GSMO_II_P111_A1_20160322.pdf

NNG16551793R

Amendment 1

3. Mission Suitability Instructions by Subfactor

1. General Instructions

The Mission Suitability Volume should be specific, detailed, and provide all the information requested by these instructions. The Mission Suitability Volume must demonstrate that the offeror understands the requirements and has the ability to meet the requirements. General statements such as the "requirements are understood" or "standard procedures will be employed" are not adequate. Also, restatement or paraphrasing of the requirements should be avoided. Information previously submitted, if any, will not be considered unless it is resubmitted as part of the Mission Suitability Volume. It must not be incorporated by reference.

2. Mission Suitability Volume Format

The Mission Suitability Volume must be divided and presented by each Mission

Suitability subfactor as follows:

Subfactor A – Technical Approach

Subfactor B – Management Approach

Subfactor C – Small Business Utilization (SBU)

3. Mission Suitability Instructions by Subfactor

Subfactor A – Technical Approach

The offeror's technical approach should demonstrate an understanding of the principal requirements of the Statement of Work (SOW) and provide the techniques and procedures that will be used to satisfy these principal requirements in an efficient and effective manner. The principal requirements are identified as WBS 2.4 (inclusive of all sub-levels), 3.3, and 3.7 (inclusive of all sub-levels).

The offeror shall identify the most significant potential risks under this contract and also describe the risk management techniques that will be used to manage identified risks during contract performance. Risk factors may be those inherent in the work, unique to the offeror's chosen approach. General areas of possible risk that are of concern to

NASA are technical, schedule, cost, security (including personnel, information technology), export control and environmental risks. The identification of risks is the