Amendment_03.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

This amendment to the Request for Proposal (RFP) N40085-17-R-4601 Skeeter Lane Conversion and Welcome Center Construction is hereby issued to extend the proposal due date, incorporate the current Wage Decision, and reflect changes to the Price Proposal Form, Draw ings and Specifications for Housing Conversion and Welcome Center.

The proposal due date is hereby extended FROM February 14th 2017 TO February 22nd 2017, 1400 local time.

NAVFAC Draw ings 12708175 and 12708176 are hereby incorporated as part of this Solicitation. See attachement M Wage Decision VA170140 dated 1/6/2017 is hereby incorporated.

See SF 30 Continuation Page.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 20

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 13-Feb-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N40085-17-R-4601

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

20-Dec-2016

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

13-Feb-2017

CODE

NAVFAC MID ATLANTIC

PWD LITTLE CREEK

FACILITIES ENGINEERING & ACQ DIV

1450 GATOR BLVD SUITE 150

VIRGINIA BEACH VA 23459-8616

N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N40085-17-R-4601

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT CONTINUATION

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

DELETE ATTACHMENT, Attachment Price Proposal Form (30 November 2016) and INSERT the Revised Price Proposal Form (07 February 2017).

PRICE PROPOSAL FORM

07 FEBRUARY 2017

The proposed price shall be the lump sum price for the following items:

CLIN 0001 – Conversion and Renovation of Military Family Housing (P-1602):

Price for the entire work for the Conversion and Renovation of Military Family Housing project complete, in accordance with the requirements of the RFP, including drawings and specifications, but excluding work described in CLINs 0001A, 0002, 0003, 0004, 0005, 0006, and 0007.

TOTAL PRICE FOR CLIN 0001 $ ______________

CLIN 0001A – Unsuitable Subgrade Soil Removal and Replacement (P-1602):

Price for the entire work for the Conversion and Renovation of Military Family Housing project, furnish all labor, material, equipment and supervision in connection with the removal, disposal and replacement of 50 cubic yards of Unsuitable Subgrade Soil from the site. Reference Contract Line CLIN Notes, Note 7.

TOTAL PRICE FOR CLIN 0001A: $ ______________

TOTAL PRICE FOR CLINS 001 – 0001A – (BASE PRICE): $ ______________

CLIN 0002 – OPTION 1 – Cementitious Siding (P-1602): Price for upgrading the Conversion and Renovation of Military Family Housing project siding, soffit, fascia, and associated trim components from vinyl to cementitious, complete in accordance with the requirements of the RFP, including drawings and specifications.

TOTAL PRICE FOR CLIN 0002: $ ______________

CLIN 0003 – OPTION 2 – Stranded Bamboo Wood Flooring (P-1602): Price for upgrading all resilient flooring, designated as RF1, in the Conversion and Renovation of Military Family Housing project drawings, from luxury vinyl tile to stranded bamboo wood, complete in accordance with the requirements of the RFP, including drawings and specifications.

TOTAL PRICE FOR CLIN 0003: $ ______________

CLIN 0004 – OPTION 3 – Quartz Kitchen Countertop (P-1602): Price for upgrading all kitchen countertops, designated as SS1, in the Conversion and Renovation of Military Family

Housing project drawings, from solid surface – acrylic to solid surface – quartz, complete in accordance with the requirements of the RFP, including drawings and specifications.

TOTAL PRICE FOR CLIN 0004: $ _______________

CLIN 0005 – OPTION 4 – Solid Surface Grade D Bath Vanity Top (P-1602): Price for upgrading all bath vanity tops, designated as SS2, in the Conversion and Renovation of Military Family Housing project drawings, from solid surface – Grade B to solid surface – Grade D, complete in accordance with the requirements of the RFP, including drawings and specifications.

TOTAL PRICE FOR CLIN 0005: $ ________________

CLIN 0006 – OPTION 5 – Housing Welcome Center (H-238): Price for the entire work for construction of the Housing Welcome Center complete, in accordance with the requirements of the RFP including drawings and specifications. Price includes all supporting elements such as conduit, junction boxes, pull wire, CAT-V cable, and wall jacks to support the installation of Audio/Visual (A/V) equipment, but excluding work described in CLINS 0006A and 0007.

TOTAL PRICE FOR CLIN 0006: $_________________

CLIN 0006A – OPTION 5A - Unsuitable Subgrade Soil Removal and Replacement (H-238):

Price for the entire work for the Housing Welcome Center project, furnish all labor, material, equipment and supervision in connection with the removal, disposal and replacement of 50 cubic yards of Unsuitable Subgrade Soil from the site. Reference Contract Line CLIN Notes, Note 7.

TOTAL PRICE FOR CLIN 0006A: $ _________________

CLIN 0007 – OPTION 6 – Cementitious Siding (H-238): Price for upgrading the entire Welcome Center siding, soffit, fascia, and associated trim components from vinyl to cementitious, complete in accordance with the requirements of the RFP, including drawings and specifications.

TOTAL PRICE FOR CLIN 0007: $ _________________

TOTAL PRICE FOR ALL CLINS 0002-0007 – (OPTIONS): $ _________________

TOTAL PRICE FOR ALL CLINS 0001-0007 (BASE PRICE + OPTIONS): $ ________________

CONTRACT LINE CLIN NOTES

General

1. Offerors shall enter unit prices and/or extended totals in spaces provided. If there is a mathematical discrepancy between the unit price and the total, the unit price will be held to be the intended price and the total recomputed accordingly. If an Offeror provides the total amount but fails to enter the unit price, the total divided by the specified quantity will be held to be the Offerors intended price.

2. FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (Jul 1990) – Except when it is determined in accordance with FAR

17.206 (b) not to be in the Government's best interest, the Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. Evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

For purposes of award, the Government will evaluate offers based on the Grand Total Price (the sum of CLINs 0001-0007).

3. In accordance with FAR 52.215-1, the Government may determine that a proposal is unacceptable if the prices proposed are materially unbalanced between line items or subline items. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items is sufficiently overstated or understated as indicated by the application of cost or price analysis techniques. A proposal may be rejected if the Contracting Officer determines that a lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

4. The Government reserves the unilateral right to award CLINs 0002, 0003, 0004, and 0005 to the contractor at the proposed price within 30 calendar days after contract award. The Government reserves the unilateral right to award CLINs 0006, 0006A, and 0007 to the contractor at the proposed price within 210 calendar days after contract award. A firm fixed proposed price is required for CLINs 0001–0007. No provision is made for economic price adjustment. If options are exercised, the contract completion date remains 504 calendar days after award of the contract for Conversion and Renovation of Military Family Housing (P-1602) and 210 calendar days after award of the contract for Construct Housing Welcome Center (H-238).

5. If CLINs 0002, 0003, 0004, 0005, 0006, 0006A, and 0007 are exercised, additional bonding and consent of surety will be required. Consequently, the Performance Bond shall reflect 100 percent of the aggregate amount of all CLINs.

6. Failure to enter a price for any of the CLINs will result in the proposal being rejected as unacceptable.

7. For CLIN 0001A and CLIN 0006A, Unit price for all work in connection with the removal, disposal and replacement of geotechnically unsuitable, non-hazardous, subgrade soil (i.e. soft subgrade soils, debris) with clean imported select granular backfill. Unsuitable subgrade soil determinations shall be made by the Contracting Officer. The price shall include the removal of geotechnically unsuitable soils and debris encountered within planned excavations (i.e. footings, utilities) or identified during proof rolling of planned subgrades, disposal at a permitted licensed disposal facility within a 50 mile radius of the project site and backfilling the excavation with compacted clean imported select granular backfill. Unit price shall include all chemical characterization testing required by the receiving facility, transportation and proper disposal at the permitted facility. Clean imported select granular backfill shall conform to project specification requirements for Select Material (Section 31 23 00.00, Paragraph 2.1.4). Soil disturbed by the Contractor’s construction activities, or that are excessively wet and soft due to lack of proper site drainage or excavation dewatering will not be considered unsuitable. Unit price shall include handling and transportation. The volume of material removed and imported backfill required shall be determined based on field measurements (length x width x depth) of the completed excavation to remove the unsuitable soil / debris as approved by the Contracting Officer.

AMENDMENTS ACKNOWLEDGED:

Amendment No. Date Amendment No. Date Amendment No. Date

Offeror:

Signature: _______________________ Date: ________

DOCUMENT 00 01 15 LIST OF DRAWINGS (W.O. 1366573 Conversion and Renovation of Military Family Housing)

1.2 CONTRACT DRAWINGS

NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12708306

General Sheet Notes

“New Work Note” 3, revise to read 4” exposed Cedar Embossed Vinyl Siding (Base Bid).

“New Work Note” 12, revise to read 4” exposed Cedar Embossed Vinyl Siding (Bid Option).

NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12708353 Remove Duct Construction and Leak Test Schedule.

SPEC SECTION 08 71 00 Door Hardware

Add the following;

3.5.1 Exterior Doors

HW-1 (Door 2 – Unit A, B, C and D)

3 Each Hinges A5111 x 630 x NRP

1 Lockset F96 x 630 1 Door Stop L02031 1 Set Weather Stripping As specified 1 Threshold J35100

1 Peephole

3.5.2 Interior Doors

HW-2 (Linen Closet Doors – Units A, B, C and D)

3 Each Hinges A8112 x 600

1 Latch set F75 x 626

HW-3 (Coat Closet Doors – Units A, B, C and D)

3 Each Hinges A8112 x 600

HW-4 (Door 10 – Unit A)

HW-5 (Family Room Doors – Units A and D)

1 Latch set F75 x 626

HW-6 (Storage Door – Unit B)

HW-7 (Door 7 – Units B, C, and D)

6 Each Hinges A8112 x 600

1 Lever Extension Flush Bolt L04081 1 Dummy 2 Door Stops (Floor) L02223

HW-8 (Bath and Bedroom Doors Units A, B, C, and D)

1 Privacy F76 x 626

HW-9 (Hall to Utility Room Doors – Units A, B, C and D)

HW-10 (Door 3 - Units A, B, C and D)

1 Set Weather Stripping As specified

NOTE: Provide wall mounted stops for doors that swing against walls and are not identified otherwise.

NOTE: Screen doors at Units A, B, C and D shall be provided with the following:

3 Each Hinges 1 Closer 1 Latch set

DOCUMENT 00 01 15 LIST OF DRAWINGS (W.O. 1366574 Housing Welcome Center)

1.2 CONTRACT DRAWINGS

NAVFAC Dwg. Nos. 12708175, 12708176 are added by this amendment. See Attachment.

NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12708209

General Sheet Notes

“New Work Note” 13, revise to read 6” exposed Cedar Embossed Vinyl Siding (Base Bid).

“New Work Note” 3, revise to read 6” exposed Cedar Embossed Vinyl Siding (Bid Option).

NAVFAC Dwg. No. 12708234 Remove Duct Construction and Leak Test Schedule.

SPEC SECTION 08 71 00 Door Hardware

Add the following;

3.5.1 Exterior Doors

HW-1 (Door 1)

4 Each Hinges (Vandal Proof) A5111 x 630 x NRP Confirm Door Thickness

1 Lockset F96 x 630 1 Closer

1 Door Stop L02031

1 Threshold J35100

HW-2 (Door 2)

3 Each Hinges A5111 x 630 x NRP

1 Lock set (No exterior entry) F96 x 630 1 Closer

HW-3 (Doors 3, 4)

3 Each Hinges A5111 x 630 x NRP

1 Lockset F96 x 630

HW-4 (Doors 5)

6 Each Hinges A5111 x 630 x NRP

1 Lockset F96 x 630

2 Door Stops L02031 1 Astragal (Surface Applied) 1 Set Weather Stripping As specified 1 Threshold J35100 2 Door Stops L02223

3.5.2 Interior Doors

HW-5 (Doors 7 and 8)

HW-6 (Doors 9 and 10)

HW-7 (Doors 6)

1 latch set F75 x 626

1 Door Stop (Floor) L02223

HW-8 (Door 11)

3 Each Hinges A8112 x 600 1 Lockset F75 x 626 1 Door Stop (Wall) L02223

NOTE: Provide hardware for coastal environment, 619 satin nickel, and transitional lever style. Simple, clean design for all elements.

SECTION 00010 - SOLICITATION CONTRACT FORM

The required performance has changed from SKEETER LANE HOUSING CENTER CONVERSION

AND RENOVATION AND CONSTRUCT NEW WELCOME CENTER SURFACE COMBAT SYSTEMS

CENTER, WALLOPS ISLANDNAICS: 236118MAGNITUDE: $1M-$5MProposals are due 14 Febuary, 2017 at 2:00 pm EDT to NAVFAC Midlant, Public Works Department Little Creek, 1450 Gator Blvd, Suite 150 Bldg 3165, Virginia Beach VA 23459-8616.The solicitation is being solicited as a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Design-Bid-Build (D-B-B) contract. to SKEETER LANE HOUSING CENTER CONVERSION AND RENOVATION AND

CONSTRUCT NEW WELCOME CENTER SURFACE COMBAT SYSTEMS CENTER, WALLOPS

ISLANDNAICS: 236118MAGNITUDE: $1M-$5MProposals are due 22 Febuary, 2017 at 2:00 pm EDT to NAVFAC Midlant, Public Works Department Little Creek, 1450 Gator Blvd, Suite 150 Bldg 3165, Virginia Beach VA 23459-8616.The solicitation is being solicited as a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Design-Bid-Build (D-B-B) contract..

SECTION 00100 - BIDDING SCHEDULE/INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

List of Attachments:

(A) Pre proposal Inquiry

(B) Directions to Wallops Island

(C) Site Visit Log

(D) Price Proposal Form

(E) Visit Access Request

(F) Construction Experience Data Sheet

(G) Past Performance Questionnaire

(H) Specifications (Housing Conversion) for Work Order 1366573

(I) NAVFAC Drawings 12708253- 12708373 (Housing Conversion)

(J) Specifications (Welcome Center) for Work Order 1366574

(K) NAVFAC Drawings 12708173- 12708242 (Welcome Center)

(L) Wage Determinations #VA170140 dated1/6/17

(M) NAVFAC Drawings 12708175 and 12708176 (H238-1366574 Life Safety)

A. GENERAL INFORMATION

OVERVIEW OF THIS SOURCE SELECTION

This solicitation is being conducted as a negotiated procurement utilizing procedures in accordance with FAR Part 15.101-2. The best value continuum source selection process used in this acquisition is the lowest price technically acceptable. Award will be made to that responsible offeror whose proposal, conforming to the solicitation, is determined to be lowest price and meeting the acceptability standards for non-price factors (technical and past performance) as stated herein.

The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration any or all offerors at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to be the best value.

The number of proposals to be evaluated for technical acceptability may be limited to the five lowest priced offers at the discretion of the contracting officer. If the number of proposals to be evaluated is limited, technical proposals shall be provided to the evaluator(s) without any identification of prices or any rank order of prices. If no proposals are found to be technically acceptable within the first group of proposals, then the process described will be conducted again as many times as necessary, until such time as the Government identifies a technically acceptable proposal.

This procurement will be awarded as Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Contract. The Government reserves the right to enter into negotiations or limit the competitive range. The magnitude of construction range is between $1,000,000 and

$5,000,000 (CLINS 0001-0007).

INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS: Proposals must set forth full, accurate and complete information as required by this Request for Proposal (including attachments). The penalty for making false statements in proposals is prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 1001. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award without discussions. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if it is later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary. Therefore, each initial offer should contain the best terms from a technical and price standpoint.

The contract completion date is 504 calendar days from the notice to proceed.

This acquisition is solicited as a 100% total small business set aside.

Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPI): Offerors who determine that the technical and or contractual requirements of this RFP require clarification(s) in order to permit submittal of a responsive proposal shall submit all questions in writing.

Additionally, all inquiries shall be submitted using the Pre-Proposal Inquiry (PPI) form attached to this solicitation as Attachment A and are due by 1200 EST Thursday, 26 January, 2017. All inquiries shall be submitted via email to tiffany.kirtsey@navy.mil. The Government does not intend to respond to inquiries submitted less than 7 days before the proposal receipt date. Responses will be published as an amendment to the solicitation.

B. ELIGIBILITY FOR AWARD

SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT

To be eligible for award, your firm(s) must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database and in the Online Representation and Certifications Application (ORCA) as required by Clause 52.204-7, System for Award Management (Jul 2013) http://www.sam.gov.

Note that the System for Award Management (SAM) is required for all offerors, including Joint Ventures (JV) (registration must state the NAME of the JV). Offerors not registered in SAM shall obtain a DUN & Bradstreet (DUNS) number and a CAGE prior to registering in SAM.

All offerors, including JV offerors, must submit with their proposal a DUNS number. In addition to the DUNS number required for JV offerors, JV offerors must submit with their proposal a DUNS number for each member comprising the JV. DUNS numbers can be obtained at http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform. The DUNS number is required in order to register in SAM (see above.)

CAGE – A CAGE code is required for all offerors, including JV offerors. JV offerors must acquire a CAGE Code registered in the JV name.

C. INQUIRIES, PROPOSAL FORMAT AND DUE DATE

SITE VISIT INFORMATION

The site visit will be held on the 18th of January, 2017 at 10:00 am at the Skeeter Lane Housing area. Each prime contractor is limited to four participants (inclusive of subcontractor representatives). Attached are directions to the Skeeter Lane Housing area (Attachment B) and the Site Visit Log (Attachment C). Each prime contractor must fill out the Site Visit Log, including subcontractor participant information, and submit via email to tiffany.kirtsey@navy.mil or amy.keiler@navy.mil no later than 2:00 pm 12 January, 2017.

DELIVERY INFORMATION

Proposals shall be delivered to:

Attn: Nikki Kirtsey NAVFAC Mid Atlantic Public Works Department Little Creek 1450 Gator Blvd, Suite 150, Bldg 3165 Virginia Beach, VA 23459-8616

ALL SUBMITTALS SHALL BE RECEIVED PRIOR TO 2:00 PM (EDT), WEDNESDAY, 22 FEBRAURY

2017. LATE SUBMITTALS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED.

LATE SUBMITTALS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED. Proposal must be clearly marked on the outside of the package with the solicitation number. ELECTRONIC AND FACSMILE SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS

WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

NON-PRICE FACTORS SUBMITTAL: Offeror shall submit one (1) marked “Original,” two (2) copies with the following characteristics:

_ 8 ½ x 11 format _ 12 point font _ Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact and their phone and email address.

_ The non-price proposal should only include information in response to Factors 1, 2, and 3, and JV agreement (if applicable). Specific page limitations and Solicitation Submittal Requirements are specified in each Factor.

**PAGES THAT EXCEED THE PAGE LIMITATIONS WILL NOT BE EVALUATED.

Special Joint Venture (JV) Requirements:

JV offerors shall provide with their proposal a notarized legal document that establishes the JV. The JV Agreement shall be in effect at the time of submission of the proposal and remain irrevocable until one (1) year after the work has been finally inspected and accepted by the Government. The notarized legal document that establishes the JV shall be furnished with the price proposal in its original language version along with a certified English translation of the notarized JV, if the original version was not in English. The Joint Venture must be formed and valid at the time of submission of the proposal. The validated notarized legal document must include language that each member of the JV will be jointly and severably liable for the performance of the whole contract and will be incorporated into the contract award if award is made to the JV.

1. The Joint Venture Agreement shall include, at a minimum, the following:

(a) Name of firms that form the JV and the name of the JV.

(b) Name and title of the corporate officials signing on behalf of each party.

(c) Solicitation number.

(d) Description of the responsibilities in terms of work category for each member (for example:

Firm A performing 100% of )

(e) The statement "The composition and structure of the JV will remain unchanged from award to one (1) year after the work has been finally inspected and accepted by the Government.”

(f) Date of issuance of the agreement and notarized signature of the corporate officials signing in behalf of each party.

(g) Statement under oath stating that the Joint Venture (JV) is in compliance at the time of proposal submission with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. This statement must be signed under oath by all members comprising the Joint Venture.

2. The U.S. Government reserves the right to review the actual JV Agreement to determine its basis and compliance with the applicable laws. Any internal agreements affecting the internal composition of the existing JV and its potential liabilities in relation to the contract (performance guarantee, insurance, etc.)

will be sent to the Contracting Officer to provide notice of the same. Any change in the composition of the JV will require the JV to formally request a Novation Agreement in accordance with FAR 42.12, which will be approved/disapproved at the discretion of the Contracting Officer.

PRICE SUBMITTAL: Offeror shall submit one (1) marked “Original,” one (1) copy, each in a separate three-ring binder with the following:

_ SF-1442, signed _ Amendments (SF30s) Acknowledged _ Completed Price Proposal Form (Attachment D) _ Offer Guarantee _ Copy of Representation and Certifications from ORCA _ Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact and their phone and email address.

_ Required Contractor Responsibility documentation (as indicated below).

Contractor Responsibility: In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 9.1, the Contracting Officer shall award contracts only to responsible vendors. No purchase or award shall be made unless the Contracting Officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must have adequate financial resources to perform the contract, or the ability to obtain them. The Contracting Officer shall require acceptable evidence of the prospective contractor’s current sound financial status, as well as the ability to obtain required resources if the need arises. In regard to resources, the contractor must be prepared to present acceptable evidence of subcontracts, commitments or explicit arrangements that will be in existence at the time of contract award, to rent, purchase or otherwise acquire the needed facilities, equipment, services, materials, other resources or personnel. Consideration of a prime contractor’s compliance with limitations on subcontracting shall be taken into account for the time period covered by the contract base period or quantities, plus option periods or quantities, if such options are considered when evaluating offers for award. Pursuant to FAR 9.104-4, the Contracting Officer reserves the right to request adequate evidence of responsibility on the part of any prospective subcontractor(s). In the absence of information clearly indicating that the prospective contractor is responsible, the

Contracting Officer shall make a determination of non-responsibility. As a minimum requirement, all offerors are requested to submit, as part of the Price proposal, the following:

1) Latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contractor, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or at least by an authorized officer of the organization (include Balance Sheet and Income Statement).

2) Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract. For Joint Venture arrangements, discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies.

3) Point of contact from a bank or any financial institution with which they transact business.

The Contracting Officer reserves the right to request additional information if needed.

HAND DELIVERIES OF PROPOSALS

All visitors to the Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Fort Story (JEBLCFS) who do not have a CAC badge or RAPIDGATE badge must have a background check run by the Naval Station Pass & ID office (Security Department at Commander, Naval Region Mid-Atlantic). Special Note: RAPIDGATE badges must be programmed for access to

JEBLCFS.

Visitors who do not have a CAC or RAPIDGATE badge must complete the attached Visitor Access Pass Request form (Attachment E). Visitors must complete and forward the form directly to the following personnel in the NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic Security Department via email:

roicclcreek@navy.mil

Visitors must complete and provide the attached form to the NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic Security Department at least 5 working days prior to their scheduled visit date to allow ample time to process and complete the background check.

Commercial couriers such as FEDEX, DHL or UPS follow the same visitor procedures listed above and they are required to have a background check if they do not have a CAC badge or RAPIDGATE badge. Commercial couriers must also have their vehicle inspected at location listed in the attached JEBLCFS commercial vehicle inspection procedures prior to accessing the JEBLCFS.

Offerors should check with their intended courier to ensure they have the proper identification credentials to access the JEBLCFS.

Temporary visitor passes must be picked up by the approved visitor from the JEBLCFS Pass and ID Office located at the following address prior to visiting JEBLCFS:

Address: JEBLCFS Pass and ID Office 1000 Helicopter Rd Virginia Beach, VA 23459 Hours of Operation: 0600-1700 on Monday through Friday

**PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED AT THE GATE**ALL DELIVERIES MUST BE

SUBMITTED TO THE FEAD LITTLE CREEK BUILDING 3165**

D. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

Factor 1 – Experience

Factor 2 – Safety

Factor 3 – Past Performance

The distinction between experience and past performance is construction experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Price:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The Offeror(s) shall submit a best and final price for the Base award and six (6) options associated with this procurement. The offeror(s) shall use the Price Proposal Form included in the Solicitation and in Attachment E of this Source Selection Plan.

(2) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option items (see Section B of the solicitation). The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

(b) Technical Factors:

(1) Factor 1, Experience:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The Offeror shall submit the following information:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Construction Experience:

Submit a maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects that demonstrates experience on projects similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. The Offeror must submit a minimum of one relevant renovation project AND one relevant new construction project as defined below. To meet the minimum number of relevant construction projects, the offeror has the option to provide a single project that includes both the relevant new construction and renovation requirements; or provide one project that meets the renovation requirement and one project that meets the new construction requirement. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defines as:

Renovation Project:

Size: A minimum of 2,000 square feet

Construction Cost: A minimum of $225,000

Scope/Complexity: General whole building unit (interior and exterior) simultaneous renovation of multiple (two or more) residential type housing units that includes building envelope, civil/landscape, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical renovation of the units.

New Construction:

Size: A minimum of 2,000 square feet

Construction Cost: A minimum of $250,000

Scope/Complexity: New construction of a residential or office type building unit.

Projects submitted shall have been completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

A project is defined as a complete construction effort performed under a single task order or contract/subcontract.

For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole should not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors should submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment F) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.: unique features, area, construction methods).

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the individual Joint Venture members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture members may be rated lower. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate the relationship and role each affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will perform under this contract. In order for the past performance information of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies to be considered. The proposal shall state specific commitments of technical resources (e.g. personnel, equipment) that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies commit to the performance of this contract. In particular, the proposal will clearly state the specific commitments of resources of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member that will be located at the worksites and company offices in the city/area of the project. The proposal shall also describe specific roles of the affiliate/subsidiary/ parent/LLC/LTD member companies in terms of the work it will either self-perform or manage on behalf of the Offeror in performance of the contract. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) will not be considered.

Experience of proposed subcontractors will not be considered for construction experience.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience will not be considered. Offerors not submitting a minimum of two (2) relevant projects (one for renovation and one for new construction or one relevant project that includes both renovation and new construction) will be rated unacceptable.

(2) Factor 2, Safety:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(For a partnership or joint venture, the following submittal requirements are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. EMR and DART Rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.)

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): For the three previous complete calendar years [2013,2014,2015] submit your EMR (which compares your company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums over a three year period). If you have no EMR, affirmatively state so, and explain why.

Any extenuating circumstances that affected the EMR and upward or downward trends should be addressed as part of this element. Lower EMRs will be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate: For the three previous complete calendar years [2013, 2014, 2015], submit your OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. If you cannot submit an OSHA DART Rate, affirmatively state so, and explain why.

Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART Rate data and upward or downward trends should be addressed as part of this element. Lower OSHA DART Rates will be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(3) Technical Approach for Safety: Describe the plan that the Offeror will implement to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors, as a part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. Also, describe any innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at all subcontractor levels. The Safety Narrative shall be limited to two pages.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s overall safety record, the Offeror’s plan to select and monitor subcontractors, any and innovative safety methods that the Offeror plans to implement for this procurement. The Government’s sources of information for evaluating safety may include, but are not limited to, OSHA, NAVFAC’s Facility Accident and Incident Reporting (FAIR) database, and other related databases. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror.

The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

- Experience Modification Rate (EMR)

- OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate

- Offeror Technical Approach to Safety

- Other sources of information available to the Government

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): The Government is seeking to determine whether the Offeror has an acceptable safety record. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s overall safety record as evidenced by the TRC and DART rates, if the Offeror’s plan includes safety in the evaluation and selection of subcontractors, and if the narrative includes a plan to monitor the safety performance of subcontractors during performance. The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

- OSHA Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rate

- OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate

- Offeror Technical Approach to Safety

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate: The Government will evaluate the OSHA DART Rate to determine if the Offeror’s OSHA DART rate is above 3.0 and extenuating circumstances that impact the rates. OSHA DART rates above 3.0, in any of the previous five years, will be considered UNACCEPTABLE, unless an adequate explanation is provided to address the extenuating circumstances that affected the rate.

(3) Technical Approach to Safety:

The Government will evaluate the narrative to determine if subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the qualification, evaluation, selection, of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project, and both the plan to monitor the safety of those subcontractors during contract performance, highlighting what specific management practices will be in place for providing deliberate safety program management and mishap prevention support to those sub-contractors whose EMR is greater than 1.0, whose TRC is greater than 4.0 and whose DART rate is greater than 3.0. Offerors must state that they will evaluate the safety performance of subcontractors in the selection process of all levels of subcontractors and monitor the safety of those subcontractors during contract performance or the proposal will be rated UNACCEPTABLE.

(c) Past Performance

(1) Factor 3, Past Performance:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1 Construction Experience. AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS

AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment G), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact Amy Keiler at amy.keiler@navy.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 1 – Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues.

Explanations shall not exceed two (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages) in total.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor. In addition to the above, the Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of Contractors who are part of a partnership or joint venture identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

A copy of the blank Past Performance Questionnaire to be used for requesting client references is included as Attachment G.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: This evaluation focuses on how well the Offeror performed on the relevant projects submitted under Factor 1 –Experience and past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources

The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination.

In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

SECTION 00800 - SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

The following have been modified:

WAGE DETERMINATION

General Decision Number: VA170140 01/06/2017 VA140 Superseded General Decision Number: VA20160140 State: Virginia Construction Type: Residential

Counties: Accomack, Essex, King And Queen, King George, Lancaster, Middlesex, Northampton, Northumberland, Richmond and Westmoreland Counties in Virginia.

RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (consisting of single family homes and apartments up to and including 4 stories).

Note: Under Executive Order (EO) 13658, an hourly minimum wage of $10.20 for calendar year 2017 applies to all contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act for which the contract is awarded (and any solicitation was issued) on or after January 1, 2015.

If this contract is covered by the EO, the contractor must pay all workers in any classification listed on this wage determination at least $10.20 per hour (or the applicable wage rate listed on this wage determination, if it is higher) for all hours spent performing on the contract in calendar year 2017. The EO minimum wage rate will be adjusted annually.

Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the EO is available at www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts.

Modification Number Publication Date 0 01/06/2017

SUVA2012-002 08/08/2014

Rates Fringes

CARPENTER........................$ 17.00 0.00

ELECTRICIAN......................$ 15.75 0.00

LABORER: Common or General......$ 9.50 0.00 OPERATOR: Loader................$ 18.75 0.00 PAINTER (Brush and Roller).......$ 10.17 0.00

PLUMBER..........................$ 19.84 3.38

WELDERS - Receive rate prescribed for craft performing operation to which welding is incidental.

Note: Executive Order (EO) 13706, Establishing Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors applies to all contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act for which the contract is awarded (and any solicitation was issued) on or after January 1, 2017. If this contract is covered by the EO, the contractor must provide employees with 1 hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours they work, up to 56 hours of paid sick leave each year.

Employees must be permitted to use paid sick leave for their own illness, injury or other health-related needs, including preventive care; to assist a family member (or person who is like family to the employee) who is ill, injured, or has other health-related needs, including preventive care; or for reasons resulting from, or to assist a family member (or person who is like family to the employee) who is a victim of, domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking. Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the EO is available at www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts.

Unlisted classifications needed for work not included within the scope of the classifications listed may be added after award only as provided in the labor standards contract clauses (29CFR 5.5 (a) (1) (ii)).

The body of each wage determination lists the classification and wage rates that have been found to be prevailing for the cited type(s) of construction in the area covered by the wage determination. The classifications are listed in alphabetical order of "identifiers" that indicate whether the particular rate is a union rate (current union negotiated rate for local), a survey rate (weighted average rate) or a union average rate (weighted union average rate).

Union Rate Identifiers

A four letter classification abbreviation identifier enclosed in dotted lines beginning with characters other than "SU" or "UAVG" denotes that the union classification and rate were prevailing for that classification in the survey. Example:

PLUM0198-005 07/01/2014. PLUM is an abbreviation identifier of the union which prevailed in the survey for this classification, which in this example would be Plumbers. 0198 indicates the local union number or district council number where applicable, i.e., Plumbers Local 0198. The next number, 005 in the example, is an internal number used in processing the wage determination. 07/01/2014 is the effective date of the most current negotiated rate, which in this example is July 1, 2014.

Union prevailing wage rates are updated to reflect all rate changes in the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) governing this classification and rate.

Survey Rate Identifiers

Classifications listed under the "SU" identifier indicate that no one rate prevailed for this classification in the survey and the published rate is derived by computing a weighted average rate based on all the rates reported in…