T-6A_ADS_B_Out_Section_L_Past_Perf_Q_Final_Draft_18_Nov_15.docx

Section L- Attachment 2 Past Performance Information Questionnaire for the T-6A ADS-B (Out) Contract

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE IAW FAR 3.104

Please provide concise comments regarding your overall assessment of the contractor's performance for the past three years on the contract identified. Please respond to each question as completely as possible. Ms. Erin Bevan, the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), is the primary point of contact (POC) and Mr. JW Terry is the alternate POC for this acquisition. Address in writing any questions or concerns you may have to both the POC and the alternate POC.

PCO: Ms. Erin Bevan, 937-904-4289, erin.bevan@us.af.mil

Alternate POC: Mr. JW Terry, 937.904.4200, jw.terry@us.af.mil

Note: If unfavorable performance information (which is not already known by the contractor) is provided, an EN will be submitted to the contractor.

They will be made aware of that unfavorable information, but not the name of the person who submitted it. Additional pages may be attached if you need more space to answer the questions. PLEASE RESPOND WITHIN 5 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THIS REQUEST.

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor:

B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to:

C. Contract number:

D. Contract type:

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes ______ No _______ F. Period of performance:

G. Initial contract cost: $ H. Current/final contract cost: $ I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

J. Description of service provided:

SECTION 2. CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description:

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3. EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name:

B. Evaluator's title:

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number:

D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

1. Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

T1. Quality of system engineering process associated with avionics systems design

T2. Quality of system engineering process associated with avionics systems development

T3. Quality of system engineering process associated with avionics systems test

T4. Quality of system engineering process associated with avionics systems integration

T5. Quality of technical system testing and FAA certification efforts

T6. Quality of technical system testing and Military certification efforts

T7. Quality/integrity of technical source data / report preparation efforts

T8. Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements

T9. Ability to implement current standard practices for hardware design

T10. Ability to implement current standard practices for computer software design

T11. Adequacy, effectiveness, and adherence to safety procedures

P1. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)

P2. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

P3. Understood/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements

P4. Successfully responded to program office questions in a timely manner

P5. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contractor management

P6. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)

P7. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost or improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer

P8. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.

T/PI1. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel to conduct research, development, test, evaluation, production and retrofit activities

T/PI2. Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.

E1. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.

C1. Accuracy in forecasting contract costs

C2. Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs

C3. Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur

C4. Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting

2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), P/VG (Purple/Very Good), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Solicitation #: FA8617-16-R-6207

PART IV / SECTION L

Yes

Default

Convenience_ Pending Terminations

No

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?

What were the contractor’s most negative aspects in the performance of the contract?

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

AFLCMC/AZA

Attn: Ms. Erin Bevan

BLDG 570, ROOM 113

1755 ELEVENTH STREET

WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB, OH 45433-7404