Attachment_11_Past_Performance_Survey_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 28 KB Posted

Attached to
Custodial Services for the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Solicitation number
ID10180005
Issued by

About this file

Attachment 11 - Past Performance Survey Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
ID10180005_Amendment_04.pdf PDF
Amendment_04_RFP_EPA_Custodial_Services_4-24-18.pdf PDF
Attachment_11_Past_Performance_Survey_Questionnaire_Amd03.docx DOCX document
ID10180005_Amendment_03.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_Space-Performance_Matrix_RFP_4-19-2018_Amd03.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ID10180005_Questions_&_Answers_Amd03.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment_02_3-30-18.pdf PDF
Attachment_7_Quality_Assurance_Surveillance_Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment_13_Key_Personnel_Qualification_Matrix.docx DOCX document
Attachment_9_Question_Submittal_Form.docx DOCX document
Attachment_6_Cleaning_Descriptions_and_Processes.pdf PDF
Attachment_14_Staffing_Plan_Table_Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_16_Wage_Determination_2015-4375.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_EPA-RTP_OARM.pdf PDF
Attachment_10_EPA_Campus_Map.pdf PDF
Attachment_17_WDNo=CBA-2018-11087.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_Space-Performance_Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ID10180005_RFP_EPA_Custodial_Services.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_Snow_Removal-Ice_Control_Locations_Map.pdf PDF
Attachment_5_Agency_Security_Requirements_for_Contractor_Personnel.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_Deliverables_Table.pdf PDF
Attachment_15_Standard_Form_1449.pdf PDF
Attachment_8_COR_Appointment_Letter.pdf PDF
Attachment_12_Past_Performance_Narrative_Sheet.docx DOCX document
Show all 24

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

General Services Administration (GSA)/Federal Acquisition Services (FAS) Office of Personal Services and Human Capital Categories (PSHC)

ATTACHMENT 11

PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

Request for Proposals EPA Custodial Services

ID10180005

Your immediate attention is requested. Please email the completed past performance reference survey questionnaire form ONLY to the following GSA, FAS, PSHC Contracting Officer: Maria.Colville@GSA.Gov. The completed questionnaire must be received by the identified Contracting Officer no later than 12:00 PM PDT on April 20, 2018.

NOTE: DO NOT PROVIDE A COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE OFFEROR FOR WHICH YOU ARE COMPLETING THIS SURVEY FOR. LATE SUBMISSIONS MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED BY THE GOVERNMENT.

You have been identified as a reference for__________________ (insert name of offeror company for which you are completing this past performance survey questionnaire for). Using the rating table, please provide concise comments and ratings (circle, underline, or highlight as appropriate) regarding your average overall assessment of the offeror’s performance under the identified contract, considering up to the past 3 years (if applicable), on the contract identified below. The Government may contact the reference name given to clarify the work your company provided (or is providing) on the contract/task order to assist in determining rationale for rating and/or relevancy for evaluation purposes.

CONTRACT DESCRIPTION INFORMATION:

(NOTE: THE FOLLOWING CONTRACT DESCRIPTION INFORMATION SHALL BE FILLED OUT BY THE REQUESTING PRIME OFFEROR AND PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTOR, IF APPLICABLE, FOR EACH PROJECT BEING SUBMITTED FOR PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE PURPOSES.)

1. Contract Number:

2. Customer Organization Name or Customer Contractor Name

3. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, T&M):

4. Total Award Amount for all Periods:

5. Period of Performance Dates, including any Options, of Contract:

6. Type and Number of Security Clearances Required: (CO: Only include if your acquisition involves the need for Security Clearances)

7. Brief Description of services:

RATING DEFINITION TABLE FOR SURVEY

Rating
Definition
Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CUSTOMER REFERENCE

QUALITY OF SERVICES

1. PLEASE COMMENT AND RATE THE QUALITY OF PRODUCTS OR SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR.

Strengths:

Weaknesses:

Rating: □ EXCEPTIONAL □ VERY GOOD □ SATISFACTORY □ MARGINAL □ UNSATISFACTORY

SCHEDULE

2. PLEASE COMMENT AND RATE THE TIMELINESS OF DELIVERABLES AND SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND ADHERENCE TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE.

Strengths:

Weaknesses:

Rating: □ EXCEPTIONAL □ VERY GOOD □ SATISFACTORY □ MARGINAL □ UNSATISFACTORY

COST CONTROL (DO NOT RATE IF THE CONTRACT OR TASK ORDER WAS FIRM-FIXED-PRICE, UNLESS UPWARD REVISIONS TO THE FFP WERE NECESSARY DURING PERFORMANCE)

3. PLEASE COMMENT AND RATE HOW WELL THE CONTRACTOR PROVIDED SERVICES WITHIN THEIR INITIALLY PROPOSED AWARDED PRICE/COST.

Strengths:

Weaknesses:

Rating: □ EXCEPTIONAL □ VERY GOOD □ SATISFACTORY □ MARGINAL □ UNSATISFACTORY

MANAGEMENT

4. PLEASE COMMENT AND RATE HOW WELL THE CONTRACTOR WAS COOPERATIVE AND RESPONSIVE TO CHANGING TECHNICAL AND/OR FUNCTIONAL NEEDS OF THE CUSTOMER; AND HOW WELL THE CONTRACTOR MANAGED ITS OWN PERSONNEL, AND MANAGED THE USE OF ANY SUBCONTRACTORS (BOTH LARGE AND SMALL).

Strengths:

Weaknesses:

Rating: □ EXCEPTIONAL □ VERY GOOD □ SATISFACTORY □ MARGINAL □ UNSATISFACTORY

UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS (ONLY APPLICABLE TO PRIME OFFEROR)

5. DID THE PRIME CONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACT ANY PART OF YOUR EFFORT TO A SMALL BUSINESS? IF APPLICABLE, PLEASE COMMENT AND RATE THE EXTENT OF SMALL BUSINESS UTILIZATION.

Strengths:

Weaknesses:

Rating: □ EXCEPTIONAL □ VERY GOOD □ SATISFACTORY □ MARGINAL □ UNSATISFACTORY

REGULATORY COMPLIANCE

6. PLEASE COMMENT AND RATE HOW WELL THE CONTRACTOR UNDERSTOOD AND COMPLIED WITH ANY REQUIRED AND/OR UNIQUE REGULATIONS SPECIFIC TO YOUR REQUIREMENT.

Strengths:

Weaknesses:

Rating: □ EXCEPTIONAL □ VERY GOOD □ SATISFACTORY □ MARGINAL □ UNSATISFACTORY

OTHER AREAS (PLEASE STATE APPLICABLE TOPICS)

7. IF THERE ARE ANY OTHER AREAS NOT OTHERWISE COVERED BY THE TOPICS ABOVE THAT YOU FEEL WOULD BE PERTINENT TO THE GOVERNMENT’S PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THIS OFFEOR, PLEASE PROVIDE AS DEEMED APPLICABLE.

Topic(s):

Strengths:

Weaknesses:

Rating: □ EXCEPTIONAL □ VERY GOOD □ SATISFACTORY □ MARGINAL □ UNSATISFACTORY

PERFORMANCE TRENDS OVER THE LAST 3 YEARS

8. DURING AND/OR UPTO THE LAST 3 YEARS OF THE IDENTIFIED CONTRACT, HOW HAS THE GENERAL QUALITY OF PERFORMANCE TRENDED:

Rating: □ UPWARDS □ ABOUT THE SAME □ DOWNWARDS

Comments:

YOUR COOPERATION IN COMPLETING THIS SURVEY IS GREATLY APPRECIATED.

Name of Reference:

Organization:

Title:

Telephone: E-mail:

Signature: Date:

File details come from the government source that posted it.