N00024-23-R-5202 FINAL 08042023.pdf

CODE

(Hour)

PAGE(S)

until 03:00 PM local time 04 Oct 2023

X

A

X B

X C X D

EX

X

G

F 113 - 119

120 - 156

X H 157 - 166 stephanie.little@navy .mil

RATING PAGE OF PAGES

7. ISSUED BY

(Date)

IMPORTANT - Award will be made on this Form, or on Standard Form 26, or by other authorized official written notice.

Previous Edition is Unusable 33-134 STANDARD FORM 33 (REV. 9-97)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.214(c)

DO-A7 1 166

(If other than Item 7)

15A. NAME 16. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO

AND

ADDRESS

SIGN OFFER (Type or print)

OF

OFFEROR

AMENDMENT NO. DATE

15B. TELEPHONE NO (Include area code) 17. SIGNATURE15C. CHECK IF REMITTANCE ADDRESS

IS DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE - ENTER

SUCH ADDRESS IN SCHEDULE.

18. OFFER DATE

1. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED ORDER

UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700)

2. CONTRACT NO.

N00024 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

See Item 7

9. Sealed offers in original and 1 copies for furnishing the supplies or services in the Schedule will be received at the place specified in Item 8, or if handcarried, in the depository located in

CAUTION - LATE Submissions, Modifications, and Withdrawals: See Section L, Provision No. 52.214-7 or 52.215-1. All offers are subject to all terms and

Section L conditions contained in this solicitation.

10. FOR INFORMATION

CALL:

A. NAME (NO COLLECT CALLS)

STEPHANIE M LITTLE 202-781-1370

11. TABLE OF CONTENTS

SOLICITATION/ CONTRACT FORM

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/ COSTS

2 - 17

X I CONTRACT CLAUSES

DESCRIPTION/ SPECS./ WORK STATEMENT X

PACKAGING AND MARKING

18 - 76

77 - 81

J LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

82 - 84

85 - 87 X K

REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND

OTHER STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA 88 - 96 X

SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror) 97 - 101 X M

L INSTRS., CONDS., AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

NOTE: Item 12 does not apply if the solicitation includes the provisions at 52.214-16, Minimum Bid Acceptance Period.

is inserted by the offeror) from the date for receipt of offers specified above, to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item, delivered at the designated point(s), within the time specified in the schedule.

13. DISCOUNT FOR PROMPT PAYMENT

(See Section I, Clause No. 52.232-8)

14. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments

AMENDMENT NO. DATE

to the SOLICITATION for offerors and related documents numbered and dated):

FACILITY

12. In compliance with the above, the undersigned agrees, if this offer is accepted within calendar days (60 calendar days unless a different period

SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD

X

(X) SEC. DESCRIPTION (X) SEC. DESCRIPTION PAGE(S)

PART I - THE SCHEDULE

26. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print) 27. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 28. AWARD DATE

EMAIL:TEL: (Signature of Contracting Officer)

CODE CODE

B. TELEPHONE (Include area code) C. E-MAIL ADDRESS

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

19. ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS NUMBERED 20. AMOUNT 21. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION

22. AUTHORITY FOR USING OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION:

10 U.S.C. 2304(c)( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)( ) (4 copies unless otherwise specified)

23. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

24. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 7) CODE 25. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE

PART IV - REPRESENTATIO NS AND INSTRUCTIO NS

PART III - LIST O F DO CUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND O THER ATTACHMENTS

102 - 111

PART II - CO NTRACT CLAUSES

NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (HQ)

1333 ISAAC HULL AVE SE

WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, DC 20376-2030

FAX:

TEL:

FAX:

TEL:

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

SOLICITATION

6. REQUISITION/PURCHASE NO.5. DATE ISSUED

04 Aug 2023

4. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

[ X ]

3. SOLICITATION NO.

N0002423R5202

Section B - Supplies or Services and Prices

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

CLIN

Number

1 Lot

Data

FFP

This CLIN is Not Separately Priced (NSP). Data for CLINs 0002, 0004, 0008, 0009, 1002, 1004, 1008, 1009.

See Note C.

FOB: Destination

PSC CD: 1287

NET AMT

866,320 Hours

Engineering and Technical Services

CPFF

Level of Effort (LOE). Ordering CLIN. See Notes A and I.

ESTIMATED COST

FIXED FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

Other Direct Costs (ODCs)

COST

Ordering CLIN. ODCs, Travel, and Material in support of CLIN 0002 and CLIN

0008. Not to Exceed (NTE) $8,481,000. See Notes A, B, and H.

34 Each

OPTION Production of AN/SQQ-89 Systems

CPIF

Ordering CLIN. Hypervisor Technology 0 (HT0) System Production - First Year.

See Note E and K.

FOB: Origin (Shipping Point)

TARGET COST

TARGET FEE

TOTAL TGT COST + FEE

MINIMUM FEE

MAXIMUM FEE

SHARE RATIO ABOVE TARGET

SHARE RATIO BELOW TARGET

OPTION Enhanced Data Rights

FFP

Ordering CLIN. See Note J.

OPTION Spares and Other Negotiated Material

FFP

Ordering CLIN. NTE $9,354,000. See Notes G.

Reserved

FFP

58,892 Hours

Program Management Office (PMO)

CPFF

Ordering CLIN. LOE. PMO in support of production CLIN 0004. See Notes A and I.

38 Each

OPTION Production of AN/SQQ-89 Systems

FPI

Ordering CLIN. HT0 System Production - Second Year and Beyond. See Note F and K.

TARGET PROFIT

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

781,040 Hours

OPTION Engineering and Technical Services

CPFF

Ordering CLIN. LOE. See Notes A, D, and I.

OPTION Other Direct Costs (ODCs)

COST

Ordering CLIN. ODCs, Travel and Material in support of CLIN 1002 and 1008.

NTE $6,421,000. See Notes A, B, D, and H.

19 Each

OPTION Production of SQQ-89 Systems

CPIF

Ordering CLIN. HT1 System Production - First Year. See Notes D, E, and K.

TARGET FEE

TOTAL TGT COST + FEE

MINIMUM FEE

MAXIMUM FEE

OPTION Spares and Other Negotiated Material

FFP

Ordering CLIN. NTE $7,660,000. See Notes D and G.

115,384 Hours

OPTION Program Management Office (PMO)

CPFF

Ordering CLIN. LOE. PMO in support of production CLIN 1004. See Notes A, D, and I.

66 Each

OPTION Production of SQQ-89 Systems

FPI

Ordering CLIN. System Production - Second Year and Beyond. See Notes D, F, and K.

TARGET PROFIT

TOTAL TARGET PRICE

CEILING PRICE

CONTRACT MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND CONTRACT VALUE

The minimum quantity and contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not be less than the minimum quantity and contract value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not exceed the maximum quantity and contract value stated in the following table.

MINIMUM

QUANTITY

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

AMOUNT

N/A $200,000.00 N/A $1,033,395,000.00

NOTE A - TECHNICAL INSTRUCTIONS - Applicable to Items 0002, 0003, 0008 (and if Option(s) exercised)

1002, 1003, and 1008– The Government will issue Technical Instructions in accordance with C-242-H003

TECHNICAL INSTRUCTIONS (NAVSEA)(OCT 2018) included in SECTION C of this contract.

NOTE B - OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) – Other Direct Costs (ODCs) to include travel and per diem and materials incidental to engineering performance for 0002, 0008 (and if Option(s) are Exercised, 1002, and 1008), are to be included on a cost-only basis (non-fee bearing) under Items 0003 (and if Option(s) exercised), 1003.

NOTE C – Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs) - The Contractor should note that Item 0001 is not separately priced (NSP) and therefore, the Contractor is expected to incorporate the price of the CDRLs into Item

0002, 0008 (and if Option(s) exercised), 1002 and 1008 where the work will be performed.

NOTE D – Option Item to which the option clause in SECTION I applies and which is to be supplied only if and to the extent said option is exercised. Applicable to Items 1002, 1003, 1004, 1006, 1008, and 1009.

NOTE E – INCENTIVE FEE INSTRUCTIONS – Applicable to Items 0004 (and if Option(s) exercised), 1004.

Minimum fee shall be zero percent (0%). Maximum fee shall not be greater than ten percent (10%). Target fee shall not be greater than 9 percent (9%). Additionally, these fee maximums apply to all subcontractors when CPIF type subcontracts are proposed.

The share ratio for the CPIF portion of the fee structure is 50/50 Government/Contractor for overruns and underruns.

CLIN TARGET

FEE*

MAXIMUM

FEE*

SHARE

RATIO*

0004 % %

1004 % %

*Offeror to fill-in.

NOTE F – Applicable to Items 0009 (and if Option(s) exercised), 1009 - Fixed Price Incentive Firm (FPIF) (if option is exercised). The target profit shall not be greater than eleven percent (11%) of the Target Cost. The Offeror shall fill in their target profit (0-11%) within this range. The share ratio is 50/50 above and below Target Cost. The

Government share under Target Cost is fifty percent (50%). The Government share above Target Cost to Ceiling is fifty percent (50%). The Ceiling is established at 120% of Target Cost.

NOTE G – Applicable to Items 0006 (and if Option(s) exercised), 1006 – CLINs X006 shall be Firm Fixed Price

(FFP). The profit proposed for Spares and Other Negotiated Material (CLINs X006) shall be no greater than five

Percent (5%). Offerors shall apply proposed profit to the Government Estimate, provided in the cost portion of

SECTION L of this RFP.

NOTE H – Applicable to Items 0003 (and if Option(s) exercised) 1003 – Offeror is to propose the Government specified Estimated Cost only amount, provided in the cost portion of SECTION L of this RFP.

NOTE I – Applicable to Items 0002 and 0008 (and if (Options(s) exercised 1002 and 1008) – CLINs X002 and

X008 shall be Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF). Offerors shall not propose fixed fees greater than seven percent (7%).

The Offeror shall complete the table below.

COMPOSITE RATE TABLE

CLIN 0002 Composite Labor Rate

(inclusive of target fee)

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

CLIN 0008 Composite Labor Rate

(inclusive of target fee)

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

CLIN 1002 Composite Labor Rate

(inclusive of target fee)

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

CLIN 1008 Composite Labor Rate

(inclusive of target fee)

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

NOTE J – If Enhanced Data Rights are proposed, an attachment containing the itemized pricing will be added to

Section J. The total amount displayed in the CLIN pricing will be the summation of all items in the Section J attachment. This does not obligate the Government to purchase all or any of the enhanced data right items. Priced

SLINs will be added to the extent the Government exercises its option to buy the enhanced data right items. This option may be exercised multiple times to buy various enhanced data right items.

NOTE K – System quantities are subject to change. Specific system quantities will be as stated in individual delivery orders. The Government reserved the right to unilaterally redistribute the total number of systems ordered between CLINs 0004, 0009, 1004, and 1009 so long as the total number of systems under this contract does not exceed 157 systems.

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

B-215-H002 REFUNDS (SPARES AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT) (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

(a) In the event that the price of a spare part or item of support equipment delivered under this contract significantly exceeds its intrinsic value, the Contractor agrees to refund the difference. Refunds will not be made to recoup the amount of cost decreases that occur over time due to productivity gains (excluding economic purchase quantity considerations) or changes in market conditions.

(b) For purposes of this requirement, the intrinsic value of an item is defined as follows:

(1) If the item is one which is sold or is substantially similar or functionally equivalent to one that is sold in substantial quantities to the general public, intrinsic value is the established catalog or market price, plus the value of any unique requirements, including delivery terms, inspection, packaging, or labeling.

(2) If there is no comparable item sold in substantial quantities to the general public, intrinsic value is defined as the price an individual would expect to pay for the item based upon an economic purchase quantity as defined in FAR

52.207-4, plus the value of any unique requirements, including delivery terms, inspection, packaging or labeling.

(c) At any time up to two years after delivery of a spare part or item of support equipment, the Contracting Officer may notify the Contractor that based on all information available at the time of the notice, the price of the part or item apparently exceeds its intrinsic value.

(d) If notified in accordance with paragraph (c) above, the Contractor agrees to enter into good faith negotiations with the Government to determine if, and in what amount, the Government is entitled to a refund.

(e) If agreement pursuant to paragraph (d) above cannot be reached, and the Navy's return of the new or unused item to the Contractor is practical, the Navy, subject to the Contractor's agreement, may elect to return the item to the Contractor.

Upon return of the item to its original point of Government acceptance, the Contractor shall refund in full the price paid.

If no agreement pursuant to paragraph (d) above is reached, and return of the item by the Navy is impractical, the

Contracting Officer may, with the approval of the Head of the Contracting Activity, issue a Contracting Officer's final decision on the matter, subject to Contractor appeal as provided in the "Disputes" clause (FAR 52.233-1).

(f) The Contractor shall make refunds, as required under this requirement, in accordance with instructions from the

Contracting Officer.

(g) The Contractor shall not be liable for a refund if the Contractor advised the Contracting Officer in a timely manner that the price it would propose for a spare part or item of support equipment exceeded its intrinsic value, and with such advice, specified the estimated proposed price, the estimated intrinsic value and known alternative sources or item, if any, that can meet the requirement.

(h) This requirement does not apply to any spare parts or items of support equipment whose price is determined through adequate price competition. This requirement also does not apply to any spare part or item of support equipment if the

Contractor submitted, and certified the currency, accuracy and completeness of, cost or pricing data applicable to the item.

(End of text)

B-216-H006 FEE TABLE (NAVSEA) (MAR 2019)

Labor CLIN Labor Hours Cost Per

Hour*

Fee Rate Per

Hour*

Loaded

Hourly Rate

0002 866,320

0008 58,892

1002 781,040

1008 115,384

*The offeror shall divide the proposed fee for each CLIN by the quantity of labor hours indicated to complete the table. Fee is calculated based on cost less FCCOM; if FCCOM is proposed, necessary columns may be added.

In the event of any inconsistency between the above table and the CLIN pricing, the CLIN pricing shall take precedence.

B-227-H001 PROVISIONING TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION – WITHHOLDING OF PAYMENT

(NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

(a) For the purpose of paragraph (c) of the "Progress Payments" clause of this contract, if included, the requirement that the Contractor develop and deliver Provisioning Technical Documentation (PTD) is considered to be a "material requirement of this contract," and Contractor failure to make adequate progress in the development of PTD, or to deliver acceptable PTD on a timely basis, may result in reduction or suspension of Progress Payments as provided in said paragraph.

(b) The PTD is considered to be a part of the "Technical Data" specified to be delivered under this contract for the purposes of the "Technical Data--Withholding of Payment" (DFARS 252.227-7030) clause. The terms and conditions of the clause entitled "Limitation On Withholding of Payments (FAR 52.232-9), if included in this contract, shall not apply to withholding of payment for failure to make timely delivery of the PTD or delivery of deficient PTD.

B-231-H001 TRAVEL COSTS (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

(a) Except as otherwise provided herein, the Contractor shall be reimbursed for its actual travel costs in accordance with FAR 31.205-46. The travel costs to be reimbursed shall be those costs for which the Contractor has maintained appropriate documentation and which have been determined to be allowable, allocable, and reasonable by the

Procuring Contracting Officer, Administrative Contracting Officer, or their duly authorized representative.

(b) Reimbursable travel costs include only that travel performed from the Contractor's facility to the worksite, in and around the worksite, and from the worksite to the Contractor's facility.

(c) Relocation costs and travel costs incidental to relocation are allowable to the extent provided in FAR 31.205-35;

however, Procuring Contracting Officer approval shall be required prior to incurring relocation expenses and travel costs incidental to relocation.

(d) The Contractor shall not be reimbursed for the following daily local travel costs:

(i) travel at U.S. Military Installations where Government transportation is available,

(ii) travel performed for personal convenience/errands, including commuting to and from work, and

(iii) travel costs incurred in the replacement of personnel when such replacement is accomplished for the

Contractor's or employee's convenience.

B-232-H003 PAYMENTS OF FEE (S) (COMPLETION) (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

(a) For purposes of this contract, "fee" means "target fee" in cost-plus-incentive-fee type contracts, "base fee" in cost-plus-award-fee type contracts, or "fixed fee" in cost-plus-fixed-fee type contracts.

(b) The Government shall make payments to the Contractor, subject to and per the clause in this contract entitled

"Fixed Fee" (FAR 52.216-8) or "Incentive Fee", (FAR 52.216-10), as applicable. Such payments shall be equal to TBD percent (TBD%) of the allowable cost of each invoice submitted by and payable to the Contractor pursuant to the clause of this contract entitled "Allowable Cost And Payment" (FAR 52.216-7), subject to the withholding terms and conditions of the "Fixed Fee" or "Incentive Fee" clause, as applicable (percentage of fee payable is based on fee dollars divided by estimated cost dollars including facilities capital cost of money). Fee shall not be applied on Facilities Capital Cost of Money per FAR 15.404-4(c)(3) and DFARS 215-404-71-4.

Total fee(s) paid to the Contractor shall not exceed the fee amount(s) set forth in this contract.

(c) In the event of discontinuance of the work under this contract, or any specified phase of the contract, per the clause of this contract entitled "Limitation of Funds" (FAR 52.232-22) or "Limitation of Cost" (FAR 52.232-20), as applicable, the fee shall be equitably adjusted by mutual agreement to reflect the diminution of work. If the adjusted fee is less than the sum of all fee payments made to the Contractor under this contract, the Contractor shall repay the excess amount to the Government. If the adjusted fee exceeds all payments made to the

Contractor under this contract, the Contractor shall be paid the additional amount, subject to the availability of funds. In no event shall the Government be required to pay the Contractor any amount in excess of the funds obligated under this contract at the time of the discontinuance of work.

(d) Fee(s) withheld pursuant to the terms and conditions of this contract shall not be paid until the contract has been modified to reduce the fee(s) per paragraph (c) above, or until the Procuring Contracting Officer has advised the paying office in writing that no fee adjustment is required.

(End of Text)

B-232-H005 PAYMENTS OF FEE(S) (LEVEL OF EFFORT)--ALTERNATE I (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

(a) For purposes of this contract, "fee" means "target fee" in cost-plus-incentive-fee type contracts, "base fee" in cost-plus-award-fee type contracts, or "fixed fee" in cost-plus-fixed-fee type contracts.

(b) The Government shall make payments to the Contractor, subject to and per the clause in this contract entitled "Fixed

Fee" (FAR 52.216-8) or "Incentive Fee", (FAR 52.216-10), as applicable. Such payments shall be submitted by and payable to the Contractor pursuant to the clause of this contract entitled "Allowable Cost and Payment" (FAR 52.216-7), subject to the withholding terms and conditions of the "Fixed Fee" or "Incentive Fee" clause, as applicable. Fee paid per hour shall be based on total fee dollars divided by total hours to be provided. Total fee(s) paid to the Contractor shall not exceed the fee amount(s) set forth in this contract. In no event shall the Government be required to pay the Contractor any amount in excess of the funds obligated under this contract.

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

B-232-H006 LIMITATION OF COST OR LIMITATION OF FUNDS CLARIFICATION (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

The clause entitled "Limitation of Cost" (FAR 52.232-20) or "Limitation of Funds" (FAR 52.232-22), as appropriate, shall apply separately and independently to each separately identified estimated cost.

Section C - Descriptions and Specifications

STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)

Surface Ship Undersea Warfare Systems Design, Integration and Production

1.0 NATURE AND SCOPE OF THE ACQUISITION

1.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE EFFORT

The Program Executive Office for Integrated Warfare Systems, Undersea Systems Program Office (PEO IWS 5.0) executes the acquisition and total life cycle system support responsibility for the Navy’s Surface Ship Undersea

Warfare (USW) programs. The program consists of the AN/SQQ-89(V) fitted on Cruisers (CGs), Arleigh Burke

Destroyers (DDG-51s), Constellation Class Frigates (FFG-62 Class), Future Surface Combatants, and derivative

USW efforts in support of Foreign Military Sale cases. Each USW system combines improved sensors, support systems, and weapon control systems with advanced acoustic data processing and displays. The systems are specifically designed to support multiple ship class requirements by leveraging technology and common components to meet operational requirements for each ship class. Individual systems integrate the specific USW combat system with MH-60R Multi-Mission Helicopter, shipboard electronics, weapon control and launch systems, and other sensors.

Surface USW Combat Systems consist of a complex set of personnel, equipment, and computer programs that provide U.S. Navy DDGs, CGs, and other surface ships with the capability to effectively meet their offensive and defensive USW mission requirements within a multi-mission operational context. The USW system designated

AN/SQQ-89(V) is an element of the Advanced Electronic Guidance and Instrumentation System (AEGIS)

Combat System on forward fit DDGs and FFGs, back fit DDGs and CGs. The system is fully interoperable with the parent combat system. The AN/SQQ-89(V) systems provide the capability for the AEGIS Destroyers, Cruisers, and Frigates to support battlespace dominance through effective conduct of USW operations in open-ocean and littoral environments. It supports implementation of command doctrine for end- to-end execution of assigned USW missions. This support includes the ability to plan, conduct, and evaluate underwater searches; to detect, classify, localize, and track contacts; and to engage or evade submarines, small objects, and torpedo threats as part of multiple platform or individual ship operations.

1.1.1 OPEN SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE APPROACH

The Government intends to procure system(s) having an Open System Architecture (OSA), to include support for

Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) via the use of hypervisor technologies. As part of this contract, the Contractor shall define, document and follow an open systems approach for using modular design, standards-based interfaces and widely supported consensus-based standards. The Contractor shall demonstrate compliance with open systems architecture during all design reviews.

As part of an open system architecture approach, the Contractor shall identify to the Government all Commercial-

Off-The-Shelf/Non-Developmental Item (COTS/NDI) components and software licenses, their functionality and proposed use in the system, and provide copies of license agreements related to the use of these components for

Government approval prior to use.

1.2 SCOPE

This Statement of Work (SOW) defines the efforts required for the production manufacturing, systems engineering, program management, logistics and supportability engineering, configuration management, hardware integration (including material procurement or fabrication, and integration of Government Furnished Property

(GFP), as applicable), test, evaluation, and installation support of Surface Ship USW systems, including the

AN/SQQ-89(V) system, with provisions included to support other Surface USW systems and components. This

SOW addresses the following major task areas:

a) Program Management

b) Engineering

c) Test and Evaluation

d) Development of Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) and Training source material

e) Configuration Management (CM)

f) Support Installation, Checkout and Field Support

g) Production

The Contractor shall execute this SOW as specified in the Contract Schedule and as identified in individual

Technical Instructions (TIs) under each Task Order.

The Foreign Military Sales (FMS) system will be a variant of the USW combat system approved for release.

Work associated with unique functional, physical, and interface requirements of the FMS system will be accomplished by the Contractor under separate tasking (i.e. separate TI) and funding. This SOW defines the minimum efforts required for the system design, hardware integration (including material procurement, fabrication and integration of GFP, as applicable), test, evaluation, production and installation preparation, and delivery of the Surface Ship USW systems which will meet the requirements specified in the appropriate USW combat system Functional Performance Specification.

The AN/SQQ-89(V) family of hardware baselines will be periodically upgraded with the latest market based

Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) hardware to resolve obsolescence, and/or add capacity and capability. The extent of system upgrades and technical refresh applied to the baseline is based on obsolescence concerns, required capacity and capability expansions, cost trade analyses, resolution of Fleet generated issues, and the approved budget. The program supports delivery of the AN/SQQ-89(V) configuration as the initial system baseline as part of AEGIS backfit, forward fit, and modernization programs. These systems, once installed, will be sustained via technology refresh to resolve obsolescence and incorporate future capabilities. Given this program is in the post-delivery phase, technology refresh and sustainability life cycle phase to continue to standardize the system across each ship variant.

CLINs 0002, 0003, 0004, 0006, 0008, and 0009 will support the HT0 hardware baseline efforts. CLINs 1002, 1003, 1004, 1006, 1008, and 1009, if exercised, will support the HT1 hardware baseline efforts.

2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

The following documents, specifications, standards, and handbooks form a part of this SOW and are for use by the Contractor as general guidance. The documents include the basic references for the performance of this SOW.

The list is not intended to be all inclusive. In the event of a conflict between the documents referenced herein and the contents of this SOW, the contents of this SOW supersede the referenced document.

2.1 GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS

2.1.1 MILITARY STANDARDS

MIL-D-23140D Military Specification: Drawings, Installation Control, For

Electronic Equipment, 30 Apr 1982

MIL-HDBK-61B Configuration Management Guidance, 07 Apr 2020

MIL-HDBK-217F

MIL-HDBK-251 Reliability/Design Thermal Applications, 19 Jan 1978

MIL-HDBK-470A Designing and Developing Maintainable Products and

Systems, May 2012

MIL-HDBK-502A Product Support Analysis, 8 Mar 2013

MIL-HDBK-1785 Not 1 System Security Engineering Program Management

Requirements, 22 Apr 2014

MIL-DTL-901E Requirements for Shock Tests High Impact Shipboard

Machinery, Equipment, and Systems, 20 June 2017

MIL-STD-167-1A

MIL-STD-1474E

MIL-STD-461G

Mechanical Vibrations of Shipboard Equipment, 02 Nov 2005

DOD Design Criteria Standard: Noise Limits, 15 Apr 2015

Requirements for Control of Electromagnetic Interference

Characteristics of Subsystems and Equipment, 11 Dec 2015

MIL-STD-882E Standard Practice for System Safety, 11 May 2012

MIL-STD-1472H Human Engineering, 15 Sep 2020

MIL-STD-3018 Chg. 2

MIL-STD-2073-1E Chg. 4

MIL-STD-881F

MIL-STD-3034

Parts Management, 02 Jun 2015

Standard Practice for Military Packaging, 22 Apr 2019

Work Breakdown Structures for Defense Materiel Items, 13

May 2022

Reliability-Centered Maintenance (RCM) Process, 15 Apr

MIL-STD-31000B Technical Data Package (TDP), 31 Oct 2018

2.1.2 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) AND DEPARTMENT OF NAVY (DON) REGULATIONS,

DIRECTIVES AND INSTRUCTIONS

DoDI 1322.26 Development, Management, and Delivery of Distributed Learning, 05 Oct 2017

SECNAVINST 4900.46D Technology Transfer and Security Assistance Review Board, 26 Apr

DoDD 5200.47E Anti-Tamper (AT), 4 Sep 2015

DoDI 5000.02 Chg. 1 Operation of the Defense Acquisition System, 8 Jun 2022

DoDI 8500.01 Cybersecurity, 14 Mar 2014

DoDI 8510.01 Risk Management Framework for DoD Systems, 19 Jul 2022

DoDD 8140.01 Cyberspace Workforce Management, 5 Oct 2020

DoD 8750.01-M Chg. 4

DoDI 5200.48

DoDI 5200.39 Chg. 3

Information Assurance Workforce Improvement Program, as 10 Nov

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI), 6 Mar 2020

Critical Program Information (CPI) Identification and Protection within Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E), 1

Oct 2020

DoD Supplier's Passive RFID Information Guide (available at https://www.acq.osd.mil/log/LOG/.AIT.html/DoD_Suppliers_Passive_RFID_Info_Guide_v15update.pdf), Version 15

Modeling And Simulation Guidance For The Acquisition Workforce, Version 1.01, October 2008, DoD

USD(AT&L)

NAVEDTREA 131-B Chg. 1 Personnel Performance Profile Based Curriculum Development Manual Nov 2010

Naval Open Architecture Contract Guidebook for Program Managers, Version 2.0, 20 Jun 2010 (available at http://acc.dau.mil/NOAGuidebook) https://www.acq.osd.mil/log/LOG/.AIT.html/DoD_Suppliers_Passive_RFID_Info_Guide_v15update.pdf

2.1.3 OPNAV INSTRUCTIONS AND DOCUMENTS

OPNAVINST 1500.76D Naval Training Systems Requirements, Acquisition, and Management, 5 May 2019

OPNAVINST 5090.1D Environmental Readiness Program Manual, 25 Jun 2021

OPNAVINST 5310.23A Navy Personnel Human Systems Integration, 17 Oct 2017

OPNAVINST C5510.93F Navy/Marine Corps Implementation of National Policy on Control of

Compromising Emanations, 10 Jan 2002

04-5023602-00 (October 2004) AN/SQQ-89(V) Operational Requirements Document (Classified Document)

2.1.4 NAVSEA AND PEO IWS INSTRUCTIONS AND DOCUMENTS

NAVSEA S9AA0-AB-GOS-010/GSO General Specifications for Overhaul of Surface Ships, Rev, April

PEO IWS INST 3058.1 Risk Management, 2 Aug 2004

PEO IWS INST 4730.1B Combat System Certification Policy, 8 Feb 2019

PEO IWS INST 4732.1A Element Certification Policy, 2 Jul 2019

PEO IWS INST 5239.1A PEO IWS Surface Navy Combat System Cybersecurity, 27 Sep

PEO IWS NAVSEA 9470-002-A-X-C PEO IWS Enterprise Configuration Control Process User Guide, Jun 2007

IWS5B-12-CMP-009R6 IWS5B Surface Ship USW Combat Systems Configuration

Management Plan, 22 October 2021

IWS5-95-Q89-EPQS-037 REV 8.1 AN/SQQ-89(V) Environmental Test and Product Quality

Specification, 23 March 2023

2.2 GOVERNMENT SPECIFICATIONS

140-2 Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) Security Requirements for Cryptographic Modules, May

2.3 NON-GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS/PUBLICATIONS

The following documents form a part of this SOW to the extent specified herein. In the event of a conflict between the documents referenced herein and the contents of this SOW, the contents of this SOW supersede any reference document.

Technical society and technical association specifications and standards are generally available for reference from libraries. They are also distributed among technical groups and using Federal Agencies.

Copies of specifications, standards, drawings, and publications required by suppliers, in connection with specified procurement functions, should be obtained from the contracting agency or as directed by the contracting officer.

2.3.1 AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE (ANSI) STANDARDS

ANSI/EIA-748C National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA) Program

Management Systems Committee (PMSC), Mar 2013

ANSI/EIA-748-A Standard for Earned Value Management Systems Intent Guide, Jun

ANSI/AIAA-R-100A Recommended Practice for Parts Management

ANSI/J-STD-001 Requirements for Soldered Electrical and Electronic Assemblies, Sep 2006

ANSI/EIA 649 National Consensus Standard for Configuration Management

2.3.2 INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERS

IEEE 828-1998 IEEE Standard for Software Configuration Management Plans

IEEE 14764-2006 ISO/IEC International Standard for Software Engineering - Software

Life Cycle Processes – Maintenance (reaffirmed 2011)

2.3.3 INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS

ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems – Requirements

2.3.4 INDUSTRY STANDARDS

TechAmerica GEIA-HB-0005-1 Program Management / Systems Engineering Guidelines for

Managing the Transition to Lead-Free Electronics (1 Feb 2016)

3.0 REQUIREMENTS

This SOW defines the efforts required for the program management, production manufacturing, systems engineering, logistics and supportability engineering, configuration management, hardware and non-developmental software integration (including material procurement or fabrication, and integration of GFP, as applicable), test, evaluation, and installation support of Surface Ship USW systems.

The Surface Ship USW Combat Systems Contractor shall provide the material, equipment, supplies and technical engineering required to define, design, develop, integrate, test, deliver and support surface combatants such as

CG-47s, DDG-51s, FFG-62s, DDG-1000s, future surface combatants, and Foreign Military Sales (FMS) case platforms.

Frequently within ship classes there are multiple versions of hardware and software. This procurement provides for the upgrades and replacement to these diverse platforms in an Open Architecture (OA) environment.

Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) is an organic part of this procurement that will serve to streamline the effort associated with the alteration of computing infrastructure. This procurement will also make it possible for physical alteration to be performed on installed shipboard cabinets via a Build-in-Place concept. The Build-In-Place philosophy aims to avoid unnecessary removal of AN/SQQ-89 cabinets and subassemblies when conducting a technology refresh. To the maximum extent possible, hardware that is still sustainable and provides the required capacity and capability will be kept in place during an upgrade. Reclaimed components may also be supplied as

GFE to the contractor to be integrated with future system deliveries.

The requirements in Sections 3.1 through 3.8 of the SOW have been organized into the following subparagraphs:

3.1) Program Management: Details the overall Program Manager (PM) requirements across all elements of the contract.

3.2) Engineering: Requirements for the design and integration of hardware baselines; requirements for

Infrastructure as a Service; requirements for the manufacture of hardware systems.

3.3) Test and Evaluation: Details the test and evaluation activities associated with developing, certifying, and fielding USW combat system baselines and updates.

3.4) Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) Support: Details development of source material for ILS products that will be created under other contract(s).

3.5) Configuration Management (CM): Details management of the hardware and software configurations across the development and fielding of USW combat system variants.

3.6) Training: Details activities associated with developing source material for USW combat system training products developed under other contract(s).

3.7) Installation, Checkout and Field Support: Details activities, to include on-site subject matter expertise, in support of USW combat system installation and check out (INCO) performed under other contract(s).

3.8) In-Service Engineering Agent (ISEA) Support: Addresses maintenance activities associated with required updates to USW combat system configurations that have already been fielded.

3.1 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

Applicable CLINs: x002, x003, x004, 0005, x009

The Contractor shall designate a Program Manager (PM) who shall have the responsibility for the planning, execution, and control of all aspects of this contract and the authority to commit the Contractor to specific courses of action. In addition, the PM shall be responsible for directing its subcontracting efforts. The PM shall have the necessary authority to utilize the company’s resources to assure the tasks of this SOW are accomplished. The

Contractor shall authorize the PM to deal directly with PEO IWS 5.0 and/or the designated representative on all matters pertaining to this contract.

The Contractor shall facilitate participation by the large number of organizations contributing to the USW baseline, including establishing relationships with key small businesses participating in USW system development. The Contractor shall be responsible for organizing, coordinating, controlling and reporting the status of all contract activities related to this contract, including activities assigned to subcontractors, to ensure the on-time delivery of all supplies and services specified in this contract.

The Contractor shall perform program management of production CLINs under production Program Management

Office (PMO) CLINs. This requirement may be modified to the extent that production program management efforts are included within each production CLIN.

CDRL A001 – Contractor's Progress and Status Report

3.1.1 FINANCIAL REPORTING

The Contractor shall maintain technical and financial status and generate progress reports. The financial status shall include the Actuals to Date (ATD), Estimate to Complete (ETC), amount funded and outlooks for when additional funding is required, as necessary, for tasks as identified in Technical Instructions.

For production tasks, the Contractor shall utilize an Earned Value Management System (EVMS) and provide a

Contract Performance Report for tracking and reporting costs segregated by tasks. EVMS must be linked to and supported by the Contractor’s management processes and systems to include the integrated master schedule, contract work breakdown structure, change management, material management, procurement, cost estimating, and accounting. The correlation and integration of these systems and processes shall provide for the early indication of cost and schedule problems, and their relation to technical achievement. The Contractor shall submit EVMS data in EVM-CR (https://www.acq.osd.mil/asda/ae/ada/ipm/about-evm-cr.html) in addition to the Integrated Program

Management Report.

CDRL A003 – Integrated Program Management Data and Analysis Report (IPMDAR)

CDRL A061 – Cost Data Summary Report https://www.acq.osd.mil/asda/ae/ada/ipm/about-evm-cr.html

3.1.2 CONTRACT WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE

The Contractor shall develop and maintain the Contract Work Breakdown Structure (CWBS) and CWBS dictionary using MIL-STD-881F for guidance. The CWBS provides the basis for further extension by the

Contractor to lower levels during the performance of the contract. The Contractor shall extend the CWBS down to a minimum of three (3) levels required to provide adequate internal management, surveillance, and performance measurement, regardless of the reporting level stipulated in the contract for Government visibility. The Contractor shall use the CWBS as the primary framework for contract planning, budgeting, and reporting of the cost, schedule, and technical performance status to the Government. The Contractor shall analyze the system requirements specified in this SOW and the system specifications and translate them into a structure representing the products and services that comprise the entire work effort under the contract. Changes to the CWBS or associated definitions, at any reporting level, require approval of the Government.

CDRL A002 – Contract Work Breakdown Structure

3.1.3 INTEGRATED BASELINE REVIEWS

The Contractor shall engage jointly with the Government’s Program Manager in Integrated Baseline Reviews

(IBR) to evaluate risks inherent in the Contractor’s planned performance measurement baseline established from the culmination of Delivery Orders in effect per year during execution of the contract. The Contractor and

Government PM shall jointly determine the initial IBR baseline 90 days after a hardware order is issued;

subsequent baselines will be established prior to the year of execution. Each IBR shall verify that the Contractor is using a reliable performance measurement baseline, which includes the entire scope of work for the culmination of Delivery Orders that are in place during the year of execution and is consistent with Contract schedule requirements and has adequate resources assigned.

CDRL A005 – Meeting Minutes

CDRL A006 – Meeting Agenda

3.1.4 INTEGRATED MASTER SCHEDULE

The Contractor shall establish and maintain the initial baseline Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) by logically networking detailed program activities, task interdependencies, and critical path activities to completion of the contract. Any changes to the baseline require approval by the Government. The schedule shall contain the planned events and milestones, accomplishments, exit criteria, and all activities from contract award to the completion of each system baseline. The schedule shall reflect all assigned Technical Instructions. The IMS must have a direct and traceable correlation with events in the Program Management Plan (PMP). The Contractor shall make periodic deliveries of the IMS in accordance with the Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL).

CDRL A003 – Integrated Program Management Data and Analysis Report (IPMDAR)

3.1.5 SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL

The Contractor shall identify and monitor subcontractor technical, quality, schedule, and milestone achievement on a continuing basis, according to the Contractor’s own established subcontract management techniques. The

USW system is comprised of segments developed and maintained by a multi-organizational community of experts, including a large number of small businesses. The infrastructure of the USW system is determined by the

Program Office.

3.1.6 PROGRAM RISK ANALYSIS

The Contractor shall perform a continuous analysis of program, technical, cost and schedule risk. The analysis shall identify the risks associated with each area, identify the impact of each risk on the overall program, and propose approaches for reducing identified risks. The Contractor shall report risk analysis in the Contractor’s

Progress, Status and Management Report and presented during Program and Technical Reviews.

CDRL A004 – Risk Management Status Report

3.1.7 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PLAN

The Contractor shall develop a Program Management Plan (PMP) for the program that will support Government established schedule requirements as documented and specified in this SOW and any subsequent Technical

Instructions. Using a metrics based management approach, the Contractor shall document in the PMP all planning, scheduling, technical, cost, risk, and quality monitoring/reporting of each Technical Instruction/contracted tasks with program-wide visibility of plan versus actual efforts under this contract. The Contractor shall provide its proposed metrics in the PMP.

CDRL A019 – Program Management Plan

3.1.8 MEETINGS

The Contractor shall conduct program progress and status review meetings at regular intervals at times and places mutually agreed upon between the Contractor and PEO IWS 5.0. The Contractor shall hold these meetings with a minimum frequency of two times per year. The Contractor shall invite PEO IWS 5.0, or such representatives as designated by PEO IWS 5.0, to the meetings. The Contractor shall issue a schedule for Program Reviews on a quarterly basis that plans at least 6 months into the future. The Contractor shall conduct Technical Interchange

Meetings (TIM) in accordance with each Technical Instruction.

At each program review the Contractor shall report at a minimum the status of the following activities:

a) Cost/schedule performance

b) Small Business Utilization

c) Design and technical issues

d) Engineering

e) Risk analysis

f) Reliability and maintainability

g) Test and evaluation

h) Production

i) Logistics development

j) Safety program

k) Configuration management

l) Government Furnished Property (GFP) status

m) Efforts authorized under Technical Instructions

n) Data items delivery schedule

o) Hazardous material management

p) Cybersecurity / Anti-Tamper

q) Field Engineering Support/Post Delivery Support

The Contractor shall prepare agendas for Contractor-hosted meetings, program reviews, Integrated Product Teams

(IPTs) and all other meetings/reviews. The agendas shall be reviewed jointly between the Government and

Contractor and distributed electronically (i.e., e-mail or other suitable manner) by the Contractor. The Contractor shall keep minutes of the meetings unless otherwise directed by the Government. Minutes of major programmatic and technical review meetings highlighted above, shall include a summary of discussions, copies of handouts or graphics, and a listing of action items, and distributed electronically.

CDRL A005 – Meeting Minutes

CDRL A006 – Meeting Agenda

CDRL A029 – Contractor's Risk Management Plan

3.1.9 DESIGN DISCLOSURE, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DATA RIGHTS

The Contractor shall establish and maintain a process that will provide design disclosure directly to third party developers via electronic access to in-process design documentation. The Contractor shall support initiatives of the Shipboard Combat Systems Development community intended to achieve open architecture and commonality.

The Contractor shall establish an Associate Contractor Agreement with each third-party developer and coordinate disclosure directly with the developers. The exchange of information must be structured so as to protect the

Contractor's and third-party developers’ proprietary rights in the information. The Contractor shall furnish to the

Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), if requested by the PCO, a copy of the Associate Contractor Agreement and copies of any written communication between the Contractor and the third-party developers that is pertinent to this contract. The Contractor shall discuss and attempt to resolve any problems between the Contractor and the third-party developers and notify the PCO if required, in writing, of any problems including documentation of problem resolution. The Contractor is responsible to ensure that all software delivered under this contract is properly marked with the delivered product. In addition, metadata for documents shall be provided with all final

USN document products.

3.1.10 NON-DEVELOPMENTAL ITEMS LICENSES

The Contractor shall be responsible for the procurement of all hardware and software licenses for Non-

Development Item (NDI) products delivered in this contract including both Contractor developed and third-party

NDI. If the Contractor needs to obtain a license for any NDI incorporated into a deliverable under this contract, the Contractor shall notify the Government immediately in writing. This notification shall specify whether the license(s) that need to be procured are transferable to the Government, FMS, and/or any other contractors.

Specifically, licenses shall support transfer of the total integrated system to the Government, including FMS. The notification shall also provide all pricing information necessary to the Government for any such licenses that the

Contractor procures under this Section.

The Contractor shall provide to the Government all licenses and documentation required by the Government to support any NDI that is modified by the Contractor.

3.1.11 DATA MANAGEMENT

The Contractor shall be responsible for the digital generation, reception and electronic delivery of data. All data shall be developed, managed, used, and delivered/exchanged electronically to the greatest extent practical.

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) submitted by email must be digitally signed and encrypted by the

Contractor. The Contractor shall deliver all unclassified electronic deliverable data items via the Government’s web server, PEO IWS 5.0’s Integrated Product Data Management System (iPDM). Individual iPDM accounts must be requested by the Contractor for all personnel who will load or access data into the Government system. A

Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) certificate is required to access all Government databases and it shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to obtain PKI certificates. The Government will provide the Contractor twenty-four hour a day access to iPDM (except for planned maintenance or unplanned outages). The Government will provide training for using iPDM and iPDM application tools if requested. Tracking, review, comment generation and consolidation, comment resolution and approval of the Contract Deliverables shall be performed between the

Contractor and the Government via iPDM.

The Contractor shall maintain a record of any Government Furnished Property (GFP) received, data items submitted, and technical and logistic documents generated in support of USW combat system development and production which is submitted for Government use. The Contractor shall catalog such data in a Data Accession

List (DAL). The Contractor shall provide the Government team access to all data listed in the DAL created for this contract.

CDRL A007 – Data Accession List

When data has been developed under a previous contract, the Contractor may submit a certificate of prior submission in lieu of submitting a duplicate data item. The item must, however, be certified by the Contractor as being 100% correct and in full compliance with the requirements of this contract. The Contractor shall provide a copy of previously submitted data, if requested by the COR.

All contract data delivered by electronic media must be accessible by one or more of the following application programs:

a) NMCI Microsoft Office Suite (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, MS Project)

b) AutoCAD 21.0 with compatibility to Solidworks 2016

c) MATLAB 9.0

d) Interactive Computer Aided Provisioning System (ICAPS) Stand-Alone 5.1 and ICAPS Client/Server (C/S)

(for Provisioning Technical Documentation (PTD) only)

The version of the…