N4008517R4601_Amendment_1.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

This admendment to Request for Proposal (RFP) N40085-17-R-4601 Skeeter Lane Conversion and Welcome Center Construction is hereby issued to provide in extension to the site visit and the proposal due date.

The site visit w ill be moved from January 10th, 2017 to January 18th, 2017.

The site visit log due date w ill be moved from January 5th, 2017 to January 12th, 2017.

The proposal due date w ill be moved from January 26th, 2017 to February 2nd, 2017.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 11

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 04-Jan-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N40085-17-R-4601

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

20-Dec-2016

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

04-Jan-2017

CODE

NAVFAC MID ATLANTIC

PWD LITTLE CREEK

FACILITIES ENGINEERING & ACQ DIV

1450 GATOR BLVD SUITE 150

VIRGINIA BEACH VA 23459-8616

N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N40085-17-R-4601

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00010 - SOLICITATION CONTRACT FORM

The required performance has changed from SKEETER LANE HOUSING CENTER CONVERSION

AND RENOVATION AND CONSTRUCT NEW WELCOME CENTER SURFACE COMBAT SYSTEMS

CENTER, WALLOPS ISLANDNAICS: 236118MAGNITUDE: $1M-$5MProposals are due 26 January, 2017 at 2:00 pm EDT to NAVFAC Midlant, Public Works Department Little Creek, 1450 Gator Blvd, Suite 150 Bldg 3165, Virginia Beach VA 23459-8616.The solicitation is being solicited as a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Design-Build (D-B) contract. to SKEETER LANE HOUSING CENTER CONVERSION AND RENOVATION AND CONSTRUCT

NEW WELCOME CENTER SURFACE COMBAT SYSTEMS CENTER, WALLOPS ISLANDNAICS:

236118MAGNITUDE: $1M-$5MProposals are due 2 Febuary, 2017 at 2:00 pm EDT to NAVFAC Midlant, Public Works Department Little Creek, 1450 Gator Blvd, Suite 150 Bldg 3165, Virginia Beach VA 23459-8616.The solicitation is being solicited as a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Design-Build (D-B) contract..

SECTION 00100 - BIDDING SCHEDULE/INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

List of Attachments:

(A) Pre proposal Inquiry

(B) Directions to Wallops Island

(C) Site Visit Log

(D) Price Proposal Form

(E) Visit Access Request

(F) Construction Experience Data Sheet

(G) Past Performance Questionnaire

(H) Specifications (Housing Conversion) for Work Order 1366573

(I) NAVFAC Drawings 12708253- 12708373 (Housing Conversion)

(J) Specifications (Welcome Center) for Work Order 1366574

(K) NAVFAC Drawings 12708173- 12708242 (Welcome Center)

(L) Wage Determinations #VA160140 1/08/2016

A. GENERAL INFORMATION

OVERVIEW OF THIS SOURCE SELECTION

This solicitation is being conducted as a negotiated procurement utilizing procedures in accordance with FAR Part 15.101-2. The best value continuum source selection process used in this acquisition is the lowest price technically acceptable. Award will be made to that responsible offeror whose proposal, conforming to the solicitation, is determined to be lowest price and meeting the acceptability standards for non-price factors (technical and past performance) as stated herein.

The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration any or all offerors at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to be the best value.

The number of proposals to be evaluated for technical acceptability may be limited to the five lowest priced offers at the discretion of the contracting officer. If the number of proposals to be evaluated is limited, technical proposals shall be provided to the evaluator(s) without any identification of prices or any rank order of prices. If no proposals are found to be technically acceptable within the first group of proposals, then the process described will be conducted again as many times as necessary, until such time as the Government identifies a technically acceptable proposal.

This procurement will be awarded as Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Contract. The Government reserves the right to enter into negotiations or limit the competitive range. The magnitude of construction range is between $1,000,000 and

$5,000,000 (CLINS 0001-0007).

INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS: Proposals must set forth full, accurate and complete information as required by this Request for Proposal (including attachments). The penalty for making false statements in proposals is prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 1001. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award without discussions. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if it is later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary. Therefore, each initial offer should contain the best terms from a technical and price standpoint.

The contract completion date is 504 calendar days from the notice to proceed.

This acquisition is solicited as a 100% total small business set aside.

Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPI): Offerors who determine that the technical and or contractual requirements of this RFP require clarification(s) in order to permit submittal of a responsive proposal shall submit all questions in writing.

Additionally, all inquiries shall be submitted using the Pre-Proposal Inquiry (PPI) form attached to this solicitation as Attachment A and are due by 1200 EST Thursday, 23 January, 2017. All inquiries shall be submitted via email to tiffany.kirtsey@navy.mil. The Government does not intend to respond to inquiries submitted less than 7 days before the proposal receipt date. Responses will be published as an amendment to the solicitation.

B. ELIGIBILITY FOR AWARD

SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT

To be eligible for award, your firm(s) must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database and in the Online Representation and Certifications Application (ORCA) as required by Clause 52.204-7, System for Award Management (Jul 2013) http://www.sam.gov.

Note that the System for Award Management (SAM) is required for all offerors, including Joint Ventures (JV) (registration must state the NAME of the JV). Offerors not registered in SAM shall obtain a DUN & Bradstreet (DUNS) number and a CAGE prior to registering in SAM.

All offerors, including JV offerors, must submit with their proposal a DUNS number. In addition to the DUNS number required for JV offerors, JV offerors must submit with their proposal a DUNS number for each member comprising the JV. DUNS numbers can be obtained at http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform. The DUNS number is required in order to register in SAM (see above.)

CAGE – A CAGE code is required for all offerors, including JV offerors. JV offerors must acquire a CAGE Code registered in the JV name.

C. INQUIRIES, PROPOSAL FORMAT AND DUE DATE

SITE VISIT INFORMATION

The site visit will be held on the 18th of January, 2017 at 10:00 am at the Skeeter Lane Housing area. Each prime contractor is limited to four participants (inclusive of subcontractor representatives). Attached are directions to the Skeeter Lane Housing area (Attachment B) and the Site Visit Log (Attachment C). Each prime contractor must fill out the Site Visit Log, including subcontractor participant information, and submit via email to tiffany.kirtsey@navy.mil or amy.keiler@navy.mil no later than 2:00 pm 12 January, 2017.

DELIVERY INFORMATION

Proposals shall be delivered to:

Attn: Nikki Kirtsey NAVFAC Mid Atlantic Public Works Department Little Creek 1450 Gator Blvd, Suite 150, Bldg 3165 Virginia Beach, VA 23459-8616

ALL SUBMITTALS SHALL BE RECEIVED PRIOR TO 2:00 PM (EDT), THURSDAY, 2 FEBRAURY

2017. LATE SUBMITTALS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED.

LATE SUBMITTALS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED. Proposal must be clearly marked on the outside of the package with the solicitation number. ELECTRONIC AND FACSMILE SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS

WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

NON-PRICE FACTORS SUBMITTAL: Offeror shall submit one (1) marked “Original,” two (2) copies with the following characteristics:

_ 8 ½ x 11 format _ 12 point font _ Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact and their phone and email address.

_ The non-price proposal should only include information in response to Factors 1, 2, and 3, and JV agreement (if applicable). Specific page limitations and Solicitation Submittal Requirements are specified in each Factor.

**PAGES THAT EXCEED THE PAGE LIMITATIONS WILL NOT BE EVALUATED.

Special Joint Venture (JV) Requirements:

JV offerors shall provide with their proposal a notarized legal document that establishes the JV. The JV Agreement shall be in effect at the time of submission of the proposal and remain irrevocable until one (1) year after the work has been finally inspected and accepted by the Government. The notarized legal document that establishes the JV shall be furnished with the price proposal in its original language version along with a certified English translation of the notarized JV, if the original version was not in English. The Joint Venture must be formed and valid at the time of submission of the proposal. The validated notarized legal document must include language that each member of the JV will be jointly and severably liable for the performance of the whole contract and will be incorporated into the contract award if award is made to the JV.

1. The Joint Venture Agreement shall include, at a minimum, the following:

(a) Name of firms that form the JV and the name of the JV.

(b) Name and title of the corporate officials signing on behalf of each party.

(c) Solicitation number.

(d) Description of the responsibilities in terms of work category for each member (for example:

Firm A performing 100% of )

(e) The statement "The composition and structure of the JV will remain unchanged from award to one (1) year after the work has been finally inspected and accepted by the Government.”

(f) Date of issuance of the agreement and notarized signature of the corporate officials signing in behalf of each party.

(g) Statement under oath stating that the Joint Venture (JV) is in compliance at the time of proposal submission with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. This statement must be signed under oath by all members comprising the Joint Venture.

2. The U.S. Government reserves the right to review the actual JV Agreement to determine its basis and compliance with the applicable laws. Any internal agreements affecting the internal composition of the existing JV and its potential liabilities in relation to the contract (performance guarantee, insurance, etc.)

will be sent to the Contracting Officer to provide notice of the same. Any change in the composition of the JV will require the JV to formally request a Novation Agreement in accordance with FAR 42.12, which will be approved/disapproved at the discretion of the Contracting Officer.

PRICE SUBMITTAL: Offeror shall submit one (1) marked “Original,” one (1) copy, each in a separate three-ring binder with the following:

_ SF-1442, signed _ Amendments (SF30s) Acknowledged _ Completed Price Proposal Form (Attachment D) _ Offer Guarantee _ Copy of Representation and Certifications from ORCA _ Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact and their phone and email address.

_ Required Contractor Responsibility documentation (as indicated below).

Contractor Responsibility: In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 9.1, the Contracting Officer shall award contracts only to responsible vendors. No purchase or award shall be made unless the Contracting Officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must have adequate financial resources to perform the contract, or the ability to obtain them. The Contracting Officer shall require acceptable evidence of the prospective contractor’s current sound financial status, as well as the ability to obtain required resources if the need arises. In regard to resources, the contractor must be prepared to present acceptable evidence of subcontracts, commitments or explicit arrangements that will be in existence at the time of contract award, to rent, purchase or otherwise acquire the needed facilities, equipment, services, materials, other resources or personnel. Consideration of a prime contractor’s compliance with limitations on subcontracting shall be taken into account for the time period covered by the contract base period or quantities, plus option periods or quantities, if such options are considered when evaluating offers for award. Pursuant to FAR 9.104-4, the Contracting Officer reserves the right to request adequate evidence of responsibility on the part of any prospective subcontractor(s). In the absence of information clearly indicating that the prospective contractor is responsible, the Contracting Officer shall make a determination of non-responsibility. As a minimum requirement, all offerors are requested to submit, as part of the Price proposal, the following:

1) Latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contractor, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or at least by an authorized officer of the organization (include Balance Sheet and Income Statement).

2) Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract. For Joint Venture arrangements, discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies.

3) Point of contact from a bank or any financial institution with which they transact business.

The Contracting Officer reserves the right to request additional information if needed.

HAND DELIVERIES OF PROPOSALS

All visitors to the Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Fort Story (JEBLCFS) who do not have a CAC badge or RAPIDGATE badge must have a background check run by the Naval Station Pass & ID office (Security Department at Commander, Naval Region Mid-Atlantic). Special Note: RAPIDGATE badges must be programmed for access to

JEBLCFS.

Visitors who do not have a CAC or RAPIDGATE badge must complete the attached Visitor Access Pass

Request form (Attachment E). Visitors must complete and forward the form directly to the following personnel in the NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic Security Department via email:

roicclcreek@navy.mil

Visitors must complete and provide the attached form to the NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic Security Department at least 5 working days prior to their scheduled visit date to allow ample time to process and complete the background check.

Commercial couriers such as FEDEX, DHL or UPS follow the same visitor procedures listed above and they are required to have a background check if they do not have a CAC badge or RAPIDGATE badge. Commercial couriers must also have their vehicle inspected at location listed in the attached JEBLCFS commercial vehicle inspection procedures prior to accessing the JEBLCFS.

Offerors should check with their intended courier to ensure they have the proper identification credentials to access the JEBLCFS.

Temporary visitor passes must be picked up by the approved visitor from the JEBLCFS Pass and ID Office located at the following address prior to visiting JEBLCFS:

Address: JEBLCFS Pass and ID Office 1000 Helicopter Rd Virginia Beach, VA 23459 Hours of Operation: 0600-1700 on Monday through Friday

**PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED AT THE GATE**ALL DELIVERIES MUST BE

SUBMITTED TO THE FEAD LITTLE CREEK BUILDING 3165**

D. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

Factor 1 – Experience

Factor 2 – Safety

Factor 3 – Past Performance

The distinction between experience and past performance is construction experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Price:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The Offeror(s) shall submit a best and final price for the Base award and six (6) options associated with this procurement. The offeror(s) shall use the Price Proposal Form included in the Solicitation and in Attachment E of this Source Selection Plan.

(2) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option items (see Section B of the solicitation). The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

(b) Technical Factors:

(1) Factor 1, Experience:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The Offeror shall submit the following information:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Construction Experience:

Submit a maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects that demonstrates experience on projects similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. The Offeror must submit a minimum of one relevant renovation project AND one relevant new construction project as defined below. To meet the minimum number of relevant construction projects, the offeror has the option to provide a single project that includes both the relevant new construction and renovation requirements; or provide one project that meets the renovation requirement and one project that meets the new construction requirement. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defines as:

Renovation Project:

Size: A minimum of 2,000 square feet

Construction Cost: A minimum of $225,000

Scope/Complexity: General whole building unit (interior and exterior) simultaneous renovation of multiple (two or more) residential type housing units that includes building envelope, civil/landscape, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical renovation of the units.

New Construction:

Size: A minimum of 2,000 square feet

Construction Cost: A minimum of $250,000

Scope/Complexity: New construction of a residential or office type building unit.

Projects submitted shall have been completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

A project is defined as a complete construction effort performed under a single task order or contract/subcontract.

For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole should not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors should submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment F) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.: unique features, area, construction methods).

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the individual Joint Venture members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture members may be rated lower. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate the relationship and role each affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will perform under this contract. In order for the past performance information of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies to be considered. The proposal shall state specific commitments of technical resources (e.g. personnel, equipment) that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies commit to the performance of this contract. In particular, the proposal will clearly state the specific commitments of resources of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member that will be located at the worksites and company offices in the city/area of the project. The proposal shall also describe specific roles of the affiliate/subsidiary/ parent/LLC/LTD member companies in terms of the work it will either self-perform or manage on behalf of the Offeror in performance of the contract. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) will not be considered.

Experience of proposed subcontractors will not be considered for construction experience.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience will not be considered. Offerors not submitting a minimum of two (2) relevant projects (one for renovation and one for new construction or one relevant project that includes both renovation and new construction) will be rated unacceptable.

(2) Factor 2, Safety:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(For a partnership or joint venture, the following submittal requirements are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. EMR and DART Rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.)

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): For the three previous complete calendar years [2013,2014,2015] submit your EMR (which compares your company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums over a three year period). If you have no EMR, affirmatively state so, and explain why.

Any extenuating circumstances that affected the EMR and upward or downward trends should be addressed as part of this element. Lower EMRs will be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate: For the three previous complete calendar years [2013, 2014, 2015], submit your OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. If you cannot submit an OSHA DART Rate, affirmatively state so, and explain why.

Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART Rate data and upward or downward trends should be addressed as part of this element. Lower OSHA DART Rates will be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(3) Technical Approach for Safety: Describe the plan that the Offeror will implement to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors, as a part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. Also, describe any innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at all subcontractor levels. The Safety Narrative shall be limited to two pages.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s overall safety record, the Offeror’s plan to select and monitor subcontractors, any and innovative safety methods that the Offeror plans to implement for this procurement. The Government’s sources of information for evaluating safety may include, but are not limited to, OSHA, NAVFAC’s Facility Accident and Incident Reporting (FAIR) database, and other related databases. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror.

The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

- Experience Modification Rate (EMR)

- OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate

- Offeror Technical Approach to Safety

- Other sources of information available to the Government

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): The Government is seeking to determine whether the Offeror has an acceptable safety record. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s overall safety record as evidenced by the TRC and DART rates, if the Offeror’s plan includes safety in the evaluation and selection of subcontractors, and if the narrative includes a plan to monitor the safety performance of subcontractors during performance. The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

- OSHA Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rate

- OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate

- Offeror Technical Approach to Safety

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate: The Government will evaluate the OSHA DART Rate to determine if the Offeror’s OSHA DART rate is above 3.0 and extenuating circumstances that impact the rates. OSHA DART rates above 3.0, in any of the previous five years, will be considered UNACCEPTABLE, unless an adequate explanation is provided to address the extenuating circumstances that affected the rate.

(3) Technical Approach to Safety:

The Government will evaluate the narrative to determine if subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the qualification, evaluation, selection, of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project, and both the plan to monitor the safety of those subcontractors during contract performance, highlighting what specific management practices will be in place for providing deliberate safety program management and mishap prevention support to those sub-contractors whose EMR is greater than 1.0, whose TRC is greater than 4.0 and whose DART rate is greater than 3.0. Offerors must state that they will evaluate the safety performance of subcontractors in the selection process of all levels of subcontractors and monitor the safety of those subcontractors during contract performance or the proposal will be rated UNACCEPTABLE.

(c) Past Performance

(1) Factor 3, Past Performance:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1 Construction Experience. AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS

AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment G), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact Amy Keiler at amy.keiler@navy.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 1 – Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues.

Explanations shall not exceed two (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages) in total.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor. In addition to the above, the Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of Contractors who are part of a partnership or joint venture identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

A copy of the blank Past Performance Questionnaire to be used for requesting client references is included as Attachment G.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: This evaluation focuses on how well the Offeror performed on the relevant projects submitted under Factor 1 –Experience and past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources

The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination.

In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

SECTION 00700 - CONTRACT CLAUSES

The following have been modified:

52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995)

(a) The clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigations and Conditions Affecting the Work, will be included in any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation. Accordingly, offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed.

(b) Site visits may be arranged during normal duty hours by contacting:

Name: Nikki Kirtsey Address: 1450 Gator Blvd, Virginia Beach, VA 23459 Telephone: 757-462-5354

(End of provision)

(End of Summary of Changes)