R1001_Atch_07_-_Sect_L_Atch_3_-_Past_Performance_Cover_Letter_and_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 168 KB Posted
- Attached to
- AFLCMC Unique IT Support
- Solicitation number
- FA8604-18-R-1001
About this file
This request for proposals solicits offers for the Air Force Lifecycle Management Center's Unique Information Technology Support effort. The solicitation seeks a contractor to provide interaction with the Chief Information Technology Office, project management, customer support, helpdesk interaction, information systems security, network security, communication security support, multimedia equipment support, hardware maintenance, software accountability support, application and environment maintenance, room support, telephone and voice management, organizational application support, software implementation, foreign military sales support, website support, records management, training, requirements analysis, meetings, and information assurance certification. Responses are due on specific dates in early 2018, and the Air Force anticipates awarding one or more firm fixed price indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contracts for a five year ordering period. The effort is set aside exclusively for certified 8(a) small businesses.
R1001_Atch_07_-_Sect_L_Atch_3_-_Past_Performance_Cov.
View the file
Other files
Show all 47
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA8604-18-R-1001, Attachment 07 Section L, Attachment 03 – Past Performance Cover Letter
PAST PERFORMANCE COVER LETTER
14 November 2017
FROM: AFLCMC/PZIT
2275 D. St., Bldg. 16, Room 128 Wright-Patterson AFB, OH45433 TO:
SUBJECT: AFLCMC Unique IT Support Present/Past Performance Assessment
1. The Air Force Lifecycle Management Center at Wright Patterson AFB, Ohio is in the process of selecting a contractor for award of the AFLCMC Unique IT Support contract. The AFLCMC Unique IT Support contract includes the following items for AFLCMC at Wright Patterson AFB, OH:
• Interaction with the Chief Information Technology Office (CITO)
• Project Management
• Customer Support and Helpdesk Interaction
• Information Systems Security
• Information Protection and Network Security
• Communication Security (COMSEC) Support
• Multi-media (Video Teleconferencing (VTC) and Audio/Visual (AV)) Equipment Support
• Hardware Maintenance, IT Equipment Custodian (ITEC), and Software Accountability Support
• Government-Off-the-Shelf (GOTS) Application and Environment Maintenance
• Support for Maintaining Rooms (e.g. Conference, Training, and Source Selection Rooms)
• Telephone, Voice Mail, and Commercial Mobile Technology Management (CMT)
• Organizational Unique Application Software and Database Support and Documentation
• Software Implementation Support
• Foreign Military Sales (FMS), Business to Business (B2B), and Unique Application Support
• Website Support
• Electronic Records Management Compliance
• Training Support
• Requirements Analysis Support
• Meetings
• Information Assurance Workforce Improvement Program Certification and Compliance
2. In the selection process, the Government intends to evaluate the past performance of each offer through verification of the Offeror’s past and present performance on other contracts. For this, we must depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had experience with an Offeror. We would appreciate if you complete the attached questionnaire and include any comments qualifying your ratings and answers. If you have any questions or difficulty completing the questionnaire, please contact the undersigned.
3. Please return your completed questionnaire to Ms. Tiffani M. AKers via e-mail tiffani.akers@us.af.mil no later than (NLT) than 10 working days from date of receipt. As an alternative, you can mail the completed questionnaire to:
AFLCMC/PZIT
Tiffani Akers 2275 D. St., Bldg. 16, Rm. 128 mailto:tiffani.akers@us.af.mil
Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433 (937) 656-7370 Tiffani.akers@us.af.mil Reference: FA8604-18-R-1001
Please do not return or e-mail the questionnaire back to the Offeror or contractor. Completed questionnaires are source selection information and must be protected. The Government will not release this information to the Offeror.
Thank you for your time and valuable comments.
Tiffani M. Akers
(937) 656-7474 Tiffani.Akers@us.af.mil mailto:Tiffani.akers@us.af.mil mailto:Tiffani.Akers@us.af.mil
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When filled in this document is source selection sensitive information IAW 3.104
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
A. Contractor:
B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to:
C. Contract number:
D. Contract type:
E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes No
F. Period of performance:
G. Initial contract cost: $
H. Current/final contract cost: $
I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:
J. Was a CPAR or other official evaluation completed? Yes No If other system was used please list name(s):
K. Contractor performed as: Prime Contractor _Sub-Contractor Key Personnel
L. Description of product or service provided (use additional sheets, if necessary):
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
A. Customer or agency name:
B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):
Air Force Other DoD Component Other Federal Gov’t Industry/Academia C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other
Commands:
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
A. Evaluator's name:
B. Evaluator's title:
C. Evaluator's phone/fax number:
D. Evaluator’s email address:
E. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL
S SATISFACTORY- Contractor performance substantially met contract requirements.
US UNSATISFACTORY- Contractor performance did not substantially meet contract requirement. N/A NOT AVAILABLE- Quality or performance information is not available.
Technical Performance S US N/A
T1. Transition Approach
a. Was the contractor able to appropriately obtain and maintain personnel?
b. Did the Contractor ensure continuity of support during transition to new contract?
c. Did the contractor obtain/maintain sufficient quantities and labor mix of personnel to meet performance requirements?
T2. IT Support
Technical Performance S US N/A
a. Did the contractor have a clear understanding of the required skillsets?
b. Did the contractor provide an appropriate management approach to providing and retaining qualified personnel?
c. Did the contractor provide appropriate oversight of subcontractors, personnel, hiring, travel, training and other direct costs?
d. The contractor demonstrated a clear understanding of: (Mark one for each)
a. Interaction with the Chief Information Technology Office (CITO)
b. Project Management
c. Customer Support and Helpdesk Interaction
d. Information Systems Security
e. Information Protection and Network Security
f. Communication Security (COMSEC) Support
g. Multi-media (Video Teleconferencing (VTC) and Audio/Visual
(AV)) Equipment Support
h. Hardware Maintenance, IT Equipment Custodian (ITEC), and
Software Accountability Support
i. Government-Off-the-Shelf (GOTS) Application and Environment
Maintenance
j. Support for Maintaining Rooms (e.g. Conference, Training, and
Source Selection Rooms)
k. Telephone, Voice Mail, and Commercial Mobile Technology
Management (CMT)
l. Organizational Unique Application Software and Database
Support and Documentation
m. Software Implementation Support
n. Foreign Military Sales (FMS), Business to Business (B2B), and
Unique Application Support
o. Website Support
p. Electronic Records Management Compliance
q. Training Support
r. Requirements Analysis Support
s. Meetings
t. Information Assurance Workforce Improvement Program
Certification and Compliance
General S US N/A
a. Was the contractor responsive to government concerns/requests (e.g.
Problem resolution, Prompt and accurate billing, timely purchasing)?
b. Was the contractor prompt and accurate with invoices?
c. What is your overall rating of the contractor’s performance?
d. Would you contract with this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated Acceptable/Unacceptable in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes____ Default ___ Convenience ____ Pending Terminations ___ No_____
If Yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract? (use additional sheets, if necessary)
What were the contactor’s most negative aspects in the performance of the contract? (use
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired. (use
Evaluator’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
tiffani.akers@us.af.mil mailto:jamie.parks@us.af.mil
| PAST PERFORMANCE COVER LETTER |
| 14 November 2017 |
| Please do not return or e-mail the questionnaire back to the Offeror or contractor. Completed questionnaires are source selection information and must be protected. The Government will not release this information to the Offeror. |
| PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE |
| SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION |
| SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION |
| SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION |
| SECTION 4: EVALUATION |
| SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY |
| Thank you for your prompt response and assistance! |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .