Q As_16_June_2016.pdf

16 June, 2016

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL N00421-16-R-0044

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Question 1: SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES: CLIN 0008 and 0010 are exactly the same. Is it the Government’s intent to have two CLINs the same? If not, how should one of the

CLINS be revised?

Answer 1: The description for CLIN 0008 will be changed from "WCF" to "Procurement" in a forthcoming amendment.

Question 2: 3.1 Past Performance: Instructions state that offerors are to see section M paragraph 5.3.2 for definition of relevancy. It appears that section M does not have a paragraph 5.3.2. Can the government please clarify the correct paragraph offerors are to reference for the relevancy definition?

Answer 2: Section L, Part B, Paragraph 3.1 will be updated in a forthcoming amendment to read as follows: "The offeror shall submit up to five summaries of past performance similar in relevancy (see section M, paragraph 5.0."

Question 3: In section L 2.2 Workforce, subparagraph 2.2.4.1, it appears the staffing plan details instruction has been cut off, or the requirements are not complete. The sentence reads, the offeror shall describe its plan for hiring qualified personnel, and…. There is not statement after the “and.” Can the government please clarify if there is additional information that needs to be provided?

Answer 3: The statement in Section L 2.2 Workforce, subparagraph 2.2.4.1 is complete. The "and" is a notation that the offeror should be addressing 2.2.4.1 and 2.2.4.2.

Question 4: Throughout many areas of the RFP, reference is made to the SOW, PWS, PBSOW, and

PBWS… Can the government please clarify which of these terms are correct?

Answer 4: This is a non-performance based requirement and all references to the statement of work should read as SOW.