VPS_CSS_09SEP.pdf

PDF 561 KB Posted

Attached to
Virtual Paint Simulator (VPS) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N6134022Q0017
Issued by
Department of the Navy Naval Air Systems Command

About this file

This combined synopsis/solicitation from the Department of the Navy Naval Air Systems Command seeks quotes for eight replacement Virtual Paint Simulator trainers. Quotes are due by 12 September 2022 and shall be submitted electronically with pricing for each trainer delivery to eight specified Navy locations between December 2022 and April 2023. The firm fixed price purchase order will be awarded as a total small business set-aside to the responsible offeror with the lowest priced technically acceptable quote based on demonstration of meeting requirements for hardware, training modes, simulation features, labs, testing, logistics, cybersecurity, and documentation.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Virtual Paint Simulator (VPS), newest first.
File Type Posted
ATT1_Virtual Paint Simulator SOW 29Aug2022 V1-1.pdf PDF
ATT3_TCCD_VPS SOW Attachment.pdf PDF
VPS CDRL C002 BOM.pdf PDF
VPS CDRL B001 CPSMR.pdf PDF
ATT2_VPS REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST.pdf PDF
VPS CDRL F001 IOT.pdf PDF
VPS CDRL A002 TEST INSPECTION REPORT.pdf PDF
VPS CDRL C001 TSSPD.pdf PDF
VPS_CSS.pdf PDF
ATT1_VPS_SOW.pdf PDF
ATT3_VPS_TCCD.pdf PDF
N6134022Q0017.pdf PDF
VPS CDRL D002 CMP.pdf PDF
VPS CDRL A003 COMPUTER SOFTWARE PRODUCT END ITEMS.pdf PDF
VPS CDRL D003 CASR.pdf PDF
VPS CDRL D001 BDD.pdf PDF
VPS CDRL E001 COTS.pdf PDF
VPS CDRL A001 TEST PLAN.pdf PDF
Show all 18

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Virtual Paint Simulator [VPS]

Attachments: #1: VPS_SOW

#2: VPS_REQUIREMENTS_CHECKLIST

#3: VPS_TCCD (Training Course Control Document)

This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; quotes are being requested and a written combine/solicitation will not be issued. Combined synopsis/solicitation N6134022Q0017 is issued as a Request for Quote (RFQ) and incorporates the provisions and clauses in effect from regulations posted to https://www.acquisition.gov inclusive, but not limited to, Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2022-06 published on 01 May 2022.

The anticipated North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code for this requirement is 333318 (Other Commercial and Service Industry Machinery Manufacturing Other Technical and Trade Schools) with a business size of 1,000 employees. The Product Service Code (PSC) for this procurement is 6910. This procurement will be awarded as a Total Small Business Set-Aside using the Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) outlined in FAR Part 13. Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division (NAWCTSD) in Orlando, Florida intends to issue a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) purchase order.

Interested sources are encouraged to submit a quote. All information shall be furnished at no cost or obligation to the Government.

Below is a description of the requirement:

Eight replacement VPS trainers will be procured and delivered to the following CNATT Learning Site locations: Norfolk, Whidbey Island, Atsugi, Lemoore, Oceana, North Island, Jacksonville, and New River.

Additional information provided in Attachment #1; VPS_SOW.

1) List of Contract Line Item Numbers, Items, Quantities and Units of Measure:

CLIN DESCRIPTION QTY PRICE

DELIVERY

DATE

DELIVERY POC

0001 VPS Norfolk 1 $__._ 02 DEC 2022

CNATTU Norfolk

COMMANDING OFFICER

CNATTU NORFOLK

ATTN: SUPPLY DEPT

9287 SEVENTH AVE

NORFOLK, VA 23511

MARK FOR: AE1 SALOME, ARIEL

PH: (757) 445-1511

ariel.c.salome.mil@us.navy.mil

0002 VPS Oceana 1 $__._ 14 DEC 2022

CNATTU Oceana

COMMANDING OFFICER

CNATTU OCEANA

790 "D" AVE. BLDG 223 RM 135

VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23460-2299

MARK FOR: ATC PTHIER, DENNIS

PH: (757) 433-2288

dennis.j.pothier.mil@us.navy.mil

0003 VPS New River 1 $__._ 13 JAN 2023 CNATTU New River

COMMANDING OFFICER

CNATTU NEW RIVER

PCS BOX 21036

JACKSONVILLE, NC 28545

MARK FOR: CPL LISET,

CORONAMANDUJANO

PH: (910) 449-6102

liset.coronamandujano.mil@us.navy.mil

0004 VPS Jacksonville 1 $__._ 03 FEB 2023

CNATTU Jacksonville

COMMANDING OFFICER

CNATTU JACKSONVILLE

BLDG 848 E, YORKTOWN AVE

NAVAL AIR STATION

JACKSONVILLE, FL 32212-0060

MARK FOR: LSC CHANNELL,

NATHAN

PH: (904) 542-6332

nathan.a.channell.mil@us.navy.mil

0005 VPS Lemoore 1 $__._ 24 FEB 2023

CNATTU Lemoore

COMMANDING OFFICER

CNATTU LEMOORE

738 ENTERPRISE AVE

LEMOORE, CA 93246-5010

MARK FOR: GLENN LOSENARA

PH: (559) 998-3960

glenn.a.losenara.civ@us.navy.mil

0006 VPS North Island 1 $__._ 17 MAR 2022

CNATTU North Island

COMMANDING OFFICER

CNATTU NORTH ISLAND, BOX

357059

STOCKDALE BLVD, BLDG 698, NAS

NORTH ISLAND

SAN DIEGO, CA. 92135-7059

MARK FOR: LS1 VILLAMANCA,

DONKING

PH: (619) 545-6214

donking.n.villamanca.mil@us.navy.mil

0007 VPS Whidbey Island 1 $__._ 07 APR 2023

CNATTU Whidbey Island

COMMANDING OFFICER

CNATTU WHIDBEY ISLAND

3665 NORTH PRINCETON ST

BUILDING 976

OAK HARBOR, WA 98278-8000

MARK FOR: LSC KELLEY, JUSTIN

PH: (360) 257-0040

justin.m.kelley4.mil@us.navy.mil

VPS Mobile Unit Atsugi

1 $__._ 28 APR 2023

CNATTDet Atsugi

OFFICER IN CHARGE

CNATT DETACHMENT ATSUGI

PSC 477 BOX 31

FPO AP 96306-2731

MARK FOR: LS3 LOVE, AMOR

2) Dates and place of delivery and acceptance:

Delivery shall be made in accordance with the above CLIN structure.

Note: Inspection and Acceptance will occur at delivery site and will be conducted by the Government.

Delivery of all devices shall be no later than 28 April 2023.

The provision at FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation–Commercial Items, does not apply.

All Offerors must include a completed copy of the provision at 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications- Commercial Items, with its offer.

3) Basis of Award:

The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation, to the responsible offeror based on the lowest priced technically acceptable (LPTA).

Note: The Government reserves the right to request additional information as it deems necessary.

Such request shall be considered clarification. Also, all new entities registering in GSA’s System for Award Management (SAM), as well as existing registrations being updated or renewed, will require the submission of an original, signed notarized letter identifying the authorized Entity Administrator for the entity associated with the Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number before the registration will be activated. It is recommended that all interested parties be aware that processing this additional information may take several days and are proactive in maintaining the SAM registrations in an “Active” status as the government cannot award to an entity without an “Active” SAM registration. More information can be found at www.gsa.gov/samupdate.”

4) Quote Submission Information:

The provision at FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors-Commercial Products and Commercial Services applies to this acquisition and is augmented with the following.

PH: 011-81-467-63-3700

Amor.Love@fe.navy.mil

0009 Tech Data NSP NSP TBD

Jeremiah Nelson NAWCTSD Logistic Manager 230 Chevalier Field Ave BLDG 3460 Suite C Pensacola FL 32508

PH: 850-452-9760

jeremiah.a.nelson.civ@us.navy.mil

Spares [Option CLIN for PIO]

1 $__._ TBD

Mitch Heskett N4 - Readiness and Integrated Logistic Programs Director Center for Naval Aviation Technical Training (CNATT) 230 Chevalier Field Avenue, Suite C Pensacola, FL 32508

PH: 850-452-8241

Mitch.a.heskett.civ@us.navy.mil

Quotes are due, via e-mail only, no later than 1200 [noon] Eastern Time 12 September 2022 to amber.m.lizotte.civ@us.navy.mil. Responses shall include the solicitation number, name, address, and telephone number of the offeror. Proprietary data in the responses will be protected where so designated. Please fill out all applicable provisions and clauses.

It is the quoter’s responsibility to submit a proposal that enables government evaluators to effectively evaluate and substantiate the validity of any assertions set forth in the quoter’s proposal.

Assume the government has no prior knowledge of a quoter’s facilities and experience.

Accordingly, do not simply rephrase or restate the government's requirements. Statements that the quoter will provide a particular feature, objective, or outcome without explaining how the quoter proposes to meet that feature, objective, or outcome are generally inadequate and may adversely impact the government’s evaluation assessment of the quoter. It is the quoter’s responsibility to draft a logical, unambiguous proposal that contains all pertinent information in sufficient detail so that government evaluators are able to meaningfully evaluate the quoter’s proposed approach and price.

For information or questions regarding this RFQ, contact the cognizant Contract Specialist, Amber Lizotte at amber.m.lizotte.civ@us.navy.mil or Bryan Walsh, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) at bryan.s.walsh2.civ@us.navy.mil.

a) Quote Format

Quotes shall be submitted electronically in one of the following searchable file formats: Microsoft Word document compatible with MS Office 2013 (.doc or .docx file), Microsoft Excel document (.xls or .xlsx file), or searchable Portable Document Format (.pdf file).

The electronic quotation shall be organized to correspond with the evaluation criteria using standard 8 ½ x 11” size paper, 12-point Times New Roman type, single spaced and 1-inch margins.

All pages should be numbered with section and page numbers. A page limit of 10 pages applies, inclusive of all pricing and technical information.

Files shall not be locked, encrypted, or otherwise contain barriers to opening.

b) Quotation Content and Volumes

Responses shall be organized in the following manner:

Volume Number

Volume Title Page Limit Copies Required

1 ADMINISTRATIVE

COMPLETENESS

As needed 1 Soft (Electronic) Original

2 TECHNICAL

APPROACH &

DELIVERY

As needed 1 Soft (Electronic) Original

3 PRICE As needed 1 Soft (Electronic) Original

Total No more than 10

Limit of 10 total pages applies to Volumes II & III only (Technical and Price), and excludes Volume I: Administrative Completeness.

Quoters shall include the following in each volume:

I. VOLUME I: ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLETENESS

(a) The Quoter shall provide the name, title, telephone number, and e-mail address of the company/division point of contact that can contractually obligate your company. The quotation shall identify those individuals authorized to negotiate with the Government. The quotation shall provide the company name, street address, and Data Universal Numbers System (DUNS) number.

(b) Quoters shall identify and address assumptions, deviations, and exceptions. Full explanation and justification of assumptions, deviations, and exceptions must be provided. Failure to provide a full explanation and justification for any assumption, deviations, and exceptions may result in the exclusion of the Quoter from consideration for award. In addition, assumptions, conditions, exceptions, and deviations may cause the Quoters RFQ to be considered “Unacceptable” and, thus, not awardable. If no assumptions, deviations or exceptions are taken to the solicitation terms and conditions, a statement to that effect is required.

(c) Quoters shall include copies of all applicable SAM records, which includes the size assertions for the applicable NAICS Code.

II. VOLUME II: TECHNICAL APPROACH & DELIVERY

(a) Quoters shall certify that the delivery and installation schedule no later than 28 April 2023

(b) Quoters shall include information (e.g. narrative, specification sheets, etc) that demonstrates the proposed solution meets each of the SOW paragraphs 3 - 7 requirements, along with Attachment

#2; VPS_REQUIREMENTS_CHECKLIST.

III. VOLUME III: PRICE

The Price portion of the quotation shall be submitted in the Quoters preferred format and shall include a single price for the identified CLIN/Quantities specified above. The price must be inclusive of all delivery and handling costs, as applicable. Quoters are reminded that the proposed prices for each CLIN shall be inclusive of all costs to complete the requirements (i.e. travel, material, labor, etc.).

Quotations should include the Quoter’s best pricing; including all discounts, as there may not be another opportunity to offer further discounts.

4.0 EVALUATION CRITERIA

Evaluation Factors and Process. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

TECHNICAL (Volume 2)

PRICE (Volume 3)

The Government will evaluate quotes received in response to this RFQ using the Lowest-Price-Technically- Acceptable (LPTA) methodology. Quoters should submit its best terms in the initial quotation. The quotation must demonstrate to the Government’s satisfaction that the Quoter will provide a quality supply or service that will ensure the successful accomplishment of the requirements and overall program objectives.

The Government will evaluate the quotation offering the lowest price first. If the Technical volume of the quotation offering the lowest price is found unacceptable, then the Government will evaluate the next lowest priced quotation's Technical volume. Next, the Government will review the Price volume from the quoter that submitted the lowest-priced, technically acceptable quotation to determine whether the price is fair and reasonable. If that quotation’s price is fair and reasonable, the Government will complete a responsibility determination, and if the Government finds the quoter responsible, then the evaluation process stops as that quotation represents the best value to the Government. Award shall be made to that quoter without further consideration of any other quotations.

The lowest evaluated price of quotation shall meet or exceed the acceptability standards for the Technical Factor. The Government will evaluate quotations against the minimum requirements set out in the RFQ to determine whether the quotation is "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable" using the ratings and descriptions provided in the evaluation ratings listed below:

Table A: Definition of Evaluation Ratings

ACCEPTABLE (A) The quotation meets the minimum requirements of the RFQ.

UNACCEPTABLE (U)

The quotation does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the

RFQ.

4.1 SPECIFIC EVALUATION CRITERIA/BASIS FOR AWARD

I. VOLUME 1: ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLETENESS

The Government will evaluate Volume 1 to verify that the requested information of Section 4.b, paragraph I, subparagraphs (a) through (c) has been provided. That information may be necessary for a quote to be acceptable for award. Any questions to Quoters to resolve issues with that information are not considered deficiencies that make a contractor unacceptable for award, even if the information is necessary for award, unless the Quoter refuses to provide the requested information.

II. VOLUME 2: TECHNICAL APPROACH & DELIVERY

The Government will evaluate Volume 2 utilizing the Acceptable/Unacceptable basis. A quotation may be deemed “Unacceptable” if the quotation merely repeats or restates the SOW words or make statements lacking the required information.

(a) An acceptable delivery schedule is one that meets the Government’s requirement to complete the SOW requirements no later than 28 April 2023.

(b) Demonstrated the ability to satisfactorily provide/satisfy each of the technical requirements in the table below (Refer to Attachment #2; VPS_REQUIREMENTS_CHECKLIST, for additional information):

SOW Paragraph Evaluation Requirement

3.1 & 3.2.1 The quoter’s quote demonstrated that they could manufacture, deliver, and set-up the hardware at all eight training sites as required

3.1 The quoter’s quote demonstrated that they could identify and mitigate cost, schedule, and performance risks

3.1 The quoter’s quote demonstrated that they could support and participate in post contract award kick-off meeting within 10 days of contract award

3.1 The quoter’s quote demonstrated that they could support and participate in a bi-weekly meeting/teleconference

3.1 The quoter’s quote demonstrated that they could support and participate Ready-to- Ship Technical Interchange Meeting prior to shipment of the first device

3.2.2 & TCCD The quoter’s quote demonstrated that they could provide the two modes required for simulator operation: Instructor Led Training and Self-Directed Training

3.2.3 & TCCD The quoter’s quote demonstrated that they could provide all 15 simulation features:

realistic spray simulation, paint booth training environment, various paintable part categories, various paint gun models, Binks Mach 1 98-1141 spray gun model, spray gun adjustments, coatings, film coverage, VR learning tool, performance feedback, performance reporting, instruction, and performance stats

3.2.5 & TCCD The quoter’s quote demonstrated that they could provide all six required trainer labs

4.0 The quoter’s quote demonstrated that they could conduct the required test and acceptance tasking

5.0 The quoter’s quote demonstrated that they could conduct the required logistics tasking

6.0 The quoter’s quote demonstrated that they could conduct the required cybersecurity tasking

7.0 The quoter’s quote demonstrated that they could complete and submit the 21 Documentation Deliverables

III. VOLUME 3: PRICE

It is expected that a purchase order award decision will include a determination that there is adequate price competition and that the proposed prices are reasonable. In limited situations, additional analysis may be required by the Government to determine reasonableness.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .