Past_Performance_Matrix_v2.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 25 KB Posted

Attached to
Joint Primary Aircraft Trainer System (JPATS) T-6A ADS-B (Out) Program Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8617-16-R-6207
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Wright Patterson Air Force Base

About this file

JPATS T-6A ADS-B (Out) Draft Past Performance Evaluation Matrix

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Joint Primary Aircraft Trainer System (JPATS) T-6A ADS-B (Out) Program, newest first.
File Type Posted
3._T-6A_ADS_B_Out_Section_L_Final_1_Jul_16.doc DOC document
4._T-6A_ADS_B_Out_Section_M_Final_1_Jul_16.docx DOCX document
Responses_to_Industry_Questions_on_the_Draft_RFP.pdf PDF
ppi_tool.accdb —
T-6A_ADS_B_Out_Section_M_Final_Draft_8_Dec_15.docx DOCX document
SGFP_Data_Input_Spreadsheet_(PDF).pdf PDF
T-6A_ADS_B_Out_Base_Support_Agreement_Final_Draft_1_Dec_15.docx DOCX document
T-6A_ADS_B_Out_SRD_Final_Draft_2_Nov_15.docx DOCX document
FA8617-16-R-6207_Model_Contract.pdf PDF
T-6A_ADS_B_Out_CDRL_Package_Final_Draft_2_Nov_15.docx DOCX document
T-6A_ADS_B_Out_Draft_RFP_Cover_Letter_Final_Draft_2_Nov_15.docx DOCX document
T-6A_ADS_B_Out_Pricing_Matrix_Final_Draft_2_Nov_15.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
T-6A_ADS_B_Out_Section_L_Past_Perf_Q_Final_Draft_18_Nov_15.docx DOCX document
T-6A_ADS-B_Out_Program_WBS_Dictionary_final_7_Dec_15.docx DOCX document
T-6A_ADS_B_Out_SOW_Final_Draft_5_Nov_15.docx DOCX document
T-6A_ADS-B_Out_Program_WBS_final_7_Dec_15.docx DOCX document
T-6A_ADS_B_Out_Section_L_Final_Draft_8_Dec_15.doc DOC document
SGFP_Data_Input_Spreadsheet_(XLSX).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 18

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Scope and Magnitude

Scope and Magnitude
Offeror - Contract Number
RecencyYes/NoStartEnd
Did contract performance end before ???
Very RelevantRelevantSomewhat RelevantNot RelevantRationale
Scope (general requirments)
Aircraft
Design, develop, production, STC cert, retrofit
Simulators
Design, develop, production, retrofit
Magnitude
Quantity of Aircraft retrofitted
Quantity of Simulators retrofitted
Contract types and values
Contract type and value (development)EX. FFP; 2M
Contract type and value (retrofit)Ex. CPFF; 30M
Total Contract Value $$$Ex. 32 M

Complexity Matrix

Complexity Matrix
Offeror - Contract Number
SubfactorsSOW ParaVery RelevantRelevantSomewhat RelevantNot RelevantRationale
Subfactor 1: System Engineering
Criteria 1--Has delivered an Interface Control Document containing established flow-down requirements

Criteria 2--Has developed Specification Requirements Verification Matrix

Criteria 3--Has developed System Engineering Management Plan (SEMP)

3.2; 3.2.13 out of 32 out of 31 out of 30 out of 3To support the ratings, information pulled directly from contract narrative will be documented here.
Subfactor 2: FAA Airworthiness Approval
Criteria 1--Has experience obtaining a Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) directly from FAA

Criteria 2--Has created and delivered Airworthiness Directives, Service Bulletins, and Advisory Data

3.2.2.12 out of 21 out of 2N/A0 out of 2
Subfactor 3: Military Airworthiness
Criteria 1--Developed, implemented, and maintained an airworthiness program and plan that resulted in Military Airworthiness certification
Criteria 2--Updated and maintained a Modified Airworthiness Certification Criteria document3.2.2.22 out of 21 out of 2N/A0 out of 2
Subfactor 4: Aircraft Integration
Criteria 1--Successfully installed avionics retrofit kit

Criteria 2--Created and maintained an Integrated Master Schedule for avionics production and retrofit program

2 out of 21 out of 2N/A0 out of 2
Subfactor 5: Simulators Integration
Criteria 1--Successfully installed simulator retrofit kit

Criteria 2--Created and maintained an Integrated Master Schedule for simulator program 2 out of 2 1 out of 2 N/A 0 out of 2

NA--Past Performance Quality

Offeror - Contract Number
SubfactorsSOW ParaExceptionalVery GoodSatisfactoryMarginalUnsatisfactoryNot ApplicableRationale
Subfactor 1: System Engineering
Criteria 1

Criteria 2 Criteria 3

etcInsert Corresponding SOW paragraphTo support the ratings, information pulled directly from PPQs, Telephone Interviews, CPARS will be documented here.
Subfactor 2: FAA Airworthiness Approval
Criteria 1

Criteria 2 Criteria 3 etc Overview:

Positives:

Performance Observations:

Subfactor 3: Military Airworthiness
Criteria 1

Criteria 2 Criteria 3 etc Overview:

Positives:

Performance Observations:

Subfactor 4: Aircraft Integration
Criteria 1

Criteria 2 Criteria 3 etc Overview:

Positives:

Performance Observations:

Subfactor 5: Simulators Integration
Criteria 1

Criteria 2 Criteria 3 etc Overview:

Positives:

Performance Observations:

Subfactor: Price - Evidence that contractor performed for cost proposed i.e. Cost Control Overview:

Positives:

Performance Observations:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .