W912D0-18-R-0002_Amendment_0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to post the questions and answ ers from the contractors and to update the various documents based on the questions asked. The date/time for the the submission of the proposals is extended until 4:00PM EST on 1 June 2018.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

Y 1 26

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 17-May-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912D0-18-R-0002

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

09-Apr-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

17-May-2018

CODE

REGIONAL CONTRACTING OFFICE - ALASKA

P O BOX 35510 1064 APPLE ST

FORT WAINWRIGHT AK 99703-0510

W912D0 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912D0-18-R-0002

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 0017

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

(Non Evaluated CLIN) 1 Nov 18 - 31 Aug 19. All materials used in maintenance and repair shall become Government property when received or installed. The Contractor is compensated only for the actual purchase price.

SEE C.4.6.4 in PWS. (Municipal Work Orders)

LABOR SCHEDULE

Category: Material Rate Title: Material Rate: 1.00

To:

(Non Evaluated CLIN) 1 Nov 18 - 31 Aug 19. All materials used in maintenance and repair shall become Government property when received or installed. The Contractor is compensated only for the actual purchase price.

CLIN 0018

(Non Evaluated CLIN) 1 Nov 18 - 31 Aug 19. All materials used in maintenance and repair shall become Government property when received or installed. The Contractor is compensated only for the actual purchase price.

SEE C.4.6.4 in PWS. (Real Property Work Orders)

Category: Materials

(Non Evaluated CLIN) 1 Nov 18 - 31 Aug 19. All materials used in maintenance and repair shall become Government property when received or installed. The Contractor is compensated only for the actual purchase price.

CLIN 0022

All costs associated with mobilizing resources to begin full performance of the IOMS contract. The cost of phase-oin may be invoiced after full contract perfomance begins.

All costs associated with mobilizing resources to begin full performance of the IOMS contract. The cost of phase-in may be invoiced after full contract perfomance begins.

CLIN 1017

(Non Evaluated CLIN) 1 Sep 19 - 30 Sep 19. All materials used in maintenance and repair shall become Government property when received or installed. The Contractor is compensated only for the actual purchase price.

Category: materials

(Non Evaluated CLIN) 1 Sep 19 - 30 Sep 19. All materials used in maintenance and repair shall become Government property when received or installed. The Contractor is compensated only for the actual purchase price.

CLIN 1018

(Non Evaluated CLIN) 1 Sep 19 - 30 Sep 19. All materials used in maintenance and repair shall become Government property when received or installed. The Contractor is compensated only for the actual purchase price.

(Non Evaluated CLIN) 1 Sep 19 - 30 Sep 19. All materials used in maintenance and repair shall become Government property when received or installed. The Contractor is compensated only for the actual purchase price.

CLIN 1019

(Non Evaluated CLIN) 1 Oct 19-31 Aug 20. All materials used in maintenanceand repair shall become Government property when received or installed. The Contractor is compensated only for the actual purchase price. SEE C.4.6.4 in PWS. (Municipal Work Orders)

(Non Evaluated CLIN) 1 Oct 19-31 Aug 20. All materials used in maintenanceand repair shall become Government property when received or installed. The Contractor is compensated only for the actual purchase price. SEE C.4.6.4

CLIN 1020

(Non Evaluated CLIN) 1 Oct 19-31 Aug 20. All materials used in maintenanceand repair shall become Government property when received or installed. The Contractor is compensated only for the actual purchase price. SEE C.4.6.4 in PWS. (Real Property Work Orders)

(Non Evaluated CLIN) 1 Oct 19-31 Aug 20. All materials used in maintenanceand repair shall become Government property when received or installed. The Contractor is compensated only for the actual purchase price. SEE C.4.6.4

CLIN 2017

(Non Evaluated CLIN) 1 Sep 20-30 Sep 20. All materials used in maintenance and repair shall become Government property when received or installed. The Contractor is compensated only for the actual purchase price. SEE C.4.6.4

(Non Evaluated CLIN) 1 Sep 20-30 Sep 20. All materials used in maintenance and repair shall become Government property when received or installed. The Contractor is compensated only for the actual purchase price. SEE C.4.6.4

CLIN 2018

(Non Evaluated CLIN) 1 Sep 20-30 Sep 20. All materials used in maintenanceand repair shall become Government property when received or installed. The Contractor is compensated only for the actual purchase price. SEE C.4.6.4

(Non Evaluated CLIN) 1 Sep 20-30 Sep 20. All materials used in maintenanceand repair shall become Government property when received or installed. The Contractor is compensated only for the actual purchase price. SEE C.4.6.4

CLIN 2019

(Non Evaluated CLIN) 1 Oct 20-31 Aug 21. All materials used in maintenanceand repair shall become Government property when received or installed. The Contractor is compensated only for the actual purchase price. SEE C.4.6.4

(Non Evaluated CLIN) 1 Oct 20-31 Aug 21. All materials used in maintenanceand repair shall become Government property when received or installed. The Contractor is compensated only for the actual purchase price. SEE C.4.6.4

CLIN 2020

(Non Evaluated CLIN) 1 Oct 20-31 Aug 21. All materials used in maintenanceand repair shall become Government property when received or installed. The Contractor is compensated only for the actual purchase price. SEE C.4.6.4

(Non Evaluated CLIN) 1 Oct 20-31 Aug 21. All materials used in maintenanceand repair shall become Government property when received or installed. The Contractor is compensated only for the actual purchase price. SEE C.4.6.4

CLIN 3017

(Non Evaluated CLIN) 1 Sep 21-30 Sep 21. All materials used in maintenance and repair shall become Government property when received or installed. The Contractor is reimbursed for actual purchased price. SEE C.4.6.4 in PWS (Municipal Work Orders)

(Non Evaluated CLIN) 1 Sep 21-30 Sep 21. All materials used in maintenance and repair shall become Government property when received or installed. The Contractor is reimbursed for actual purchased price. SEE C.4.6.4 in PWS (Municipal Work Orders)

CLIN 3018

(Non Evaluated CLIN) 1 Sep 21-30 Sep 21. All materials used in maintenanceand repair shall become Government property when received or installed. The Contractor is compensated only for the actual purchase price. SEE C.4.6.4

(Non Evaluated CLIN) 1 Sep 21-30 Sep 21. All materials used in maintenanceand repair shall become Government property when received or installed. The Contractor is compensated only for the actual purchase price. SEE C.4.6.4

CLIN 3019

(Non Evaluated CLIN) 1 Oct 21-31 Aug 22. All materials used in maintenanceand repair shall become Government property when received or installed. The Contractor is compensated only for the actual purchase price. SEE C.4.6.4

(Non Evaluated CLIN) 1 Oct 21-31 Aug 22. All materials used in maintenanceand repair shall become Government property when received or installed. The Contractor is compensated only for the actual purchase price. SEE C.4.6.4

CLIN 3020

(Non Evaluated CLIN) 1 Oct 21-31 Aug 22. All materials used in maintenanceand repair shall become Government property when received or installed. The Contractor is compensated only for the actual purchase price. SEE C.4.6.4

(Non Evaluated CLIN) 1 Oct 21-31 Aug 22. All materials used in maintenanceand repair shall become Government property when received or installed. The Contractor is compensated only for the actual purchase price. SEE C.4.6.4

SECTION F - DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0022 has been changed from:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

POP 01-SEP-2018 TO

31-OCT-2019

N/A DIRECTORATE OF PUBLIC WORKS

SHEILA LALEME

CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

BLDG 3022, MONTGOMERY ROAD

FORT WAINWRIGHT AK 99703

907-361-7459 FOB: Destination

WC1XR7

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

POP 01-SEP-2018 TO

31-OCT-2018

N/A DIRECTORATE OF PUBLIC WORKS

SHEILA LALEME

CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

BLDG 3022, MONTGOMERY ROAD

FORT WAINWRIGHT AK 99703

907-361-7459 FOB: Destination

WC1XR7

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION (FAR 52.212-1)

1. Introduction. A Best Value Trade-Off source selection process will be used to select the contractor for award of this requirement. All criteria under the Trade-Off process are evaluated on a qualitative basis found in SECTION M – Evaluation Approach only. The proposals are intended to be evaluated, and awarded without discussions with the offerors. However, if the award cannot be made on initial proposals, the Government will negotiate with all offerors in the competitive range. The Government reserves the right to limit the number of most highly qualified offerors selected for the competitive range negotiations for the purposes of executing an efficient competition.

The offeror’s proposal shall be submitted in hard copy, with accompanying digital copies, as set forth below. The RFP shall provide the Government address and receipt date for proposal submittal. PROPOSALS MUST BE RECEIVED BY THIS OFFICE NLT 1 June 2018 at 4:00PM EST. Proposals received after the due date and time will not be reviewed and are not eligible for award. The offeror’s proposal shall be submitted to one of the below addresses depending on method of shipment:

For packages sent via USPS:

RCO-Ft Wainwright Attn: Mark Puhak

PO BOX 35510

Fort Wainwright, AK 99703

For Packages sent via UPS, FedEx or DHS:

RCO-Ft Wainwright Attn: Mark Puhak 1064 Apple Street, Room 203 Ft Wainwright, AK 99703

The offeror’s proposal shall consist of four (4) volumes. The Volumes are I – General, II – Technical Proposal, III – Past Performance, and IV – Price. Files shall not contain classified data. The use of hyperlinks in proposals is prohibited.

Offerors are cautioned that “parroting” of the Technical requirements or the PWS with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect an understanding of the requirement or capability to perform. Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. Proprietary information shall be clearly marked.

2. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

a. Each volume shall be submitted in a separate three-ring binder. Any pages that are changed (as a result of negotiations or proposal revisions) should be of a different color and have changed information clearly marked by a vertical line in the right margin of the page. The revised pages shall be dated. Each binder shall be clearly labeled with its Title and a copy number (e.g., copy 1 of 5).

b. Printing shall be single spaced. Each paragraph shall be separated by at least one blank line. A standard, 12-point minimum font size applies. Arial or New Times Roman fonts are required. Tables and illustrations may use a reduced font size no less than 8-point and may be landscape.

c. The following volumes of material shall be submitted:

PRINTED DIGITAL MAXIMUM

VOLUME TITLE COPIES COPIES PAGES

I – General Original + 4 1 N/A II – Technical Proposal Original + 4 1 50 III – Past Performance Original + 4 1 25 IV – Cost/Price Original + 4 1 N/A

NOTE: Pages that exceed the required page limitations will not be evaluated.

Additional pages over the maximum allowed will be removed or not read and will not be evaluated by the Government. The manpower charts, Title Page, Table of Contents, and Summary Sections are not included in the total page count.

3. PROPOSAL FILES

a. Format. The submission shall be clearly indexed and logically assembled.

Each volume shall be clearly identified and shall begin at the top of a page. All pages of each volume shall be appropriately numbered and identified by the complete company name, date and RFP number in the header and/or footer. A Table of Contents should be created using the Table of Content feature in MS Word. MS Word (doc) files shall use the following page setup parameters:

Margins – Top, Bottom, Left, Right – 1” Gutter – 0” From Edge – Header, Footer 0.5” Page Size, Width – 8.5” Page Size, Height – 11”

NOTE: 11X17 folded pages are acceptable for tables/graphic representations;

however, each 11X17 page counts as two pages.

The following additional restrictions apply:

b. File Packaging. All of the proposal files shall be compressed (zipped) into one file entitled proposal zip using WinZip version 6.2 or later, or as separate uploads in their native format, i.e. doc, xls, ppt, etc., and provided on CDs or DVDs. Zip disks are not permitted. Files shall be in read-only format, using PDF files. All price breakdown information to aide in the cost/price evaluation shall be submitted in Microsoft Office Excel Read/Write format and viewable in Microsoft Excel 2010. Each disc shall be externally labeled with the volume number, date, and the offeror’s name. **Please note

– Self extracting exe files are not acceptable. ** If the hard-copy proposal differs from the electronic version, the hard copy will govern.

c. Content Requirement. All information shall be confined to the appropriate file.

The offeror shall confine submissions to essential matters, sufficient to define the proposal in a concise manner, to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. Each file of the proposal shall consist of a Table of Contents, Summary Section, and the Narrative discussion. The Summary Section shall contain a brief abstract of the file. Proprietary information shall be clearly marked. The following shall be included in the Narrative discussion:

(i) VOLUME I – General. Volume I shall contain the accurate, fully completed, and signed original of all proposal documents requiring signatures of the offeror. An authorized official of the firm shall sign the offer and all certifications requiring original signature. Failure to follow the below Contract Proposal preparation instructions may cause your proposal to be deemed unacceptable by the Government. The General Volume shall be organized as follows and contain the identified information.

TAB A, Solicitation, Offer and Award - The SF 33 shall be submitted fully completed. The offeror is cautioned that the SF 33 must contain an original signature in block 17 of the form. The offeror shall provide the name, title and telephone number of the company/division point of contact regarding decisions made with respect to your proposal and who can obligate your company contractually.

TAB B, Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors–

The offeror shall ensure that Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors are completed in the Online Representations and Certifications (ORCA) database in SAM.

TAB C, Small Business Participation Form

(ii) VOLUME II Technical Proposal. The Technical Proposal shall be clear, concise, and include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims in the Offeror’s proposal. Legibility, clarity and coherence are very important. Your responses will be evaluated against the factors defined in the solicitation. The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements, but rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. Statements that the offeror understands, can, or will comply with the PWS (including referenced publications, technical data, etc.);

statements paraphrasing the PWS or parts thereof (including applicable publications, technical data, etc.); and phrases such as “standard procedures will be employed” or “well known techniques will be used,” etc., will be considered unacceptable. Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their experience, and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror's proposal. Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed art work, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired.

Volume II will be evaluated to determine whether offeror has an acceptable management approach, staffing approach, technical approach, and quality control program resources in place to satisfactorily fulfill requirements of the solicitation performance work statement. Offeror’s proposal shall discuss in sufficient detail the overall understanding of the requirement, and the expertise required to perform all required services. Any major errors, omissions, or deficiencies will cause the technical proposal to be unacceptable. The volume shall be organized according to the following general outline:

-Table of Contents -Evaluation Criteria (Factors and Subfactors) The offeror’s proposal shall contain the following factors/subfactors:

Factor 1: Technical Proposal Subfactor 1. Management Approach

Subfactor 2. Staffing Approach Subfactor 3. Technical Approach.

TAB A – Subfactor 1: Management Approach. Under Management Approach the offeror shall submit the following:

KEY POINT #1: Planning, Organizing, Controlling of Work Orders. A narrative detailing management’s techniques and procedures for planning, organizing, and controlling maintenance orders, preventive maintenance orders, and municipal work orders as set forth in the PWS.

KEY POINT #2: Control of Government Furnished Property: A detailed description of the management approach to develop operation instructions, procedures, and control directives in preparation of the assumption of responsibilities and accountability for all Government Furnished Property (GFP). In addition, provide a narrative to effectively demonstrate how government furnished property and facilities, contractor furnished property, equipment, will be maintained and safeguarded to include a narrative of the property management plan describing how the application of government furnished property and facilities, contractor furnished property, equipment, material and other resources will be utilized to accomplish each service within the PWS

KEY POINT #3: Key Contractor Personnel: A chart that illustrates the management team as well as all key contractor personnel for this requirement to include any positions that involve partnerships or subcontractors. The chart shall include a narrative of experience levels, education levels, and professional experience required of all key positions listed to include at least the Project Manager, Deputy Project Manager, Quality Control Manager, and those individuals responsible for managing the work in each major service areas of the contract. The intent is for the contractor to list their mimimum requirements when hiring for those positions, not to provide a list of names and resumes.

KEY POINT #4: Phase-In Plan: A phase-In plan that demonstrates an approach for obtaining personnel, inventory, supplies, property, automated systems, and equipment necessary to satisfy contract requirements. Include a milestone chart with key events noted.

KEY POINT #5: Subcontracting: Describe to what extent subcontracting, if applicable, shall be used to satisfy requirements in the solicitation and ensuring the performance is in accordance with the contract requirement.

Describe the controls project management will have to ensure timeliness and quality of all subcontracted effort and how this work will be coordinated. If the offeror is proposing teaming arrangement in accordance with FAR 9.601(2), as a prime contractor with one or more subcontractors, it shall completely address both how the prime plans to manage the subcontractor(s) to ensure contract performance and how the prime will be able to continue uninterrupted performance in the event that the subcontract(s) are terminated.

In order to fully understand the plan, offerors shall describe the extent of subcontracting by listing the tasks to be performed by the proposed subcontractor (s).

KEY POINT #6: Quality Control Plan: A Quality Control Plan (QCP) that shows the contractor has an adequate and standardized procedure in place at contract start to monitor performance. A detailed description of the approach to develop and disseminate the quality control program and the ability to respond to quality control issues to satisfy the size and scope of the requirements described in the PWS. The proposal shall describe the methods to adequately ensure performance compliance IAW with the QCP. The proposal shall also describe the methods and processes to correct and prevent continuous deficiencies and defects in services.

TAB B – Subfactor 2: Staffing Approach. Under the Staffing Approach the offeror shall submit the following:

KEY POINT #1: Labor matrix: Labor matrix (ices) that depicts the productive man-hours for all necessary staffing to execute the contract based on the historical workload data provided for each of the required services cited in the Technical Exhibit J2.

KEY POINT #2: Organization Chart: An organization chart that shows the skill types/levels, category of employment, Full Time Equivalent and Part Time Equivalent, and number of personnel. Each position shall be identified with a designation that can be cross-referenced with the productive man-hour matrices, and narratives that are based on the historical workload data for each of the required services cited in the Technical Exhibit J2.

KEY POINT #3: Personnel Management: A detailed description of the approach to personnel hiring practices and policies, employee selection criteria including job descriptions, how job qualifications are determined, background check policies, training practices and policies, stable staff practices and policies including labor pool availability and incentives.

Approach shall cover unexpected workload fluctuations and absences such as sick leave, vacation and training.

TAB C – Subfactor 3: Technical Approach: Under the Technical Approach the offeror shall submit the following:

KEY POINT #1: Work Order Process/Control: A detailed description of the approach and expertise to perform each of the functional areas:

Maintenance Orders, Preventative Maintenance and Municipal Services described in the PWS. In this description provide the processes and procedures to be utilized to ensure all tasks are identified, the frequency, scheduled, tracked and documented to ensure timely execution to include what manufacturer, regulatory, or instructional guidance will be followed in executing the maintenance and municipal tasks to ensure they are accomplished correctly.

KEY POINT #2: Risk Management/Mitigation: A description of the process to identify any risk that may be encountered and how its technical approach will mitigate such risk.

(iii) VOLUME III – Past Performance. This volume shall contain past performance information regarding similar contracts. This volume shall not exceed 25 pages plus five pages for each major subcontractor, excluding Past Performance Questionnaire Forms. Offerors shall submit all Government and/or commercial contracts for the prime offeror and each major subcontractor in performance or awarded during the past three years, from the issue date of this RFP, which are relevant to the efforts required by this solicitation. Relevant efforts are defined as services/efforts that are the same as or similar to the effort (as compared to NAICS code 561210) required by the RFP. Data concerning the offeror shall be provided first, followed by each proposed major subcontractor, in alphabetical order. The Offeror shall also submit the written consent of its major subcontractors to allow the disclosure of its subcontractor’s past performance information to the Offeror. In addition, letters of commitment shall be included for all major subcontractors for their past performance to be considered. This volume shall be organized into the following sections:

(1) Section 1 – Contract Descriptions. This section shall include the following information in the following format.

(a) Contractor/Subcontractor place of performance, CAGE Code and DUNS Number. If the work was performed as a subcontractor, also provide the name of the prime contractor and Point of Contact (POC) within the prime contractor organization (name, and current address, e-mail address, and telephone and fax numbers).

(b) Government contracting activity, and current address, Procuring Contracting Officer’s name, e-mail address, telephone and fax numbers.

(c) Government’s technical representative/COR and current email address, telephone and fax numbers.

(d) Government contract administration activity and the Administrative Contracting Officer’s name, and current e-mail address, telephone and fax number.

(e) Government contract administration activity’s Pre-Award Monitor’s name, and current e-mail address, telephone and fax numbers.

(f) Contract Number and, in the case of Indefinite Delivery type contracts, GSA contracts, and Blanket Purchase Agreements, include Delivery Order Numbers.

(g) Contract Type (specific type such as Fixed-Price (FP), Cost Reimbursement (CR), Time & Material (T&M), etc.). In the case of Indefinite Delivery contracts, indicate specific type (Requirements, Definite Quantity, and Indefinite Quantity) and secondary contract type (FP, CR, T&M, etc.).

(h) Awarded price/cost.

(i) Final or projected final price/cost.

(j) Original delivery schedule, including dates of start and completion or work.

(k) Final or projected final, delivery schedule, including dates of start and completion of work.

(2) Section 2 – Performance. Offerors shall provide a specific narrative explanation of each contract listed in Section 1, Contract Description, describing the objectives achieved and detailing how the effort is relevant to the requirement of this RFP.

(a) For any contracts that did not/do not meet original schedule or technical performance requirements, provide a brief explanation of the reason(s) for the shortcomings and any corrective action(s) taken to avoid recurrence. The offerors shall list each time the delivery schedule was revised and provide an explanation of why the revision was necessary. All Requests for Deviation and Requests for Waiver shall be addressed with respect to causes and corrective actions. The offerors shall also provide copy of any Cure Notices or Show Cause Letters received on each contract listed and a description of any corrective action implemented by the offeror or proposed subcontractor. The offerors shall indicate if any of the contracts listed were terminated and the type and reasons for the termination.

(b) REMOVED

(3) Section 3 – Subcontracts. Offerors shall provide an outline of how the effort required by the RFP will be assigned for performance within the offeror’s corporate entity and among the proposed subcontractors. The information provided for the prime offeror and each proposed major subcontractor must include the entire company name, company address, CAGE Code, DUNS Number and type of work to be performed by citing the applicable Government PWS subparagraph number. This includes all subcontractors who will be providing critical hardware/services or whose subcontract is for more than 10% of the total proposed cost/price. This section will further include written consent of major subcontractors to allow the disclosure of their subcontractor’s past performance information to the Offeror. In addition, letters of commitment shall be included for all major subcontractors

(4) Section 4 – New Corporate Entities. New corporate entities may submit data on prior contracts involving its officers and employees. However, in addition to the other requirements in this section, the offeror shall discuss in detail the role performed by such persons in the prior contracts cited. Information should be included in the files described in the sections above. Letters of Commitment shall be included in the proposal for these employees in order to be considered.

(5) Past Performance Questionnaire. For all contracts identified in Section 1, Contract Descriptions, a Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment J17) must be completed and submitted. The offeror shall complete Part I of the Past Performance Questionnaire and e-mail the questionnaire to both the Government contracting activity and technical representative responsible for the past/current contract. The POCs shall be instructed to electronically complete Part II of the questionnaire and e-mail the entire questionnaire to the Contracting Office no later than the proposal due date, to Mr. Mark Puhak mark.a.puhak.civ@mail.mil, Mrs. Rhonda Richardson, rhonda.m.richardson4.civ@mail.mil, and Mr. John R. Quarles, john.r.quarles.civ@mail.mil. The offeror shall e-mail to the Contracting Officer a list of all the POC’s who were sent a questionnaire. The Government must receive this list no later than the proposal due date. The POC List shall be submitted in Word for Windows Table Format to include the following fields: Solicitation Number; Company Name;

Contract Number; Government Agency; POC Last Name, First Name; POC Title; POC Telephone Number; POC E-mail Address; and Date E-Mail to POC (month/day).

(6) Submissions. Offerors are discouraged from providing points of contact with another contractors’ facility, i.e., in case an offeror (or one of his/her team members) is in a subcontract with another contractor who has submitted a proposal on the same requirement. Offerors shall provide and submit the prime contract number and all Governmental agency points of contact (POC) in lieu of subcontract numbers or prime contract POCs in situations as described above.

(iv) VOLUME IV –Cost/Price. The offeror shall complete the schedule section of the solicitation. The offeror shall submit prices for each CLIN and SubCLIN on Attachment_J14_Bid Document to the solicitation. The SubCLIN prices shall sum (roll

up) to the respective CLIN prices on that attachment, which shall be transferred to CLINs listed in Schedule B of the solicitation. This volume shall consist of all information, required to support proposed costs and prices. Certified cost and pricing data are not currently required; however, the Government reserves the right to request such data prior to award. The information submitted in this volume shall comply with FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, and the requirements set forth below. There are no page limitations for this volume.

The offeror shall ensure that the information submitted in this volume is consistent with and fully supports the amounts set forth in the SF33 and continuation sheets.

(1) The proposal shall set forth a summary of the total estimated costs by cost element and shall provide a breakdown of the proposed estimated costs of each CLIN separately, including all direct and indirect charges and fees. In order to maintain a minimum level of commonality between proposals, each offeror is required to complete (in entirety) the five (5) cost summary spreadsheets provided at Attachment J14. The cost summary spreadsheets shall be provided for the base effort and each option year. All documentation furnished to support the cost summaries are to be provided in a format chosen by the offeror that is easily traceable to the cost summary sheets. All pricing and calculations must be rounded to two (2) decimal points.

(2) Phase-in costs shall be included separately in the offerors cost proposal.

(3) The specific direct labor rates utilized to price the proposal must be identified in the cost and pricing proposal only. The proposal shall set forth a complete breakdown of the direct and indirect rates by category and the rationale thereof.

Provisions for overtime and shift differential charges shall be clearly addressed on a per-hour basis. Bid codes (applicable codes used to identify a labor category in the offerors accounting system), employee names and/or other documentation (such as assigned letter of commitment for key personnel not currently employed by the offeror) to support the rates proposed shall be provided. Letters of commitment shall clearly identify the prospective employees’ agreed-to salary/hourly rate and other pertinent conditions of employment. The same detailed support data shall be furnished for all major subcontractors.

(4) Removed.

(5) Direct labor hours and rates shall be delineated by labor category by contract year for the offeror and each subcontractor. The labor hour delineation must be directly traceable to the same information proposed in the Technical Proposal Volume.

(6) Indirect expense rates shall be proposed in the same manner as direct labor rates, i.e., by contract year with the methodology used to derive any composite rates proposed.

(7) Pursuant to the Service Contract Act of 1965, the determination by the Secretary of Labor as to the applicable minimum monetary wage and fringe benefits will be made part of any resulting contract. For evaluation purposes only, the Government has incorporated the applicable Area Wage Determinations and the Collective Bargaining Agreement as Attachment J15 of this RFP. The offeror shall provide a crosswalk of the proposed labor categories against the Area Wage Determinations.

(8) For proposal preparation purposes, the expected or approximate date for initiation of contract performance is 1 September 2018.

(9) The offeror shall submit a complete breakdown of costs by major subcontractor. A major subcontractor is defined as a member of the offeror’s overall team who is expected to perform 10% or more of the proposed effort.

DISCUSSIONS

GENERAL INFORMATION. The Government intends to award a single contract as a result of the solicitation. The Government reserves the right to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the offeror’s initial proposal should contain the offeror’s best terms from a cost or price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the contracting officer later determines them to be necessary.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2

BASIS FOR AWARD (52.212-2)

This is a Best Value Tradeoff source selection conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.3, Source Selection, as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), and the Army Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFARS) to obtain the best value for the Government, price and other factors considered. Award will be made to a single offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with the FAR, whose proposal conforms to the solicitation requirements, and whose proposal, judged by an overall assessment of the evaluation criteria and other considerations specified in this solicitation, represents the overall best value to the Government. A Best Value Tradeoff approach is supported by the need for experience in the unique conditions under which contract performance will be required.

The award will be made based on the best overall proposal that is determined to be the most beneficial to the Government, with appropriate consideration given to the three (3) evaluation factors: Technical Proposal, Cost/Price, and Past Performance. The Technical factor is approximately equal to Past Performance. Technical and Past Performance factors combined are approximately equal to Cost/Price. To receive consideration for award, a rating of no less than "Acceptable" must be achieved for the Technical factor (to include all subfactors) and no lower than a “Satisfactory” or “Neutral Confidence” Rating for Past Performance. The subfactors for the Technical Proposal factor will be weighted as follows: Management Approach will be weighted higher than Staffing Approach and Technical Approach. Staffing Approach and Technical Approach will be weighted approximately equal. Offerors will be cautioned that the award may not necessarily be made to the lowest cost offered. Price reasonableness will be used to determine if the additional cost warrants tradeoff for the higher rated technical/past performance proposals.

B. FACTORS AND SUB-FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED

Award will be made to the offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment of the evaluation factors and subfactors described below. Any subfactor rated less than acceptable will result in the entire factor being rated unacceptable. The following evaluation factors and subfactors will be used to evaluate each proposal:

Factor 1: The Technical Proposal factor is further divided into the following subfactors:

a. Subfactor 1- Management Approach

b. Subfactor 2- Staffing Approach

c. Subfactor 3-Technical Approach

**Management Approach will be weighted higher than Staffing Approach and Technical Approach. Staffing Approach and Technical Approach will be weighted approximately equal.

Evaluation of the offeror’s proposal shall address each subfactor as it applies to the Performance Work Statement (PWS). A detailed explanation of the criteria for the evaluation is set forth in the “Evaluation Approach”, Paragraph C of this section. During evaluations of each proposal, the Government will assign each subfactor an adjectival rating and write a narrative evaluation reflecting the identified findings. Each evaluator will then determine an overall rating for the Technical Proposal based on the ratings assigned to each subfactor.

Factor 2: Past Performance: Each offeror’s past performance will be reviewed to determine relevancy and confidence assessment.

Factor 3: Cost/Price: The resulting award will be a Firm-Fixed Price Hybrid Contract with Time and Material CLINs used strictly for materials only. Price reasonableness will be utilized in the evaluation of the Firm-Fixed Price effort.

C. EVALUATION APPROACH

All proposals shall be subject to evaluation by the Source Selection Team (SST).

1. The overarching evaluation approach for all factors and subfactors is as follows:

a. Adequacy of Response. The proposal will be evaluated to determine whether the offeror’s methods and approach have adequately and completely considered, defined, and satisfied the requirements specified in the RFP. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which each requirement has been addressed in the proposal in accordance with the proposal submission section of the

RFP.

b. Feasibility of Approach. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the proposed approach is workable and the end results achievable.

The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which successful performance is contingent upon proven devices and techniques. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the offeror is expected to be able to successfully complete the proposed tasks and technical requirements within the required schedule.

c. Understanding of Requirements. The proposals will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the proposals demonstrate a clear understanding of all technical aspects involved in addressing and meeting the performance requirements of the solicitation.

2. The Technical Proposal factor is divided into the following subfactors:

Subfactor 1: This subfactor evaluates the offeror’s proposed Management Approach for the basic contract period and all option years. Marginal levels of overall management information requested could indicate a lack of understanding concerning mission requirements and may result in the entire proposal receiving an unfavorable rating and/or being eliminated from the competitive range. The evaluation will focus on the offerors’:

KEY POINT #1: Planning, Organizing, Controlling of Work Orders.

KEY POINT #2: Control of Government Furnished Property

KEY POINT #3: Key Positions

KEY POINT #4: Phase-In Plan

KEY POINT #5: Subcontracting

KEY POINT #6: Quality Control Plan

Subfactor 2: This subfactor evaluates the offeror’s Staffing Approach. Major emphasis will be placed on the following:

KEY POINT #1: Labor matrix

KEY POINT #2: Organization Chart

KEY POINT #3: Personnel Management

Subfactor 3: This subfactor evaluates the offeror’s Technical Approach. The evaluation will focus on the offerors’:

KEY POINT #1: Work Order Process/Control

KEY POINT #2: Risk Management/Mitigation

The Technical Proposal Factor Ratings, excerpted below focus on the strengths, deficiencies, weaknesses, risks and uncertainties of the offeror's proposal. The ratings depict how well the offeror’s proposal meets the Technical Proposal subfactor requirements.

Adjectival

Rating

Description Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

3. FACTOR 2. Past Performance. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s record of past and current performance to ascertain the probability of successfully performing the required efforts of the PWS.

a. Evaluation of past performance shall be in accordance with this plan.

b. The Government will focus its inquiries on the offeror’s (and major subcontractor’s) record of performance as it relates to all solicitation requirements, including cost, schedule, performance and management of subcontractors. Major subcontractors are defined as members of an offeror’s overall team who are expected to perform ten (10) percent or more of the proposed effort. A significant achievement, problem, or lack of relevant data in any element of the work can become an important consideration in the evaluation process. Therefore, offerors will be reminded to include the most recent and relevant efforts (within the past three years) in their proposal.

Absent any recent and relevant past performance history or when the performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror will be assigned an “unknown confidence rating” and its proposal will not be evaluated either favorably or unfavorably on past performance.

The Government may use data provided by the offeror in its proposal and data obtained from other sources, including data in Government files or data obtained through interviews with personnel familiar with the contractor and their current and past performance under Federal, State or Local government or commercial contracts for same or similar services as compared to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 561210. Data used in conducting performance risk assessments shall not extend past three years prior to the issue date of the RFP, but may include performance data generated during the past three (3) years without regard to the contract award date.

c. Offerors shall submit all Government and/or commercial contracts for the prime offeror and each major subcontractor in performance or awarded during the past three years, from the issue date of this RFP, which are relevant to the efforts required by this RFP. The Government may consider a wide array of information from a variety of sources, but is not compelled to rely on all of the information available.

d. The past performance factor considers each offeror’s demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance in supplying products and services that meet the contract requirements. There are three aspects to the past performance evaluation:

relevancy, quality assessment, and performance confidence assessment.

(i) RELEVANCY: The first aspect of the past performance evaluation is to assess the offeror’s past performance to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the offeror is to the effort to be acquired through the source selection.

Relevancy is not separately rated; however, the following criteria will be used to establish what is relevant which shall include similarity of service/support, complexity, dollar value, contract type, and degree of subcontract/teaming.

Past Performance Relevancy Ratings Rating Definition Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

(ii) QUALITY ASSESSMENT: Assess the quality of the offeror’s past performance on those recent efforts that were determined relevant by determining how well the contractor performed on the contracts. Documented results from Past

Performance Questionnaires, interviews, CPARS, and other sources form the support and basis for this assessment.

(iii) PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENT: The final step is for the team to arrive at a single consensus performance confidence assessment for the offeror, selecting the most appropriate rating from the chart below. This rating considers the assessed quality of the relevant/recent efforts gathered. Ensure the rationale for the conclusions reached are included.

Performance Confidence Assessments

Rating Definition Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor or past performance.

4. FACTOR 3. Cost/Price: The cost/price proposal will be evaluated to determine whether the proposal reflects a thorough understanding of the PWS, and whether the proposal is…