LRS_PSI_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 56 KB Posted
- Attached to
- HC-130 PSI
- Solicitation number
- HSCG38-12-I-H00007
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
Show all 31
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
HSCG38-13-R-H00001
Long Range Surveillance (LRS), Progressive Structural Inspection (PSI) The Contractor shall submit this questionnaire to references for completion. The references shall return directly to the U. S. Coast Guard, Aviation Logistics Center (ALC), Elizabeth City, NC, at the address or email listed below. The offeror is responsible for ensuring that the questionnaire is completed and returned no later than the closing date of this solicitation (submitted by the reference).
The Coast Guard will use any additional information as needed to determine contractor performance.
EVALUATION INSTRUCTIONS
You have been requested to provide contract-related information for technical qualifications and expertise to provide the capabilities required to perform a C-130 PSI. The contract period is for a base year with four one year option periods. Please provide your assessment of the company’s level of past performance on the contract for which you are a reference. Mark the appropriate block, indicating whether the contractor’s/subcontractor’s past performance was Unsatisfactory, Marginal, Satisfactory or Superior using the following rating guidelines. Space is provided for comments. Comments are encouraged in order to make an informed evaluation of the contractor’s current or previous performance performing PSI’s.
Please send the completed form directly to the mailing address, e-mail address or fax number listed below.
USCG, ALC
Bldg. 63, ALD Attn: Sherri Peele
1664 Weeksville Rd.
Elizabeth City, NC 27909 Sherri.l.Peele@uscg.mil Fax: (252) 335-6840
RATING GUIDELINES
Quality of Product or Service
0 = Unsatisfactory 1 = Marginal 2 = Satisfactory 3 = Superior
| Unsatisfactory |
| Non-conformances are jeopardizing the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of Agency resources. Recovery is not likely. If performance cannot be substantially corrected, it constitutes a significant impediment in consideration for future awards containing similar requirements. |
| Marginal |
| Overall compliance requires minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Satisfactory |
| There are no, or very minimal, quality problems, and the Contractor has met the contract requirements. |
| Superior |
| There are no quality issues, and the Contractor has substantially exceeded the contract performance requirements without commensurate additional costs to the Government. |
Cost Control
0 = Unsatisfactory 1 = Marginal 2 = Satisfactory 3 = Superior
| Unsatisfactory |
| Ability to manage cost issues is jeopardizing performance of contract requirements, despite use of Agency resources. Recovery is not likely. If performance cannot be substantially corrected, this level of ability to manage cost issues constitutes a significant impediment in consideration for future awards. |
| Marginal |
| Ability to control cost issues requires minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Satisfactory |
| There are no, or very minimal, cost management issues and the Contractor has met the contract requirements. |
| Superior |
| There are no cost management issues and the Contractor has exceeded the contract requirements, achieving cost savings to the Government. |
Timeliness of Performance
| Unsatisfactory |
| Delays are jeopardizing the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of Agency resources. Recovery is not likely. If performance cannot be substantially corrected, it constitutes a significant impediment in consideration for future awards. |
| Marginal |
| Delays require minor Agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements. |
| Satisfactory |
| There are no, or minimal, delays that impact achievement of contract requirements. |
| Superior |
| There are no delays and the contractor has exceeded the agreed upon time schedule. |
Business Relations
| Unsatisfactory |
| Response to inquiries and/or technical, service, administrative issues is not effective. If not substantially mitigated or corrected it should constitute a significant impediment in considerations for future awards. |
| Marginal |
| Response to inquiries and/or technical, service, administrative issues are somewhat effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Response to inquiries and/or technical, service, administrative issues are consistently effective. |
| Superior |
| Response to inquiries and/or technical, service, administrative issues exceed Government expectation. |
Please ensure all of the following information is provided.
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Past Performance information is being requested on:
Name of Company being evaluated:
Address:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Period of Performance: From: To:
Total Contract Value: $
Description of Contract:
During the contract performance being evaluated, this firm was the ( Prime Contractor
( Subcontractor
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| N/A |
| 1. |
| Quality of Product or Service – please rate |
Comments for Quality of Product or Service
| 2. |
| Cost Control – N/A |
Comments for Cost Control
| 3. |
| Timeliness of Performance – please rate |
Comments for Timeliness of Performance
| 4. |
| Business Relations – please rate |
Comments for Business Relations
Subcontracts
Were Subcontracts involved? ____Yes ____No
Comments for Subcontracts
Customer Satisfaction
Was the contractor committed to customer satisfaction? ____Yes ____No
Comments for Customer Satisfaction
Past Performance Information Provided by:
Name/Title:
Agency/Company:
Address:
Phone: Fax:
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .