Pre-Proposal Conference (23-R-0001).pptx
PPTX presentation 724 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Repair Base Perimeter Fence
- Solicitation number
- W50S8W23R0001
- Issued by
-
Department of the Army National Guard
About this file
This document outlines a pre-proposal conference for a two-phase design-build solicitation to repair a perimeter fence at an Air National Guard base. The solicitation is number W50S8W23R0001 and has a magnitude between $250,000 to $500,000. It will be awarded as a firm-fixed price contract to a certified HubZone small business. The conceptual phase will evaluate experience, technical approach and past performance, while the detailed phase will assess technical approach and price. The project completion period is 180 days from notice to proceed. The pre-proposal conference presentation provides information on the evaluation criteria and ratings, questions process, and site visit, with a proposal due date of June 12, 2023.
View the file
Other files
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Repair base Perimeter fence design build
SOLICITATION NO.: W50S8W-23-R-0001
PROJECT NO.: DPEZ 182030
LOCATION: 153D AIRLIFT WING, CHEYENNE, WY
DATE: 18-MAY-2023
PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE
Contracting Officer (CO/KO)
Contract Specialist (CS/KS)
Contracting Officer Representative (COR)
INTRODUCTION
Your Name
Company
Your Position in Company
Are you a Prime or a Subcontractor
INTRODUCTION
Magnitude-$250,000 TO $500,000
A Firm-fixed Price Contract Will Be Awarded
100% HubZone Certified Small Business
Two-Phased Design-Build Solicitation Process
SYNOPSIS
On The Web – https://www.sam.gov
Solicitation Drawings Questions & Answers Document Amendments Check Regularly & Refresh Web Page Plans & Specifications- must be registered and request access in sam.gov.
SOLICITATION, PLANS & SPECS
Construction Period Is 180 Calendar Days After Receiving The Notice To Proceed
365 days after receipt of Notice to Proceed (NTP)
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE
DISCLAIMER!!
**The following is a brief overview of the proposal requirements**
Offerors Are Strongly Cautioned To Carefully Read The Requirements Of The Solicitation And Comply Accordingly
DISCLAIMER
This solicitation is for a Firm Fixed Price Contract. The Government intends to award a single contract to a Certified HubZone Small Business Offeror deemed responsible in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), whose proposal conforms to all the RFP’s requirements and is judged to represent the Best Value to the Government in accordance with the evaluation scheme set out in this solicitation. The award of this Design-Build contract will be made using a two-phase best value tradeoff process in accordance with FAR Part 36.3 and Part 15.101, based on the best overall (i.e. best value) proposal that is determined to be the most beneficial to the Government, with appropriate consideration given to the evaluation factors in Phase 1 and Phase 2.
SOLICITATION
Phase 1 will consist of three (3) factors: (1) Team Experience, (2) Conceptual Technical Approach, and (3) Past Performance. Factors 1 through 3 are sorted are in descending order of importance. Factor 1, Team Experience, is more important than Factor 2, Conceptual Technical Approach, which is more important than Factor 3, Past Performance. The Government may evaluate Phase 1 proposals as submitted, without conducting exchanges. Offerors should not assume that they will have an opportunity to clarify or correct anything in their proposal after submitting it in response to Phase 1.
Up to five (5) of the most highly qualified Offerors who submit a proposal in Phase 1 may be invited to submit proposals for Phase 2, where they will submit a technical and price proposal. Offerors must receive minimum ratings of “Acceptable” for all Factors 1, 2, and 3 to move on to Phase 2 for further consideration.
PHASE 1 – EVAL FACTORS
Phase 2 will consist of two (2) factors: (1) Detailed Technical Approach, and (2) Price. Factor 1, Detailed Technical Approach, is approximately equal to Factor 2, Price.
Final selection will be based on the best overall proposal in Phase 2 that is determined to be the best value to the Government, with appropriate consideration given to the technical and price proposals. To receive consideration for award, a rating of no less than “Acceptable” on the technical factor must be achieved. Offerors are cautioned that award may not necessarily be made to the lowest priced offeror.
PHASE 2 – EVAL FACTORS
During the evaluation of each proposal, the Government will assign a rating for Factors 1, 2 and 3 in Phase 1, and Factor 1 in Phase 2. Factor 2 in Phase 2 (Price) will be evaluated for price reasonableness. The firm that represents the best value to the Government will be selected for award in accordance with FAR 15.1 Source Selection Processes and Techniques.
Technical Ratings will be applied to the following factors in each phase
Phase 1:
Factor 1 – Team Experience Factor 2 – Conceptual Technical Approach The Past/Present Performance evaluation will consist of a “relevancy” rating and a “confidence” rating.
Phase 2:
Factor 1 – Detailed Technical Approach (Price) will be evaluated for price reasonableness
EVALUATION PROCESS
TECHNICAL RATING SCALE
Important Reminder!!
The Government Intends To Award Without Discussion And There May Not Be A Chance For Discussions, Corrections, Or Revised Proposals
GOVT’S INTENTIONS
PROPOSAL LIMITATIONS
Past Performance. There is no page limit on the Past Performance proposal. Offerors shall submit past performance information for each project submitted for Factor 1, Team Experience. Offerors shall provide for each submitted project a copy of any interim and final performance evaluations for the project from the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) -OR- a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ), Attachment 4, to obtain references from past and present clients. Inform references that completed Performance Questionnaire should be returned to Contract Specialist Kristopher Kahle at kristopher.kahle@us.af.mil and Contracting Officer Christopher Davalos at christopher.davalos.1@us.af.mil to arrive no later than the closing date for receipt of proposals. Offeror must not review the Past Performance Questionnaire prior to submission. They are to be submitted by the client/evaluator directly to the Contracting Officer. Offeror's should follow-up and encourage references to get the questionnaires to the Contracting Officer in a timely manner.
PAST PERFORMANCE
A Bid bond is required with submission of the proposal. The bid bond is due on the date as stated on the SF1442 block 13. The bid bond must be on a SF24 form. Rejection of a bid bond shall be in accordance with FAR 28.101-4 Noncompliance with bid guarantee requirements.
Bid Guarantees in accordance with FAR 52.228-1 must be submitted no later than the date and time for proposal submission.
BID BOND
Proposal Due:
12-JUNE-2023
0900 MST
Proposal Must Be Signed By Officer Of Your Company
No Facsimile Offers
Send or deliver to christopher.davalos.1@us.af.mil AND kristopher.kahle@us.af.mil.
PROPOSAL DUE DATE
Questions Must Be Submitted in the format shown on page 12 of solicitation.
Submit Questions NLT the 5th working day prior to solicitation closing date.
Do Not Call Technical Personnel
RFIs & QUESTIONS
All Questions, On A Non-Attribution Basis, And The Answers Will Be Posted To The Web Site https://www.sam.gov
If Necessary Addendums, Issued By An Amendment, Will Also Be Posted
Check Web Site Regularly And Don’t Forget To Refresh Web Page
RFIs & QUESTIONS
QUESTIONS
Let’s Go Visit the Site!!
SITE VISIT
image1.jpeg image2.png image3.png image4.png image5.png image6.PNG image7.PNG image8.wmf image9.wmf image10.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .