L15PS00378_PPQ_Attachment_7.docx
DOCX document 45 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Oil & Gas IT Support and Development IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- L15PS00378
About this file
Attachment 8 (Attachment 7 to RFP) Past Performance Questionaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_L15PS00378_Amd_000003.pdf | ||
| Sol_L15PS00378_Amd_000002.pdf | ||
| Answers_to_Questions_for_O M_IDIQ_Competition.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Sol_L15PS00378_Amd_000001.pdf | ||
| L15PS00378_Pricing_Worksheet.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| 11515_IDIQ_Labor_Categories_(2).docx | DOCX document | |
| Appendix_1_-_AFMSS_II_Scope_(2).docx | DOCX document | |
| Sol_L15PS00378.pdf | ||
| NFLSS_SRS.docx | DOCX document | |
| Appendix_2_-_NFLSS_Scope_(2).docx | DOCX document | |
| 031715_IDIQ_PWS_Oil_and_Gas_App_Dev_(3).docx | DOCX document | |
| L15PS00378_IDIQ.doc | DOC document | |
| L15PS00378_Pricing_Worksheet.xls | XLS spreadsheet |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Bureau of Land Management Division of Information Resource Management
BLM Oil & Gas Application Development Services
OFFEROR:
Client Organization:
| **FOR GOVERNMENT USE ONLY ONCE COMPLETED** | Page 2 of 5 |
| **FOR GOVERNMENT USE ONLY ONCE COMPLETED** | Page 1 of 5 |
A. GENERAL
This exhibit will not be incorporated into the resultant contract.
This questionnaire is being requested as a provisionary item by the Offeror indicated in response to the referenced solicitation in support of a requirement solicited on behalf of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), National Operations Center (NOC) Contracting Office.
THIS DOCUMENT, ONCE COMPLETED, IS ONLY FOR VIEW BY THE GOVERNMENT.
B. PART I – OFFEROR REFERENCE BACKGROUND INFORMATION
This part shall be filled out by the Offeror within the original Word Document and returned in Word as follows:
| Date to return to BLM NOC: |
| 27 May 2015 |
| Time: |
| 9:00 a.m. MT |
| E-Mail to CS Laura Lomba-Berg: |
| jbrock@blm.gov |
Note: In the instance where the Offeror wishes for the Client organization to illustrate past performance on multiple applicable contracts, the Offeror shall complete and submit separate questionnaire forms.
Name of Client Organization:
Project Manager (PM):
PM E-mail:
Phone:
Contract/Order/Number:
Contract Type:
Contract Value:
Period of Performance:
Other:
Description of the Services Provided (short bullet points):
Description of Significant Accomplishments (short bullet points):
Description of Challenges Faced with Subsequent Solutions (short bullet points):
C. PART II – CLIENT ORGANIZATION INFORMATION
Part II and Part III shall be filled out by the Client Organization and returned in Adobe PDF format as follows:
THIS DOCUMENT, ONCE COMPLETED, IS ONLY FOR VIEW BY THE GOVERNMENT.
| Date to return to BLM NOC: |
| 27 May 2015 |
| Time: |
| 3:00 p.m. MT |
| E-Mail to CS John Brock: |
| jbrock@blm.gov |
Name of Person Completing:
Title:
Street Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail:
Corporate Affiliation with Offeror:
Signature
Date
D.
PART III – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS
1. To what extent was the Contractor reasonable, cooperative and flexible:
2. Describe the Contractor’s responsiveness to, and method used, when correcting issues as needed:
3. Describe any unique, controversial or negative experiences with the Contractor:
4. Describe any termination of services:
5. Describe any claims due to the inability of the Contractor to meet contractual or technical requirements:
Please assess the contractor’s performance using the following rating scale that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation pertaining to the subsequent questions:
| Rating |
| Definition |
| 0. Unknown |
| No record of past performance; or the record is inconclusive |
| 1. Unsatisfactory |
| Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| 2. Marginal |
| Performance did not meet some contract requirements. There were problems yet corrective actions taken by the Contractor were acceptable. |
| 3. Satisfactory |
| Performance met contract requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the Contractor were satisfactory. |
| 4. Very Good |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the organization’s benefit. There were a few minor problems which the Contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner. |
| 5. Exceptional |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the organization’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner. |
Rating
1. The Contractor provided all stated deliverables.
2. The Contractor resolved all claims timely.
3. The Contractor did not cause any delays and services rendered are delivered on time.
4. The Contractor resolved all technology related incidents in a timely manner.
5. The Contractor provided courteous and responsive customer service.
6. The Contractor displayed initiative in meeting current and new customer requirements.
7. Please rate the overall consistency and reliability of the Contractor to meet the terms of the contract or terms of the agreement.
| 8. Would you award another contract or place another order with this contractor? |
| Yes |
No
Additional comments:
Please give any additional remarks on exceptional performance:
Please give any additional remarks on unsatisfactory performance:
Other remarks you wish to make:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .