Attach_6-_PPQ_Questionnaire.doc

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

The Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) is in the process of selecting a contractor for the National Leadership Command Capabilities Division (NLCC) Program Engineering Security & Technical (PEST) Support Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) contract.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the Offerors' past and present performance on contracts, which reflect the Offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from Agencies such as yours, which have had firsthand experience with an Offeror, for the evaluation of the Offeror's performance on those contracts.

Our areas of interest in the Offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. Your written response to the questionnaire is requested no later than the proposal due date of 02 January 2018.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire should be completed electronically and emailed to Contracting Officer, Quinton Smith, quinton.a.smith.civ@mail.mil and Contracting Specialist, Michelle Rand, michelle.l.rand.civ@mail.mil .

Your completed questionnaire will be considered SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104 and will become a part of the official contract file.

Your help is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

Respectfully, Quinton A. Smith Contracting Officer 1 Attachment

Past Performance Questionnaire

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When filled in this document is source selection sensitive information iaw FAR 2.101 & 3.104

SECTION 1 - CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor: ______________________________________________________________________________

B. Cage Code of Contractor Contract Was Awarded to: _________________________________

C. Contract Number: _______________________________________ D. Task Order Number (if applicable): ___________________________ D. Contract Type: ______________________________ (FFP, FPI, Cost, CPFF, CPIF, LH, T&M) E. Was this a Competitive Contract? Yes _____ No _____ F. Was this contract performance-based? Yes _____ No _____

G. Additional Past Performance Information for this Contract Available in CPARS/PPIRS? Yes _____ No _____

H. Period of Performance (including option periods): _____________________________________________________ I. Number of Users Support by this Contract: __________

J. Number of Locations/Sites Supported by the Contract: ____________

K. Initial Contract Cost: $____________________________

L. Current/Final Contract Cost: $_______________________________

M. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: _____________________________________ N. Description of service provided:__________________________________________________________________________

SECTION 2 - CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or Agency Name: _________________________________________________________________

B. Customer or Agency Description (if applicable): ____________________________________________________________

C. Geographic Description of Services under this Contract, i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3 - EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's Name: ____________________________________________________________________________________ B. Evaluator's Title: _____________________________________________________________________________________ C. Evaluator's Phone/Fax Number: _________________________________________________________________________ D. Evaluator’s E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________________ E. Number of Years Evaluator Worked on Subject Contract: _____________________

SECTION 4 - EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the Contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

PERFORMANCE LEVEL

EXCEPTIONAL (E) - Performance meets or met contractual requirements and exceeds or exceeded many to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

VERY GOOD (VG) - Performance meets or met contractual requirements and exceeds or exceeded some to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

SATISFACTORY(S) – Performance meets or met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL (M) – Performance does not or did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNSATISFACTORY (U) – Performance does not or did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

NOT APPLICABLE (NA) - Unable to provide a score.

Technical Approach

T1. Ability to do Identity Management Attribute Based Access Control (ABAC) and Signal Sign On (SSO)

T2. Knowledge of Ozone Widget Framework

T3. Experience deploying to the Defense Enterprise Computing Centers (DECCs)

T4. Knowledge of Information Assurance

T5. Experience with Agile Software Methodology

Management Approach

M1. Ability to Plan & Execute a Smooth Transition / Assumption of Responsibilities

M2. Effectiveness of Contract Management (i.e. ability to lead, manage and control the program)

M3. Interaction with Government Personnel and Other Contractor Staff

M4. Ability to Recruit and Retain Key Staff

M5. Effectiveness at devising and adhering to a plan or agreement, such as a Program Management Plan (PMP), which consists of control policies and procedures in accordance with standard industry practices for logistics administration, execution and tracking.

M6. Timeliness / Effectiveness of Problem Resolution

M7. Contractor Personnel Properly Workloaded and Productive

M8. Overall effectiveness in establishing and meeting customer satisfaction objectives

Cost Performance

C1. Ability to effectively manage cost type tasks

C2. Ability to Alert the Government of Constructive Changes before They Occur

C3. Number of Cost-related Equitable Adjustments

C4. Number of Projects / Tasks that Incurred Additional Costs

C5. Ability to Meet Forecasted / Projected Costs

C6. Sufficiency, Accuracy and Timeliness of Cost Reporting

C7. Timely Submission of Correct Invoices

2. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___

No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 5 - NARRATIVE SUMMARY

What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract (what strengths did the contractor bring to the effort)?

What was the contractor’s most negative aspect in the performance of the contract (what were the contractor’s weaknesses)? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Would you have any reservations about using this contractor again?

Evaluator’s Signature

Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire via e-mail to Contracting Officer, Quinton Smith, quinton.a.smith.civ@mail.mil and Contract Specialist, Michelle Rand, michelle.l.rand.civ@mail.mil .