Amendment_0002_N0060420Q4005_Combined_Synopsis_Solicitation.pdf

Silver Dolphin Bistro Mess Attendant Services

This is a COMBINED SYNOPSIS/SOLICITATION for commercial services prepared in accordance with the information in FAR Subpart 12.6, using Simplified Acquisition Procedures for commercial items found at FAR Part 13, as supplemented with the additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; a written solicitation will not be issued. PAPER COPIES OF THIS SOLICITATION WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE. This combined synopsis/solicitation SHALL be posted on both Navy Electronic Commerce Online (NECO) (https://www.neco.navy.mil/) and Contract Opportunities on beta.sam.gov (formerly Federal Business Opportunities/FBO)

The RFQ number is N0060420Q4005. This solicitation documents and incorporates provisions and clauses in effect through FAC 2020-01/11-12-2019 and DFARS Publication Notice 20191031. It is the responsibility of the contractor to be familiar with the applicable clauses and provisions. The clauses may be accessed in full text at these addresses: https://www.acquisition.gov/far/ and http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfarspgi/current/index.html. The NAICS code is 722310 and the Small Business Standard is $41.5 million.

The NAVSUP Fleet Logistics Center Pearl Harbor requests responses from qualified sources capable of providing:

Mess attendant services at the Silver Dolphin Bistro located at Joint Base Pearl Harbor Hickam, Hawaii in accordance with the attached Performance Work Statement.

Estimated periods of performance:

0001 – Mess Attendant Services, QTY 12 months, Period of Performance 13 Apr 2020 – 12 Apr 2021 1001 – (option) Mess Attendant Services, QTY 12 months, Period of Performance 13 Apr 2021 – 12 Apr 2022 2001 – (option) Mess Attendant Services, QTY 12 months, Period of Performance 13 Apr 2022 – 12 Apr 2023 3001 – (option) Mess Attendant Services, QTY 12 months, Period of Performance 13 Apr 2023 – 12 Apr 2024 4001 – (option) Mess Attendant Services, QTY 12 months, Period of Performance 13 Apr 2024 – 12 Apr 2025

Attachments:

1. Performance Work Statement

2. FAR 52.212-3 and Alternate I

3. Wage Determination 2018-0159

4. CBA 2018-2021

5. Past Performance Information Form

6. Small Business Subcontracting Plan (for large business)

Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Quoters

1.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTION.

This solicitation is to be competed exclusively by 8(a) small businesses and the State Licensing Authority (SLA) under the Randolph Sheppard Act (20 U.S.C. §107, et. seq.). Quotations by other contractors will NOT be considered. The award resulting from this solicitation will be a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract type. The contract will consist of a one-year base period with four one-year option periods to be exercised at the discretion of the Government. The Government intends to award to the responsible respondent whose quotation offers the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered, as described in this solicitation.

https://www.neco.navy.mil/ https://www.acquisition.gov/far/ http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfarspgi/current/index.html

To be eligible for award, the quoter must fully comply with this instruction and sufficiently address all solicitation requirements. As such, quotations that take exception to any term or condition of this solicitation, propose any additional term or condition, or omit any required information shall be considered ineligible for award. Alternate quotations are NOT authorized and will be rejected.

The Government intends to award this contract without discussions. Notwithstanding this intent, the Government reserves the right to request additional information from quoters as deemed necessary by the Contracting Officer.

To be considered eligible for award, each respondent must submit a single quotation that contains a complete and accurate response to the requirements of this solicitation. No multiple awards will be made.

Quotations must be submitted via email to jeffrey.geringer@navy.mil and patricia.murakami@navy.mil by 20 December, 2019, 11:00 AM Hawaii Standard Time (HST).

Quoters must comply with the detailed instructions in this solicitation for the format and content of the quotation. Quotations that do not comply shall be considered unacceptable and will render the quoter ineligible for award. Quotations submitted by mail or Fax, unless specifically authorized in advance by the Contracting Officer, will not be accepted.

Each initial quotation should contain the quoter’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. It is the quoter’s responsibility to ensure that there are no discrepancies presented within the information contained in its quotation. Quoters are hereby notified that in the event there are discrepancies within the information received by the Government, or in comparison to Government information provided in the solicitation, the Government reserves the right to apply its judgment to resolve such discrepancies during the evaluation of the quotation without further communications with the quoter.

A respondent’s quotation is presumed to represent the quoter’s best efforts to comply with the solicitation requirements. Clarity and completeness of the quotation are of the utmost importance.

The quotation must be written in a practical, clear, and concise manner. It must use quantitative terms whenever possible and must avoid qualitative adjectives to the maximum extent possible. Quotation volumes must be internally consistent or the quotation may be considered unrealistic, precluding further consideration for award. The quotation should be complete as submitted and not include references to data or information previously submitted. Data previously submitted to the Navy, if any, will not be incorporated “by reference” into the quotation and will not be considered in the evaluation of the quotation.

The quotation must demonstrate that the quoter understands all solicitation and Performance Work Statement (PWS) requirements and their interrelationships. It must demonstrate the quoter’s familiarity with the detailed aspects of the requirements, and clearly show that the quoter correctly interpreted all of the requirements. Quoters are cautioned against restating PWS requirements in their quotation, particularly with regard to technical requirements and must state how all solicitation and PWS requirements will be met. Statements such as "the quoter understands" and "the quoter shall/can comply," along with responses that paraphrase the solicitation, are inadequate. The use of phrases such as "standard practices" (with a specific government reference or industry reference) does not mailto:jeffrey.geringer@navy.mil indicate that a quoter understands the requirements and will likely result in a diminished evaluation rating. At the Government’s discretion, the Contractor’s quotation may be incorporated into the final contract, either in whole or in part.

A site visit will be scheduled to provide potential contractors the opportunity to examine the equipment and spaces that will be incorporated in the resulting contract – see Section 3.0 below.

All questions related to the solicitation must be submitted via email to jeffrey.geringer@navy.mil and patricia.murakami@navy.mil. Other methods of submitting questions are not authorized and will not be acknowledged or addressed.

All questions must be submitted by 11 December, 2019, 11:00 AM HST.

Quotation Format and Content:

Quotations shall be submitted in separate volumes. Each volume, as described below, shall be appropriately tabbed to present a clear and concise information. Each page shall be affixed with the following footer:

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104.:

- Volume I – TECHNICAL CAPABILITY (Do Not Include Pricing Info)

- Volume II – PAST PERFORMANCE (Do Not Include Pricing Info)

- Volume III – PRICE

Each volume shall have a Cover Page and Table of Contents described as follows:

a. Table of Contents: The table of contents should provide sufficient detail to allow the important elements within the volume to be easily located.

b. Volume Cover Page: Each volume’s cover page must include:

• RFQ Number

• Volume Category (Technical, Past Performance, Price)

• Volume Number

• Company Name, Mailing Address & Website Address

• Primary point of contact - name, phone number, and e-mail address

• Alternate point of contact - name, phone number, and e-mail address

• CAGE Code and DUNS Number

• NAICS code(s)

• Business Size

• Socioeconomic Program (i.e., 8(a), HUBZone, SDVOSB, or WOSB), if applicable

c. Technical Volume Subfactor Cover page: In addition to the volume cover page, each technical subfactor shall begin with its own individual cover page. The subfactor name and number shall be identified on the cover page.

mailto:jeffrey.geringer@navy.mil

Quotation Format

Volumes I and II shall be:

• Single-Spaced Body Text

• Times New Roman Font (no condensed spacing)

• 10 Point Size Type or Larger

• One Inch Margins On All Sides

• Each “page” is one sheet on 8-1/2” x 11”

• Multiple pages or foldouts count as an equivalent number of 8 ½” x 11” pages.

• Portrait Page Orientation

• Pages Sequentially Numbered

• E-mail delivery in Portable Document Format (PDF)

Volume III shall:

• Be a Microsoft Excel file

• All formulas used shall be viewable and accessible in order to check for mathematical accuracy

• Be in Arial font size no smaller than 8

* Pages submitted in excess of the page limits will not be evaluated. The page number limitation does not include the transmittal letter, cover page, table of contents, dividers or resumes.

Note: Elaborate brochures or other presentations beyond those sufficient to present a complete and effective response to the solicitation are not desired. Elaborate artwork and other presentation aids are not necessary.

2.0 SPECIFIC VOLUME INSTRUCTIONS.

VOLUME I: TECHNICAL CAPABILITY. This volume shall not contain any cost/pricing information. Quotations that take exception to any aspect of the PWS shall be considered ineligible for award.

The following page limitations are established for each of the Technical Subfactors for Technical Capability.

1) Technical Approach: maximum of 20 pages

2) Resumes: maximum of 4 pages per resume

3) Cleaning and Housekeeping Plan: maximum of 10 pages

4) Quality Control Plan: maximum of 10 pages

5) Training Plan: maximum of 8 pages.

6) Phase-In Plan: maximum of 8 pages.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: To ensure fairness to all quoters, the above page limitations shall be strictly enforced by the Government’s evaluation process. Material over and above the page limitation established for any one plan will not be reviewed and/or evaluated by the Government.

Volume I shall be organized in six separate sections: Technical Approach, Resumes, Cleaning and Housekeeping Plan, Quality Control Plan, Training Plan, and Phase-In Plan. Description as follows:

1) TECHNICAL APPROACH. Establishes effective processes and methods to best achieve the various requirements of the PWS. The technical approach shall be written with enough detail to demonstrate a clear understanding of the complexity and diversity of requirements.

Areas to be addressed include:

a. Performance of tasks and submission of deliverables as described in PWS;

b. Staffing plan – labor categories; how personnel will be assigned to meet PWS requirements; overall and immediate supervision at the work areas; and ability to respond to replacement of on-site personnel on short notice, considering both planned and unplanned absences;

c. Letters of Intent. For any key personnel proposed who is not a current employee of the quoter, a letter of intent signed by the employee shall be included in the proposal indicating that the employee is able and willing to perform under the resulting contract when awarded. Failure to submit a "letter of intent" for a proposed key person that is not an employee of the prime/subcontractor, will result in a "no evaluation" of that person's resume.

2) RESUMES. Submit resumes of the key personnel, e.g. contract manager, on-site manager, and supervisors, clearly showing qualifications and experience levels match or exceed the minimum qualifications set in Section 7.0 of the PWS.

3) CLEANING AND HOUSEKEEPING PLAN. The Cleaning and Housekeeping Plan must incorporate the requirements of NAVMED P-5010-1, Tri-service Food Code, Food Service Operations Handbook, and Food Service Management, NAVSUP Publication 486. The Plan must include schedules (frequencies and locations) that clearly show PWS requirements will be met.

4) QUALITY CONTROL PLAN. The Quality Control Plan (QCP) will describe contractor self- monitoring, performance measurement, and documented compliance of the PWS and associated Performance Requirement Summary (PRS) thresholds. QCP will address the following areas:

a. Self-monitoring methods;

b. Performance measurements metrics;

c. Document compliance with the Performance Requirements Summary (PRS) and PWS;

d. Methodology to be used for discrepancy resolution of any discrepancies, to include the ability to incorporate and address unplanned events and circumstances.

5) TRAINING PLAN. The plan shall address the following areas:

a. Annual OSHA training; Sanitation; Participation in Government-conducted fire drills;

b. Certification process for Food Service Equipment Operation;

c. The mandatory training requirements of the NAVMED P-5010-1, Tri-service Food

Code;

d. Details to include who will conduct the training, the schedule for such training, the rationale for the frequency of the training sessions, and, if training is conducted by the quoter, the plan should identify the basis of the curriculum.

6) PHASE-IN PLAN. The plan shall address:

a. Quoter’s ability to ensure adequate personnel are hired and are available prior to contract start date;

b. How the quoter proposes to ensure successful transition from the current closed status of the facility to the re-opening and full operational capability of the facility; and

c. Include a timeline chart that details significant events anticipated during the phase-in period.

Note: Cleaning and Housekeeping Plan, Quality Control Plan, Training Plan, and Phase-In Plan may be incorporated in the resulting contract.

VOLUME II: PAST PERFORMANCE – Volume II shall be a 2 part volume as follows:

1) PART I. The first part of this volume should include a summary discussion that correlates the relevancy of the quoter’s past performance to the requirements of the statement of work. The maximum page requirement of 10 pages excludes cover sheets, tables of content, or separation/index pages.

2) PART II. For the second part of this volume, quoter’s shall submit a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of five (5) Past Performance Information Forms (Attachment 5) for the most recent and relevant past performance information of the prime contractor. Quoter’s shall also submit a minimum of one (1) and a maximum of three (3) past perfromance data sheets for each of its subcontractors. The provided references can include Federal/State/Local government contracts and private sector work. To be considered recent, contract performance must be presently on-going or active within three (3) years of the solicitation closing date.

Failure to submit the required Contractor Performance Data Sheets within Volume II shall be considered certification (by signature on the proposal) that the contractor has no past performance for like or similar items for the Government to evaluate. Individual data sheets must not exceed one page per referenced contract. All points of contact, phone numbers, and e-mail addresses identified on the data sheets shall be validated by quoters prior to submission of the quotation to ensure they remain current. Part II of this Volume shall include a statement that this validation has been performed and shall provide a point of contact in the event the Government’s evaluation team requires assistance in establishing contact with the references.

When subcontracting possibilities existed on the contracts submitted by the quoter in the Past

Performance volume, address whether or not the quoter awarded subcontracts to small businesses (SB), small disadvantaged businesses (SDB), service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses (SDVOSB), veteran-owned small businesses (VOSB), woman-owned small businesses (WOSB), and HUBZone small businesses (HZ) concerns to the fullest extent consistent with efficient contract performance. Provide reports from eSRS (Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System), if applicable. Explanation of efforts where minimum quantitative requirements and/or goals were not met shall be provided.

VOLUME III: PRICE – The price volume shall include ALL price elements applicable to the proposed effort (see PWS paragraph 6.0 – Contractor Furnished Items and Services). Data contained in the price volume shall be consistent with data contained in Volume I.

Guidance as follows:

1) The Historical Labor Hours are provided for informational purposes in the table (below). This data reflects the historical average workload of the galley and is provided for informational and evaluation purposes only. No guarantee is made, nor should any assurances be inferred, that the historical data provided herein will necessarily reflect the number of labor hours that the Contractor’s personnel shall perform in the execution of this contract.

2) The Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) – Attachment 4, provides labor category rates.

Historical Labor Hours Table

LABOR

CATEGORY

TOTAL

HRS

Program Manager 2,080 Food Service Worker (Lead) 7,337.5

Food Service Worker 23,660

Price Volume shall include the following:

1) Price quotations for each CLIN item – base and option CLINs (i.e. CLIN 0001 and Option CLINs 1001 through 4001). Provide monthly price and also 12-month extended price for each CLIN.

Unit of Issue shall be “Month”.

2) Pricing data. Quoters shall provide supporting price information with a breakdown of the composition of labor pricing and associated contractor furnished items pricing for each CLIN unit price submitted. Labor pricing will include the labor category and rate. Contractor

Furnished Items pricing will include specific pricing for items listed in the PWS paragraph 6.0, Contractor Furnished Items and Services.

All price information spreadsheets must be in EXCEL format and not in .pdf or read-only format. The use of macro commands is neither desired nor encouraged. Spreadsheets are to be included in one work file to alleviate the need to combine, add, or transfer data from different work files. Excel files shall include all equations and formulas used for calculations.

3) A completed FAR 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications – Commercial Items Alt I.

3.0 SITE VISIT. A site visit for this procurement will be held at the Silver Dolphin Bistro Facility, Bldgs 654 & 655, Joint Base Pearl Harbor Hickam Hawaii on 6 December 2019, 10:00 AM HST.

The purpose of the scheduled site visit is to provide prospective quoters with the opportunity to inventory and examine equipment and spaces to be placed under the contract resulting from this solicitation. Joint Base Pearl Harbor Hickam is a military base with access limited to authorized personnel only. Attendee(s) shall notify Jeffrey.geringer@navy.mil, with copy to patricia.murakami@navy.mil no later than 10:00 AM HST on 5 Dec 2019. The attendee(s) name/e-mail/telephone number, Company name, company CAGE Code, and DUNS number must be provided in the notification email. Indicate if contractors do not have a Department of Defense Common Access Card (CAC) or Defense Biometric Identification System (DBIDS) access. The Silver Dolphin Bistro facility is currently being renovated and is considered an active construction zone. Contractors must bring their own safety hard hats to enter the facility, as well as safety goggles if desiring to view the equipment. Closed-toe shoes and long pants are required.

EVALUATION OF QUOTATIONS AND BASIS OF AWARD

If the quotation of a SLA is determined to be technically acceptable (as determined using Technical Capability criteria described below) and fair and reasonably priced, it will be deemed the presumptive awardee of the contract in accordance with Randolph Sheppard Act (20 U.S.C. §107, et. seq.), conditioned on resolution of:

• Questions regarding the SLA quoter’s technical volume;

• Matters of responsibility, including but not limited to compliance with the subcontracting plans submitted on previous contracts and state and local licensing and credentialing related to food handling, preparation, and service;

• Submission of a final price deemed by the Government to be the best value to the government as well as fair and reasonable in accordance with FAR 13.106(a) and 34 C.F.R. § 395.33.

If such matters cannot be resolved to ensure that the government obtains best value, the Government will remove the SLA from the competition and proceed with evaluation of other quotations as described below.

mailto:Jeffrey.geringer@navy.mil

Evaluation Factors for Award

In accordance with FAR Part 13 Simplified Acquisition Procedures, the Government will award a contract from this solicitation to the responsible quoter on a comparative basis whose quote conforms to the solicitation and represent the best overall value to the government. The Government will conduct a comparative assessment of quoters' responses based upon the evaluation factors and subfactors explained below. The Government will compare quotes against each other in an impartial and simplified manner based on FAR part 13. Source selection techniques described in FAR part 15 will not be used. The Government reserves the right to award to a quoter with other than the lowest price if the quotation offered additional benefits to the Government. The Government will not pay a price premium for a technical capability or past performance record that is not of value to the Government.

The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

Factor I - Technical Capability Factor II - Past Performance Factor III - Price

Factor I - Technical Capability Grading Criteria:

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY, Factor I, represents the MINIMUM acceptable criteria. Quoters’ technical information will be used to determine whether the services proposed meet the specifications included in this solicitation. Services offered, as provided in Quoters’ technical information, will be evaluated as Acceptable or Unacceptable. Quotations that received an overall rating of Unacceptable in Factor I will not be eligible for award.

NOTE: The term “technical” as used herein refers to non-price factors other than past performance.

The purpose of the technical factor is to assess whether the quoter’s proposal will satisfy the Government’s minimum requirements. The Government will evaluate quotations against these requirements to determine whether the quotation is acceptable or unacceptable, using the ratings and descriptions outlined in Table 1, below.

Table 1, Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings Rating Description Acceptable Quotation clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Quotation does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Factor I - Technical Capability, will be evaluated based on six (6) sub-factors.

1. Technical Approach

2. Resumes

3. Cleaning and Housekeeping Plan

4. Quality Control Plan

5. Training Plan

6. Phase-In Plan

Each sub-factor will be rated Acceptable or Unacceptable. A rating of Unacceptable in any of the sub-factors will render the Technical Capability factor overall rating to also be Unacceptable.

Factor II - Past Performance Grading Criteria:

Past performance will be rated on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis using the ratings in Table 2 below:

TABLE 2. Past Performance Evaluation Ratings Rating Definition

Acceptable Based on the Quoter’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the quoter will successfully perform the required effort, or the quoter’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)

Unacceptable Based on the quoter’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the quoter will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of a quoter without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the quoter may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.

Therefore, the quoter shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered Acceptable. An evaluation of Acceptable based on unknown past performance may render the quotation non-competitive when compared with other quotations. Accordingly, the Contracting Officer reserves the right to determine that a higher-priced quotation with an Acceptable rating on Past Performance may be of more value to the Government than a lower-priced quotation that also has an Acceptable rating but without a record of Past Performance. Conversely, the Contracting Officer reserves the right to determine a lower-priced quotation with an Acceptable rating on Past Performance may be of more value to the Government than a higher-priced quotation that also has an Acceptable rating but without a record of Past Performance.

Aspects of Past Performance Evaluation. The past performance evaluation results is an assessment of the quoter’s probability of meeting the minimum past performance solicitation requirements. This assessment is based on the quoter’s record of relevant and recent past performance information that pertain to the products and/or services outlined in the solicitation requirements.

There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation. The first is to evaluate whether the quoter’s present/past performance is relevant or not relevant to the effort to be acquired.

“Relevancy” for this procurement means similar contracts (“similar” defined as approximately equal in value and task requirement – food service attendant services). “Recency” for this procurement means similar contracts completed or being performed within the last three (3) years of the closing date of this solicitation.

The second aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine how well the contractor performed on the contracts. The past performance evaluation performed in support of a current source selection does not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the quoter’s past performance on past contracts; rather, the past performance evaluation process gathers information from customers on how well the quoter performed those past contracts.

Sources of Past Performance Information for Evaluation are as follows:

• Past performance information may be provided by the quoter, as solicited.

• Past performance information will be obtained from any other sources available to the

Government, to include, but not limited to, the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and Fee Determining Officials; and the Defense Contract Management Agency.

The Government will review this past performance information and determine the quality and usefulness as it applies to performance competence assessment.

Factor III – Price

Only quotations that are rated Acceptable in both Factor I - Technical Capability, and Factor II - Past Performance will be evaluated for Factor III - Price.

If competition is not adequate to establish price reasonableness, cost analysis may be performed to establish reasonableness of the otherwise successful quoter’s price.

Quoters are cautioned that, to the extent proposed price appears to be wholly unrealistic, the Government may infer either a lack of understanding of the requirements, increased risk of performance, or lack of credibility on the part of the quoter.

The Government will calculate each quotations total evaluated price for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The total evaluated price will include the price of the FAR 52.217-8 Option to Extend Services, which will be calculated by using the CLIN 4001 unit (monthly) price times 6 months. The Government may determine that a quotation is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

After a quotation has been evaluated the Government may request additional information in order to clarify aspects of the quotation.

System for Award Management (SAM). Quoters must be registered in the SAM database to be considered for award. Registration is free and can be completed on-line at http://www.sam.gov/.

The following FAR provisions and clauses are applicable to this procurement:

52.203-6 Alt I Restrictions on Subcontractor Sales to the Government 52.203-13 Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct http://www.sam.gov/

52.204-7 System for Award Management 52.204-9 Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel 52.204-13 SAM Maintenance 52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting 52.204-18 Commercial and Government Entity Code Maintenance 52.204-24 Representation Regarding Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or

Equipment 52.209-7 Information Regarding Responsibility Matters 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors - Commercial Items (DEVIATION 2018-O0018);

52.212-3 Offeror Representations and Certifications—Commercial Items—Alternate I 52.212-4 Contract Terms and Conditions—Commercial Items 52.212-5 Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or Executive Orders-

Commercial Items 52.203-19 Prohibition on Requiring Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements or

Statements 52.203-6 with Alt I Restrictions on Subcontractor Sales to the Government 52.204-10 Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards 52.204-23 Prohibition on Contracting for Hardware, Software, and Services Developed or

Provided by Kaspersky Lab and Other Covered Entities 52.204-25 Prohibition of Contracting for Certain Telecomunications and Video Surveillance

Services or Equipment 52.209-6 Protecting the Government’s Interest When Subcontracting with Contractors

Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment 52.209-9 Updates of Publicly Available Information Regarding Responsibility Matters 52.209-10 Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations 52.219-8 Utilization of Small Business Concerns *52.219-9 Small Business Subcontracting Plan (DEVIATION 2018-O0018)* *Applies only to SLA* *52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting (DEVIATION 2019-O0003)

* Does NOT apply to SLA* *52.219-16 Liquidated Damages - Subcontracting Plan* *Applies only to SLA* 52.219-28 Post Award Small Business Program Representation 52.222-3 Convict Labor *52.222-17 Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers* *Does NOT apply to SLA* 52.222-21 Prohibition of Segregated Facilities 52.222-26 Equal Opportunity 52.222-35 Equal Opportunity for Veterans 52.222-36 Equal Opportunity for Workers w/Disabilities 52.222-37 Employment Reports on Veterans 52.222-40 Notification of Employee Rights Under the National Labor Relations Act 52.222-41 Service Contract Labor Standards 52.222-42 Statement of Equivalent Rates for Federal Hires

Employee Class Monetary Wage – Fringe Benefits Food Service Working, WG-7408-02, Step 2 $16.75 – 36.25% Waiter, WG-7420-02, Step 2 $16.754 – 36.25%

52.222-43 Fair Labor Standards Act and Service Contract Labor Standards—Price Adjustment

(Multiple Year and Option Contracts) 52.222-50 Combatting Trafficking in Persons 52.222-54 Employment Eligibility Verification 52.222-55 Minimum Wages Under Executive Order 13658 52.222-62 Paid Sick Leave Under Executive Order 13706 52.223-18 Encouraging Contractor Policies to Ban Text Messaging while Driving 52.232-33 Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer 52.233-3 Protest After Award 52.233-4 Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim

*52.242-5 Payments to Small Business Subcontractors* *Applies only to SLA* 52.217-5 Evaluation of Options 52.217-8 Option to Extend Services 52.217-9 Option to Extend the Term of the Contract 52.232-18 Availability of Funds 52.232-40 Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business Subcontractors 52.237-1 Site Visit 52.237-2 Protection of Government Buildings, Equipment, and Vegetation

Additional contract terms and conditions applicable to this procurement are:

252.203-7000 Requirements Relating To Compensation of Former DoD Officials 252.203-7005 Representation Relating To Compensation of Former DoD Officials 252.204-7004 DoD Antiterrorism Awareness Training for Contractors 252.204-7012 Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting 252.204-7015 Notice of Authorized Disclosure of Information for Litigation Support 252.205-7000 Provision of Information to Cooperative Agreement Holders 252.215-7008 Only One Offer 252.219-7003 Small Business Subcontracting Plan (DoD Contracts)--Basic 252.219-7010 Notification of Competition Limited to Eligible 8(a) Concerns--Partnership Agreement

(DEVIATION 2019-O0003)

252.226-7001 Utilization of Indian Organizations, Indian-Owned Economic Enterprises, and Native

Hawaiian Small Business Concerns 252.232-7003 Electronic Submission of Payment Requests And Receiving Reports 252.232-7006 Wide Area Workflow Payment Instructions 252.232-7010 Levies On Contract Payments 252.243-7002 Requests for Equitable Adjustment 252.244-7000 Subcontracts For Commercial Items 252.247-7023 Transportation of Supplies by Sea

******* End of Combined Synopsis/Solicitation ********