W909MY21R0006-0001-Final.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. Contract ID Code Page Of

2. Amendment/Modification No.

3. Effective Date

4. Requisition/Purchase Req No.

5. Project No. (If applicable)

6. Issued By Code 7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code

8. Name And Address Of Contractor (No., Street, City, County, State and Zip Code)

9A. Amendment Of Solicitation No.

9B. Dated (See Item 11)

10A. Modification Of Contract/Order No.

10B. Dated (See Item 13) Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____________ copies of the amendments: (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting And Appropriation Data (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

It Modifies The Contract/Order No. As Described In Item 14.

A. This Change Order is Issued Pursuant To: The Changes Set Forth In Item 14 Are Made In

The Contract/Order No. In Item 10A.

B. The Above Numbered Contract/Order Is Modified To Reflect The Administrative Changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) Set

Forth In Item 14, Pursuant To The Authority of FAR 43.103(b).

C. This Supplemental Agreement Is Entered Into Pursuant To Authority Of:

D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______________ copies to the Issuing Office.

14. Description Of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name And Title Of Signer (Type or print)

16A. Name And Title Of Contracting Officer (Type or print)

15B. Contractor/Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States Of America 16C. Date Signed

By (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE

30-105-02 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SEE SCHEDULE

X

Firm Fixed Price

0001 2021FEB04

W909MY

ARMY CONTRACTING CMD-APG

10205 BURBECK RD

FORT BELVOIR, VA 22060-5811

TAMARA JENKINS

EMAIL: TAMARA.N.JENKINS.CIV@MAIL.MIL

W909MY-21-R-0006

2021JAN05

X

X 2021FEB12 02:00pm

/SIGNED/

2 signed

SEE SECOND PAGE FOR DESCRIPTION

1 14

CONTINUATION SHEET

Reference No. of Document Being Continued Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Buyer Name: TAMARA JENKINS

Buyer Office Symbol/Telephone Number: CCAP-CCV-A/(703)704-0827

Type of Contract 1: Firm Fixed Price

Type of Contract 2: Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Kind of Contract: Supply Contracts and Priced Orders

*** End of Narrative A0000 ***

Amendment 0001 Changes-Section A Narrative

The purpose of Amendment 0001 is to revise the solicitation to incorporate changes made as a result of questions received upon release of the final RFP for Solicitation W909MY-21-R-0006.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. Description of Supplies/Services:

This solicitation is is for the acquisition of Security Surveillance System (SSS) formerly known as the Tactical Security System (TSS) equipment and technical and logistic support services.

2. Program Objective/Needs:

Product Manager Force Protection Systems (PM FPS) has a requirement for the production and sustainment of the SSS. The SSS is a modular, scalable, rapidly deployable, security and surveillance system providing short- and long-term security and surveillance. The SSS provides day/night, limited visibility and all-weather imaging, pan/tilt/zoom controls, manual or automatic slew to cue; and near real-time semi-autonomous monitoring. This new, total small business set-aside competitive contract will support Full Rate Production (FRP), and provide engineering and logistics support during the production phase.

3. Delivery Schedule:

The resulting contract shall be Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ)contract with an ordering period of five (5) years and one

(1) three (3) year option.

4. Type of Contract:

A hybrid Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) / Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF)Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract with an ordering period of five (5) years and one (1) three (3) year option will be issued. The total contract value is $191.637M to purchase SSS equipment to field to units in theater as well as provide support for repairs, engineering changes, testing, documentation, installation, and training. This contract includes Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) Firm Fixed Price(FFP)type CLINS. The

Contractor shall complete all work as specificed in each task/delivery order within the timefreame set forth in that task/delivery order and subject to the conditions of Federal Acquisition Regulation(FAR)52.216-18, 52.216-19, and 52.216-22.

5. Source Selection Methodology:

The Government intends to award a single ID/IQ contract resulting from a 100% competitive Small Business Set-a-side solicitation IAW FAR

15 with award made to the offeror that provides the best overall value to the Government based on a tradeoff of three factors:

Technical, Price, and Past Performance.

6. Minimum Order:

At the time of contract award, the Government will issue the first Delivery Order against the IDIQ for the purchase of 7 units and associated FAT and Qualification tests (CLIN 0001, CLIN 0015, CDRL A006 and A007). This amount will satisfy the Government's contractual guaranteed minimum order requirement under this contract.

7. Any questions regarding the solicitation shall be provided to the Contracting Officer Ms. Rosetta Wisdom-Russell at rosetta.wisdom-russell.civ@mail.mil and Ms. Tamara Jenkins at tamara.n.jenkins.civ@mail.mil no later than 20 January 2021. All questions will be answered prior to the closing date of 05 February 2021.

8. Interested/prospective Offerors may request copies of programmatic documents (such as the Technical Data Package and Performance

Specifications) by submitting a written request to the Contracting Officer and Contracting Specialist via email. Attachment 0006 contains a list of documents that will require submission of an NDA. The Contracting Officer and Contracting Specialist will provide the

NDA upon request.

2 14

W909MY-21-R-0006

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

9. This solicitation and the resultant contract are a 100% small-business set aside. See 52.219-6, Notice of Total Small Business Set-

Aside (Nov 2020). The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this acquisition is 334511, Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing, and the Business Size Standard is 1,250 employees.

10. Solicitation Ombudsman:

Cynthia A. Jackson

6001 Combat Drive

APG, MD 21005

443-861-5349

11. Disclaimer:

This Executive Summary has been prepared as an aid to the potential offeror. We have made every attempt to accurately reflect the requirements/information contained in the solicitation. However, if you find any discrepancies between the Executive Summary and the clauses/provisions contained in the solicitation, the clauses/provisions contained in the solicitation shall prevail. Subject to

Availability of Funds - This acquisition is being solicited subject to availability of Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 funding. No award will be made until such time as FY 2021 funding is made available sufficient to fund the minimum guaranteed amount. The earliest funding will be made available is March 2021.

The following changes were made:

12. Section L, page 92

FROM:

(i) VOLUME I Executive Summary. This documents shall briefly summarize the proposal and shall reference all ensuing volumes. This document shall also contain sufficient information about the contractors accounting systems and property management systems to support that the offeror can meet the criteria in FAR 52.245-1 Government Furnished Property and DFARs 252.242-7006 Accounting System

Administration. Offerors shall also supply signed subcontractor agreements within this volume. The executive summary is meant for administrative information including any descriptions of certifications. The executive summary will not be part of the evaluation.

TO:

(i) VOLUME I Executive Summary. This documents shall briefly summarize the proposal and shall reference all ensuing volumes. This document shall also contain sufficient information about the contractors accounting systems and property management systems to support that the offeror can meet the criteria in FAR 52.245-1 Government Furnished Property and DFARs 252.242-7006 Accounting System

Administration. Offerors shall also supply signed subcontractor agreements within this volume. The executive summary is meant for administrative information including any descriptions of certifications. The executive summary will not be part of the evaluation.

Offerors are required to execute a non-disclosure agreement with the above Subcontractors and provide copies as attachments to the submitted Volume 5.

13. Section L, Page 91

FROM:

I - Executive Summary I_EXSUM_OfferorsName.pdf 25

II Technical II_Tech_OfferorsName.pdf 50

II_Tech_IMS_OfferorsName.pdf No limit

III Cost Price

Cost Volume Attachment 0004 Price Model III_Cost_OfferorsName.xls No limit

Cost Methodologies III_CostM_OfferorsName.pdf No limit

IV Past Performance IV_PastP_OfferorsName.pdf 25

V Solicitation, Offer, and Award Documents and Certification/Representations V_Sol_OfferorsName.pdf No limit

NOTE: Pages that exceed the required page limitations will not be evaluated. Additional pages over the maximum allowed will be removed or not read and will not be evaluated by the Government.

*Manpower charts are excluded from the page count.

TO:

I - Executive Summary I_EXSUM_OfferorsName.pdf 25**

II Technical II_Tech_OfferorsName.pdf 50

II_Tech_IMS_OfferorsName.pdf No limit

III Cost Price

Cost Volume Attachment 0004 Price Model III_Cost_OfferorsName.xls No limit

Cost Methodologies III_CostM_OfferorsName.pdf No limit

IV Past Performance IV_PastP_OfferorsName.pdf 25

V Solicitation, Offer, and Award Documents and Certification/Representations V_Sol_OfferorsName.pdf No limit

NOTE: Pages that exceed the required page limitations will not be evaluated. Additional pages over the maximum allowed will be removed or not read and will not be evaluated by the Government.

*Manpower charts are excluded from the page count.

3 14

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

** NDA with Patricio Enterprises, Inc. is excluded from page limit

FROM: "Each file shall be clearly labeled with its Title and a copy number"

TO: "Each file shall be clearly labeled with its Title and a Volume number"

14. Section L, Page 91, L(1)(a)

FROM:

If an offeror experiences submission issues via SAM, offerors may send a second submission to DoD SAFE access at https://safe.apps.mil/ to Ms. Tamara Jenkins (tamara.n.jenkins.civ@mail.mil) and Ms. Rosetta Wisdom-Russell (rosetta.wisom-russell.civ@mail.mil) to ensure timely receipt.

TO:

If an offeror experiences submission issues via SAM, offerors may send a second submission to DoD SAFE access at https://safe.apps.mil/ to Ms. Tamara Jenkins (tamara.n.jenkins.civ@mail.mil) and Ms. Rosetta Wisdom-Russell (rosetta.wisom-russell.civ@mail.mil) to ensure timely receipt. Please notify the KO/KS and a link will be provided upon request.

15. Attachment 0004 Price Model has been revised to change contract type under Travel CLIN from FFP to Cost no Fee. all

16. Subcontract (or Teaming) Agreements are required for all major subcontractors to include critical Hardware/service vendors.

17. Section M, page 98, 4.a

FROM:

4. Past Performance Factor. The Government will evaluate the offerors record of past and current performance to ascertain the probability of successfully performing the required efforts of the PWS. The evaluation will be based on recency, relevancy, and quality.

a. Evaluation of past performance shall be in accordance with this plan utilizing the forms and questionnaires set forth in Appendix C.

TO:

4. Past Performance Factor. The Government will evaluate the offerors record of past and current performance to ascertain the probability of successfully performing the required efforts of the PWS. The evaluation will be based on recency, relevancy, and quality.

a. Evaluation of past performance shall be in accordance with this plan utilizing the forms and questionnaires set forth under

Attachment 0005.

18. RFP Section A, Executive Summary, Page 2 Paragraphs 2 & 5

FROM:

2. Program Objective/Needs:

Product Manager Force Protection Systems (PM FPS) has a requirement for the production and sustainment of the SSS. The SSS is a modular,scalable, rapidly deployable, security and surveillance system providing short- and long-term security and surveillance. The SSS provides day/night, limited visibility and all-weather imaging, pan/tilt/zoom controls, manual or automatic slew to cue; and near realtime semi-autonomous monitoring. This new, full and open competitive contract will support Full Rate Production (FRP), and provide engineering and logistics support during the production phase.

19. Source Selection Methodology:

The Government intends to award a single contract resulting from Full and Open Competition IAW FAR 15 with award made to the offeror that provides the best overall value to the Government based on a tradeoff of three factors: Technical, Price, and Past Performance.

TO:

2. Program Objective/Needs:

Product Manager Force Protection Systems (PM FPS) has a requirement for the production and sustainment of the SSS. The SSS is a modular,scalable, rapidly deployable, security and surveillance system providing short- and long-term security and surveillance. The SSS provides day/night, limited visibility and all-weather imaging, pan/tilt/zoom controls, manual or automatic slew to cue; and near realtime semi-autonomous monitoring. This new, total small business set-aside competitive contract will support Full Rate Production

(FRP), and provide engineering and logistics support during the production phase.

20. Source Selection Methodology:

The Government intends to award a single contract resulting from a competitive Small Business Set-a-Side IAW FAR 15 with award made to the offeror that provides the best overall value to the Government based on a tradeoff of three factors: Technical, Price, and Past

Performance.

21. Small Business Participation requirement was removed from the QASP. See Revision I Section J.

22. Extension is granted through 12 February 2021

23. Send DOD safe link will be sent per request per request.

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0001 ***

4 14

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION J - LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

List of Number List of Number

Addenda Title Date of Pages Transmitted By Addenda Title Date of Pages Transmitted By________________ ____________________________________________________________ _______________ ____________ _______________________________ ____________________________________________________________ _______________ ____________ _______________

Exhibit A CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST DD FORM 1423-REVISED 02-FEB-2021

Attachment 0001 PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT 01-FEB-2021

Attachment 0002 QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN 02-FEB-2021

Attachment 0004 PRICE MODEL 02-FEB-2021

Attachment 0007 QUESTION/ANSWERS 01-FEB-2021

5 14

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION (Section L)

1. Introduction.

a. The Offeror proposal shall be submitted electronically via the System for Award Management (SAM) (formerly FEDBIZOPPS) in the files set forth below.

The offerors proposal shall consist of five (5) volumes. The Volumes are as follows:

I Executive Summary

II Technical

III Cost/Price

IV Past Performance

V Solicitation, Offer and Award Documents and Certifications/Representations.

Files shall not contain classified data. The use of hyperlinks in proposals is prohibited. The URL for the SAM is https://sam.gov/

Directions for navigating this Internet site are contained on SAM in the Getting Started section of the homepage. Offerors will need to be registered users of SAM in order to submit proposals. WARNING: Please do not wait until the last minute to submit your proposals! To avoid submission of late proposals, we recommend the transmission of your proposal file 24 hours prior to the required proposal due date and time. Please review FAR 52.215-1 for rules relating to late proposals and required submission times. If an offeror experiences submission issues via SAM, offerors may send a second submission to DoD SAFE access at https://safe.apps.mil/ to Ms. Tamara Jenkins

(tamara.n.jenkins.civ@mail.mil) and Ms. Rosetta Wisdom-Russell (rosetta.wisom-russell.civ@mail.mil) to ensure timely receipt. Please notify the KO/KS and a link will be provided upon request.

Proposals shall remain valid for a minimum of 180 days from the closing date for receipt of proposals.

b. Offerors are cautioned that parroting of the Technical requirements or the PWS with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect an understanding of the requirement or capability to perform. Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. Proprietary information shall be clearly marked.

c. If discussions are conducted with Offerors in the Competitive Range, regarding unclassified proposal submissions, the Government intends to use the Acquisition Source Selection Interactive Support Tool (ASSIST). The ASSIST software tool will allow Offerors to receive and respond to Evaluation Notifications (ENs) securely on-line. Offerors are required to provide the names of two (2) company individuals whose responsibilities will include receiving and responding to ENs through ASSIST. Two (2) agents names, company titles, telephone numbers, facsimile numbers, and email addresses shall be provided. This information is to be submitted with proposals under

Volume IV Solicitation, Offer and Award Documents and Certifications/Representations. Detailed instructions will be provided during the proposal evaluation phase. The intent of this section is to advise Offerors that they may be receiving ENs on-line if they are included in the Competitive Range.

d. During the evaluation phase, Non-Government Subject Matter Experts (SME) from Patricio Enterprises, Inc. will be utilized and will have access to all the necessary parts of the Offerors proposal pertinent to the SMEs area of expertise. As such, the above-listed

Government contactor company is precluded from being a prime contractor or participating in any teaming arrangement with potential

Offerors due to Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) concerns. Offerors must advise the Contracting Officer as soon as possible of any concerns/questions with regard to the use of the Non-Government SMEs from the company listed above. Any Offeror that is affiliated with, or is contemplating a contractual relationship with the above listed firm, must notify the Contracting Officer for the solicitation as soon as possible. Offerors are required to execute a non-disclosure agreement with the above company and provide copies with submitted proposals.

e. It is the Governments intent to make award without discussions, in accordance with FAR 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors

Competitive Acquisition. Therefore, Offerors should provide their best terms from a price and technical standpoint in their initial proposal. The Government reserves the right, however, to conduct discussions if determined necessary. If the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

2. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

a. Each volume shall be submitted in separate files. Any pages that are changed (as a result of negotiations or proposal revisions) should be of a different color and have changed information clearly marked by a vertical line in the right margin of the page. The revised pages shall be dated. Each file shall be clearly labeled with its Title and a Volume number.

b. Printing should be single spaced. Each paragraph shall be separated by at least one blank line. A standard, 12-point minimum font size applies. Arial or New Times Roman fonts are required. Tables and illustrations may use a reduced font size no less than 8-point and may be landscape.

c. The following volumes of material shall be submitted:

Volume Title File Name Maximum Pages

I - Executive Summary I_EXSUM_OfferorsName.pdf 25**

II Technical II_Tech_OfferorsName.pdf 50*

6 14

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

II_Tech_IMS_OfferorsName.pdf No limit

III Cost Price

Cost Volume Attachment 0004 Price Model III_Cost_OfferorsName.xls No limit

Cost Methodologies III_CostM_OfferorsName.pdf No limit

IV Past Performance IV_PastP_OfferorsName.pdf 25

V Solicitation, Offer, and Award Documents and Certification/Representations V_Sol_OfferorsName.pdf No limit

NOTE: Pages that exceed the required page limitations will not be evaluated. Additional pages over the maximum allowed will be removed or not read and will not be evaluated by the Government.

*Manpower charts are excluded from the page count.

** NDA with Patricio Enterprises, Inc. is excluded from page limit

NOTE: Pages that exceed the required page limitations will not be evaluated. Additional pages over the maximum allowed will be removed or not read and will not be evaluated by the Government.

3. PROPOSAL FILES

a. Format. The submission shall be clearly indexed and logically assembled. Each volume shall be clearly identified and shall begin at the top of a page. All pages of each volume shall be appropriately numbered and identified by the complete company name, date and RFP number in the header and/or footer. A Table of Contents should be created using the Table of Content feature in MS Word. MS

Word (doc) files shall use the following page setup parameters:

Margins Top, Bottom, Left, Right 1

Gutter 0

From Edge Header, Footer 0.5

Page Size, Width 8.5

Page Size, Height 11

NOTE: 11X17 folded pages are acceptable for tables/graphic representations; however, each 11X17 page counts as two pages.

The following additional restrictions apply:

b. File Packaging. All of the proposal files shall be compressed (zipped) into one file entitled proposal zip using WinZip version 6.2 or later, or as separate uploads. Document files shall be in read-only PDF file format. All price breakdown information to aide in the cost/price evaluation shall be submitted in Microsoft Office Excel Read/Write format and viewable in Microsoft Excel 2013.

**Please note Self extracting exe files are not acceptable.

c. Content Requirement. All information shall be confined to the appropriate file. The offeror shall confine submissions to essential matters, sufficient to define the proposal in a concise manner, to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal.

Each file of the proposal shall consist of a Table of Contents, Summary Section, and the Narrative discussion. The Summary Section shall contain a brief abstract of the file. Proprietary information shall be clearly marked. The following shall be included in the

Narrative discussion:

(i) VOLUME I Executive Summary. Executive Summary. This documents shall briefly summarize the proposal and shall reference all ensuing volumes. This document shall also contain sufficient information about the contractors accounting systems and property management systems to support that the offeror can meet the criteria in FAR 52.245-1 Government Furnished Property and DFARs 252.242-7006

Accounting System Administration. Offerors shall also supply signed subcontractor agreements within this volume. The executive summary is meant for administrative information including any descriptions of certifications. The executive summary will not be part of the evaluation. Offerors are required to execute a non-disclosure agreement with the above Subcontractors and provide copies as attachments to the submitted Volume 5.

(i) VOLUME II Technical. This volume shall contain technical performance information in response to the four subfactors listed below. This volume shall not exceed 50 pages. The volume shall be organized into the following sections:

(1) Section 1 Subfactor 1. The offerors proposed program management approach. The program management portion of the proposal shall address the following as a minimum:

Approach to program management including quality assurance, configuration management, obsolescence management and inventory and failure tracking.

Proposed technical, cost, and schedule performance measures for tracking the program success.

Proposed Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) for at least the first year of production and sustainment.

Identification of key risks and potential mitigation strategies.

Ability to propose cost and schedule savings through updated sustainment strategy (i.e. offer repairs instead of replacement)

Ability to provide field service representatives with relevant knowledge, experience, and skills for deployment Outside the

Continental United States (OCONUS) to be used for training, maintenance, and installation support.

(2) Section 2 Subfactor 2. This subfactor evaluates the offerors ability to build the system and maintain the Technical Data Package

(TDP). The contractor will provide information that substantiates:

Production and integration capabilities including the ability to build-to-print from a Production Level TDP. The offeror should show a clear understanding of the TDP including assembly and quality requirements.

Ability to provide engineering services including creating and addressing Engineering Change Proposals and updating technical drawings for the TDP.

Ability to perform acceptance and regression testing to specifications including IAVA/STIG patching and verification.

Interested/prospective Offerors may request copies of programmatic documents (such as the

7 14

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

Technical Data Package and Performance Specifications) by submitting a written request to the Contracting Officer and Contracting Specialist via email. Attachment 0006 contains a list of documents that will require submission of an NDA. The Contracting Officer and Contracting

Specialist will provide the NDA upon request.

(ii) VOLUME III Cost/Price. This volume shall consist of all information, required to support proposed costs and prices. Certified cost and pricing data are not currently required; however, the Government reserves the right to request such data prior to award. The information submitted in this volume shall comply with FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, and the requirements set forth below. There are no page limitations for this volume. For the CPFF evaluation offerors shall provide a Sample task proposal utilizing the sample task listed at Attachment 0004 Price Model, excel sheet labeled Sample Task. For the FFP portion of the effort offerors shall provide complete FFP unit pricing in Attachment 0004 Price Model and return with the solicitation for evaluation.

(1) The offeror shall ensure that the information submitted in this volume is consistent with and fully supports the amounts set forth in the SF33 and continuation sheets.

(2) The proposal shall set forth a summary of the total estimated costs by cost element and shall provide a breakdown of the proposed estimated costs of each CLIN separately, including all direct and indirect charges and fees. In order to maintain a minimum level of commonality between proposals, each offeror is required to complete (in entirety) the cost summary spreadsheets provided in Attachment 0004 Price Model. The cost summary spreadsheets shall be provided for the base effort and each option year. All documentation furnished to support the cost summaries are to be provided in a format chosen by the offeror that is easily traceable to the cost summary sheets.

(3) The specific direct labor rates utilized to price the proposal must be identified in the cost and pricing proposal only. The proposal shall set forth a complete breakdown of the direct and indirect rates by category and the rationale thereof. Provisions for overtime and shift differential charges shall be clearly addressed on a per-hour basis. Bid codes (applicable codes used to identify a labor category in the offerors accounting system), employee names and/or other documentation (such as assigned letter of commitment for key personnel not currently employed by the offeror) to support the rates proposed shall be provided. Letters of commitment shall clearly identify the prospective employees agreed-to salary/hourly rate and other pertinent conditions of employment. The same detailed support data shall be furnished for all major subcontractors.

(4) For evaluation purposes only and in determining probable cost for options in the out-years, wage determination rates shall be escalated 3 percent per year. However, if the offeror substantiates higher wage rates and justifies different escalation factors, those wage/escalation factors will be utilized. Direct labor rates shall identify the baseline (takeoff point) plus projected escalation for each basic and option period, and the methodology for computing composite labor rates shall be shown. For example: 3 months of FY12 + 9 months of FY13 divided by 12 = the average labor rates for the contractual period of performance. The offeror and each subcontractor shall clearly state their fiscal year. Offerors are advised that projected escalation must be applied to both exempt and non-exempt labor categories.

(5) Direct labor hours and rates shall be delineated by labor category by contract year for the offeror and each subcontractor. The labor hour delineation must be directly traceable to the same information proposed in the Technical Volume.

(6) Indirect expense rates shall be proposed in the same manner as direct labor rates, i.e., by contract year with the methodology used to derive any composite rates proposed.

(7) Forward-pricing Rate Agreements (FPRA) shall be clearly documented with agreements and responsible

Government officials identified.

(8) Offerors are reminded to identify any uncompensated or partially compensated overtime included in the proposal per FAR Clause 52.237-10.

(9) Pursuant to the Service Contract Act of 1965, the determination by the Secretary of Labor as to the applicable minimum monetary wage and fringe benefits will be made part of any resulting contract. For evaluation purposes only, the

Government has incorporated the applicable Area Wage Determinations and the Collective Bargaining Agreement. The offeror shall provide a crosswalk of the proposed labor categories against the Area Wage Determinations.

(10) In order to expedite the evaluation, offerors (prime and sub) are requested to provide a copy of their cost and pricing proposal, in the same format required by this RFP, to their cognizant DCAA office upon submission of the proposal to the Contracting Officer. The offeror shall provide information regarding its cognizant DCAA office, to include point of contact, telephone number and email address.

(11) Offerors are reminded of the requirements of Section 39 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy

(OFPP) Act (41 U.S.C. 1127, formerly 41 U.S.C. 435), as amended, which limits allowable costs for senior executive personnel compensation to $693,951 per year.

(12) For proposal preparation purposes, the expected or approximate date for initiation of contract performance is 30 September 2021.

(13) The offeror shall submit a complete breakdown of costs by major subcontractor. A major subcontractor is defined as a member of the offerors overall team who is expected to perform 10% or more of the proposed effort.

(iii) VOLUME IV Past Performance. This volume shall contain past performance information regarding similar contracts. This volume shall not exceed 25 pages plus up to five pages for each major subcontractor, excluding Past Performance

Questionnaire Forms. Offerors shall submit no more than three (3) Government and/or commercial contracts for the prime offeror and no more than three (3) for each major subcontractor in performance or awarded during the past five years, from the issue date of this RFP, which are relevant to the efforts required by this solicitation. Relevant efforts are defined as services/efforts that are the same as or similar to the effort required by the RFP. Data concerning the offeror shall be provided first, followed by each proposed major subcontractor, in alphabetical order. The Offeror shall also submit the written consent of its major subcontractors to allow the disclosure of its subcontractors past performance information to the Offeror. In addition, letters of commitment shall be included for all major subcontractors for their past performance to be considered. This volume shall be organized into the following sections:

8 14

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

(1) Section 1 Contract Descriptions. This section shall include the following information in the following format.

(a) Contractor/Subcontractor place of performance, CAGE Code and DUNS Number. If the work was performed as a subcontractor, also provide the name of the prime contractor and Point of Contact (POC) within the prime contractor organization (name, and current address, e-mail address, and telephone and fax numbers).

(b) Government contracting activity, and current address, Procuring Contracting Officers name, e-mail address, telephone and fax numbers.

(c) Governments technical representative/COR and current email address, telephone and fax numbers.

(d) Government contract administration activity and the Administrative Contracting Officers name, and current e-mail address, telephone and fax number.

(e) Government contract administration activitys Pre-Award Monitors name, and current e-mail address, telephone and fax numbers.

(f) Contract Number and, in the case of Indefinite Delivery type contracts, GSA contracts, and Blanket Purchase

Agreements, include Delivery Order Numbers.

(g) Contract Type (specific type such as Fixed-Price (FP), Cost Reimbursement (CR), Time & Material (T&M), etc.). In the case of Indefinite Delivery contracts, indicate specific type (Requirements, Definite Quantity, and Indefinite Quantity) and secondary contract type (FP, CR, T&M, etc.).

(h) Awarded price/cost.

(i) Final or projected final price/cost.

(j) Original delivery schedule, including dates of start and completion or work.

(k) Final or projected final, delivery schedule, including dates of start and completion of work.

(2) Section 2 Performance. Offerors shall provide a specific narrative explanation of each contract listed in Section 1, Contract Description, describing the objectives achieved and detailing how the effort is relevant to the requirement of this RFP.

(a) For any contracts that did not/do not meet original schedule or technical performance requirements, provide a brief explanation of the reason(s) for the shortcomings and any corrective action(s) taken to avoid recurrence. The offerors shall list each time the delivery schedule was revised and provide an explanation of why the revision was necessary. All Requests for Deviation and Requests for Waiver shall be addressed with respect to causes and corrective actions. The offerors shall also provide copy of any

Cure Notices or Show Cause Letters received on each contract listed and a description of any corrective action implemented by the offeror or proposed subcontractor. The offerors shall indicate if any of the contracts listed were terminated and the type and reasons for the termination.

(b) For all contracts, the offeror shall provide data on all manufacturing warranty returns. Data shall delineate total number of warranty returns, number of Could Not Duplicate (CND), number of failures attributable to GFE component failures, and number and nature of failures attributable to the offerors delivered product.

(3) Section 3 Subcontracts. Offerors shall provide an outline of how the effort required by the RFP will be assigned for performance within the offerors corporate entity and among the proposed subcontractors. The information provided for the prime offeror and each proposed major subcontractor must include the entire company name, company address, CAGE Code, DUNS Number and type of work to be performed by citing the applicable Government PWS subparagraph number. This includes all subcontractors who will be providing critical hardware/services or whose subcontract is for more than 10% of the total proposed cost/price. This section will further include written consent of major subcontractors to allow the disclosure of their subcontractors past performance information to the Offeror. In addition, letters of commitment shall be included for all major subcontractors.

Prime contractors shall conduct appropriate cost or price analysis to establish the reasonableness of proposed subcontract prices and to include the results of that analysis in their cost/price proposal IAW FAR 15.404-3.

(4) Section 4 New Corporate Entities. New corporate entities may submit data on prior contracts involving its officers and employees. However, in addition to the other requirements in this section, the offeror shall discuss in detail the role performed by such persons in the prior contracts cited. Information should be included in the files described in the sections above. Letters of Commitment shall be included in the proposal for these employees in order to be considered.

(5) Past Performance Questionnaire. For all contracts identified in Section 1, Contract Descriptions, a Past

Performance Questionnaire must be completed and submitted. The offeror shall complete Part I of the Past Performance Questionnaire and e-mail the questionnaire to both the Government contracting activity and technical representative responsible for the past/current contract. The POCs shall be instructed to electronically complete Part II of the questionnaire and e-mail the entire questionnaire to the Contracting Office no later than the proposal due date, to rosetta.wisdom-russell.civ@mail.mil and tamara.n.jenkins.civ@mail.mil.

The offeror shall e-mail to the Contracting Officer a list of all the POCs who were sent a questionnaire. The Government must receive this list no later than the proposal due date. The POC List shall be submitted in Word for Windows Table Format to include the following fields: Solicitation Number; Company Name; Contract Number; Government Agency; POC Last Name, First Name; POC Title; POC

Telephone Number; POC E-mail Address; and Date E-Mail to POC (month/day).

(6) Submissions. Offerors are discouraged from providing points of contact with another contractors facility, i.e., in case an offeror (or one of his/her team members) is in a subcontract with another contractor who has submitted a proposal on the same requirement. Offerors shall provide and submit the prime contract number and all Governmental agency points of contact (POC) in lieu of subcontract numbers or prime contract POCs in situations as described above.

9 14

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

(7) Small Business Participation Past Performance. All Offerors shall submit information substantiating the

Offerors past performance in complying with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business, maximizing opportunities for U.S. small business subcontractors. Offerors shall also provide a statement indicating whether any negative information has been reported in the past six years concerning the Offerors past compliance with FAR 52.219-8. If any such negative information has been reported, the

Offeror may submit explanations or comments responding to such negative information. Offerors with no prior contracts containing FAR

52.219-8 shall certify the same.

(iv) VOLUME V SOLICITATIONS, OFFER AND AWARD DOCUMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS/REPRESENTATIONS

Certifications and Representations Each offeror shall complete (fill-in and signatures) the solicitation sections indicated below using the file (without modification to the file) provided with the RFP. An authorized official of the firm shall sign the SF 33 and all certifications requiring original signature. An Acrobat PDF file shall be created to capture the signatures for submission.

A current version of the Data Rights Assertion List governing all Prime and sub-Contractors (including sub-contractors from previous

Task Orders) shall be included in Section K Representations, Certification and Other Statements of Offerors as an addendum.

The contractor shall submit the corresponding commercial software license agreements which will be reviewed and approved by the

Contracting Officer for the Government.

Section A Standard Form 33 (SF 33), Solicitation, Offer and Award

Section G Contract Administration Data

Section K Representations, Certification and Other Statements of Offerors

Solicitations, Offer and Award Documents and Certifications/Representations shall not be addressed separately from that submitted in VOLUME V SOLICITATIONS, OFFER AND AWARD DOCUMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS /REPRESENTATIONS

E. DISCUSSIONS

1. GENERAL INFORMATION. In accordance with FAR 15.306(d), discussion sessions with each offeror may be held.

Should discussions take place, all offerors in the competitive range will be allowed a minimum of 14 calendar days to submit Final

Proposal Revisions.

2. DISCUSSION SCHEDULING. If discussions are conducted, the Contracting Officer will schedule the discussion sessions, and each offeror, in the competitive range, will be notified. Discussions will be held via the Acquisition Source Selection Interactive

Support Tool (ASSIST) website. The Contracting Officer will provide additional instructions with the notification.

*** END OF NARRATIVE L0001 ***

10 14

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

BASIS FOR AWARD (Section M)

The award will be made based on the best overall proposal (using a Best Value Tradeoff) that is determined to be the most beneficial to the Government, with appropriate consideration given to the three (3) evaluation factors: Technical, Cost/Price, and Past Performance.

The

Technical factor is more important than the Cost/Price factor, which is more important than the Past Performance factor. The non-cost factors combined are significantly more important than the Cost factor. To receive consideration for award, a rating of no less than

Acceptable must be achieved for the Technical factor (to include all subfactors). Offerors will be cautioned that the award may not necessarily be made to the lowest cost offered.

The burden is on Offerors to demonstrate that each technical criteria is satisfied; technical capabilities being evaluated herein should be demonstrated not by mere conclusory statements, but by specific approaches and examples. The Offerors are cautioned that statements of compliance or repetition of the technical requirements for the subfactors being evaluated below, without complete and factual discussion and analysis, do not reflect an understanding of the requirement or capability to perform. In addition, the Offeror must make an affirmative statement at the beginning of their technical proposal that their proposed approach meets all requirements of the solicitation. Failure to do so could result in the Offeror being deemed unacceptable and removed from any set competitive range. The

Offerors are cautioned that any capabilities proposed that exceed the threshold requirements will be incorporated into the resultant

Contract, Performance Work Statement (PWS), as the requirement if the Offeror is successful.

It is the Governments intent to make award without discussions, in accordance with FAR 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors Competitive

Acquisition. Therefore, offerors should provide their best terms from a price and technical standpoint in their initial proposal. If the

Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals. Therefore, offerors are cautioned that the initial proposal should contain the offerors best terms from a technical and price standpoint. In addition, proposals that do not include all the information and materials prescribed in Section L of the solicitation, may be disqualified from consideration for award upon receipt without further review by the Government. In order to be considered for award, an Offeror must also be determined responsible in accordance with FAR Subpart 9.1.Finally, proposals shall not include any assumptions, terms, conditions, caveats, or exceptions.

With the exception of the Past Performance factor, evaluations will be based solely on information included in the proposal.

B. FACTORS AND SUB-FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED

The following evaluation factors and subfactors will be used to evaluate each proposal: Award will be made to the offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment of the evaluation factors and subfactors described below.

A detailed explanation of the criteria for the evaluation is set forth in the Evaluation Approach, Paragraph C of this section. During evaluations of each proposal, the Government will assign each subfactor an adjectival rating and write a narrative evaluation reflecting the identified findings.

Factor 1: Technical:

The Technical factor is further divided into the following subfactors:

a) Subfactor 1: Proposed program management approach

b) Subfactor 2: Capability to build the system and maintain a TDP

The relative order of importance for these subfactors is as follows. Subfactor 1 is slightly more important than Subfactor 2.

Evaluation of the offerors proposal shall address each subfactor as it applies to the Performance Work Statement (PWS). A detailed explanation of the criteria for the evaluation is set forth in the Evaluation Approach, Paragraph C of this section. During evaluations of each proposal, the Government will assign each subfactor an adjectival rating and write a narrative evaluation reflecting the identified findings.

Factor 2: Cost/Price:

The resulting award will be a hybrid Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) / Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF)/Cost no fee Indefinite Delivery Indefinite

Quantity (IDIQ) contract type. The award may be made to a proposal that is not the lowest cost but most advantageous to the Government. Cost reasonableness will be utilized in the evaluation of Cost Reimbursable efforts. Price reasonableness will be utilized in the evaluation of the Firm-Fixed Price effort.

Factor 3: Past Performance:

Each offerors past performance will be reviewed with the following subfactors:

a) Recency

b) Relevancy

c) Quality Assessment

C. EVALUATION APPROACH

All proposals shall be subject to evaluation by the Source Selection Team (SST).

1. The overarching evaluation approach for all factors and subfactors is as follows:

a. Adequacy of Response. The proposal will be evaluated to determine whether the offerors methods and approach have adequately and completely considered, defined, and satisfied the requirements specified in the RFP. The proposal will be evaluated to

11 14

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

determine the extent to which each requirement has been addressed in the proposal in accordance with the proposal submission section of the RFP.

b. Feasibility of Approach. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the proposed approach is workable and the end results achievable. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which successful performance is contingent upon proven devices and techniques. The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the offeror is expected to be able to successfully complete the proposed tasks and technical requirements within the required schedule.

2. The Technical Factor is divided into the following subfactors:

Subfactor 1 - Proposed program management approach: This subfactor evaluates the offerors proposed program management approach for the basic contract period and all option years. Marginal levels of overall responses could indicate a lack of understanding concerning mission requirements and may result in the entire proposal receiving an unfavorable rating and/or being eliminated from the competitive range. The evaluation will focus on the offerors:

Approach to program management including quality assurance, configuration management, obsolescence management, and inventory and failure tracking.

Proposed technical, cost, and schedule performance measures for tracking the program success.

Proposed Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) for at least the…