%

Light Gray Wall Paint

(L7-1 to L7-3) Walls in Room 2 <0.0080%

Blue Door Frame Paint

(L8-1 to L8-3) Men’s Room, Utility Closet, Room 11 Door Frames <0.0080% – <0.028%

Blue Radiator Paint

(L9-1 to L9-3) Hallway Radiators – Room 2, Restrooms, Room 12 <0.018% – 0.14%

White Radiator Paint

(L10-1 to L10-3) Radiators – Room 8, Room 5, Room 1 0.058% - 0.19%

Gray Wall Paint

(L11-1 to L11-3) Walls of Auditorium <0.0080%

White Wall Paint

(L12-1 to L12-3) Walls of Mechanical Equipment Rooms #1 and #2 <0.0080% – 0.017%

Gray Metal Paint

(L13-1 to L13-3) Double Doors of Gym on North Wall <0.0090% - <0.030%

Light Gray Wall Paint

(L14-1 to L14-3) Walls in Room 11 <0.0080%

Table 1 (continued)

Analytical Results of Paint Chip Sampling for Lead

McGuire, Dix, Lakehurst Joint Base

Building 1928

Paint Description

(Sample Numbers) Location

Range of Lead

(% calculated)

Gray Floor Paint

(L16-1 to L16-3) Floors of Mechanical Equipment Room #1 0.044% – 0.13%

Yellow Wall Paint

(L17-1 to L17-3) Walls of Mechanical Equipment Rooms #3 <0.0080% - <0.091%

Gray Floor Paint

(L18-1 to L18-3) Floors of Mechanical Equipment Rooms #2 <0.0080%

White CMU Wall Paint

(L19-1 to L19-3) Walls of Gym 0.36% – 1.1%

Gray Floor Paint

(L20-1 to L20-3) Floors of Gym <0.0080% - 0.027%

Blue Chalkboard Paint

(L21-1 to L21-3) Hand Painted Chalkboard Walls in Gym <0.0080%

* Less Than

4.0 STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES

4.1 LEAD STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES

As indicated in Section 3.0, detectible levels of lead base paints (LBP) were identified in the building.

LBP activities are the subject of several federal regulations and guidelines. Some federal regulations are focused on the protection of building occupants while others focus on disposal of lead based paint waste and lead exposure of workers. These regulations and guidelines include:

4.1.1 USEPA Regulations

40 CFR Part 745 (Final Rule)

The USEPA has mandated that every state adopt abatement protocols and institute training and certification programs for inspectors, workers, supervisors, etc. This certification rule went into effect on

August 1998, and beginning on August 1999 USEPA's abatement work practices must be followed.

States that do not implement State Lead Regulations are required to implement the USEPA's program. It must be noted, however, that the USEPA Final Rule certification and work practice requirements apply to lead abatement in child-occupied facilities, with minimal direct impact on commercial property operations.

The USEPA has also established LBP testing and abatement practices and worker training requirements applicable to renovation of property built before 1978. This action is supported by new USEPA studies showing hazardous lead dust levels generated by conventional renovation of lead painted components.

Resource Conservation & Recovery Act (RCRA)

RCRA deals with the waste and disposal requirements associated with lead containing paint. The

USEPA is in rulemaking to exempt architectural components with lead containing paint from RCRA waste classification requirements and to allow these components to be disposed of in specified non-hazardous waste landfills. Standard abatement wastes (paint chips, caustic paste slag, High Efficiency Particulate

Air (HEPA) vacuum bags, etc.) will still require waste characterization under RCRA.

4.1.2 OSHA Regulations

29 CFR 1926.62, Lead Exposure in Construction

Applies to "all construction work where an employee may be occupationally exposed to lead”. If lead is present in detectable levels, the Contractor must perform a negative exposure assessment to ensure that their workers will not be exposed to airborne lead above the allowable personal exposure limits.

A property owner is obligated by federal OSHA regulations to inform employees and outside contractors of the known presence of a hazardous material that may be encountered during their work activities including lead-based paint (Right to Know).

29 CFR 1910.134: Use of Respirators

The OSHA Respiratory Protection Standard defines the program and requirements as to when personnel are allowed to wear respirators, maintenance of respirators, etc.

In general, OSHA coverage extends to private sector employers and employees. Those not covered under the standard typically include self-employed persons and federal, state, and local municipal employees.

4.1.3 New Jersey Regulations

The following state agencies regulate lead in New Jersey: New Jersey Department of Environmental

Protection (NJDEP) New Jersey Administrative Code (N.J.A.C.) 7:26, New Jersey Department of

Community Affairs’ (NJDCA) N.J.A.C. 5:17, and the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) N.J.A.C.

8:60. The NJDEP, NJDCA, and the NJDOH regulations are similar but not identical to the federal 29 CFR

1926.62 regulations.

The State of New Jersey requires that contracting businesses performing lead consulting and/or remediation possess and maintain a New Jersey lead Contractor’s license. Additionally, workers performing lead related activities for such contractors must possess and maintain New Jersey Lead

Worker permits.

Notification to the NJDEP, NJDCA, and the NJDOH is required when lead based paints are to be remediated. The NJDEP, NJDCA, and the NJDOH must be notified at least ten (10) days in advance of performing lead abatement.

The NJDEP Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste requires that representative samples of the waste generated from renovation and demolition activities be analyzed for RCRA Toxicity Characteristics to determine proper disposal of the waste as Construction and Demolition Waste or Hazardous Waste in accordance with the EPA’s 40 CFR Part 262.

5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

The building owner must inform the contractor in writing of the presence of lead in certain building components. The building owner should be aware of the contractor’s work practices to protect adjacent property. BVNA recommends the following safe work practices to minimize lead exposure to workers and occupants and to protect property from contamination from dust and debris associated with lead containing paint. Contractor must:

1. Have lead safety program in accordance with OSHA requirements for Lead in Construction, 29 CFR 1926.62.

2. Have negative exposure data for job specific compliance, indicating that workers will not be exposed to lead at OSHA Action Level (AL) and Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL).

3. Utilize engineering controls and safe work practice controls to keep lead dust or fumes from becoming airborne. Engineering controls include local and general exhaust ventilation, process and equipment modification, material substitution, component replacement, and isolation or automation. (i.e. curtain doorways at openings to outside the work area, drop cloths, high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter equipped vacuums, and air filtration devices with HEPA filter.)

4. Provide respiratory protection and protective clothing and equipment such as disposable coveralls, gloves, hats, and shoes or disposable shoe coverlets, goggles or face shields, welding or abrasive blasting helmets, as required.

5. Perform routine housekeeping.

6. Provide hygiene facilities and best hygiene practices to minimize employee exposure to lead during the demolition.

7. Provide employee information and training regarding the hazards of lead.

8. Maintain records pertaining to the control of employee exposures to lead including training and air monitoring.

Specifically, BVNA recommends the following work practices for the renovation of materials that contain lead containing paint in proposed work areas:

Debris should be cleaned up as soon as possible and should not be left behind at the end of the work shift.

Debris waste should be sampled and submitted to a New Jersey State certified laboratory for lead toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) analysis for waste classification. Based on the analytical results, determination should be made if renovation waste needs to be manifested as hazardous waste. The State of New Jersey will require the TCLP be conducted on the waste generated during renovations for determination of waste disposal, otherwise the waste can be assumed to be a lead hazardous waste, and manifested and disposed of as a hazardous waste in an USEPA approved disposal site.

Please call Mr. J-B Chadwick at 732.623.4538 if you have any questions or require additional information.

This report submitted by: This report reviewed by:

Melanie Deitzel J-B Chadwick

Consultant Program Manager

Health, Safety, and Environmental Services Health, Safety, and Environmental Services

Attachments

APPENDIX A

ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF PAINT SAMPLES

Bulk Paint Sampling for Lead at the

McGuire, Dix, Lakehurst Joint Base

Sample Number Sample Description/Location Lead %

MDL-1928-L1- 1 Light Gray Wall Paint/ Men’s Room North Wall <0.0080%

2 Light Gray Wall Paint/ Men’s Room East Wall <0.0094%

3 Light Gray Wall Paint/ Men’s Room South Wall <0.0080%

MDL-1928-L2- 1 Yellow- Blue Wall Paint/ Utility Closet West Wall <0.0080%

2 Yellow-Blue Wall Paint/ Utility Closet East Wall 0.98%

3 Yellow-Blue Wall Paint/ Utility Closet North Wall 1.6%

MDL-1928-L3- 1 Light Gray Wall Paint / Ladies Room South Wall by Door <0.0080%

2 Light Gray Wall Paint/ Ladies Room South Wall Behind Utility Closet <0.0080%

3 Light Gray Wall Paint/ Ladies Room East Wall <0.0080%

MDL-1928-L4- 1 Light Gray Wall Paint / Room 6 South Wall <0.0080%

2 Light Gray Wall Paint/ Room 6 East Wall <0.0080%

3 Light Gray Wall Paint/ Room 6 West Wall <0.0080%

MDL-1928-L5- 1 White Wall Paint/ Main Hallway West End Wall, Front of Room 3 <0.0080%

2 White Wall Paint/ Main Hallway Middle Wall, Front of Room <0.0080%

3 White Wall Paint/ Main Hallway East End Wall, Front of Room 14 <0.0080%

Table 1 (continued)

McGuire, Dix, Lakehurst Joint Base

MDL-1928-L6- 1 White Door Frame Paint/ Room 6 Door Frames 0.14%

2 White Door Frame Paint/ Utility Closet Exterior Door Frames 0.25%

3 White Door Frame Paint/ Room 11 Exterior Door Frames 012%

MDL-1928-L7- 1 Light Gray Wall Paint / Room 2 East Wall <0.0080%

2 Light Gray Wall Paint/ Room 2 North Wall <0.0080%

3 Light Gray Wall Paint/ Room 2 South Wall <0.0080%

MDL-1928-L8- 1 Blue Door Frame Paint/ Men’s Room Door Frames <0.0128%

2 Blue Door Frame Paint/ Utility Closet Interior Door Frames <0.0080%

3 Blue Door Frame Paint/ Room 11 Interior Door Frames <0.021%

MDL-1928-L9- 1 Blue Radiator Paint / Hallway Radiator in Front of Room 2 0.018%

2 Blue Radiator Paint/ Hallway Radiator in Front of Restrooms 0.023%

3 Blue Radiator Paint/ Hallway Radiator in Front of Room 12 0.14%

MDL-1928-L10- 1 White Radiator Paint / Radiator in Room 8 0.060%

2 White Radiator Paint/ Radiator in Room 5 0.19%

3 White Radiator Paint/ Radiator in Room 1 0.058%

Table 1 (Continued)

McGuire, Dix, Lakehurst Joint Base

MDL-1928-L11- 1 Gray Wall Paint / Auditorium West Wall <0.0080%

2 Gray Wall Paint/ Auditorium North Wall <0.0080%

3 Gray Wall Paint/ Auditorium South Wall <0.0080%

MDL-1928-L12- 1 White Wall Paint / Mechanical Room #2, South Wall 0.0094%

2 White Wall Paint / Mechanical Room #1, South Wall <0.0080%

3 White Wall Paint / Mechanical Room #1, East Wall 0.017%

MDL-1928-L13- 1 Gray Metal Paint/ Far Right of Gym Double Doors on North Wall <0.019%

2 Gray Metal Paint/ Middle of Gym Double Doors on North Wall <0.030%

3 Gray Metal Paint/ Far Left of Gym Double Doors on North Wall <0.0090%

MDL-1928-L14- 1 Light Gray Wall Paint / Room 11 North Wall <0.0080%

2 Light Gray Wall Paint/ Room 11 East Wall <0.0080%

3 Light Gray Wall Paint/ Room 11 South Wall <0.0080%

MDL-1928-L16- 1 Gray Floor Paint/ Mechanical Room #1, West Side 0.13%

2 Gray Floor Paint/ Mechanical Room #1, Center 0.044%

3 Gray Floor Paint/ Mechanical Room #1, Front of Doors 0.046%

Table 1 (Continued)

McGuire, Dix, Lakehurst Joint Base

MDL-1928-L17- 1 Yellow Wall Paint/ Mechanical Room #3, West Wall 0.091%

2 Yellow Wall Paint/ Mechanical Room #3, South Wall <0.022%

3 Yellow Wall Paint/ Mechanical Room #3, North Wall <0.0080%

MDL-1928-L18- 1 Gray Floor Paint/ Mechanical Room #2, East Side <0.0080%

2 Gray Floor Paint/ Mechanical Room #2, Center North End <0.0080%

3 Gray Floor Paint / Mechanical Room #2, Center South End <0.0080%

MDL-1928-L19- 1 White CMU Wall Paint/ West Gym Wall 0.37%

2 White CMU Wall Paint/ South Gym Wall 0.36%

3 White CMU Wall Paint/ East Gym Wall 1.1%

MDL-1928-L20- 1 Gray Floor Paint/ East Side of Gym Floor <0.010%

2 Gray Floor Paint/ West Side of Gym Floor, North End <0.0080%

3 Gray Floor Paint/ West Side of Gym Floor, South End 0.027%

MDL-1928-L21- 1 Blue Chalkboard Paint/ Hand Painted on North Wall, Left End <0.0080%

2 Blue Chalkboard Paint/ Hand Painted on North Wall, Center <0.0080%

3 Blue Chalkboard Paint/ Hand Painted on North Wall, Right End <0.0080%

Samples collected by Lead Consulting and Inspection, Inc. of Short Hills, New Jersey, New Jersey State Lead

Inspector/Risk Assessor No. 001615. Analytical Method: EPA Method SW 846 3050B/7000B. The samples in this table were analyzed by the EMSL Analytical, Inc., in Cinnaminson, New Jersey. EMSL is accredited by the American

Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) and Certified by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.

APPENDIX B

LABORATORY DOCUMENTATION

Client Sample Description ConcentrationLab ID Analyzed Weight Lead

Collected

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com cinnaminsonleadlab@emsl.com

Attn: Melanie Deitzel Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.

109 North Center Drive North Brunswick, NJ 08902

Received: 09/28/18 4:25 PM

12018-000163.00

Fax: (732) 225-4577 Phone: (732) 225-6040

Project:

9/28/2018Collected:

Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B/7000B)*

201811077 CustomerID: CLAY50B CustomerPO:

ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

0.2646201811077-0001MDL-1928-L1-1 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2132201811077-0002MDL-1928-L1-2 <0.0094 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2601201811077-0003MDL-1928-L1-3 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2518201811077-0004MDL-1928-L2-1 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2919201811077-0005MDL-1928-L2-2 0.98 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2685201811077-0006MDL-1928-L2-3 1.6 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2525201811077-0007MDL-1928-L3-1 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2702201811077-0008MDL-1928-L3-2 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2808201811077-0009MDL-1928-L3-3 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2703201811077-0010MDL-1928-L4-1 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2761201811077-0011MDL-1928-L4-2 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018

0.2551201811077-0012MDL-1928-L4-3 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2546201811077-0013MDL-1928-L5-1 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2716201811077-0014MDL-1928-L5-2 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2770201811077-0015MDL-1928-L5-3 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2675201811077-0016MDL-1928-L6-1 0.14 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2565201811077-0017MDL-1928-L6-2 0.25 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2646201811077-0018MDL-1928-L6-3 0.12 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2634201811077-0019MDL-1928-L7-1 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2698201811077-0020MDL-1928-L7-2 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2557201811077-0021MDL-1928-L7-3 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2522201811077-0022MDL-1928-L8-1 0.028 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2733201811077-0023MDL-1928-L8-2 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2769201811077-0024MDL-1928-L8-3 0.021 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2653201811077-0025MDL-1928-L9-1 0.018 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2829201811077-0026MDL-1928-L9-2 0.023 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2562201811077-0027MDL-1928-L9-3 0.14 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2969201811077-0028MDL-1928-L10-1 0.060 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2544201811077-0029MDL-1928-L10-2 0.19 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018

Phillip Worby, Lead Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

Test Report ChmSnglePrm/nQC-7.32.3 Printed: 10/1/2018 5:24:19 PM

*Analysis following Lead in Paint by EMSL SOP/Determination of Environmental Lead by FLAA. Reporting limit is 0.008 % wt based on the minimum sample weight per our SOP. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank corrected. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. "<" (less than) result signifies that the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit. Measurement of uncertainty is available upon request. The QC data associated with the sample results included in this report meet the recovery and precision requirements unless specifically indicated otherwise.

Definitions of modifications are available upon request.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NELAP Certifications: NJ 03036, NY 10872, PA 68-00367, AIHA-LAP, LLC ELLAP 100194, A2LA 2845.01

Initial report from 10/01/2018 17:24:19 http://www.EMSL.com mailto:cinnaminsonleadlab@emsl.com

Collected

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com cinnaminsonleadlab@emsl.com

Attn: Melanie Deitzel Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.

109 North Center Drive North Brunswick, NJ 08902

Received: 09/28/18 4:25 PM

12018-000163.00

Fax: (732) 225-4577 Phone: (732) 225-6040

Project:

9/28/2018Collected:

Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B/7000B)*

201811077 CustomerID: CLAY50B CustomerPO:

ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

0.2597201811077-0030MDL-1928-L10-3 0.058 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2702201811077-0031MDL-1928-L11-1 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2756201811077-0032MDL-1928-L11-2 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2505201811077-0033MDL-1928-L11-3 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2513201811077-0034MDL-1928-L12-1 0.0094 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2726201811077-0035MDL-1928-L12-2 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2516201811077-0036MDL-1928-L12-3 0.017 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.1040201811077-0037MDL-1928-L13-1 <0.019 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.0665201811077-0038MDL-1928-L13-2 <0.030 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2222201811077-0039MDL-1928-L13-3 <0.0090 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2599201811077-0040MDL-1928-L14-1 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2526201811077-0041MDL-1928-L14-2 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2532201811077-0042MDL-1928-L14-3 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2595201811077-0046MDL-1928-L16-1 0.13 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2541201811077-0047MDL-1928-L16-2 0.044 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2130201811077-0048MDL-1928-L16-3 0.046 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.0917201811077-0049MDL-1928-L17-1 0.091 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.0905201811077-0050MDL-1928-L17-2 <0.022 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2531201811077-0051MDL-1928-L17-3 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2565201811077-0052MDL-1928-L18-1 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2584201811077-0053MDL-1928-L18-2 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2526201811077-0054MDL-1928-L18-3 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2534201811077-0055MDL-1928-L19-1 0.37 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2513201811077-0056MDL-1928-L19-2 0.36 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2540201811077-0057MDL-1928-L19-3 1.1 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.1985201811077-0058MDL-1928-L20-1 <0.010 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2599201811077-0059MDL-1928-L20-2 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2275201811077-0060MDL-1928-L20-3 0.027 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2519201811077-0061MDL-1928-L21-1 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018

Phillip Worby, Lead Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

Test Report ChmSnglePrm/nQC-7.32.3 Printed: 10/1/2018 5:24:19 PM

*Analysis following Lead in Paint by EMSL SOP/Determination of Environmental Lead by FLAA. Reporting limit is 0.008 % wt based on the minimum sample weight per our SOP. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank corrected. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. "<" (less than) result signifies that the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit. Measurement of uncertainty is available upon request. The QC data associated with the sample results included in this report meet the recovery and precision requirements unless specifically indicated otherwise.

Definitions of modifications are available upon request.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NELAP Certifications: NJ 03036, NY 10872, PA 68-00367, AIHA-LAP, LLC ELLAP 100194, A2LA 2845.01

Initial report from 10/01/2018 17:24:19

Collected

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com cinnaminsonleadlab@emsl.com

Attn: Melanie Deitzel Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.

109 North Center Drive North Brunswick, NJ 08902

Received: 09/28/18 4:25 PM

12018-000163.00

Fax: (732) 225-4577 Phone: (732) 225-6040

Project:

9/28/2018Collected:

Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B/7000B)*

201811077 CustomerID: CLAY50B CustomerPO:

ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

0.2587201811077-0062MDL-1928-L21-2 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018 0.2567201811077-0063MDL-1928-L21-3 <0.0080 % wt10/1/2018 g9/28/2018

Phillip Worby, Lead Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

Test Report ChmSnglePrm/nQC-7.32.3 Printed: 10/1/2018 5:24:19 PM

*Analysis following Lead in Paint by EMSL SOP/Determination of Environmental Lead by FLAA. Reporting limit is 0.008 % wt based on the minimum sample weight per our SOP. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank corrected. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. "<" (less than) result signifies that the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit. Measurement of uncertainty is available upon request. The QC data associated with the sample results included in this report meet the recovery and precision requirements unless specifically indicated otherwise.

Definitions of modifications are available upon request.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NELAP Certifications: NJ 03036, NY 10872, PA 68-00367, AIHA-LAP, LLC ELLAP 100194, A2LA 2845.01

Initial report from 10/01/2018 17:24:19

OrderID: 201811077

OrderID: 201811077

APPENDIX C

SAMPLE LOCATION DRAWING

APPENDIX D

POSITIVE SAMPLE PHOTOGRAPH

Building 1928 Paint Assessment October 23, 2018

Figure 1: Building 1928 sampling location.

Utility Closet Walls Containing Lead Based Paint

Layered Blue Paint over Yellow Paint Sample Numbers: MDL-1928-L2-2

MDL-1928-L2-3

Building 1928 Paint Assessment October 23, 2018

Figure 2: Building 1928 sampling location.

Areas containing Lead Based Paint is indicated on photograph.

Sample Numbers: MDL-1928-L19-1 to L19-3

White Paint on Concrete Masonry Unit Block Walls

Appendix F.2 Building 1928 Asbestos Containing Material

Bureau Ver i tas Nor th Amer ica , Inc .

109 North Center Drive

North Brunswick, NJ 08902

Main: (732) 225-6040

Fax: (732) 225-4577

October 30, 2018

Joint Base McGuire/Dix/Lakehurst

3021 McGuire Boulevard

McGuire AFB, NJ 08641-0000

McGuire, Dix, Lakehurst Joint Base

McGuire AFB, New Jersey

Dear Sir or Madam:

We are pleased to enclose Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.’s draft report of the assessment of suspect asbestos-containing materials in building 1928 at the McGuire Air Force Base (AFB) at the Joint Base

McGuire, Dix, Lakehurst (JB MDL), New Jersey.

As always, it is a pleasure to provide our services to you. If you have any questions, please call me at

732.225.6040.

Sincerely, J-B Chadwick

Senior Project Manager

Enclosures

Report for the Assessment of

Suspect Asbestos-Containing

Materials

Joint Base McGuire, Dix, Lakehurst 3021 McGuire Boulevard

McGuire AFB, New Jersey

CH2M Project No. 695847

October 30, 2018

OSACE Contract No. W912ER-14-D-003

Task Order No. W912DS18F0012

Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.

109 North Center Drive

North Brunswick, New Jersey 08902

732.225.6040

ACM Assessment of Building 1928 October 30, 2018 ii

CONTENTS

Section Page

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT

3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.0 STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES

4.1 RENOVATION AND DEMOLITION (UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[USEPA] NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS

4.2 EMPLOYEE EXPOSURE (OSHA STANDARDS, 29 CFR 1910.1001 AND 1926.1101)

4.3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY ASBESTOS REQUIREMENTS

5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

6.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE

APPENDIX A - ANALYTICAL RESULTS

APPENDIX B - LABORATORY DOCUMENTATION

APPENDIX C - SAMPLE LOCATION DIAGRAM

APPENDIX D - POSITIVE SAMPLE PHOTOGRAPHS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. (BVNA) was retained to conduct an assessment of suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) in building 1928 at the McGuire AFB at Joint Base McGuire, Dix

Lakehurst (JB MDL), New Jersey. The purpose of the assessment was to determine the presence of

Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACMs) prior to their planned renovations of the building.

On July 17, 2018, Mr. Jean-Bruce Chadwick and Ms. Melanie Deitzel, both of BVNA, conducted a visual inspection to estimate homogeneous areas and develop a sampling plan. The BVNA Inspectors possess training required by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Asbestos Hazard

Emergency Response Act (AHERA) as asbestos inspectors.

Appendix A presents tables of analytical results for asbestos. Appendix B presents the laboratory documentation. Appendix C presents the sample and asbestos-containing material location diagrams in the proposed work areas. Appendix D presents positive-sample photographs of ACMs.

2.0 DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT

On July 17, 2018 BVNA inspected Building 1928. This walkthrough assessment provided a visual inspection of the readily accessible portions of the building and allowed BVNA to determine where sampling of suspect ACMs should be performed. BVNA did not dismantle equipment to identify suspect

ACMs. The assessment was performed based on the following documents:

BVNA’s Proposal Number 1209.18.274, dated May 2, 2018, modified May 9, 10, 21, 23, and 24, 2018.

BVNA’s Sampling Plan dated July 24, 2018, which Unites States Army Corps of Engineers

(USACE) approved on August 8, 2018. BVNA developed the sampling plan based on a site walkthrough conducted on July 17, 2018.

On September 28, 2018 Mr. Jean-Bruce Chadwick, Ms. Melanie Deitzel, and Peter Grimson, all of BVNA, collected bulk samples from materials that would be impacted in the planned renovation work areas.

BVNA collected a total of eighty-six (86) single and multi-layered bulk samples of suspect ACMs. Mr.

Chadwick was the site supervisor for this project and Ms. Deitzel was the site safety officer.

The samples for laboratory analysis collected during this assessment were analyzed by EMSL Analytical

Laboratory, in Cinnaminson, New Jersey. EMSL is accredited by the American Industrial Hygiene

Association (AIHA), National Institute of Standards and Technology’s National Voluntary Laboratory

Accreditation Program (NIST/NVLAP)

Bulk samples of friable materials and some non-friable materials were analyzed using polarized light microscopy (PLM). Samples of non-friable organically bound (NOB) materials such as vinyl floor coverings, caulk, and similar materials were analyzed by PLM with gravimetric reduction. Transmission

Electron Microscopy (TEM) was also employed to analyze samples of NOB materials that yielded concentrations of asbestos that were less than 1 percent by PLM.

BVNA collected a total of eighty-six (86) sample layers from forty-one (41) suspect HAs of Building 1928 on site at the McGuire AFB at the JB MDL, New Jersey. The laboratory results include analysis of fifty-four (54) sample layers by PLM, twenty-nine (29) sample layers by PLM for NOBs, and twenty-seven (27) sample layers by TEM. The bulk samples were collected in accordance with the approved sampling plan.

3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

BVNA collected a total of eighty-six (86) single and multi-layered bulk samples during the survey for the planned renovation project. Analytical results indicate that of the forty-one (41) HAs identified and sampled in Building 1928 at the McGuire AFB at the JB MDL, five (5) were found to contain asbestos in a quantity greater than one percent, and one (1) HA that was found to be Assumed ACM (AACM), which could not be sampled due to safety concerns, making these materials ACM by definition. There are also two (2) HAs that resulted in trace amounts of ACMs, but were well below the regulated quantity of less than one percent, making these material Non-ACM by definition.

Appendix C presents sample and asbestos-containing material location diagrams in the proposed work areas. Appendix D presents positive-sample photographs of ACMs. The following selected ACMs are of particular note.

The following table lists total quantities of ACMs and AACMs for Building 1928:

HA Location Material

Approximate

Quantity

USEPA

NESHAP Cat.

Asbestos

Project Size

7 Room 11 Entrance Black Floor Tile (M) 3,070 SF NF Cat. I

Large

8 Room 11 Entrance 12”X12” Beige Floor Tile with Brown

Streaks (M) 3,070 SF NF Cat. I

32 Pipes Above Ceiling

Gray/white cementitious pipe fitting insulation associated with cloth-wrapped fiberglass pipe insulation (T)

50 Pipe

Fittings

RACM

33 Pipes Above Ceiling

Gray/white cementitious pipe fitting insulation associated with cloth-wrapped corrugated pipe insulation (T)

40 Pipe

Fittings

RACM

34 Pipes Above Ceiling White cloth-wrapped corrugated pipe insulation (2" line) (T)

450 LF RACM

30 Wires Behind Walls White Cloth Wire Insulation (M) Unknown AACM

Interior of Gym Doors

Leading to Exterior of

Building

Gray Interior Door Caulk (M) 20 LF Trace

Amounts N/A

Exterior of Gym Doors at the Base of Wall on

Exterior of Building

Black Joint Flashing (M) 8 LF Trace

Amounts N/A

4.0 STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES

As indicated in Section 3.0, asbestos was identified in some of the samples collected during this assessment. The following regulations and guidelines are applicable to ACMs. The following sections contain summaries of federal, state, and local regulations and are not intended as exhaustive instructions for removal or management of ACMs.

4.1 RENOVATION AND DEMOLITION (United States Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA] National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants [NESHAP] [40 CFR 61])

The USEPA National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) asbestos regulations apply to certain demolition and renovation projects in facilities containing asbestos-containing materials

(ACMs). The NESHAP rule usually requires that friable ACMs, and some categories of non-friable ACMs, be removed before a building is demolished and may require localized removal before or as part of a renovation or demolition.

For renovation and demolition projects where friable ACMs will be disturbed, the NESHAP rule may require appropriate work practices or procedures to control emissions. The following USEPA NESHAP definitions of ACM are important in interpreting which NESHAP requirements may apply to a building:

Asbestos-containing material (ACM): any material that contains more than 1 percent asbestos, as determined using polarized light microscopy (PLM) analysis.

Friable asbestos-containing material: a material containing more than 1 percent asbestos, determined using PLM analysis that, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

Category I non-friable asbestos-containing material: asbestos-containing packings, gaskets, resilient floor covering, and asphalt roofing products containing more than 1 percent asbestos, as determined using PLM.

Category II non-friable asbestos-containing material: a material, excluding Category I non-friable

ACM, containing more than 1 percent asbestos as determined using PLM that, when dry, cannot be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

Regulated asbestos-containing material (RACM): (1) friable ACM, (2) Category I non-friable ACM that has become friable, (3) Category I non-friable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading, or (4) Category II non-friable ACM that has a high probability of

HA=Homogenous Sampling Area, M=Miscellaneous Material, S=Surfacing Material, T=Thermal System Insulation, SF =

Square Feet, LF = Linear Feet, NF Cat. I = Category I Non-Friable, RACM = Regulated Asbestos Containing Material, AACM = Assumed Asbestos Containing Material becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the materials in the course of demolition or renovation operations regulated by NESHAP.

RACM need not be removed before demolition if:

It is Category I non-friable ACM that is not in poor condition and is not friable.

It is on a facility component that is enclosed in concrete or other similarly hard material and is adequately wet whenever exposed during demolition.

It was discovered after demolition began and, as a result, cannot be safely removed. If not removed, the material must be kept wet until disposal.

It is Category II non-friable ACM and the probability is low that the material will become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder during demolition.

NESHAP also requires that the USEPA or the state (if the state has been delegated authority under

NESHAP) be notified before a building containing RACM is demolished or before certain renovations impacting RACM begin.

4.2 EMPLOYEE EXPOSURE (OSHA Standards, 29 CFR 1910.1001 and 1926.1101)

OSHA regulates employee exposure to asbestos and in 1994 revised its final rule on asbestos. OSHA asbestos standards for general industry and for construction mandate a permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 0.1 fibers (equal to or longer than 5 micrometers) per cubic centimeter (f/cc) of air, determined as an

8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) and an excursion limit of 1.0 f/cc, as a 30-minute TWA.

Although materials containing less than or equal to one percent are not ACMs and trained, certified personnel are not required to abate these materials prior to demolition or renovation, OSHA and

Canadian Occupational Health and Safety do require certain work practices for demolition or renovation of materials containing less than or equal to one percent asbestos. Wet methods must be used during

"handling, mixing, removal, cutting, application, and cleanup" of materials containing less than or equal to one percent asbestos. Waste must be promptly cleaned up and sealed in leak-tight containers.

Employees must be notified about these materials. If vacuums are used to clean debris, they must be

HEPA-vacuums. An abrasive saw without HEPA filtration is prohibited, using compressed air to clean or remove these materials is prohibited, and employee rotation as a means of reducing employee exposures is prohibited. If the employer does not already have a negative exposure assessment for demolition or renovation of similar materials, then the employer must conduct personal air sampling for airborne fibers

(i.e. asbestos) in order to generate a negative exposure assessment. Until the negative exposure assessment is complete, employees must wear half-face respirators with P100 filters at a minimum.

4.3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY ASBESTOS REQUIREMENTS

The State of New Jersey requires that contracting businesses performing asbestos removal possess and maintain a New Jersey Asbestos Contractor’s license. Additionally, workers performing asbestos related activities for such contractors must possess and maintain New Jersey Asbestos Worker licenses. A New

Jersey Asbestos Supervisor licensed employee must be present onsite during all such work.

Prior to undertaking an asbestos abatement project involving the removal of more than three (3 )linear or three (3) square feet of asbestos, a State of New Jersey asbestos contractor must provide the State of

New Jersey Department of Labor and Workplace Development with a notification of the project. The notification must be filed at least ten days in advance of the project.

The State of New Jersey has also promulgated certain performance requirements with which asbestos contractors and their employees must comply in order to maintain licensure. State inspectors from the

Department of Health and/or the Department of Labor often visit active asbestos work site to verify that these requirements are being met. Additionally the Department of Health has entered into an agreement with the USEPA by which it performs site inspections to ascertain compliance with USEPA requirements.

The State of New Jersey does exempt certain activities from its asbestos regulations. Among these activities is operations and maintenance type work so long as that work is performed by an employer’s employees within a building owned by the employer and so long as all requirements of the OSHA asbestos standard are met by the employer and its employee’s.

5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

Areas of the Joint Base with ACMs are subject to NESHAP requirements. If JB MDL plans to renovate/demolish areas of the building containing ACMs, compliance with NESHAP is required.

Approximate total ACM quantities within the building appear in Section 3.0. Based on the quantities, Building 1928 will be a large asbestos project.

It does appear that the identified ACMs may be impacted by the planned renovation. A careful review of the demolition and rebuild plans must be conducted to determine what asbestos will be impacted.

As indicated within the body of this report and its appendices, ACMs were identified in Building 1928 on site at the McGuire AFB of JB MDL, New Jersey. Based on these findings and on the observations of the

Inspectors who performed the asbestos assessment, BVNA offers the following recommendations to JB

MDL understanding that the building is planned for renovations.

Notify employees and contractors of the presence of confirmed ACM and assumed ACM in

Building 1928. Notification should be done verbally, in writing, and by the use of labels if appropriate.

Since the building is to be renovated, BVNA recommends that all of the identified ACM and assumed ACM be removed from the building prior to renovation activities. Removal must be performed by a State of New Jersey Licensed Asbestos Abatement Contractor with appropriately permitted workers. During demolition or renovation operations, materials may be uncovered which are different from those accessible for sampling during this assessment. BVNA recommends that the personnel in charge of renovations should be alerted to note materials that differ substantially from those included in this assessment. Such materials may include thermal system insulation located in hidden pipe chases within walls and above ceilings. If additional

ACM or suspect ACM is discovered during the demolition, the demolition activities should stop and the materials in question must be assessed for its asbestos content or assumed to be ACM and handled accordingly.

Any additional bulk sampling should be conducted by a properly trained and accredited Asbestos

Inspector, and any laboratory performing bulk sample analysis should be appropriately accredited for this analysis.

Note that this asbestos assessment is limited to those materials and areas visually apparent at the time of the assessment. Furthermore, the assessment reflects conditions at the time of the assessment. Proper management of ACM requires that planned alterations and changes impacting asbestos be tracked and thorough records maintained. Additionally, periodic review of ACM in the building is necessary to track the condition of materials and determine appropriate actions.

6.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE

As a world leader in providing services that our clients depend on, we continually strive to provide the highest quality. This report has been reviewed as a part of our quality process.

This report submitted by: This report reviewed by:

Melanie Deitzel J-B Chadwick

Consultant Senior Project Manager

Health, Safety, and Environmental Services Health, Safety, and Environmental Services

Attachments

APPENDIX A

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Analytical Results of Asbestos Bulk Material Sampling

CH2M Hill, Inc.

McGuire, Dix, Lakehurst Joint Base

Wrightstown, New Jersey

BVNA Project Number 12018-000163.00

September 28, 2018

Sample Number Sample Location Material Description Analytical Method Result

(percent & type)

JB MDL-1928-092818-1A-Drywall Between restroom, north wall gypsum board PLM ND

JB MDL-1928-092818-1A-Joint Compound Between restroom, north wall joint compound PLM ND

JB MDL-1928-092818-1B-Drywall West end of main hall, south side above trash area gypsum board PLM ND

JB MDL-1928-092818-1B-Joint Compound West end of main hall, south side above trash area joint compound PLM ND

JB MDL-1928-092818-2A West side, Room 11 Mortar associated with stone on bar PLM ND

JB MDL-1928-092818-2B East side, Room 11 Mortar associated with stone on bar PLM ND

JB MDL-1928-092818-3A Entrance to Room 11 Mastic (yellow carpet glue) PLM NOB/TEM NOB ND / ND

JB MDL-1928-092818-3B South main entrance, 2nd doorway Mastic (yellow carpet glue) PLM NOB/TEM NOB ND / ND

JB MDL-1928-092818-4A West wall, center - Room 11 Dark blue covebase PLM NOB/TEM NOB ND / ND

JB MDL-1928-092818-4B East wall, center - Room 11 Dark blue covebase PLM NOB/TEM NOB ND / ND

JB MDL-1928-092818-5A West wall, center - Room 11 Mastic associated with cove base PLM NOB/TEM NOB ND / ND

JB MDL-1928-092818-5B East wall, center - Room 11 Mastic associated with cove base PLM NOB/TEM NOB ND / ND

JB MDL-1928-092818-6A Entrance to Room 11 White floor levelling compound PLM ND

JB MDL-1928-092818-6B South main entrance, 2nd doorway White floor levelling compound PLM ND

JB MDL-1928-092818-7A Entrance to Room 11 Black hallway tile PLM NOB 4.5 Chrysotile

JB MDL-1928-092818-7B South main entrance, 2nd doorway Black hallway tile PLM NOB Pos Stop

JB MDL-1928-092818-8A Entrance to Room 11 12"x12" beige tile with brown streaks, black mastic

PLM NOB 2.9 Chrysotile

JB MDL-1928-092818-8B South main entrance, 2nd doorway 12"x12" beige tile with brown streaks, black mastic

PLM NOB Pos Stop

JB MDL-1928-092818-9A West end of main hall, soutj side above trash area

Tape associated with gypsum PLM ND

JB MDL-1928-092818-9B Northwest corner of room, Student

Resource Center

Tape associated with gypsum PLM ND

ND = None Detected

Analytical Method = PLM (EPA Method 600/R-93/116), PLM NOB (EPA Method 600/R-93/116 Section 2.3), TEM NOB (EPA Method 600/R-93/116 Section 2.5.5.1)

Samples Analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc., Cinnaminson, NJ

CH2M Hill, Inc.

McGuire, Dix, Lakehurst Joint Base

Wrightstown, New Jersey

BVNA Project Number 12018-000163.00

September 28, 2018

Sample Number Sample Location Material Description Analytical Method Result

(percent & type)

JB MDL-1928-092818-10A West end of main hall, south side above trash area

Joint compound associated with gypsum

PLM ND

JB MDL-1928-092818-10B Northwest corner of room, Student

Resource Center

Joi…