Attachment_5_-_Present _Past_Performance_Quest.doc_-__-_08-28-2013.doc
DOC document 61 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Synopsis for Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) for the Advanced Digital Test Station (ADTS) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8519-13-R-30000
About this file
Attachment 5 Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 47
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
(WHEN COMPLETED) SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
RFP FA8519-13-R-30000
ATTACHMENT 5
PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
B1-B ADVANCED DIGITAL TEST STATION (ADTS) CONTRACT LOGISTIC SUPPORT (CLS) REQUIREMENT
PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ABOUT YOURSELF:
Name/Signature and Role Relative to Contract (e.g. Buyer, Program Manager):________________________________________________________
Agency or Business: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Address: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Telephone No. _______________________________
FAX No. ____________________________________
Return your completed questionnaire either electronically, by fax or by mail to Charles Massey at Charles.Massey.3@us.af.mil or 478-222-1910 or Kimberly Langford Kimberly.Langford@us.af.mil or 478-222-1956. See Section L of the solicitation for appropriate email address, mailing address, or fax number.
NOTICE: WHEN COMPLETED, THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WILL BE CONSIDERED SENSITIVE AND SHALL NOT BE RELEASED TO THE OFFEROR.
Part I. SPECIFIC PROGRAM INFORMATION.
Contractor/Business: _____________________________________________
CAGE Code: __________
Program Title and Brief Description: _____________________________________________________________________________________
Role in the Program/Work Performed As:
_____Prime _____Subcontractor _____Vendor/Supplier
Contract Number: ________________________________ Number of Years?: Basic:________ Option: _________
Contract Type(s): List all applicable contract types, i.e. Firm-Fixed-Price, Time & Materials, Cost, etc._________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PART II. GENERAL PROGRAM INFORMATION.
Period of Performance:
1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised): Beginning Date _________ through ____________
2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised): Beginning Date _________ through ____________
3. Reason for difference (if applicable) ___________________________________________________________________________________
Contract Dollar Value:
1. Original MAX Contract $ Value (assuming all options exercised):________________________________________________________
2. Current MAX $ Value (assuming all options exercised): ________________________________________________________________
3. Primary Causes of Changes: ______________________________________________________________________________________
NOTE: In Part III., SHOULD YOUR RESPONSES BE OTHER THAN “SATISFACTORY”, PLEASE PROVIDE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IN “ADDITIONAL REMARKS” ON PAGE 4 OF 5 OR ON AN ADDITIONAL SHEET TO THIS DOCUMENT (WHICH IS IN WORD FORMAT). PLEASE MARK EACH SUBSTANTIATION COMMENTS WITH THE AREA OF PERFORMANCE IT IS IN RELATION TO. IF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS NOT PROVIDE FOR RATINGS THAT ARE OTHER THAN “SATISFACTORY”, THE RATINGS WILL BE CONSIDERED TO BE UNSUBSTANTIATED AND WILL BE INTERPRETED AS SATISFACTORY.
PART III. PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS.
Please check the appropriate rating for each of the following questions:
N/A=Not Applicable U=Unsatisfactory M=Marginal S=Satisfactory V=Very Good E=Exceptional
| N/A |
| U |
| M |
| S |
| V |
| E |
1. Extent to which Company’s products and/or services met the specification /performance requirements:
2. Product Consistency (first product delivered same as last):
3. Quality of Completed Product/Service:
4. Overall management of subcontracting efforts:
5. Customer’s Satisfaction with warranty response times and corrective actions:
6. Adequate Number of Dedicated Resources For Your Program:
7. Timely recognition and notification of administrative, engineering, production, problems affecting the program:
8. Company performed independently without significant customer direction/oversight?
9. Monitoring of Program Schedules and Critical Milestones:
10. Completed Work on Time:
11. Maintained obsolescence surveillance/awareness and reported findings in a timely manner as not to affect the program negatively:
13. Has action been initiated to cancel or terminate the contract for default? If yes, explain. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. Have there been any disputes/claims relative to the contract? If yes, explain.
15. Describe the contractor’s or company’s strong and/or weak points identified as a result of technical performance and any technical performance risk identified during the life of the contract. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
16. If given a choice, would you award to this contractor again? If not, please explain. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
17. Do you feel you “got what you paid for” ? Please explain. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
18. Additional Remarks.
RFP NUMBER
PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
ASSESSMENT RATING SYSTEM
E EXCEPTIONAL: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
V VERY GOOD: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
S SATISFACTORY: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M MARGINAL: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
U UNSATISFACTORY: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N/A NOT APPLICABLE: Did not apply to this acquisition; or, questionnaire respondent has no knowledge of, and/or did not observe, the contractor’s performance in this area.
NOTICE TO QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONDENTS: Please do not include this page when returning the completed questionnaire.
(WHEN COMPLETED) SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .