Attachment_3_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 28 KB Posted

Attached to
Personnel Tracking Locator Integrator Software and Support
Solicitation number
S-AQMMA-12-R-0413
Issued by

About this file

Attachment 3 Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
SF30_PTL_A006.docx DOCX document
Change_Page_67.docx DOCX document
Amendment_0005_Notice.docx DOCX document
SF30_PTL_A005.docx DOCX document
SF30_Continuation_Page_A005.docx DOCX document
Attachment_6_-_PTL_Requirements_Matrix_A005.docx DOCX document
Solicitation_PTL_System_A005.docx DOCX document
Attachment_2_Price_Proposal_Worksheet_A004.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
PTL_-_Responses_to_Vendor_Questions_A004.docx DOCX document
Solicitation_PTL_System_A004.docx DOCX document
SF30_PTL_A004.docx DOCX document
Attachment_1_Quality_Assurance_Surveillance_Plan_A004.docx DOCX document
Attachment_5_ITCCB_Approved_Hardware_and__Software_A004.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SF30_PTL_A003.docx DOCX document
SF30_PTL_A002.docx DOCX document
Solicitation_PTL_System_A001.docx DOCX document
SF30_PTL_A001.docx DOCX document
Attachment_2_Price_Proposal_Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation_PTL_System.docx DOCX document
SF33_PTL.docx DOCX document
Attachment_4_DD254.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_Quality_Assurance_Surveillance_Plan.docx DOCX document
Show all 22

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Solicitation No. S-AQMMA-12-R-0413 ATTACHMENT 3 Department of State Personnel Tracking Locator

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Please complete this questionnaire based on the following guidance:

Handwritten responses are sufficient.

Indicate, based on the codes below, the contractor’s performance on the identified program. Assessments should reflect only contractor liable performance. The following is a definition of the scoring levels:

PERFORMANCE LEVEL
CODE
EXCELLENT
(E)
Indicates that the contractor’s performance within the area of evaluation clearly exceeds contractual requirements.
GOOD
(G)
Indicates no problems exist in the area of evaluation or has only minor problems for which solutions are in hand.
MARGINAL
(M)
Indicates the area of evaluation contains an existing problem for which there is doubt whether the identified solution is adequate but the problem appears to be within the contractor’s ability to solve.
UNACCEPTABLE
(U)
Indicates a serious problem exists in the evaluation area which may be outside the contractor’s ability to solve. The contractor is in danger of not being able to satisfy contractual requirements and timely recovery in not likely.
NEUTRAL
(N)
Performance did not include such efforts or performance was not observed.

Please circle a letter corresponding to your rating or ‘N/A’ if you are unable to provide a rating for an area.

FOR ANY RATING BELOW SATISFACTORY, A CLARIFICATION AND EXPLANATION IS REQUESTED. IF MORE SPACE IS NEEDED, USE THE BACK OF THIS QUESTIONNAIRE.

You are urged to supplement your knowledge of the contractor’s performance with the judgment of others in your organization. In addition to completing the attached questionnaire for the identified program, we solicit your comments on other similar programs for which your activity has contracts with this offeror.

Return the completed questionnaire to the requestor in a sealed envelope with the responder’s signature over the seal or direct to email address listed below.

If you have any questions, please contact Frank O’Donnell at o’donnellfb@state.gov.

A.
Brief Description of contract effort or task:

B. General Information

Contractors Company Name (Evaluated)

Evaluators Company Name

Contract Effort or Program Title

Contract Type

Estimated Amount/Annual Volume of Service:

Period of Performance

C.
MANAGEMENT ABILITY AND EFFECTIVENESS
1.
The contractor provided experienced executives, including project manager and supervisors and replacements with the technical and administrative qualifications required to meet the contract requirements.
E
G
M
U
N
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
2.
The contractor’s delegation of authority to project manager and supervisors met contract requirements.
E
G
M
U
N
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
3.
The contractor provided adequate resources (personnel/equipment) in each specialty necessary to fulfill contractual requirements.
E
G
M
U
N
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
4.
The contractor provided effective emergency response actions and corrective actions to cover incidents such as: disruption of utilities, accidents, material shortages, safety, security, and hazardous materials handling incidents.
E
G
M
U
N
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|

II.

QUALITY

1.
Contractor provided effective Quality/ Inspection procedures and personnel to meet contract requirements.
E
G
M
U
N
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
2.
When deficiencies were reported, the contractor took effective corrective actions pursuant to their Quality Control procedures.
E
G
M
U
N
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
3.
Contractor completed projects and subsequent corrective actions, including punch-list items, in a timely manner.
E
G
M
U
N
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
4.
Overall quality of the services provided under the contract
E
G
M
U
N
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
III.
COST/PRICE
1.
The contractor provided accurate and timely proposals for changes.
E
G
M
U
N
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
IV.
GENERAL
1.
Compliance with contract terms and conditions.
E
G
M
U
N
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
2.
Willingness to cooperate with and assist the customer in routine matters and when confronted by unexpected difficulties.
E
G
M
U
N
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
3.
Business integrity and business conduct.
E
G
M
U
N
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
|_|
4.
Given the opportunity, would your organization enter into another contractual relationship with this contractor in the future?
Yes
No
|_|
|_|
V.
COMMENTS

NOTE: Additional comments are appreciated:

VI.
RESPONSE INFORMATION

The following information will assist in the analysis of the data. This information will be kept confidential.

Name of Evaluator

Phone Number

Email Address

Date Questionnaire Completed:

Source of Information/Documentation utilized to rate Performance Level

May we contact you to discuss/validate ?
Yes or No (circle one)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .