HC102818R0064-0001_Conform_Copy.docx
DOCX document 242 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HC102818R0064
- Issued by
-
Defense Information Systems Agency
About this file
Amended RFP Conform copy (full copy with changes incorporated) with Q&A/updates
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| HC102818R0064_Responses_to_QA_Round_2,_21_June.pdf | ||
| 18R0064__AMD_0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| HC102818R0064-0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Response_to_Questions_HC102818R0064__QA_June_1_2018_(12_June).docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_2__Price_Proposal_Spreadsheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Q&A.docx | DOCX document | |
| Q&A.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_3__Pre-Proposal_Site_Visit_Request.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_3__Pre-Proposal_Site_Visit_Request.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_4__PP_References.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment__1_QASP.pdf | ||
| Attachment_2__Price_Proposal_Spreadsheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_3__Pre-Proposal_Site_Visit_Request.doc | DOC document | |
| HC102818R0064.pdf |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
HC102818R0064
Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)
1. This RFP is to support the Workforce Services Directorate’s requirement for a raised floor and high density cooling and power upgrade at the Oklahoma City, Oklahoma (OKC) data center.
The specifics are as follows:
| Tracking Number |
| HC102818R0064 |
| Task/Delivery Order Title |
| OKC raised floor and high density cooling & power upgrade |
| Small Business Set-Aside |
| Yes- 100% set-aside for small business |
| Order Type |
| firm fixed price (FFP) with cost CLINs |
NAICS
335311. For the purposes of this RFP, the small business size standard is 750 employees.
| Period of Performance |
| The resultant contract will be awarded with a 1-year period of performance (PoP). The anticipated start date of this requirement is July 23, 2018; this date is subject to change. |
| Incumbent Contractor |
| No |
| Section 508 Applicable |
| No |
| Method of Evaluation |
| Lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) |
| Performance Based |
| Yes |
| DD254 Required |
| No |
| Proposal Due Date |
| Thursday, July 02, 2018 at 1300 CST |
2. Offerors are requested to submit a written technical and price proposal in response to the RFP and Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)(Attachment 1). Further information on submission of the technical and price proposals is provided throughout this document.
a. In accordance with Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DARS) 52.209-9000, each offeror shall specifically identify in its proposal whether or not any potential or actual organizational and consultant conflicts of interest (OCCI) as described in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 9.5 exists for this procurement. If the offeror believes that no OCCI exists, the OCCI response shall set forth sufficient details to support such a position. If an offeror believes that an actual or perceived OCCI does exist on this procurement, the offeror shall submit an OCCI plan with the proposal, explaining in detail how the OCCI will be mitigated and/or avoided.
b. Section 508 Accessibility Standards do not apply to this requirement.
c. The following administrative requirements apply to the offeror’s proposals in response to the RFP. The technical portion of the proposal shall include information regarding the offeror’s ability to conform to all required terms and conditions in the solicitation. The offeror’s proposals shall address all aspects of the Performance Work Statement (PWS). Page limitations are identified below, under each evaluation factor, and will be treated as maximums. If exceeded, excess pages will not be read or considered in evaluation of the proposal. The following items will not be considered when calculating page limits: cover page, table of contents, glossary, executive summary, generic resumes, and OCCI mitigation plans. In the event any evaluation notices are issued, page limitations may also be placed on those. The technical portion of the proposal is to be submitted as a Microsoft (MS) Word 2007 or PDF document. The page format shall have a 1-inch margin, using no smaller than an 11 point Ariel, Times New Roman, or Courier New font for all text, to include any text contained in a table. The price proposal spreadsheet (Attachment 2) shall be a separate document from the technical proposal and shall be submitted in MS Excel 2007 format. All formulas shall remain present in the spreadsheet for verification. The total size of each email (including all attachments) shall not exceed 20MB. Email attachments shall not be submitted in a .zip file format. Page limitations shall not be circumvented by including inserted text boxes/pop-ups or internet links to additional information; such inclusions are not acceptable and will not be considered as part of a proposal. The Government reserves the right to not consider for award any proposal that does not adhere to the administrative requirements of this RFP.
d. This requirement is being solicited as a 100 percent set-aside to eligible small business contractors.
3. Evaluation Factors and Basis for Award Determination:
a. Award will be made to the offeror whose proposal is determined to represent the overall best value to the Government, using an LPTA evaluation process. The evaluation factors and subfactors identified in paragraph 3c(1) below will be used in the determination of technical acceptability.
b. After receipt of proposals, the Government will first evaluate the lowest priced proposal. If the lowest priced proposal is determined to be technically acceptable and otherwise properly awardable, no further evaluations will be conducted, and award will be made. If, however, the lowest price proposal is determined to be technically unacceptable and/or otherwise not properly awardable, further evaluations will be conducted.
c. The standards for determining technical acceptability are below, as well as information concerning price proposals.
(1) Technical/Management Approach Factor: The Technical/Management Subfactors will be evaluated and rated either Acceptable or Unacceptable. In order for a proposal to be rated overall Technically Acceptable, each of the following subfactors must be rated Acceptable. Technical/management proposals should not exceed 20 pages.
1. Subfactor 1: PWS Paragraph 6.1.1. In order for this subfactor to be rated Acceptable, the contractor shall provide an acceptable and executable schedule that demonstrates the contractor’s ability to execute the equipment installation and project completion within the stated PoP of 365 calendar days after award.
1. Subfactor 2: PWS Paragraph 6.2.1. In order for this subfactor to be rated Acceptable, the contractor shall provide detailed information describing the specific methods to be utilized in replacing the raised floor components expected to be used, to include specific equipment, material information sheets, or specifications for the raised floor system that are expected to be used in this project. The technical response shall include detailed information that allows the Government to fully evaluate the offeror’s response.
1. Subfactor 3: PWS Paragraph 6.3.1. In order for this subfactor to be rated Acceptable, the contractor shall provide detailed information describing the specific equipment, material information sheets, or specifications for the enclosures that are expected to be used in this project. The technical response shall include detailed information that allows the Government to fully evaluate the offeror’s response.
1. Subfactor 4: PWS Paragraph 6.5.1. In order for this subfactor to be rated Acceptable, the contractor shall provide detailed information describing the specific equipment, material information sheets, or specifications for the in-row coolers (IRC) that are expected to be used in this project. The technical response shall include detailed information that allows the Government to fully evaluate the offeror’s response.
1. Subfactor 5: PWS Paragraph 6.6.1. In order for this subfactor to be rated Acceptable, the contractor shall provide detailed information describing the specific equipment, material information sheets, or specifications for the Power Distribution Units (PDU) that are expected to be used in this project. The technical response shall include detailed information that allows the Government to fully evaluate the offeror’s response.
1. Subfactor 6: PWS Paragraph 6.9.1. In order for this subfactor to be rated Acceptable, the contractor shall provide detailed information describing the specific equipment, material information sheets, or specifications for the Computer Room Air Handlers (CRAH) that are expected to be used in this project. The technical response shall include detailed information that allows the Government to fully evaluate the offeror’s response.
1. Past Performance Factor:
Offerors will be evaluated on performance under existing and prior contracts for similar products or services with the past performance being rated as "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable”. The contractor shall provide documented experience that demonstrates successful completion of projects in raised floor environments, installation of PDUs, and installation of CRAHs; all in a data center environment. In order to be rated Acceptable, the Government must determine that, based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort or that the offeror’s performance record is unknown. For the past performance efforts cites, the contractor shall be the prime contractor on at least two of the efforts. This factor will be rated Unacceptable if, based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
Past performance efforts cited must be for similar services, as outlined in the PWS, with satisfactory performance and must have occurred within the last five years. A minimum of two, but maximum of three, past performance efforts shall be submitted. Each past performance effort submitted shall not exceed two pages. For the past performance effort cites, the contractor shall have been the prime contractor on at least two of the efforts. The Government must be able to determine experience in raised floor environments, installation of PDUs, and installation of CRAHs (all in a data center environment), through review of the past performance efforts submitted. In order to be rated acceptable, the offeror shall have confirmed performance in all three areas identified. The Government reserves the right to obtain information relative to present and past performance on its own, in addition to that provided by the offeror. Past performance information may be obtained through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System, through interviews with program managers on past efforts, or any other sources known to the Government.
1. Price Factor:
(a) The price proposal will be evaluated using one or more of the techniques defined in FAR Part 15.404 in order to determine if they are reasonable and complete. The Government will determine completeness of the offeror’s proposal by verifying that all solicitation requirements have been priced, figures are correctly calculated, and costs are presented in a clear and useful format. The offeror shall submit pricing for the scope of work requested for the 1-year PoP. The total evaluated price will consist of the contractor’s proposed price for the work requested.
(b) Offerors should ensure price proposals include detailed information regarding the resources required to accomplish the task (e.g., labor categories, labor hours, number of employees for each labor category, rates, incidental equipment, contract access fees, etc.). Again, the price proposal spreadsheet shall be a separate document from the technical/management proposal. The offeror shall submit their price proposal utilizing the Government-provided contract line item numbering (CLIN) worksheet (Attachment 2). The spreadsheet shall include all formulas. See attached pricing worksheet, tab “Pricing Instructions” for more information.
(c) Due to the likely inability of any offeror to accurately estimate material/equipment purchases associated with this requirement, the Government is providing plug numbers to be used by all offerors when proposing other direct costs (ODC) for installation contingencies. Offerors are instructed to propose the plug number for ODCs in the following EXACT amount. However, note that actual incurrence of the costs shall be authorized by the contracting officer representative (COR) in writing prior to incurrence.
ODCs CLIN 0004 Installation Contingency $336,015.28
The proposed ODC amounts for material/equipment shall be the EXACT amount listed above. Any indirect costs associated with installation contingencies shall not be added to the plug number, as it is already included. A proposal that fails to bid the plug number EXACTLY as provided may be excluded from further consideration.
Table 1. Technical/Management Ratings
| Rating |
| Description |
| Acceptable |
| Proposal/quotation clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation. |
| Unacceptable |
| Proposal/quotation does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation. |
Table 2. Past Performance Ratings
| Rating |
| Description |
| Acceptable |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. |
| Unacceptable |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. |
4. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions or seek clarifications if the contracting officer (KO) determines they are necessary. In the event issues pertaining to a proposed task cannot be resolved to the KO’s satisfaction, the Government reserves the right to withdraw and cancel the proposed contract. In such an event, offerors will be notified in writing. In the event a competitive range is established and the KO determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the KO may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition.
5. In response to this RFP, no terms, conditions, or assumptions will be entertained. If terms, conditions, or assumptions are included in a proposal, the proposal may be excluded on grounds that it failed to comply with the RFP’s instructions.
6. An offeror agrees that if its offer is accepted within 90 calendar days from the date of receipt of proposals (unless a different period is stated in the proposal), it will furnish the items and/or services identified in its proposal at the price offered to the designated point(s) within the time specified in the contract.
7. Portions of the successful offeror’s proposal may be incorporated into the contract.
8. Questions should be addressed to sharon.e.brace.civ@mail.mil. Please provide any questions, in writing, no later than June 1, 2018 at 1400 (CST). The Government reserves the right to not answer questions submitted after this time.
9. Proposals are due no later than July 02, 2018 at 1300 (CST) and should be submitted electronically to sharon.e.brace.civ@mail.mil. The Government will not accept proposals that are not submitted electronically (i.e., through e-mail).
10. Site Visit Information. A site visit will be offered at the place of performance identified in the PWS. A site visit is tentatively planned for May 31, 2018 at 1:00 pm Central Standard Time (CST) during which contractors may obtain a better understanding of the work required. Offerors are strongly urged to attend this site visit to fully inform themselves about the location and conditions under which the work is to be performed.
All questions raised and not addressed, following the conclusion of the site visit, must be submitted in writing to the Contracting Officer no later than 1 working days after the site visit (June 1, 2018). A record of the site visit and answers to the questions submitted will be distributed to all contractors as an amendment to the solicitation. Contractors are cautioned that, notwithstanding any remarks or clarifications given at the site visit, all terms and conditions of their contract apply unless changed in writing by the Contracting Officer.
1.1 Proposed Site Visit Itinerary
1:00 pm - Meet interested contractor representatives at:
8705 Industrial Boulevard (Building 3900) Tinker AFB OK 73145 (Sign in at base main gate) 1:15 pm - Project Overview and Location tour with DISA Facilities. (No photos are allowed.)
3:00 pm - Return to Conference Room for Question and Answer Session if needed.
3:30 pm - Conclude Site Visit and depart facility.
Visit Authorization Request Requirements
A Visit Authorization Request (VAR) Letter is required for all individuals requesting visitor access to the facility. The request must be on file with the Data Center Oklahoma City Security Office at least 48 hours PRIOR to the actual date of the site visit. Companies are required to provide a Visit Authorization Request (VAR) letter listing each employee visiting or working at a Computing Services facility. The letter must be on company letterhead, be signed by the company’s Facility Security Officer (FSO), and contain the following information:
· Company’s Name and Address
· Name and Address of the Facility to be Visited:
DISA Data Center Oklahoma City 8705 Industrial Boulevard (Building 3900) Tinker AFB OK 73145
· Date(s) of Visit
· Purpose of Visit
· Contract Number: RFP # HC120818R0064
· Full Name and Telephone Number of Hosting Facility’s POC Charles Davis, Facility Manager, (405) 855-8135, charles.e.davis354.civ@mail.mil Gary Brown, Alt Facility Manager, (405) 855-8086, gary.f.brown2.civ@mail.mil
· Visitor’s Name, Social Security Number, Date and Place of Birth, Citizenship, and Clearance Data (clearance level, agency who granted clearance and date granted)
· Company’s Cognizant Security Office’s Name and Address
· Company’s Clearance Data (clearance and safeguarding levels, date granted and CAGE code)
· Company FSO’s Name, Telephone Number, Signature and Date
The VAR will be sent (normally via e-mailed) from the company to the Security Manager/Monitor at the Computing Services site where the work is to be performed.
| Attn: | Security Manager |
| E-mail: | disa.tinker.ops.list.securitymanager@mail.mil |
| Phone: | (405) 855-8208 / (405) 855-8083 |
11. Attachments & Appendixes. The PWS includes reference to various appendixes. CONTRACTOR’S INTERESTED IN PROPOSING THIS EFFORT SHOULD REQUEST COPIES OF THE APPENDIXES FROM MR. RODNEY PLACZEK AT at rodney.c.placzek.civ@mail.mil.
The following attachments are associated with this requirement:
Attachments:
Attachment 1_ Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) Attachment 2_ Price Proposal Spreadsheet Attachment 3_ Pre-Proposal Site Visit Request Attachment 4_ Past Performance Reference Sheet
The following appendixes are associated with this requirement:
Appendix A_ Design Concept Drawings Appendix B _Flooring Specification Appendix C _ MIL-STD-188-124B Appendix D _PDU & STS Specifications Appendix E_Sample MOP Detail Appendix F_Electrical Safety Program Appendix G_ BAS System Div 25 Integrated Automation Appendix H_CRAH Specification Appendix I _SEC Inventory Format Appendix J_Label Standard
PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT
Performance Work Statement (PWS) DISA Computing Center Oklahoma City Raised Floor and High Density Cooling & Power Upgrade As of April 27, 2018
| Contract Number: |
| To be determined (TBD) |
| Task Order Number: |
| Not applicable (N/A) |
| Tracking Number: |
| HC102818R0064 |
| Contractor Name: |
| TBD |
| Follow-on to Previous Contract and Task Order Number: |
| N/A |
1. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR).
a. Primary COR.
| Name: |
| TBD |
Organization:
Department of Defense Activity Address Code (DODAAC):
Address:
Phone Number:
Fax Number:
E-Mail Address:
b. Alternate COR.
| Name: |
| TBD |
Organization:
DODAAC:
Address:
Phone Number:
Fax Number:
E-Mail Address:
2. Contract or Task Order Title. DISA Computing Center Oklahoma City Raised Floor and High Density Cooling & Power Upgrade
3. Background.
DISA Computing Centers provide routine and mission-critical computer processing resources and support to numerous Government agencies, 24 hours per day and seven (7) days a week. DISA’s operational goal is to provide high availability and redundancy to all supported programs and workloads at a Tier III redundant datacenter. The Oklahoma City computing center needs repairs and upgrades to the raised floor and high density cooling and power solutions for new information technology (IT) missions. The existing raised floor panels are wood core and must be replaced with concrete core panels for fire protection and higher floor load capacity, to meet the DOD standards.
DISA computing centers are laid out with a traditional hot aisle/cold aisle equipment rack configuration. The rack aisles are not enclosed with doors or a ceiling. The aisles are open and the rooms are typically kept cool. This is effective for racks that generate under five (5) kilowatts of heat load. Racks that generate higher kilowatts of heat require exploration of different cooling alternatives. The best way to do this is enclosing the racks in a cold aisle configuration. The cold aisle containment enclosures with IRCs provide a higher concentration for cooling the high density IT equipment racks. Additionally, another new IT mission requires secure space to be powered and cooled in a standard computing room configuration with static transfer switch (STS)/PDU pairs and CRAHs.
4. Objectives.
Upgrade the raised-access floor by replacing all access floor panels with concrete core panels; and upgrade or modify, as needed, the access flooring structure to support a floor load of 2500 pounds per square foot (psf). Clean the structural floor during the access floor replacement and upgrade the signal reference grid grounding system. Provide and install six (6 each) cold aisle containment enclosures for DISA computer equipment racks in Computer Room 147 in the southwest corner as referenced in the Design Concept Drawings at Appendix A. The racks will be arranged in linear configurations with six feet separating two rack rows. The contractor shall fully enclose six cold aisles of the proposed linear rack configurations with containment systems, complete with doors and retractable ceiling. The contractor shall provide, install, and connect eighteen new 40-kilowatt (kW) IRCs, three in each enclosure, with two (2 each) cold water manifold distribution units that will support the IRCs. Underfloor differential pressure sensors and controls shall also be installed and integrate on specified existing CRAHs. The contractor shall also provide, install, and connect a total of 16 200kVA static transfer switch/power distribution unit STS/PDU sets to support the IT equipment. Four STS/PDU sets shall support the new enclosures. Eight STS/PDU sets shall be provided and installed to support IT workload throughout Computer Room 147 and four STS/PDU sets shall support IT workload in Computer Room 180. Additionally, four 30-Ton CRAH units shall be purchased, installed, and connected in Room 180. Building automation system (BAS) controls shall be connected and integrated on all new equipment items, as specified. This project will also require red line installation shop drawings, and methods of procedures (MOPs) that have detailed sequence of events for tie-in circuits from the power source panels to the STS/ PDU pairs. Work includes all installation of equipment, electrical supplies, connections, start-up and testing commissioning, quality control, and parts warranty.
5. Scope.
5.1. Task 1: Develop detailed project schedule, investigate existing conditions, prepare and submit shop drawings for approval by the Government. Prepare and submit product data and a commissioning plan for start-up and testing for all electrical and mechanical equipment.
5.2. Task 2: Raised floor upgrade to replace all access floor panels with new concrete core panels and upgrade or modify, as needed, the access flooring structure. Clean the structural concrete floor during replacement the access flooring system. Signal Reference Grid (SRG) shall be detached, as needed, from the access floor system structure to allow for floor upgrade. Re-attach SRG to the new access flooring system and expand/extend to full 2’x2’ grid and bond with new racks to conform to industry standard.
5.3. Task 3: Purchase and install six (6 each) cold aisle containment enclosures between the planned linear rack configurations with air tight double sliding doors at both ends of the enclosure, retractable ceiling, and removable side panels for IT equipment racks.
5.4. Task 4: Purchase, install, and test two (2 each) chilled water distribution units (WDU).
5.5. Task 5: Purchase, install, start-up, and test 18 (18 each) 40 kW IRCs, three units in each enclosure.
5.6. Task 6: Purchase, install, integrate, and test 18 (18 each) underfloor differential pressure sensors and controls contacted to specified existing CRAH in Room 145 and Room 147.
5.7. Task 7: Purchase, install, start-up, and test 12 (12 each) static transfer switches (STS) and 12 (12 each) 200 kVA PDUs in Computer Room 147 to support IT equipment.
5.8. Task 8: Purchase, install, start-up and test four (4 each) STSs and four (4 each) 200 kVA PDUs in Room 180. The four new STSs and PDUs shall be paired as four sets with two on the A-bus and two on B-bus critical power.
5.9. Task 9: Purchase, install, start-up, and connect four (4 each) 30-Ton CRAH units with differential pressure sensors and controls in Room 180.
5.10. Task 10: Purchase and have installed all necessary BAS Controls systems on new equipment through the DISA Facilities BAS services contractor, SPEC LLC.
1. Performance Requirements.
0. Task 1: Develop detailed project schedule, investigate existing conditions, prepare and submit shop drawings for approval by the Government. Prepare and submit product data and submit a start-up and testing plan for new equipment, to accomplish the project requirements as identified in this PWS and on the Design Concept Drawings (Appendix A).
0. Develop Detailed Project Schedule with phasing plan. The Contractor shall develop and submit for review and approval a detailed project schedule. Project schedule shall be developed using Microsoft Project or similar program. Schedule shall use ‘critical path’ method and identify all milestones; the schedule shall include start date, submittal dates, key milestone dates, and completion dates, as a minimum. The project schedule shall incorporate a phasing plan and MOPs to maintain the existing operational mission. The contractor’s plan shall include, but not limited to: Quality control plan, protection of existing systems to remain, building access, location of dumpsters, contractors’ trainer, and phasing of the project execution. The project schedule shall be reviewed at monthly progress meetings.
0. Investigate Existing Conditions. The contractor and subcontractors shall perform site visits and review the as-built drawings, as necessary, to gather information on existing conditions and have a complete understanding of existing conditions and required work. The contractor shall investigate and verify all existing conditions, including (but not limited to) working conditions, access, and other items/systems, as required. DISA’s existing record drawings will be made available to the contractor, but these record drawings should not be viewed as complete and accurate. The contractor shall field verify all existing conditions.
0. Prepare and submit detailed shop drawings and product data (as required).
0. Prepare and submit a plan for the connection, start-up, and operational testing of all installed power and cooling equipment, IAW American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) 202- 2013 and the factory start-up testing procedures.
0. The contactor shall take precautions to ensure no computing equipment will be taken offline (power or IT communication loss) during the replacement/installation of the raised floor panels and components. The contractor must ensure, before raised floor panel replacement, that they can move the IT rack(s) and keep the IT equipment operational while replacing the raised flooring underneath the piece of equipment. Racks are connected with power cables and IT cabling via cable tray under the raised floor.
0. Task 2: Raised Floor Upgrade.
1. Contractor shall replace the raised-access floor panels in Rooms 145 (approx. 1,152 sf) and Room 147 (approx. 31,388 sf) to include any damaged floor structure, stringers or pedestals, and associated plates and connections as required. Access Floor Specification is provided at Appendix B.
0. Access Panels shall be concrete core (Concore) 2500 psf strength capacity to fit on the existing access floor structure.
0. There are approximately 8,076 panels with a requirement to provide and install approximately 7,700 solid panels and 376 perforated panels. Perforated panels shall be steel, 25 percent perforation and 1,250 psf strength. Contractor shall verify floor panel count on site.
0. An additional 75 perforated panels and 150 solid panels shall be provided on pallets as spare panels for future use by the Government.
0. Cut-outs shall be done on panels for IT and power cabling on edges of panels. No center cut holes in panels shall be used for cable access. Cutting shall be done outside the raised floor environment to avoid dust and debris near the IT equipment, unless required to remove existing panels with center access holes, which shall be done with high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) vacuums in use.
0. Grommets shall be installed to cover cut-outs in access floor panels.
0. The raised access floor shall be removed and replaced in incremental sections so as not to disrupt the temperature-controlled climate in the data center room.
0. Phasing plan shall be developed to allow continual operation of IT racks and limit the number of open floor area to maintain cooling to the racks. The phasing plan shall be submitted for Government review and approval.
0. The finished raised floor shall be level to meet the tolerance criteria as stated in the Access Floor Specification at Appendix B. Laser-leveling device shall be used to ensure floor is level.
1. Replace or upgrade, as needed, the access flooring structure to support required load capacity of 2500 psf. The pedestals and stringers have been determined, through separate engineering study, to be adequate to meet the 2500 psf requirement and shall remain in place unless found to be damaged, requiring replacement.
| 6.2.2.1 | Existing pedestals utilize a screw connection top plate, capable of receiving Concore 2500 compatible stringers. Existing stringers are four feet long and are laid out in basket weave configuration, meeting Concore 2500 requirements. However, stringers are one inch wide, compared to a width of approximately 0.8 inch for Concore 2500 standard stringers. Field verification will be required to determine how the Concore 2500 panels will fit with the existing stringer system. |
| 6.2.3. | Clean the structural concrete floor during replacement of the access flooring system. |
0. Cleaning shall be performed using vacuums equipped with HEPA filtration systems, removing all dust and debris from the sub floor area. Vacuums capable of capturing particles as minute as .3 microns at a 99.97 percent efficiency rating will be utilized.
0. Protect the existing cable tray under the raised floor and support the trays, as necessary, during access floor system upgrade.
0. Leak detection cable system shall remain in-place and operational around the CRAH units. Care shall be taken to prevent damage to the under-floor leak detection system.
0. SRG grounding system shall be upgraded to meet the SRG requirements in MIL Standard 188-124B (most current) at Appendix C. This SRG upgrade will expand on the existing grounding system to a 2’x2’ grid and will be bonded to IT racks. If access floor pedestals need to be replaced, reattach the existing SRG grounding wire, as required.
0. Task 3: Purchase and install six (6 each) cold aisle containment enclosures.
2. Contractor shall purchase and install six cold aisle enclosures for DISA IT equipment racks in Computer Room 147, as shown on Design Concept Drawings (Appendix A). The enclosures shall be self-standing at industry standard height of approximately 78 inches, complete with sliding doors on each end of the cold aisle, a roof system to cover the top of the cold aisle that extends the entire length of the aisle and connects to each door assembly, and removable side panels for ease of rack installation. Width of enclosures is approximately six feet (6’) wide, by a length of twelve feet (12’) for short aisles and sixteen feet (16’) for two longer aisles, as noted on drawings. The enclosure shall meet the following requirements:
2. Sliding door at each end of the enclosures shall be manually operated and provide unobstructed access, with a maximum clearance. Assembly shall cover completely the end of row’s typical rough opening of approximately 72 inches wide by 78 inches high.
2. A ceiling shall cover the top of the cold aisle completely, extend the entire length of the cold aisle, and connect to each double sliding door assembly at the ends of the aisles. Bracing shall be provided, as required, to provide a stable and rigid structure. Roof light transmittance, per American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D1003, shall be 85% minimum.
2. The cold aisle containment enclosures shall comply with all requirements of National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 75 standards, and automatically allow for entrance of clean agent into the CACS in the event of a fire.
2. Fire system connections shall be made for any retractable roof of the enclosures to the appropriate fire alarm panel to ensure activation of the roof mechanism to retract, as required.
2. If required, electrical requirements of any motor for the retractable/removable ceiling typically requires 120V/1PH/60 Hz. Circuit capacity shall be manufacturer specific. All wiring shall be in conduit and connected to a dedicated branch emergency backup power supply circuit to ensure that the retractable ceiling will operate during a facility power outage.
2. Blanking panels shall be provided to allow for the removal, repositioning, and/or the replacement of IT equipment racks with minimal modifications. The blanking panel sizes are determined by the layout of the cold aisle containment provided in the location plan.
2. The entire containment system shall be airtight.
2. Grommets and/or blanking plates will be used to accommodate variances or discrepancies in the IT rack heights and ensure an airtight seal.
0. Task 4: Purchase, install and test two (2 each) chilled WDUs in Room 147.
3. Contractor shall provide, install, and connect two (2 each) WDUs with manifold to support the IRCs. An acceptable WDU product is Liebert Water Distribution System model number WDS12BP0, or an approved Government equivalent that meets the following requirement:
0. Each WDU shall be able to support up to 12 (12 each) 40 kW IRCs with bottom supply and return connections.
3. The WDUs shall be installed IAW the Design Concept Drawings (Appendix A). Verify final location with site, prior to installation.
3. The chilled water piping supporting each WDU shall be connected to the existing underfloor chilled water distribution loop in a rectilinear fashion, as shown on the design concept drawings.
3. The contractor shall connect each WDU to the existing 6-inch diameter underfloor chilled water pipes with new 3-inch diameter branch chilled water supply and return pipes. When connecting to the existing 6-inch diameter chilled water pipes, the contractor shall install two (2) 6-inch diameter by 3-inch diameter tee fittings (one each for supply and return pipes) at locations shown on the design concept drawings. The contractor shall verify the length and make any adjustments during the pre-bid walk-through. No piping will be placed in the cold aisles and restrict cooling air flow to perforated floor tiles.
3. Contractor shall coordinate the isolation of the chilled water distribution in order to install WDU tee fittings with and receive approval from DISA and site facilities.
3. Contractor shall provide and install the following ancillaries for each WDU branch chilled water piping: 1) branch isolation valves at the main connection, 2) a strainer with blow down valve and capped hose end connection on the chilled water supply branch with isolation valves, 3) a strainer pipe by-pass for servicing, 4) a strainer with blow down valve and capped hose end connection on the by-pass with isolation valves. Refer to design concept drawings for piping schematic and details.
3. The insulation for all piping shall be flexible closed-cell elastomeric. The seal face shall be taped after the adhesive has been applied and has cured. Elastomeric shall be provided in lengths no less than three (3) feet, unless the piping is less than three (3) feet or unless the end of the pipe requires a shorter piece.
3. Labeling of WDUs shall be IAW DISA Identification, Labeling and Marking standards (Appendix J – Label Standard). Label shall reflect: WDU -1-x-01 and WDU -1-x-02
0. Task 5: Purchase, install, and test a total of 18 (18 each) 40 kW IRCs, three units in each enclosure.
4. Contractor shall install three (3 each) 40 kW chilled water type IRC into each of the six new cold aisle containment enclosures, in accordance with the Design Concept Drawings (Appendix A). Verify final locations with site prior to installation. IRCs shall be manufactured by APC, Vertiv (formerly Liebert/Emerson Power) or a Government-approved equivalent that meets the following requirements:
0. IRC modules shall be designed to produce cooled air at specified capacity with chilled water supplied; generally at 45 to 55 degrees F and within 10 degrees F. Chilled water supply temperatures and change of temperature range may vary, and shall be verified.
0. IRC modules dimensionally shall fit within a standard tile’s (24 inches) width, and its maximum height shall be of a typical 42U type rack of approximately 78 inches high.
0. IRC cabinet shall have a frame constructed of 16-gauge (minimum) welded, formed steel with exterior panels of 18-gauge (minimum) steel and insulation on the interior sides of 3.7 pounds per cubic foot (minimum). Front and rear panels shall be hinged door-type or detachable, constructed of 18-gauge (minimum) perforated steel with 69 percent free area (minimum). Doors/panels shall be equipped with a keyed lock to provide means of securing access to internal components. Cabinet and panels shall be powder-coated black.
0. Internal components shall be serviceable from the front and rear panels and not require removal from the rack row to perform standard maintenance, repairs, or internal component replacement.
0. IRC units shall include casters and leveling feet to allow ease of installation in the row and provide a means to level the equipment.
0. IRC fans shall be direct drive, variable speed, electronic commuted (EC), and dynamically balanced. The fans shall be configured for a draw-through arrangement to provide uniform air flow over the entire face of the coil and maximum performance. Fans shall be soft start type to minimize in-rush current when starting.
0. Units shall utilize a copper tube/aluminum fin coil system and shall be designed to maximize face area, decrease face velocity, and minimize pressure drop. The coil shall be configured in a counter flow design to optimize heat transfer.
0. IRC units shall contain a factory installed condensate pump with dual float control and alarm. Each unit shall be equipped with a stainless steel corrosion-free condensate catch pans.
0. Air filters shall be 30 percent efficient per ASHRAE 52.1, Underwriters Laboratories (UL) Class 2 (minimum efficiency reporting value 8 per ASHRAE 52.2).
0. IRC will have a local graphic monitoring/control display affixed to the unit and will be microprocessor-based. The display shall be capable of reporting all status and alarm conditions. Each unit shall also have a Modbus communications connection.
0. Control systems on each IRC shall comply with, but not limited to the following: 1) A network management card to provide controls management through a computer network. Management through the network should include the ability to monitor and control each unit. 2) An appropriate communication card or hardware to support connecting to a site’s BAS as well as being graphically represented on the BAS. The communication protocol shall be BacNet, to comply with DISA standards.
4. IRCs shall be installed per manufacture’s recommendations and connected to new WDUs (refer to Task 4). The length of the water lines longest run from the WDU to the IRCs is approximately 40 feet or less.
4. Installation of three IRCs into each enclosure shall have chilled water line connections to the new WDUs with 1-inch multi-layer composite PEX tubing or equal, PEX-AL-PEX-type, formed with proper bend radii to prevent flattening. Chilled water pipes shall be completely insulated with closed cell elastomeric insulation, per ASHRAE standard.
4. Chilled water piping shall be routed under the raised floor in the rack rows hot aisle and connected at the rear of each IRC unit. No piping will be placed in the cold aisles, to avoid restricting cold air flow to perforated floor tiles.
4. Chilled water valves shall be modulated by a micro-processor controlled two-way valve to maintain optimum cooling performance.
4. Condensate drain line of 1-inch diameter shall be routed to the nearest floor drain for each IRC. If the condensate drain lines are combined, the drain line size shall be approved by the Government.
4. Remote rack inlet temperature sensors (three minimum) shall be provided with each unit for field placement and connection to the IRC module, with approximately 20 feet of cable. Microprocessor shall accept inputs from rack inlet temperature sensors to control IRC unit.
4. IRCs shall be connected to the existing BAS system to allow monitoring of the unit status, temperature settings, and output.
4. Electrical system of the IRCs shall comply with the input voltage, shall be 480 volts alternating current (VAC) at 60 Hz.
4. Main disconnect switch for each IRC shall be front-panel mounted to provide a means of disconnecting power. This disconnect switch shall be non-locking.
4. Install new electrical panels and feeders for power to the IRCs. Panel EDP-A4-1 is to be fed from existing panel EDP-A4. Panel EDP-B4-1 is to be fed from panel EDP-B4. New panels are to be located at Column K-3.
4. Route the electrical supply for each new IRC to identified electrical panels, as shown on the design concept drawings. No splices are allowed. All wiring shall be in correctly sized conduit. Contractor shall install all required, correctly sized breakers.
4. Labeling of IRC units shall be IAW DISA Identification, Labeling and Marking standards (Appendix J – Label Standard). Labels shall reflect: IRC-1-A (or B)-01 through IRC-1-A (or B)-18.
0. Task 6: Purchase, install, integrate, and test (18 each) underfloor differential pressure sensors contacted to specified existing CRAH located in Room 145 and Room 147.
5. Contractor shall provide and install 16 (16 each) underfloor differential pressure sensors and modify the controls for the existing CRAH unit zones in Room 147 and two (2) CRAH units in Room 145, IAW the Design Concept Drawings (Appendix A).
5. CRAH controls shall be adapted to incorporate underfloor pressure differential sensors to modulate EC plug fan speeds, based upon a pressure sensor set point and maintain room cooling set point.
5. CRAH units shall communicate and work together as a team so that all CRAH units shall modulate fan speed to maintain underfloor pressure set point.
5. Pressure differential sensors integrated with the CRAH units shall be monitored by the existing BAS.
5. CRAH units shall be controlled to maintain a stable static pressure of 0.1-inch water-column gauge (w.g.) (adjustable) and chilled water control valves shall modulate to maintain 55 F (adjustable) supply air temperature.
5. The sensors and controls shall be designed and manufactured to be compatible with existing Liebert CW CRAH units with Liebert iCOM® controls.
5. Sensors and controls shall be installed IAW DISA Control Specifications, Div 23 and 25 (Appendix G), and manufacturer’s recommendations.
5. The type of differential pressure sensors shall have to be approved by DISA and shall be selected from sensors used in similar applications.
5. The CRAH units shall satisfy the recommended temperature range as per the most current version of ASHRAE TC 9.9 Thermal Guidelines for Data Processing Environments.
5. The CRAH unit controls shall be tested to validate control methodology and cooling performance. Adjust set points during testing to maintain CRAH unit return and room temperatures as required.
0. Task 7: Purchase, install, start-up, and test 12 (12 each) Static Transfer Switches (STS) and 12 (12 each) 200 kVA PDUs in Computer Room 147 to support IT equipment.
6. The contractor shall provide and install the STS and PDU sets in Room 147, where designed on the design concept drawings. Verify final locations with site prior to installation. The new PDUs and STS units shall be paired as sets. Four (4 each) sets will support the new enclosures and eight (8 each) sets will support various specified zones in Computer Room 147, per the Design Concept Drawings (Appendix A). The STS/PDU sets shall be the same, or equal, as shown in Appendix D –PDU & STS Specifications.
0. STS/PDU locations are noted as follows:
| Zone |
| Unit Designation |
| Floor Grid |
| Notes |
| PDU 19 |
| STS/PDU-1-A-19 |
| AK 14 |
| Supports new Cold Aisle Enclosure #2 & 3 |
| STS/PDU-1-B-19 |
| AU 14 |
| Supports new Cold Aisle Enclosure #2 & 3 |
| PDU 20 |
| STS/PDU-1-A-20 |
| AK 31 |
| Supports new Cold Aisle Enclosure #5 & 6 |
| STS/PDU-1-B-20 |
| AU 31 |
| Supports new Cold Aisle Enclosure #5 & 6 |
| PDU 03 |
| STS/PDU-1-A-03 |
| AD 38 |
| Supports new zone 03 |
| STS/PDU-1-B-03 |
| AD 41 |
| Supports new zone 03 |
| PDU 05 |
| STS/PDU-1-A-05 |
| AD 69 |
| Supports zone 05 |
| STS/PDU-1-B-05 |
| AD 70 |
| Requires placement of new STS/PDU to support Zone 06 at grid location AD82 and relocation of power whips to the newly installed PDU (to be designated as PDU-1-A-06. Existing STS/PDU-1-B-06 shall be |
re-designated as PDU-1-B-05.
| PDU 13 |
| STS/PDU-1-A-13 |
| CG 51 |
| Supports zone 13 |
| STS/PDU-1-B-13 |
| CG 54 |
| Existing remote power panel, ZDC-1-B-14 at location CG53, shall be disconnected, and power whips will be reconnected to the new STS/PDU. |
| PDU 16 |
| STS/PDU-1-A-16 |
| CG 05 |
| Supports zone 16 |
| STS/PDU-1-B-16 |
| CG 10 |
| Supports zone 16 |
6. Power for each STS shall be electrically fed from an ‘A’ bus power source and a ‘B’ bus power source. The load side of each STS will feed a 200kVA PDU. Install the conduit and conductors from the existing distribution panels to the new STS’s in a rectilinear fashion.
6. The contractor shall provide electrical feeder whip, appropriately sized, per National Electrical Code, from existing junction boxes to new PDU locations, per the Design Concept Drawings (Appendix A).
6. The contractor shall provide PDU manufacturer startup for new PDU equipment, verifying proper performance including energization, phase rotation, metering, local emergency power off (EPO) and Modbus communications. Startup documentation will be included in close-out submittals. Coordinate exact equipment location with the site point of contact (POC). Verify meter functionality/accuracy.
6. Connection of the new PDU feeder circuits to the datacenter EPO system (shunt trip breakers required). The contractor shall provide a minimum notice of 30 calendar days for coordination with the site facility manager for connection and testing per the MOP requirements, as outlined in Appendix E – Sample MOP Detail.
6. The contractor shall ensure proper PDU grounding IAW applicable Standards and Codes.
6. All electrical wiring and conduit required to properly operate the new equipment shall be part of this contract.
6. Contractor shall update all electrical panel schedules with new circuit and equipment information.
6. Label all equipment IAW the DISA Identification, Labeling and Marking specification (Appendix J - Label Standard). Labels shall reflect: PDU-1-A (or B)-## per the PDU zones used at the site.
6. STS/PDU sets shall be connected to the existing BAS system to allow monitoring of the units status.
6. All work in this task must be coordinated via a hazardous condition (HAZCON) request through the site personnel. HAZCON requests shall be submitted but does not guarantee acceptance by DISA operations. The 3-week request period should be sufficient, but approval is based on operations acceptance and real world conditions.
6. Electrical Safety: All work that requires the opening or internal investigations of electrical equipment is classified by DISA as work on or near energized equipment, and any person associated with this work must comply with the Appendix F, DISA MPE Electrical Safety Program.
0. Task 8: Purchase, install, and test four (4 each) STSs and four (4 each) 200 kVA PDUs, as paired PDU/STS sets in Room 180.
7. The contractor shall provide and install four each STSs and four each PDUs in Room 180. The STSs and PDUs shall be the same or equal, as shown in Appendix D –PDU & STS Specifications. Each STS will be electrically fed from an ‘A’ bus power source and a ‘B’ bus power source. The load side of each STS will feed a 200kVA PDU.
7. Install two (2 each) 800A main sub-panels in Room 147 from the Panels UDP-A-10-1 and UDP-B-10-1 on the east wall, as indicated on the drawings. Sub-panels shall be designated UDP-A10-1 fed from UDP-1-A-10 and UDP-B10-1 fed from UDP-1-B-10. Existing panels shall remain in use during the installation of sub-panel feeds. Replace panel directories with new type-written directory to reflect new connected loads.
1. Replace one each 400A breaker with one each 800A breaker in each of the existing panels UPD-1-A-10 and UPD-1-B-10 to support the new sub-panels. Install four (4 each) 400A breakers with 300A trip units in the new sub-panels.
1. Install the conduit and conductors from the new distribution sub-panels to the new STS locations in Room 180. Install 2-inch conduit with three - #350 MCM and one - #2/0 GND through the wall to meet security requirements by sealing both sides of penetrations with acoustical foam or sealant, finished to match adjacent wall. Use dielectric union or non-conductive break on conduit installed at the interior of perimeter wall of secure room.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it.