PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE_FORM-Fillable.pdf
PDF 59 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Business & Economic Development
- Solicitation number
- H92239-16-T-0002
- Issued by
-
United States Special Operations Command
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Q A_(Submission_Clarification).docx | DOCX document | |
| Additional_Q A_Clarifications.pdf | ||
| 16-T-0002-0001_(Q A_-_Extension).pdf | ||
| QA's_-_BE_(FINAL).pdf | ||
| 16-T-0002_BEDC_Solicitation-14_Apr_16_(Final).pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
BUSINESS & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TRAINING
H92239-16-T-0002
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
(to be completed prior to mailing or faxing to the respondent)
NOTICE: WHEN COMPLETED, THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WILL BE CONSIDERED SENSITIVE AND SHALL
NOT BE RELEASED TO THE OFFEROR.
A. Contractor's Name: ________________________________ B. Contract number: __________________________________ C. Contractor's Role in the contract identified above: Prime: Yes _____ No _____
Subcontractor to Prime? If Yes, who?______________ D. Cage Code: _________________________________ D. Contract type: ______________________________ E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____ F. Period of performance: __________________________________ G. Initial contract cost: $____________________________ H. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________ I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: ________________________ J. Description of service provided: ____________________________________________________________
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
(to be completed prior to mailing or faxing to the respondent)
A. Customer or agency name: _________________________________________________________________ B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): _________________________________________________ C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other
Commands:______________________________________________________________________________
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
(to be completed by the respondent)
A. Evaluator's name: __________________________________________________________________________ B. Evaluator's title/role: ________________________________________________________________________ C. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ________________________________________________________________ D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: ____________________________________________
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
(to be completed by the respondent)
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL
E EXCEPTIONAL: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
REQUIRED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PURPOSES:
SELECT WHICH APPLIES: _____PRIME OFFEROR
_____SUBCONTRACTOR TO__________________(ENTER PRIME OFFEROR)
V VERY GOOD: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
S SATISFACTORY: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M MARGINAL: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
U UNSATISFACTORY: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N/A NOT APPLICABLE: Did not apply to this acquisition; or, questionnaire respondent has no knowledge of, and/or did not observe, the contractor’s performance in this area.
Program Management E V S M U N/A
The Contractor is committed to customer satisfaction.
Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements and regulations
Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support
Effectiveness in scheduling and maintaining instructor ratios
Provided all reports required by the contract in a timely manner.
Identified problems in advance and when necessary, took positive and effective corrective actions.
Met the terms of the contract and within the contractual price.
Select one rating which most accurately describes the contractor’s overall performance on your contract.
1. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated a M (Marginal) or US (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
2. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes____ Default____ Convenience____ Pending Terminations____ No ____ If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc)._________________________________________________________________________________________
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs? Yes____ or No_____
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance in a separate document.
Evaluator’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
RETURN YOUR COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO, HQ UNITED STATES ARMY SPECIAL OPERATION
COMMAND, DCSC, BLDG E2929 DESERT STORM DRIVE, , ATTN: BRITTANY C. BLACK, EMAIL:
brittany.c.black@soc.mil AND CC jennifer.payne@soc.mil
| SELECT WHICH APPLIES: |
| PRIME OFFEROR: |
| SUBCONTRACTOR TO: |
| s Name: |
| Contract number: |
| s Role in the contract identified above Prime Yes: |
| No: |
| Subcontractor to Prime If Yes who: |
| Cage Code: |
| Contract type: |
| Was this a competitive contract Yes: |
| No_2: |
| Period of performance: |
| Initial contract cost: |
| Currentfinal contract cost: |
| Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: |
| Description of service provided: |
| Customer or agency name: |
| Customer or agency description if applicable: |
| Commands: |
| s name: |
| s titlerole: |
| s phonefax number: |
| Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: |
| EThe Contractor is committed to customer satisfaction: |
| VThe Contractor is committed to customer satisfaction: |
| SThe Contractor is committed to customer satisfaction: |
| MThe Contractor is committed to customer satisfaction: |
| U: |
| Effectiveness of overall contract management including ability to effectively: |
| Timelinesseffectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive: |
| Understandcomplied with customer objectives and technical requirements and: |
| Contractor implemented responsiveflexible processes to improve quality and: |
| EEffectiveness in scheduling and maintaining instructor ratios: |
| VEffectiveness in scheduling and maintaining instructor ratios: |
| SEffectiveness in scheduling and maintaining instructor ratios: |
| MEffectiveness in scheduling and maintaining instructor ratios: |
| undefined: |
| EProvided all reports required by the contract in a timely manner: |
| VProvided all reports required by the contract in a timely manner: |
| SProvided all reports required by the contract in a timely manner: |
| MProvided all reports required by the contract in a timely manner: |
| undefined_2: |
| Identified problems in advance and when necessary took positive and effective: |
| EMet the terms of the contract and within the contractual price: |
| VMet the terms of the contract and within the contractual price: |
| SMet the terms of the contract and within the contractual price: |
| MMet the terms of the contract and within the contractual price: |
| undefined_3: |
| Select one rating which most accurately describes the contractors overall: |
| response to the questions above use additional sheets if necessary 1: |
| response to the questions above use additional sheets if necessary 2: |
| convenience or are there any pending terminations: |
| Default: |
| Convenience: |
| Pending Terminations: |
| Yes: |
| Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your: |
| No_3: |
| Date: |
| Text1: |
| Text2: |
| Text3: |
| Text4: |
| Text5: |
| Text6: |
| Text7: |
| Text8: |
| Text9: |
| Text10: |
| Text11: |
| Text12: |
| Text13: |
| Text14: |
| Text15: |
| Text16: |
| Text17: |
| Text18: |
| Text19: |
| Text20: |
| Text21: |
| Text22: |
| Text23: |
| Text24: |
| Text25: |
| Text26: |
| Text27: |
| Text28: |
| Text29: |
| Text30: |
| Text31: |
| Text32: |
| Text33: |
| Text34: |
| Text35: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .