FA8519-13-R-30000_ADTS_Questions_Round_2.pdf

FA8519‐13‐R‐30000

Questions/Responses Round 2

# Question Government Response

Based on the sample provided on Page 3 of the solicitation (CLINs X001, X002 and X003 and associated SubCLINs), it appears that the contractor may receive an indeterminate number of systems to support for some indeterminate period of time. In the event that support for less than the whole 34 systems is awarded, as with the sample provided, will the Government provide the contractor configuration control of those specific assigned system(s), identifying all system components by model and serial number?

The Government will maintain overall configuration control of the ADTS stations. However, in the event that support for all 34 systems is not procured via a Task Order (TO), the Government will provide configuration information of those specific assigned system(s) covered by the TO identifying all system components by model and serial number ‐ OR‐ for spreadsheet simplicity, the Government will provide configuration of those specific system(s) NOT covered by the TO by identifying all system components by model and serial number.

PWS Paragraph 4.4.2, line 7, references paragraph 4.1.4. Paragraph 4.1.4 does not exist. Please clarify. Correct, Paragraph 4.1.4 does not exist. This should read Paragraph 4.14.

GFE Spares for the ADTS Program, Page 1, Item 8, Qty 36 – Is the B‐1 ADE component to be supported by the contractor?

Page 1, Item 8, Qty 36 is the DVD burner for the ADE; not the entire ADE.

The contractor will be required to support this particular item of the ADE.

4 Will the Government perform calibration of all 34 systems?

Yes, the Government will use the existing Calibration TPS and PATEC to perform calibration of all 34 systems.

5 Formatting Issue Notice by the Government

Please note that on page 82 of the RFP the phrases "program management", "spares management", and "spare procurement" all include a "+". The "+" is located above each phrase and defined on page 84 of the RFP. Due to formatting issues, the "+" is located above the phrase in lieu of behind the phrase.

11/1/2013 Page 1 of 1