Attachment-14-PastPerformanceQuestionnaire.pdf

ATTACHMENT 14

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104

The Mission and Installation Contracting Command at Fort Sill, OK is in the process of selecting a contractor to perform minor construction, facility repair, and real property maintenance projects. Work under this requirement consists of real property maintenance, repair, remodel, alteration, and minor construction projects to include industrial, commercial, and institutional facilities located on Fort Sill. The Government will order work under multiple firm-fixed-price task orders issued as provided in the parent Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract. Each task order may involve a variety of construction trades. The contractor shall provide all materials, labor, equipment, tools, transportation, and ancillary items necessary to complete each project from conception to completion.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past and present performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had firsthand experience with an offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor:

B. Cage Code:

C. Contract number:

D. Contract type:

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes No F. Period of performance:

G. Initial contract cost:

H. Current/final contract cost:

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

J. Description of service provided:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description:

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name:

B. Evaluator's title:

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number:

W9124L16R0001 Attachment 14

D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

S SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

NA NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.

Quality Control S M US NA

Q1. Contractor provided effective quality control and inspection procedures that resulted in a quality-finished project.

Q2. Contractor developed and submitted realistic progress schedules.

Q3. Contractor provided well researched and clearly identified submittals that matched contract requirements.

Q4. Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements

Q5. Contractor completed all work with good workmanship and in conformance with the specifications, resulting in minor, if any, punchlist items.

Q6. Contractor thoroughly reviewed design package proposals for accuracy, completeness, and compliance with contract requirements.

Q7. Contractor designs were all concise, accurate and captured all details of the site visit.

Program Management S M US NA

P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)

P3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

P4. Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements

P5. Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations

P6. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts

P7. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)

Program Management S M US NA

P8. Effectiveness of acquisition management

P9. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer

P10. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.

Timely Performance S M US NA

T1. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.

T2. Contractor met established project schedules to complete the project on time.

T3. Contractor performed all work without the issuance of a cure notice or show cause letter. (If a notice was issued, please describe the circumstances on a separate sheet of paper and identify if liquidated damages were assessed.)

T4. Contractor provided timely cost/design proposals.

T5. Contractor provided payrolls for both their firm and their subcontractors’ s employees as required and scheduled and timely.

T6. Contractor submitted the progress schedule and interim progress reports as required in a timely manner and the schedule was approved prior to actual construction.

T7. Contractor provided timely resolution of all punchlist items.

T8. Contractor submitted submittals and reports as required and in a timely manner.

Compliance with Labor Standards S M US NA

E1. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce/suppliers.

E2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce and effectively manage and coordinated their work.

E3. Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work.

E4. Contractor paid employees/subcontractors/suppliers as required.

Compliance with Safety Standards S M US NA

C1. Adequacy of Safety Plan.

C2. Implementation of Safety Plan.

Contract Performance S M US NA

C1. Accuracy in forecasting contract costs.

C2. Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs.

C3. Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur.

C4. Sufficiency and timeliness of reporting of submittals.

C5. Contractors provided bonds on time as required.

Contract Performance S M US NA

C6. Contractor’s response to cure notices/show causes.

C7. Contractors overall performance.

Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

Yes No

Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” Yes No

Remarks:

Is the contractor rated in CPARS? Yes No

Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated M (Marginal) or US (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes____ No ____ Default____ Convenience____ Pending Terminations____

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having the contractor perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Evaluator’s Signature: Date:

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance. Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Pauline.k.abraham.civ@mail.mil and martha.s.livsey.civ@mail.mil